Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry, 02 October 2024
Sec. Addictive Disorders

Unveiling the grip of mobile phone addiction: an in-depth review

  • School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

Mobile Phone Addiction represents an emergent addictive disorder that gravely jeopardizes the physical and mental health of adolescents worldwide, necessitating exhaustive research. Current reviews of MPA are in dire need of updates and enhancements. Therefore, this review aggregates the extant research spanning the past two decades on the prevalence, pathogenesis, comorbidities, assessment, and treatment of MPA, aiming to furnish a reference for future investigations into this condition.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
www.frontiersin.org

Graphical Abstract. Pathogenesis, pathophysiology, assessment and treatment of MPA.

1 Introduction

Mobile phone is becoming a necessary tool for daily life, changing living, working, and leisure activities (1). It is a double-edged sword one side offers convenience, but the other side could seriously damage physical and mental health when overused (2). Mobile Phone Addiction (MPA) refers to excessive use of mobile phones by individuals, which leads to a loss of self-control over mobile phone use, affecting social function and causing psychological or behavioral problems, and is characterized by withdrawal, tolerance, and loss of control (3). MPA is alternatively denominated as Mobile Phone Overuse (MPO) (4), Problematic Smartphone Use (PSU) (5), and Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency (MPAT) (6). Recent data from June 2021 underscores a significant adoption of mobile internet usage among individuals aged 10 to 19 in China, with the user base reaching a staggering 123.86 million (7). Compared to other age groups, adolescents exhibit a heightened risk for MPA (8).

Current research on the mechanisms of MPA can be broadly categorized into three main areas. The first is psychological mechanisms. This area primarily focuses on psychological factors, including anxiety, depression, and other mental health conditions. Research in this category predominantly employs qualitative methods to investigate the causal relationship between MPA and psychological disorders (9). Second, neurobiological mechanisms. The neurobiological underpinnings of MPA, include the role of the brain’s dopamine system and reward system. The application of neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has shed light on the neural mechanisms underlying MPA (10). The last one is emerging research with new technologies. This area encompasses studies using novel techniques and methods, such as genomics and metabolomics, to identify biological markers of MPA. These studies have yielded promising results, suggesting potential genetic susceptibility or aberrant gene methylation in MPA (11, 12). Additional insights: Research on associated conditions of MPA has revealed that sleep disorders are common among individuals with MPA. Moreover, analyses of saliva metabolites and microbiome composition in MPA individuals suggest potential involvement in the development of the disorder (13, 14). However, a significant gap exists in connecting neurobiological mechanisms with genetic susceptibility, microbiome, and other potential factors. Future research could explore the role of exosomes as a potential intermediary link in these complex interactions.

Presently, a globally unified diagnostic criterion for MPA is absent. Analogous to other behavioral addictions, assessment predominantly relies on evaluative scales, including but not limited to the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale (MAPS) (15), Mobile Phone Addiction Index (MPAI) (16), Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) (17), and others of a similar nature. Research into the treatment of MPA predominantly focuses on psychological (18), exercise (19), and various other interventions (20), yet these modalities exhibit significant limitations regarding the scope of treatment options and the durability of their efficacy. In this review, we aim to elucidate the recent founding of MPA mechanism, pathophysiology, assessment, and intervention, and discuss the current limitations.

2 Methods

This review employed an in-depth approach to comprehensively examine the multifaceted phenomenon of MPA. We aimed to provide a nuanced understanding of the topic, considering both empirical findings and theoretical perspectives. The following methods were employed. Search strategy: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science. The search terms included combinations of keywords related to “mobile phone addiction”, “smartphone addiction”, “problematic mobile phone use”, “neuroimaging”, “brain structure”, “brain function”, “behavioral correlates”, “Treatment”, “Therapy”, “Therapeutic approach”, “Intervention Pathogenesis”, and “Mechanism”. The search was not limited by publication date, but only articles published in English were considered. In addition to the database searches, the reference lists of relevant review articles and the authors’ files were manually searched to identify any additional eligible studies. Gray literature, such as conference proceedings and dissertations, was also screened to minimize publication bias. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) Studies focused on mobile phone addiction, its causes, consequences, or prevention and treatment strategies. (2) Studies involving human participants of any age, from diverse cultural and geographical backgrounds. (3) English-language studies, including both peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources. The following exclusion criteria were applied: (1) Studies unrelated to mobile phone addiction or lacking clear connections to the topic. The synthesis was organized into thematic sections, including the neurobiological correlates of mobile phone addiction, the psychological and behavioral features, and the diagnostic and assessment instruments used in this field. Limitations of the current evidence base and directions for future research were also discussed. To capture the breadth of the topic, we searched for studies published from 2010 onwards.

