Ita Fitzgerald1,2*
Laura J. Sahm1,2,3Ciara Ní Dhubhlaing1,4Sarah O’Dwyer5Jean O’Connell6,7Jennifer Torrens1
Erin K. Crowley2- 1Pharmacy Department, St Patrick’s Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland
- 2Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- 3Pharmacy Department, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- 4College of Mental Health Pharmacy, Burgess Hill, United Kingdom
- 5Department of Medicine, St Patrick’s Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland
- 6Centre for Obesity Management, St Columcille’s and St Vincent’s University Hospitals, Dublin, Ireland
- 7University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Introduction
Antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) contributes significantly to the 2-3-fold higher rates of obesity seen amongst those living with a severe mental illness (SMI) (1). Clinically significant weight gain (≥7% increase in weight) has been linked to almost all antipsychotics (2). Adjunctive metformin treatment has been demonstrated to effectively reduce AIWG (3). However, metformin’s position within current AIWG management algorithms is typically limited to an option only to be considered after alternative interventions have been trialled and deemed unsuccessful (4–6). One of the most recent guidelines influencing the management of AIWG in psychiatry is the 2018 World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of physical health conditions in adults with severe mental disorders (4). Within this guideline, they recommend “where lifestyle interventions and/or switching psychotropic medication do not appear successful, adjunctive metformin may be considered. This should be considered under close clinical supervision and monitoring” (4). Leaving aside evidence addressing the comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological management interventions, whether such recommendations, and other similar guideline recommendations (5, 6), reflect the preferences of patients burdened with managing both a SMI and AIWG has recently been scrutinised within critiques of available management guidance (7, 8). Within this paper, we argue for much earlier and broader use of metformin to manage AIWG.
Evidence demonstrating the efficacy of metformin primarily as an early intervention agent, rather than - as conventionally thought - a treatment of established AIWG will be outlined. We aim to demonstrate how inadequate consideration of the typical trajectory of weight gain following antipsychotic initiation among susceptible patients, and associated timing of metformin introduction within trials assessing its efficacy, have led to inaccurate conclusions regarding its role within management algorithms. Frequent barriers to the use of metformin cited by psychiatric clinicians include concern regarding it’s risks and the appropriateness of prescribing glucose-lowering medications among cohorts without diabetes (9, 10). We will provide an overview of current risk estimates relating to established, but low risks of vitamin B12 deficiency and lactic acidosis. The rationale for why hypoglycaemia is not a concern when metformin is used in AIWG management will be discussed. Finally, the relationship between metformin and renal functioning and management strategies of common gastrointestinal side effects will also be discussed.
Use of metformin to manage AIWG – by whom should we be guided?
Healthcare professionals can (often unconsciously) endorse stereotypical assumptions and stigmatising attitudes about those living with obesity (7, 11). Obesity management among those with a SMI may be particularly vulnerable to such implicit biases, where the experience of a ‘dual stigma’ has been described by those living with both obesity and a SMI (12). Recommendations addressing weight management in this cohort may be uniquely susceptible to ideology and sociocultural values regarding the appropriateness of anti-obesity medications and expectations of self-management (7). To date, recommendations addressing weight management within SMI cohorts have largely been informed by the expert opinion of guideline development groups - with no or minimal patient input (4–6). Until recently (7), availability of empirical evidence outlining patient values and preferences for management interventions, including their acceptability and transferability across cohorts and contexts, was relatively unexplored. The prognosis of AIWG is highly variable (13, 14). Thus, patient management preferences are likely also extensively variable. We believe the absence of this diverse lived experience representation within guideline development groups limits the applicability and clinical utility of current guideline recommendations, where the role of metformin remains inappropriately limited.
