Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Mental Health Occupational Therapy
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1461705
This article is part of the Research Topic Editors' Showcase: Mental Health Occupational Therapy View all 7 articles

Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: A scoping review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
  • 2 Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
  • 3 The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • 4 Northern Adult Area Mental Health Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 5 Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
  • 6 Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Time use is an important indicator of health and well-being. Exploration of time use can provide in-depth information about individuals’ activity patterns including routines and structure, the experience of activities, personal priorities and challenges. People experiencing severe mental illness may be at particular risk for time use patterns associated with poor health and wellbeing. This scoping review aimed to identify and map the evidence about how a time use perspective informs assessment and intervention in community mental health practice. Electronic databases and hand-searches were used to identify relevant studies involving people with severe mental illness, and focused on time use applications in practice. Twenty-nine studies were included in this review, data-extracted and synthesized with reference to the review question. Seven described development and psychometric testing of time use assessments; twelve used time use tools to measure outcomes; and ten described or evaluated time use intervention approaches. The identified time use assessments typically involved retrospective diaries completed before or during structured interviews, and an Experience Sampling Method using smart technology to gather activity data in real time. Both psychosocial and occupational interventions used time use to measure outcomes relevant to activity engagement, social functioning, and personal recovery. The identified time use interventions originated in occupational therapy; included structured manuals and workbooks to enable reflection on daily time use; individual or group sessions to collaborate in identifying priorities, goal planning and supporting desired changes to activity patterns. These interventions were viewed favorably overall, with improved activity engagement, quality of life, and personal recovery reported. In conclusion, time use assessments evaluate outcomes of importance to personal recovery and community inclusion. Time use interventions address activity patterns associated with poor health and wellbeing, using collaborative and supported activity engagement approaches, and contribute to emerging evidence on interventions that support personal recovery. Furthering peer involvement in developing and delivering these interventions will bring important insights to time use practice and research, while the social forces that marginalize or constrain activity participation for people with severe mental illness also need to be addressed to advance time use and other approaches that aim to support community inclusion.

    Keywords: Time use, Participation, Recovery, Occupational Therapy, mental illness

    Received: 09 Jul 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Fossey, Doroud, Harvey, Dun, Hitch, Farnworth and Krupa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ellie Fossey, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, 3199, Victoria, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.