3 Risk factors for MPA

The prevailing consensus within the scholarly community suggests that psychological and neurobiological factors are central to the disorder’s etiology. Emerging evidence indicates that genetic basis and circadian rhythm may also play a role in MPA (21).

3.1 Mental health issues

Compensatory Internet Use Theory (CIUT) posited that depression and anxiety may intensify mobile phone usage resulting in MPA (22). In recent years, research has focused on the psychology and MPA (23, 24). Especially anxiety and depression served as significant predictors of MPA (25).

3.1.1 Depression

Depression is characterized by an enduring state of low mood and a significant reduction in self-esteem (26). Employing network analysis, Wei (27) elucidated the linkage between symptoms of MPA and depression. Their findings were congruent with the CIUT tenets. They contended that MPA represented not merely a tactic to elude depressive moods but also a consequential outcome of depression, which incited a loss of interest in alternative activities among individuals. Nevertheless, some research posited that MPA positively predicted the manifestation of depressive symptoms in individuals at a later stage, yet initial depressive symptoms appeared to bear no relevance to subsequent MPA occurrences (28). Furthermore, a cyclical interplay may be present between MPA and depressive symptoms (29). Engagement with mobile phones may have transiently alleviated negative emotional states, including depression, thereby reinforcing usage patterns. However, when access to mobile phones was impeded, individuals experienced negative emotions due to unfulfilled cravings. The reward system in the neural network was less active in MPA patients, a phenomenon paralleled in patients with depressive disorders (30). Nevertheless, a regression analysis study indicated that the link between MPA and depression was not mediated by the reward system. Depression and reward processing emerged as unique predictors of MPA, they did not share a common mechanism (31).

3.1.2 Anxiety

Social anxiety refers to the experience of discomfort, fear, and agitation in social situations, particularly in settings requiring face-to-face interaction (30). In an attempt to alleviate anxiety, those particular individuals exhibiting social anxiety depicted a preference for interpersonal communication via mobile phones, subsequently rendering them more susceptible to MPA (32). The research conducted by Li (33) indicated that shyness acted as a predictive factor for MPA, given that individuals with shyness were more susceptible to the onset of social anxiety disorder. Shyness was considered a type of social disengagement (34). Three varieties of social withdrawal were identified by social motivation theory: social evasion, shyness, and social disorder (35). In contrast to individuals who had social evasion and social disorder, individuals with shyness exhibited a paradoxical profile with higher motivations for social engagement and higher inclinations for social withdrawal. Therefore, within these subtypes, shyness was the most distinctly contradictory. This internal conflict led to social anxiety, prompting shy individuals to prefer mobile phone-mediated communication over face-to-face interactions (32). Similarly, research has indicated that alexithymia (36) and low self-esteem (33) were likewise pivotal factors contributing to MPA. Individuals with alexithymia are unable to identify or describe their own emotions, and individuals with low self-esteem exhibit an exaggerated sensitivity to negative appraisals from others. Both groups, facing challenges in communicating with others, demonstrated heightened social anxiety. Consequently, they showed a preference for engaging in virtual social interactions via mobile phones to fulfill their social needs, thereby alleviating their anxiety. All these findings are congruent with the CIUT (22), which posited that mobile phone usage served to meet psychological needs and mitigate negative emotions.