Prognosis and aetiology of weight gain induced by antipsychotic treatment
The largest proportion of total weight gained occurs within the first 12 months of antipsychotic treatment (13). Whilst AIWG can continue after this time, this is typically at a much slower rate (13, 15, 16). In this way, the relationship between duration of antipsychotic treatment and weight gain can be described as hyperbolic (weight increases steadily early in treatment until a plateau is approached). This has been demonstrated with antipsychotics associated with medium- and/or high-risk of inducing clinically significant AIWG and is largely independent of dose (17, 18). Current understanding of mechanisms behind this hyperbolic relationship and eventual reaching of AIWG plateau suggests that antipsychotics interfere with homeostatic mechanisms regulating weight and total body fat mass, culminating in the development of a new body weight set-point (19). Mechanisms responsible for the orexigenic effects of antipsychotics are thought to be primarily attributable to their affinity to bind a broad range of neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system (CNS) (20). Through antagonism of specific subtypes of serotonergic, histaminergic, muscarinic, and dopaminergic receptors, antipsychotics interfere with the regulation of metabolic signals that communicate energy status and suppress appetite when the body has met its energy requirements (21, 22).
As the primary regulator of food intake and body weight, the hypothalamus regulates energy intake and expenditure via signalling mediated by neuromodulators, including the anorexigenic neuropeptides proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) and the orexigenic neuropeptides, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agouti-related peptide (AgRP). Antagonism of Histamine 1 (H1), 5HT (serotonin) 1A, 2A and 2C and Muscarinic 3 (M3) receptors by antipsychotics enhances appetite and reduces satiety through a final common pathway leading to up-regulation of the NPY-AgRP signals and downregulation of POMC. Antagonism of Dopamine 2 (D2) receptors in the mesolimbic pathway may lead to dysregulated eating by opposing the effects of pre-synaptic dopamine release within neurons connecting the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens involved in mediating satiety following food intake (20–22). The reward deficiency hypothesis posits that decreased dopaminergic signalling within the striatum may impair the reward response following food intake, resulting in compensatory increase in food cravings and excessive caloric intake (22).
However, antipsychotics with selective activity at D2 receptors through partial agonism (e.g., aripiprazole) or antagonism (e.g., amisulpride) are uncommonly associated with clinically significant AIWG (23). Additionally clozapine, often demonstrated as being the highest risk antipsychotic with regards to inducing AIWG (23), possesses little affinity for the D2 receptor (24). A high affinity for 5HT2A, 5HT2C and H1 appears important in mediating the most clinically significant presentations of AIWG (22). A more detailed discussion on current understanding of the aetiology of AIWG can be found elsewhere (20, 21). Understanding the aetiology of AIWG provides biological plausibility for the demonstrated benefit of metformin in preventing further weight gain when introduced early in antipsychotic treatment, i.e., before a plateau of AIWG is reached.
Metformin interference with mechanisms mediating AIWG
The capacity of metformin to attenuate AIWG lies in its ability to oppose both hyperphagia and reduced satiety induced by antipsychotic treatment. The mechanisms by which metformin exerts anorexigenic effects are still emerging, with evidence of direct and indirect effects on the gastrointestinal tract, the gut microbiome, the CNS, and the gut-brain axis (25).Although peripheral activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a major pathway for the metabolic benefits of metformin, this effect appears to be tissue-specific. Within the hypothalamic appetite regulatory centres, metformin has been shown to inhibit AMPK and decrease orexigenic NPY expression (26). Within the gastrointestinal tract, metformin has been shown to increase secretion of the gut-derived anorectic hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY by enteroendocrine L cells via activation of intestinal 5’AMPK-dependent pathways and alteration of bile acid absorption (25, 27). Within animal models, treatment with metformin is associated with an increase in leptin receptor expression and decrease in hypothalamic leptin resistance (28). A more detailed overview of the suggested mechanisms through which metformin decreases total caloric intake is beyond the scope of this paper, and can be found elsewhere (25). Although traditionally the benefit of metformin has been assessed from the perspective of absolute weight reduction (3, 29), use of pharmacological interventions in inducing feelings of satiety is an additional, patient-reported outcome demonstrated as important among those prescribed antipsychotics (7), but is rarely considered in discussions about the role of pharmacological adjuncts in managing AIWG (3, 29).
Metformin – health gains versus weight loss
The primary rationale for delayed introduction of metformin within AIWG treatment guidelines is limited efficacy in reversing the typically significant burden of weight gain induced by antipsychotic treatment. A measure of 2-3kg weight reversal is often cited (4–6). This “modest” weight reduction, alongside consideration of risk of side effects, increased tablet burden and concerns about adherence, are all arguments used to support delayed introduction of metformin (5, 6). Efficacy of metformin in reversing AIWG is, however, often presented with an implicit assumption that a plateau of weight gain has occurred. To draw accurate conclusions regarding the efficacy of any intervention in managing AIWG, the duration of antipsychotic treatment and prognosis of AIWG must be considered, specifically whether continued weight gain is likely.
