The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Psychopathology
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1473051
The Progress in the Field of Clinical Staging for Mental Disorders within the Last Decade: An Updated Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted- 1 Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
- 2 Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD), Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 3 Clinical Centre of Excellence for Older Adults with Personality Disorders, Mondriaan Mental Health Center, Heerlen-Maastricht, Netherlands
- 4 PersonaCura, Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality and Developmental Disorders in Older Adults, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, Netherlands
- 5 Scientific Centre for Care and Wellbeing of the Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences of Tilburg University, Tranzo, Tilburg, Netherlands
- 6 Personality and Psychopathology research group (PEPS), Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussel, Belgium
- 7 NPI Centre for Personality Disorders, Arkin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 8 Levvel, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 9 Orygen, Melbourne, Australia
- 10 Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Clinical staging aims to refine psychiatric diagnosis by describing mental disorders on a continuum of disorder progression, with the pragmatic goal of improved treatment planning and outcome prediction. The first systematic review on this topic, published a decade ago, included 78 papers, and identified separate staging models for schizophrenia, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, substance use disorder, anorexia, and bulimia nervosa. The current review updates this review by including new proposals for staging models and by systematically reviewing research based upon full or partial staging models since 2012.PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were systematically searched from 2012 to June 2023. The original review's eligibility criteria were used and extended with newly introduced categories of DSM-5 mental disorders, along with mental disorders for which a progressive course might be expected. Included papers: a) contained a complete or partial staging model, or b) focused upon clinical features that might be associated with stages, or c) focused upon treatment research associated with specific stages.Seventy-one publications met the inclusion criteria. They described staging models for schizophrenia and related psychoses (21 papers), bipolar (20), depressive (4), anxiety (2), obsessive-compulsive (3), trauma related (4), eating (3), personality disorders (2), and 'transdiagnostic' staging models (13).There is a steady but slow increase in interest in clinical staging and evidence for the validity of staging remains scarce. Staging models might need to be better tailored to the complexities of mental disorders to improve their clinical utility.
Keywords: staging, mental disorder, Systematic review, Clinimetrics, Psychiatric disorder, Psychiatry
Received: 30 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Clarke, Soons, Videler, van Alphen, Van, Dil, Pappijn, Corbeij, Broekhof, Chanen and Hutsebaut. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sharon L Clarke, Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.