The link between MPA and social anxiety and depression likely involves several mechanisms. One key factor is constant phone use replaces real-life interactions. This is further fueled by Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), the anxiety of missing out on social experiences, leading to a constant need to stay connected (37, 38). Tao (39) found that FOMO mediates the relationship between social anxiety and MPA. FOMO is a cognitive bias related to phone use, influencing emotional and mental responses. Executive functions and inhibitory control then influence decision-making regarding phone use. In essence, social anxiety can lead to FOMO, which in turn drives excessive phone use and contributes to MPA, potentially exacerbating social anxiety and depression (40).

3.2 Neurobiological issues

3.2.1 Brain connectivity in MPA

Dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) are considered crucial neurotransmitters within the brain’s reward system (41). The reward system consists of three key pathways: the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, the mesostriatal pathway, and the mesocortical pathway. Neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI, have revealed the neurobiological basis of MPA. Research using neuroimaging techniques has identified several brain regions associated with MPA: 238 Chinese university students’ brains MRI indicated that MPA exhibited an augmented intrinsic functional connectivity (IFC) between several cortical regions (28). Li (42) used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to compare brain activity in individuals with MPA and healthy controls. They found reduced brain activity and functional connectivity in the creative idea-generation process in individuals with MPA. Pyeon demonstrated reduced connectivity between the right inferior frontal gyrus and limbic regions in individuals with MPA (43). This reduced connectivity was associated with MPD severity, self-control levels, and the amount of time spent using mobile phones. Horvath observed a significant negative correlation between MPD and the volume and activity of the right anterior cingulate cortex (44). Han found that activation levels in the frontal pole cortex (FPC) were significantly negatively correlated with MPA (45). The FPC plays a crucial role in the self-regulation of attention, suggesting a neurobiological mechanism for the difficulty in focusing attention experienced by individuals with MPA. Studies have identified (46) that there was a notable reduction in functional connectivity (FC)within the salience and central executive networks among individuals with MPA. This diminution was characterized by reduced FC among the front insular cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). These studies collectively highlight the involvement of specific brain regions and pathways connection in the development and maintenance of MPA.

3.2.2 Brain substructure and volumes in MPA

Research on the brains of people with MPA has revealed changes in several key regions: Caudate Nucleus, an area associated with reward and impulsivity, was smaller in the MPA group than in the normal group, and the degree of shrinkage was positively correlated with the severity of MPA (47). Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC), this area is crucial for decision-making and impulse control (48). People with MPA have less gray matter in this region, which may contribute to their difficulty in making choices (49). Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), this region is involved in reward processing and error monitoring. Studies suggest that it may be less active in individuals with MPA, potentially impairing their ability to adjust their behavior. Superior Cerebellar Peduncle (SCP), this brainstem structure is involved in transmitting signals related to motivation. People with MPA have smaller SCP volumes, which may be linked to difficulties with reward and aversion (50). These findings implicate the reduction in SCP volume as a contributory neurobiological mechanism underlying MPA. These brain changes may play a role in the development and maintenance of MPA. The volume reduction in MPA is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Volume reduction of the caudate nucleus (related to compulsivity)、ACC (decrease error monitoring and cognitive control abilities)、SCP (Interfering with the balanced regulation of reward and aversion)、OFC (disrupt adaptive decision-making processes) in MPA. The figure was created by Biorender.

3.2.3 Brain Activation in MPA

Chun’s research showed (51) that when MPA patients were faced with other people’s negative emotions and emotional changes, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (DACC) activation was reduced. The DLPFC and DACCA are involved in cognitive control and emotion regulation (52). Their reduced activation indicated that individuals had cognitive defects in processing other people’s facial emotions during social interactions, which in turn led to poor real-life social experiences and prompted individuals to meet their social needs through virtual social interactions on mobile phones.