Metformin treatment has been demonstrated to be more effective when prescribed in the context of first episode psychosis (FEP) (10, 29). Compared to those with an established psychotic illness, those with FEP likely have minimal, or no, prior antipsychotic exposure. In one example, a subgroup analysis of a systematic review tested the hypothesis of differential efficacy among those with varying illness chronicity (29). Metformin was more efficacious among those experiencing FEP compared to those with so-called ‘chronic psychosis’ i.e., extensive prior antipsychotic treatment. Among those treated with metformin, mean weight reduction was significantly higher among the FEP cohort, mean difference -3.24kg, 95% CI [-4.55 – (-1.92)], p <0.001. On closer inspection of individual studies included in the analysis, weight loss in both metformin-treated groups was comparatively similar, with median weight reductions of – 2.37kg in the FEP cohort, and – 1.56kg in the chronic psychosis groups. Rather, observed differences between the FEP and chronic psychosis groups are largely accounted for through dissimilarities in the weight gain trajectory of the placebo-treated groups of both cohorts. Corresponding median weight increases over an average of 16 weeks in the antipsychotic-placebo-treated groups were 2.5kg (FEP) and 0.16kg (chronic psychosis) (29). Median measurements are cited here as a more accurate representation of central tendency, given the interindividual variation in AIWG trajectory.
The primary benefit of metformin as a weight control agent in preventing further or inducing modest weight reductions can also be seen in more recent studies among those who are antipsychotic-naïve or initiating a new antipsychotic (30–32), and in studies including child and adolescent populations (33, 34). Metformin’s benefits have also been demonstrated to extend to those prescribed clozapine in the context of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (35, 36). Given the typical short length of randomised controlled trials (≤6 months) (29–34, 36), and recommended duration of antipsychotic treatment extending far beyond this (23), average weight change figures underestimate the impact of AIWG on final body weight, and thus, the benefit of early metformin initiation.
Contextualising risk concerns
Concerns regarding risk of serious side effects have been reported as a barrier to use in settings outside of diabetes management (9). Serious side effects associated with metformin use include lactic acidosis and vitamin B12 deficiency. Potentially serious side-effects associated with metformin use include lactic acidosis and vitamin B12 deficiency. Metformin-induced lactic acidosis is rare, and clear recommendations exist regarding when to avoid prescribing in high-risk groups (37). Vitamin B12 deficiency can occur with continued use, although is manageable with appropriate monitoring and supplementation, where required. Gastrointestinal side-effects are common on metformin initiation, but are usually transient, and can be managed by a series of preventative measures outlined below. Figure 1 gives an overview of the prevalence of such side-effects and management advice (8). Misconceptions about metformin being nephrotoxic may also serve as a barrier to more widespread use and are addressed in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Risks associated with metformin prescribing (Created in BioRender. Fitzgerald, I. (2024) /BioRender.com/m67m178).
Discussion
Early initiation of metformin is essential for those taking antipsychotics to benefit from its weight stabilisation properties. Current AIWG management algorithms endorse limiting use of metformin to those for whom lifestyle interventions and/or switching antipsychotic appear ineffective (4–6). However, interpretations drawn from reviewing studies assessing the efficacy of metformin, without considering the timing of metformin initiation and typical prognosis of AIWG, substantially underestimate the benefit of metformin for most patients in managing AIWG. Thus, an unintended consequence of current guideline recommendations is delayed use of a pharmacological intervention that is largely effective in preventing further weight gain, not significantly reversing established AIWG (30). This understanding of metformin, in modifying the prognosis of AIWG when introduced early in antipsychotic treatment, has been largely unaccounted for within discussions first addressing metformin’s role in AIWG management published over 20 years ago (38).
