Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Mood Disorders
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1458696

Effect of Sleep Quality on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Outcomes in Depression

Provisionally accepted
Jamie Kweon Jamie Kweon 1Andrew M. Fukuda Andrew M. Fukuda 1,2Asi P. Gobin Asi P. Gobin 3Lamaan Haq Lamaan Haq 1Linda Carpenter Linda Carpenter 3,4Joshua Brown Joshua Brown 1,2*
  • 1 McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
  • 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 3 Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
  • 4 Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: While repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective for 50-60% of those treatment-resistant depression, it is critical to identify predictors of response for optimal patient selection to improve therapy. Insomnia is a known symptom of depression that is both correlated with depression severity and associated with poor antidepressant response. Therefore, understanding this relationship may open new opportunities for the optimization of rTMS treatment. We aimed to explore whether baseline sleep quality, specifically insomnia, is associated with rTMS outcomes in a naturalistic sample of 975 patients (age 18-90; 63.9% F) receiving a standard course of rTMS treatment from two outpatient TMS clinics located within psychiatric hospitals in the United States. One site additionally collected information on concurrent medication use on 350 patients; among these, we examined whether pharmacological treatment of insomnia affected TMS treatment response. Methods: Depression was measured using the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomology Self Report (IDS-SR) in site one and an abbreviated 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS) derived from the IDS-SR in site two. Sleep disturbances were measured using three insomnia-related questions. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine whether baseline insomnia scores were associated with TMS treatment outcome. Upon dichotomous categorization of the sample by insomnia and sleep-medication use, depression and sleep scores were analyzed across time using mixed repeated measures ANOVA. Results: We found that sleep quality improves after TMS (p<.001) and correlates with improvement in non-insomnia related depression symptoms (r= .318, p<.001). We found that among those who had significant insomnia at baseline, those not using sleep medications had significantly worse post-treatment IDS-SR scores compared to those using sleep medications (p=. 021) despite no difference in final insomnia score. Discussion: Together, our results suggest that while baseline insomnia is not associated with TMS effectiveness, treating insomnia may affect the trajectory of TMS therapy. Future prospective studies are needed to examine the effect of insomnia treatment alongside TMS for depression.

    Keywords: Sleep, TMS, plasticity, predictors, Depression

    Received: 02 Jul 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kweon, Fukuda, Gobin, Haq, Carpenter and Brown. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Joshua Brown, McLean Hospital, Belmont, 02478, Massachusetts, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.