3.3 Genetic and circadian rhythm issues

Circadian rhythm is a biological rhythm with an approximately 24-hour cycle that enables organisms to adapt to the daily fluctuations inherent in the day-night cycle, thereby maintaining an internal temporal alignment with external environmental changes (53). Individuals’ circadian preferences constituted a significant predictive factor for MPA (21) and were categorized into three distinct phenotypes (54): the “morning type,” “evening type” and “neither type.” Individuals identified as the evening type were predisposed to spending more on social interactions (55) and were at a higher risk of developing MPA, aligning with the notion posited by Walsh that mobile phones served as a social facilitator (56). Additionally, evening-type individuals were more inclined to delay their sleep, resorting to mobile phone usage to alleviate the stress induced by postponed sleep, thereby seeking immediate gratification (57). Moreover, using mobile phones at night increased individuals’ exposure to light, intensified their propensity towards the evening and further augmented the likelihood of developing MPA (58). Furthermore, melatonin not only played a pivotal role in modulating circadian rhythms but also served as a “state marker” and “trait marker” for emotional regulation (59). Disruptions in circadian rhythms could precipitate aberrant secretion of melatonin, leading to affective dysregulation (such as depression) (60), which may subsequently have contributed to the development of MPA.

4 Pathophysiology of MPA

4.1 Sleep disorder

Sleep disorders (SD) encompass difficulties in initiating sleep, insufficient sleep duration, insomnia, and sleeplessness (61). MPA has become a pivotal contributor to the onset of sleep disturbances (62). Cross-sectional research elucidated that MPA indirectly compromised sleep quality by inducing pre-sleep delay (63). This finding concurs with Steel’s Temporal Motivation Theory (TMT), wherein an individual’s tendency to procrastinate is contingent on the perceived utility of a task (62). MPA, the time required to reap the health benefits of sleep is considerably more significant than the time needed to attain immediate gratification from using a mobile phone. Consequently, individuals with MPA were predisposed to defer the task of sleeping in favor of a relatively heightened perceived utility. Additionally, research has revealed that utilizing a mobile phone during intended sleep hours can alter circadian rhythm systems, cerebral blood flow, and heart rate, thereby negatively impacting sleep quality (64).

4.2 Eating disorder

An eating disorder constitutes a pathological condition characterized by aberrant eating behaviors or weight control practices, which pose a severe threat to physical well-being (65). Cross-sectional research (66) has illuminated a positive correlation between MPA and eating disorders, though the research could not ascertain a causal linkage between the two phenomena. A subsequent longitudinal investigation, spanning one year and encompassing 1,181 university students, elucidated that MPA precipitated eating disorders rather than the control (67). This could potentially be correlated with the increased susceptibility of individuals with MPA to sociocultural influences. The pervasive dissemination of slimming and beauty marketing through digital platforms frequently engendered dissatisfaction among individuals with their physiques and appearances (68). The portrayal and propagation of an idealized body on social media further amplifies body anxieties. Consequently, adolescents who regularly engaged in selfie-taking and shared these photos on social media platforms were more prone to manifest symptoms of eating disorders (69). Another contributory factor is that MPA alters lifestyle-related elements, culminating in irregular eating patterns. Research identified a significant positive correlation between MPA and the frequency of consuming late-night snacks, fast food, and carbonated soft drinks (70). Furthermore, radio frequency-modulated electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) emitted by mobile phones have been linked to a notable increase in food intake, particularly that of carbohydrates (71), representing a pivotal element in the etiology of eating disorders. Synthesizing these factors, it can be hypothesized that individuals with MPA, being chronically exposed to RF-EMFs, may develop deleterious dietary habits such as late-night snacking and frequent fast food consumption, consequently leading to eating disorders in this demographic.

4.3 Somatic symptom

MPA is frequently associated with reduced levels of physical activity. A study targeting Chinese international students in South Korea revealed (72) that the severity of MPA was inversely correlated with the average daily step count. The study reveals that individuals addicted to mobile phones exhibit a significant reduction in daily walking steps, coupled with an increase in body fat and a decrease in muscle mass. This indicates that MPA negatively impacts health by reducing physical activity levels, such as walking. Additionally, the research finds a positive correlation between the duration of daily mobile phone use and the degree of MPA, while there is an inverse relationship between the number of daily walking steps and the level of MPA. Research indicated that prolonged use of mobile phones was associated with the occurrence of neck pain (73), and individuals with chronic neck pain demonstrated a higher prevalence of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration (74). This condition was correlated with maintaining a flexed head posture for extended periods during mobile phone use (75). A study found that individuals with MPA experienced more severe and frequent symptoms of pain-related temporomandibular disorders (TMD) (76), which may also have been related to the long-term maintenance of a head-forward posture by individuals with MPA. Additionally, individuals afflicted with MPA tended to engage with their mobile phone screens for more extended periods than the average person (77). Consequently, this cohort exhibited a greater prevalence of ocular discomfort, including symptoms such as redness, dryness, and visual disturbances. The incidence rate of these ocular symptoms was correspondingly higher in individuals with MPA than in the general population.

