Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Aging Psychiatry
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437967
This article is part of the Research Topic Ethical Conflicts Regarding the Care of Older Adults with Dementia View all 7 articles

Empowerment in Structures Practical-Ethical Considerations of the Preconditions for Technology-Assisted Dementia Care in Germany Based on an Expert-Interview Study

Provisionally accepted
  • University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background Intelligent assistive technologies (IAT) have become more common in dementia care. Ethical reflection on technology-assisted dementia care (TADC) has focused so far mainly on individual and interpersonal implications (e.g., self-determination, (in)dependence, safety or privacy issues, caregivers' support and cost-efficiency). From an empowerment-sensitive perspective, however, the societal, political, economic and technological preconditions for TADC should be more deeply analyzed in terms of their accelerating or inhibiting effects on technology development, implementation and usage. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore these preconditions in the German context and so to contribute to more empowerment-sensitive structures.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 German-speaking experts from health care, health policy and the fields contributing to IAT (e.g., computer science, engineering). Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the data.The experts' assessments of the current preconditions for TADC in Germany were starkly ambivalent. In the field of "society", they identified digitalization, a change in mentality towards IAT and demographic change as accelerators, unequally distributed digital literacy, misleading perceptions and a lack of affinity as inhibitors. In the field "politics -regulation -economy", experts identified scarcity of public resources, growing private wealth and regulatory pro-gress as accelerators and unclear financing options, an uncertain market, data protection and ethical challenges as inhibitors. In the field "technology", they identified progress in basic technical research and improved customizability and interconnectivity as accelerators, while deficient digital infrastructure, a lack of user participation, dementia-specific challenges and challenges regarding data collection and security were seen as inhibitors.Conclusions TADC promises an empowerment of persons with dementia, e.g. by enhancing their self-determination, increasing their independence from social control and by allowing more social participation. Yet its societal, political, economic and technological environments preconfigure the likelihood of successful empowerment as a socio-technical practice within TADC. Accelerators in the fields of society, politics-regulation-economy and technology need to be consolidated and strengthened. Inhibitors need to be mitigated, e.g. by with new educational, political and market economic policies. We make policy recommendations based on these conclusions.

    Keywords: empowerment, Dementia, Intelligent assistive technology, digitalization, Exogenous Preconditions, Policy recommendations

    Received: 24 May 2024; Accepted: 18 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Welsch and Schicktanz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Johannes Welsch, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.