Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Autism
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1431693
This article is part of the Research Topic Women in Psychiatry 2023: Autism View all 11 articles

Head circumference growth in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: trend and clinical correlates in the first five years of life

Provisionally accepted
Lara Cirnigliaro Lara Cirnigliaro 1Luisa Clericò Luisa Clericò 1Lorenza C. Russo Lorenza C. Russo 1Adriana Prato Adriana Prato 1MANUELA C. CARUSO MANUELA C. CARUSO 2Renata Rizzo Renata Rizzo 1Rita Barone Rita Barone 3*
  • 1 Other, Catania, Italy
  • 2 2Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy, Catania, Italy
  • 3 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Catania, Other, Catania, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Macrocephaly is described in almost 15% of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Relationships between head growth trajectories and clinical findings in ASD children show a high degree of variability, highlighting the complex heterogeneity of the disorder.Objectives: The aim of this study was to measure differences of the early growth trajectory of head circumference (HC) in children with ASD and macrocephaly compared to ASD normocephalic children, examining clinical correlates in the two groups of patients.Methods: HC data were collected from birth to 5 years of age in a sample of children with a confirmed diagnosis of ASD. Participants were classified into two groups: ASD macrocephaly (ASD-M, Z-scores ≥1.88 in at least two consecutive HC measurements), and ASD non-macrocephaly (ASD-N). Based on the distribution of HC measurements (Z-scores), five age groups were identified for the longitudinal study. Developmental and behavioral characteristics of the ASD-M children compared to the ASD-N group were compared by using standardized scores.Results: 20,8% of the children sample met criteria for macrocephaly. HC values became indicative of macrocephaly in the ASD-M group at the age range from 1 to 6 months, and persisted thereafter throughout the first five years of age. ASD-M children showed significantly higher developmental quotients of Griffiths III B and D subscales compared to ASD-N group. No significant differences in the severity of ASD symptoms assessed by ADOS-2were observed between ASD-M and ASD-N groups.Conclusion: In this study HC size from birth to 5 years links to accelerated HC growth rate as early as the first 6 months of age in children with ASD and macrocephaly, preceding the onset and diagnosis of ASD. We found that in early childhood, children with ASD-M may exhibit some advantages in language and social communication and emotional skills without differences in autism severity, when compared with age-matched normocephalic ASD children. Longitudinal analyses are required to catchup prospectively possible relationships between head size as proxy measure of brain development and neuro-developmental and behavioral features in children with ASD.

    Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Macrocephaly, head circumference, head growth trajectory, neurodevelopment, endophenotype

    Received: 12 May 2024; Accepted: 23 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cirnigliaro, Clericò, Russo, Prato, CARUSO, Rizzo and Barone. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Rita Barone, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Catania, Other, Catania, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.