Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Behavioral and Psychiatric Genetics
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436875

A survey in Austria supports the significance of genetic counseling and pharmacogenetic testing for mental illness

Provisionally accepted
Elena Aschauer Elena Aschauer 1Shahriar I. Yazdi Shahriar I. Yazdi 2Harald Aschauer Harald Aschauer 3*
  • 1 Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapeutische Medizin mit Zentrum für Psychosomatik, Hietzing Clinic, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 2 Rehaklinik Wien Baumgarten, Vienna, Austria
  • 3 Biopsychosocial Corporation (BioPsyC), Vienna, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Genetic counseling and testing in psychiatry warrant attention, but research results on attitude, knowledge, personal experience and interest are limited. There are only a few studies that have compared the opinions of the general population and experts regarding genetic counseling and genetic testing in mental illness.This study aimed to investigate these gaps through a cross-sectional survey conducted in Austria, involving a sample of the web-active population, representative according to gender, age and geographical location (n=1,000, 24.5% of them had a psychiatric diagnosis), and experts (n=145, 83.4% of them psychiatrists). Two questionnaires were developed. Pearson chi-square statistics were used to compare responses, and regression analyses were employed to measure the strength of psycho-sociodemographic influences on answers.The findings revealed that public considered genetic counseling to be more important than experts did (68.8% versus 54.2%; Pearson chi-square 12.183; df=1; p<0.001). The general population believed that genetic testing is useful for diagnosing mental disorders, which contrasted with experts' opinions (67.9% versus 17.2%; Pearson chi-square 137.236; df=1; p<0.001). Both groups agreed on the potential benefits of pharmacogenetic testing (79% versus 80%). A small number of individuals from the public had sought genetic counseling (8%), and only a minority of experts had specific training and experience in this field (28%).Discussion: This is the first survey study on the topic conducted in Austria, with limited international studies available. Austrian experts place less value on genetic counseling compared to their counterparts in other countries. Despite recognized importance placed on genetic counseling and testing, utilization rates remain low. The value of pharmacogenetics is predicted to increase in the future. Consequently, it is crucial for medical training programs to emphasize the significance of genetic counseling and enhance the understanding of genetic aspects related to mental illnesses to enable experts to provide adequate psychoeducation and personalized care to the extent possible to patients and their families.

    Keywords: Genetic Counseling, Genetic Testing, mental illness, Survey, general population, Experts, Attitude, Interest

    Received: 22 May 2024; Accepted: 09 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Aschauer, Yazdi and Aschauer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Harald Aschauer, Biopsychosocial Corporation (BioPsyC), Vienna, Austria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.