Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Forensic Psychiatry
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474626

Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices and Their Association With Rehospitalization in a Forensic Psychiatric Sample

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 2 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 Institut Philippe Pinel de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 4 Département de Psychiatrie et d’Addictologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 5 British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    While there is extensive literature examining the effectiveness of antipsychotic prescribing to patients with schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders in general psychiatric services, there is a dearth of studies examining antipsychotic prescribing practices and their effectiveness in forensic psychiatric services. Forensic psychiatric patients have unique challenges often due to their high-profile offences, public scrutiny, and legal requirements. This longitudinal, retrospective study aimed to examine antipsychotic prescribing and rehospitalization rates in a forensic psychiatric sample, along with relevant socio-demographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics. All patients had a psychotic illness and were prescribed antipsychotic medication. The sample included 153 patients, of which the majority were male (85.6%), Caucasian (71.2%), middle aged (30s to 50s), had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (76.5%), had a substance use disorder (62.1%), and had a most serious index offence against the person (80.4%). Atypical antipsychotics accounted for the majority of antipsychotic prescriptions (75.9%) and the sample had an antipsychotic polypharmacy rate of 39.9%. The sample was divided into four primary antipsychotic formulation types, which were oral (34.0%), injection (39.2%), clozapine (19.0%), and subtherapeutic (7.8%). Regarding rehospitalization, 52.9% of the sample was rehospitalized, with the average number of rehospitalizations being 1.2 (SD = 1.7) and proportion of the follow up period rehospitalized being 16.4% (SD = 27.7%). Patients prescribed clozapine had numerically lower rates of rehospitalization than those prescibedprescribed oral and injection formulation types, but it was not statistically significant. With a 19.0% prescription rate, clozapine may be underutilized in this sample. Further research is needed to demonstrate the potential benefits of clozapine regarding rehospitalization in forensic psychiatric patients, as has already been done in general psychiatry. Advancing treatment of the high-profile forensic population can reduce stigma toward people with mental illness and criminal justice involvement.

    Keywords: antipsychotic, Prescribing practices, forensic, Psychiatry, rehospitalization, Clozapine

    Received: 01 Aug 2024; Accepted: 17 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Goody, Petersen, Brink, Crocker and Nicholls. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Joseph Goody, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, British Columbia, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.