Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Autism
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474003
This article is part of the Research Topic Neuroimaging in Psychiatry 2023: Neurodevelopmental Disorders View all articles

Heterogeneity and convergence across seven neuroimaging modalities: a review of the autism spectrum disorder literature

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Section on Social and Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Illinois, United States
  • 2 Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3 University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, United States
  • 4 Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: A growing body of literature classifies autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as a heterogeneous, complex neurodevelopmental disorder that often is identified prior to three years of age. We aim to provide a narrative review of key structural and functional properties that differentiate the neuroimaging profile of autistic youth from their typically developing (TD) peers across different neuroimaging modalities.Methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching for key terms in PubMed, with the most recent search conducted on September 1, 2023. Original research papers were included if they applied at least one of seven neuroimaging modalities (structural MRI, functional MRI, DTI, MRS, fNIRS, MEG, EEG) to compare autistic children or those with a family history of ASD to TD youth or those without ASD family history; included only participants <18 years; and were published from 2013 to 2023.In total, 172 papers were considered for qualitative synthesis. When comparing ASD to TD groups, structural MRI-based papers (n = 26) indicated larger subcortical gray matter volume in ASD groups. DTI-based papers (n = 14) reported higher mean and radial diffusivity in ASD participants. Functional MRI-based papers (n = 41) reported a substantial number of between-network functional connectivity findings in both directions. MRS-based papers (n = 19) demonstrated higher metabolite markers of excitatory neurotransmission and lower inhibitory markers in ASD groups. fNIRS-based papers (n = 20) reported lower oxygenated hemoglobin signals in ASD. Converging findings in MEG-(n = 20) and EEG-based (n = 32) papers indicated lower event-related potential and field amplitudes in ASD groups. Findings in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, thalamus, cerebellum, corpus callosum, and default mode network appeared numerous times across modalities and provided opportunities for multimodal qualitative analysis.Comparing across neuroimaging modalities, we found significant differences between the ASD and TD neuroimaging profile in addition to substantial heterogeneity. Inconsistent results are frequently seen within imaging modalities, comparable study populations and research designs. Still, converging patterns across imaging modalities support various existing theories on ASD.

    Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Neuroimaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Magnetoencephalography, Electroencephalography, Near Infrared Spectroscopy

    Received: 31 Jul 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Halliday, Vucic, Georges, LaRoche, Mendoza Pardo, Swiggard, McDonald, Olofsson, Menon, Francis, Oberman, White and Van Der Velpen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Isabelle Van Der Velpen, Section on Social and Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Illinois, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.