For most, by the time metformin is started, the unique weight management benefits of this agent have been lost. Furthermore, compared to effective, resource-intensive dietary and exercise interventions (3), or use of costly GLP-1 agonists, metformin use in AIWG management represents an intervention associated with equitable implementation opportunities. Metformin is included on the WHO’s essential medication list (39), and is associated with minimal drug-drug interactions, including psychotropic medications (37). As such, with its favourable benefit-risk profile, metformin can be accessed across contexts and cohorts and is safe for initiation within psychiatric settings (8).
Further trials, similar to existing ones, are very unlikely to change our understanding of metformin’s role in managing AIWG. Larger, extended studies would be helpful in ascertaining whether benefits of earlier use of metformin, such as benefits in reducing cardiovascular risk demonstrated among those with diabetes in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (40), are replicated within SMI cohorts without diabetes. Accumulation of safety data in diverse populations has demonstrated metformin to be associated with a very low absolute risk of serious side effects (37, 41). The reality of the current, and potentially worsening (1), burden of excess morbidity and mortality amongst those with a SMI also needs to be acknowledged when considering interventions to address AIWG (42).
Implementing paradigm shifts in general obesity management into psychiatry
As in general overweight and obesity management, heterogeneity in response to any intervention is to be expected (43). Thus, a one-size-fits all management algorithm, currently endorsed within AIWG management guidance, does not reflect current understanding of the pathophysiology of obesity more generally (5, 6), nor indeed the preferences of patients with experience of managing AIWG (7). Thus, an individualised and more patient-centred approach to weight management in psychiatry is required. Accordingly, pharmacological adjuncts beyond metformin are needed for effective AIWG management. Should metformin fail to plateau, or meaningfully slow the trajectory of AIWG, prompt intervention is required to protect weight status. Evidence for the role of GLP-1 agonists in preventing and reversing established AIWG remains in its infancy (44, 45). Aside from novel treatment strategies, research using implementation science methods is also required to support effective design of psychiatric settings in delivering proactive weight management services. Availability of dedicated AIWG management guidance co-produced by endocrinology, psychiatric clinicians and patients with lived experience is one example of a targeted intervention that may increase uptake of evidence-based weight management practices within psychiatry (46).
Author contributions
IF: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LS: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CN: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. SO’D: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JO’C: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JT: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. EC: Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Firth J, Siddiqi N, Koyanagi A, Siskind D, Rosenbaum S, Galletly C, et al. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. (2019) 6:675–712. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30132-4
2. Bak M, Fransen A, Janssen J, van Os J, Drukker M. Almost all antipsychotics result in weight gain: a meta-analysis. PloS One. (2014) 9:e94112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094112
3. Vancampfort D, Firth J, Correll CU, Solmi M, Siskind D, De Hert M, et al. The impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve physical health outcomes in people with schizophrenia: a meta-review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. (2019) 18:53–66. doi: 10.1002/wps.20614
4. Management of physical health conditions in adults with severe mental disorders: WHO guidelines (2018). World Health Organisation. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550383 (Accessed 1 May 2024).
5. Castle DJ, Galletly CA, Dark F, Humberstone V, Morgan VA, Killackey E, et al. The 2016 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists guidelines for the management of schizophrenia and related disorders. Med J Aust. (2017) 206:501–5. doi: 10.5694/mja2.2017.206.issue-11
6. Cooper SJ, Reynolds GP, Barnes T, England E, Haddad PM, Heald A, et al. BAP guidelines on the management of weight gain, metabolic disturbances and cardiovascular risk associated with psychosis and antipsychotic drug treatment. J Psychopharmacol. (2016) 30:717–48. doi: 10.1177/0269881116645254
7. Fitzgerald I, Crowley EK, Ní Dhubhlaing C, O'Dwyer S, Sahm LJ. Informing the development of antipsychotic-induced weight gain management guidance: patient experiences and preferences – a qualitative descriptive study. BJPsych Open. (2024) 10:e136. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.725
