The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Adolescent and Young Adult Psychiatry
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1454484
Youth Epidemiology and Resilience (YEAR) in a student population: prevalence and predictors of mental health symptoms
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 2 National University Health System (Singapore), Singapore, Singapore
- 3 Student Development Curriculum Division, Ministry of Education (Singapore), Singapore, Singapore
- 4 National University Singapore Medicine Biostatistics Unit, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 5 Department of Developmental Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
- 6 Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System (Singapore), Singapore, Singapore
- 7 Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Background Adolescence is a pivotal developmental phase, marked by a high prevalence of mental health issues. The Singapore Youth Epidemiology and Resilience (YEAR) study aims to assess the prevalence of mental health symptoms, sociodemographic risk factors, and the protective role of resilience in a multi-ethnic, Asian school-going adolescent population. Methods School-based adolescents aged 10-18 and their parents were invited from a stratified sample of national schools, designed to be demographically representative of the mainstream school-going population. In the screening phase, adolescents completed a battery of questionnaires including the Youth Self-Report (YSR), Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL), and the Singapore Youth Resilience Scale (SYRESS). Thereafter, diagnostic interviews were conducted on high-risk and control participants. Data analysis was conducted to establish prevalence rates of mental health symptoms, and to examine the associations between mental health symptoms, sociodemographic factors, and resilience. Results The final study sample consisted of 3336 adolescents and 2475 parents. Based on adolescents' response on the YSR, 37.3%, 13.1% and 27.7% of the YEAR Study population scored in the clinical range for internalizing, externalizing and total problems respectively. Based on parents' reporting on their children on the CBCL, 15.9%, 4.0% and 11.2% scored in the clinical range for internalizing, externalizing and total problems respectively. Sociodemographic risk factors for specific mental health symptoms were identified, including belonging to the age category of 15-16 (OR, 1.8-2.2) and those living in either a 4-, 5-room or executive flat (OR, 0.6-0.7), or in condominiums and other apartments (OR, 0.4-0.6). Total resilience scores were moderately correlated with total [rs(3334) = -.49, p <.01] and internalizing [rs(3334) = -.50, p <.01] problem scores on the YSR. Conclusion This study illustrates the state of mental health of school-going adolescents aged 10-18. The greater prevalence of internalizing symptoms indicates the need for stronger attention for identifying internalizing problems and targeted interventions for those at risk of such symptoms. The association between mental health symptoms and resilience factors highlights the protective potential of resilience building for adolescents.
Keywords: Mental Health, resilience, adolescence, Epidemiology, Demographics (Min.5-Max
Received: 25 Jun 2024; Accepted: 03 Oct 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Wong, Lei, Kom, Fee, Yap, Teoh, Shen, Yap, Wan, Du, Kroneman, Fung, Ong, Tian, Muhammad Syukri Bin Sachiman, Sii, Teng, Ng and Verhulst. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
John C. Wong, Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.