8. Fitzgerald I, O’Connell J, Keating D, Hynes C, McWilliams S, Crowley EK. Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in adults with psychosis: development of the first evidence-based guideline using GRADE methodology. Evid Based Ment Health. (2022) 25:15–22. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291
9. Klein CC, Topalian AG, Starr B, Welge J, Blom T, Starr C, et al. The importance of second-generation antipsychotic-related weight gain and adherence barriers in youth with bipolar disorders: patient, parent, and provider perspectives. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. (2020) 30:376–80. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0184
10. Lee K, Akinola A, Abraham S. Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: exploring the role of psychiatrists in managing patients’ physical health - challenges, current options and direction for future care. BJPsych Bull. (2024) 48:24–9. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2023.29
11. Ryan L, Coyne R, Heary C, Birney S, Crotty M, Dunne R, et al. Weight stigma experienced by patients with obesity in healthcare settings: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Obes Rev. (2023) 24:e13606. doi: 10.1111/obr.v24.10
12. FitzGerald C, Mumenthaler C, Berner D, Schindler M, Brosch T, Hurst S. How is physicians’ implicit prejudice against the obese and mentally ill moderated by specialty and experience? BMC Med Ethics. (2022) 23:86. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00815-7
13. Perez-Iglesias R, Crespo-Facorro B, Martinez-Garcia O, Ramirez-Bonilla ML, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Pelayo-Teran JM, et al. Weight gain induced by haloperidol, risperidone and olanzapine after 1 year: findings of a randomized clinical trial in a drug-naïve population. Schizophr Res. (2008) 99:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.10.022
14. Fitzgerald I, Sahm LJ, Byrne A, O’Connell J, Ensor J, Ní Dhubhlaing C, et al. Predicting antipsychotic-induced weight gain in first episode psychosis - A field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis of non-genetic prognostic factors. Eur Psychiatry. (2023) 66:e42. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2417
15. Bushe CJ, Slooff CJ, Haddad PM, Karagianis JL. Weight change by baseline BMI from three-year observational data: findings from the Worldwide Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes Database. J Psychopharmacol. (2013) 27:358–65. doi: 10.1177/0269881112473789
16. Pérez-Iglesias R, Martínez-García O, Pardo-Garcia G, Amado JA, Garcia-Unzueta MT, Tabares-Seisdedos R, et al. Course of weight gain and metabolic abnormalities in first treated episode of psychosis: the first year is a critical period for development of cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2014) 17:41–51. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001053
17. Wu H, Siafis S, Hamza T, Schneider-Thoma J, Davis JM, Salanti G, et al. Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr Bull. (2022) 48:643–54. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac001
18. Speyer H, Westergaard C, Albert N, Karlsen M, Stürup AE, Nordentoft M, et al. Reversibility of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. (2021) 12:577919. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.577919
19. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Claeys F, Ribordy F, Zullino D, Cabanac M. Antipsychotic drug and body weight set-point. Physiol Behav. (2008) 95:157–60. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.05.013
20. Ye W, Xing J, Yu Z, Hu X, Zhao Y. Mechanism and treatments of antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Int J Obes. (2023) 47:423–33. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01291-8
21. Mukherjee S, Skrede S, Milbank E, Andriantsitohaina R, López M, Fernø J. Understanding the effects of antipsychotics on appetite control. Front Nutr. (2022) 8:815456. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.815456
22. Dunigan AI, Roseberry AG. Actions of feeding-related peptides on the mesolimbic dopamine system in regulation of natural and drug rewards. Addict Neurosci. (2022) 2:100011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201992/.
23. Huhn M, Nikolakopoulou A, Schneider-Thoma J, Krause M, Samara M, Peter N, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. (2020) 18:443–55. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.18306
24. Seeman P. Clozapine, a fast-off-D2 antipsychotic. ACS Chem Neurosci. (2013) 5:24–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894721/.
25. Yerevanian A, Soukas AA. Metformin: mechanisms in human obesity and weight loss. Curr Obes Rep. (2019) 8:156–64. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00335-3
26. Chau-Van C, Gamba M, Salvi R, Gaillard RC, Pralong FP. Metformin inhibits adenosine 5’monophosphate-activated kinase activation and prevents increases in neuropeptide Y expression in cultured hypothalamic neurons. Endocrinology. (2007) 148:507–11. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1237
27. Bahne E, Sun EWL, Young RL, Hansen M, Sonne DP, Hansen JS, et al. Metformin-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion contributes to the actions of metformin in type 2 diabetes. JCI Insight. (2018) 3:e93936. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328020/.
28. Aubert G, Mansuy V, Voirol MJ, Pellerin L, Pralong FP, et al. The anorexigenic effects of metformin involve increases in hypothalamic leptin receptor expression. Metabolism. (2011) 60:327–34. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.02.007
29. De Silva VA, Suraweera C, Ratnatunga SS, Dayabandara M, Wanniarachchi N, Hanwella R. Metformin in prevention and treatment of antipsychotic induced weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. (2016) 16:341. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1049-5
30. Yu O, Lu M, Lai TKY, Hahn M, Agarwal SM, O’Donoghue B, et al. Metformin co-commencement at time of antipsychotic initiation for attenuation of weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. (2024) 14:20451253241255476. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141220/.
31. Tang C, Chua YC, Abdin E, Subramaniam M, Verma S, Hiluy JC, et al. Twenty-four week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of metformin for antipsychotic-induced weight gain in patients with first-episode psychosis: A pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 19:137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010137
32. Hiluy JC, Nazar BP, Gonçalves WS, Coutinho W, Appolinario JC. Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Interventions in the Management of Weight Gain in Patients With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. (2019) 21:19r02483. doi: 10.4088/PCC.19r02483
33. Mansuri Z, Makani R, Trivedi C, Adnan M, Vadukapuram R, Rafael J, et al. The role of metformin in treatment of weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotic treatment in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:933570. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705964/.
34. Chen H, Lyu N, Calarge C, de la Cruz A, Chan W. The effectiveness of metformin in managing second generation antipsychotic-induced weight gain in children and adolescents. J Clin Psychiatry. (2023) 85:23m14894. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23m14894
35. Stogios N, Maksyutynska K, Navagnanavel J, Sanches M, Powell V, Gerretsen P, et al. Metformin for the prevention of clozapine-induced weight gain: A retrospective naturalistic cohort study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2022) 146:190–200. doi: 10.1111/acps.v146.3
36. Siskind DJ, Leung J, Russell AW, Wysoczanski D, Kisely S. Metformin for clozapine associated obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0156208. https://www.ncbi.nlm/nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909277/.
37. Glucophage 1000mg film-coated tablets SPC (2022). Ireland: Medicines.ie. Available online at: https://www.medicines.ie/medicines/glucophage-1000mg-film-coated-tablets-32304/spc (Accessed 9 July 2024).
38. Werneke U, Taylor D, Sanders TA. Options for pharmacological management of obesity in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. (2002) 17:145–60. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200207000-00001
39. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines - 23rd list (2023). World Health Organisation. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MHP-HPS-EML-2023.02 (Accessed 10 July 2024).
40. King P, Peacock I, Donnelly R. The UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (1999) 48:643–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00092.x
41. Bailey CJ. Metformin: historical overview. Diabetologia. (2017) 60:1566–76. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4318-z
42. WHO handbook for guideline development 2nd ed (2014). World Health Organisation. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/145714 (Accessed 10 July 2024).
43. Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376:254–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1514009
44. Agarwal SM, Stogios N, Ahsan ZA, Lockwood JT, Duncan MJ, Takeuchi H, et al. Pharmacological interventions for prevention of weight gain in people with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2022) 10:CD013337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013337.pub2
45. Patoulias D, Michailidis T, Dimosiari A, Fragakis N, Tse G, Rizzo M. Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cardio-metabolic risk factors among obese/overweight individuals treated with antipsychotic drug classes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biomedicines. (2023) 11:669. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030669
Keywords: antipsychotics, weight gain, obesity, schizophrenia, psychosis, metformin
Citation: Fitzgerald I, Sahm LJ, Ní Dhubhlaing C, O’Dwyer S, O’Connell J, Torrens J and Crowley EK (2024) Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain – why the ‘weight’? Front. Psychiatry 15:1491417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1491417
Received: 04 September 2024; Accepted: 29 October 2024;
Published: 12 November 2024.
Edited by:
Mirko Manchia, University of Cagliari, ItalyReviewed by:
Francesco Monaco, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, ItalyKristen Ward, University of Michigan, United States
Copyright © 2024 Fitzgerald, Sahm, Ní Dhubhlaing, O’Dwyer, O’Connell, Torrens and Crowley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ita Fitzgerald, aXRhZml0emdlcmFsZEByY3NpLmll