5 Assessment of MPA

MPA has not been included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (78). The assessment for MPA primarily relies on assessment scales developed by various researchers tailored to the characteristics of distinct populations (refer to Table 1 for details). Among these, the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale (MAPS) (15), the Mobile Phone Addiction Index (MPAI) (16), and the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) (17) are extensively utilized in research on MPA.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. MPA-related scale.

5.1 Mobile Phone Addiction Scale

Hong (13) fashioned MPAS predicated on Young’s (79) Internet Addiction Test, devised to assess the severity of MPA. The scale encompassed 11 items across three dimensions: time management issues, academic difficulties and their impacts, and substitution of reality. It employed a six-point scoring system, with 1 denoting “strongly disagree” and 6 indicating “strongly agree.” Higher aggregate or mean scores suggested a more severe degree of MPA. Furthermore, according to Young’s Internet Addiction Test diagnostic criteria, item scores between 4 to 6 denoted prominent symptoms, and pronounced symptoms in seven or more items may have warranted a diagnosis of MPA.

5.2 Mobile Phone Addiction Index

Building upon the foundations laid by Bianchi and Phillips’ Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale (80), Leung (16) constructed MPAI to diagnose symptoms of MPA. The Likert scoring system used by this scale has five points: 1 for “strongly disagree” and 5 for “strongly agree.” The 17 items were divided into four categories: compulsivity, withdrawal, escape, and inefficiency. A higher total or average score correlated with a more acute degree of MPA. Drawing on Young’s criteria for screening internet addiction, affirmative responses to 8 specific items were sufficient to categorize an individual as an MPA sufferer (81).

5.3 Smartphone Addiction Scale

Kwon (17) developed the first Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS), which considered the distinctive attributes of mobile phones and was aimed at evaluating mobile phone usage to determine proclivities toward mobile phone addiction without rendering a clinical diagnosis. The scale comprised 33 items distributed across six dimensions: withdrawal, tolerance, positive anticipation, overuse, disruption of daily life, and cyberspace-oriented relationships. It utilized a six-point rating system, 1 signified “strongly disagree,” whereas 6 conveyed “strongly agree.” Higher total or average scores indicated an increased degree of MPA. Table 1 shows the MPA-related scale.

6 Treatment of MPA

From the mechanism of MPA, it is understood that MPA results from a combination of external and internal factors. Consequently, current treatments for MPA encompass psychological intervention, exercise therapy, and technical intervention, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Interventions for MPA.

6.1 Psychological intervention

In the array of psychological intervention strategies, Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), Mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), and mental meditation emerge as principal approaches. CBT is a short-term, structured psychotherapeutic treatment designed to alleviate adverse emotions and addictive behaviors by modifying an individual’s erroneous cognitions and behavioral patterns (18). A 12-week randomized controlled trial ascertained that CBT significantly mitigated stress among university students, thereby alleviating the severity of MPA (93). Findings from a single-blinded randomized trial indicated that a three-month CBT intervention substantively alleviated MPA and enhanced psychological health (94). MBI, representing mindfulness, fosters psychological well-being, bolsters executive functions, and augments the abilities for affective self-regulation, mitigating intense emotional states and refining interpersonal dynamics (95). Interventions based on MBI significantly elevated attention and emotional control, thereby improving MPA (96). Research has discerned that mental meditation interventions targeting MPA significantly tempered addictive behaviors, ameliorated self-regulation, and reduced stress (97). Among these methods, CBT underscores the transformation of cognition and behaviors, whereas mindfulness and meditation focus predominantly on accepting circumstances and emotions.

6.2 Exercise therapy

Youths engaged in social interaction and sports activities exhibited lower frequency and duration of mobile phone use (98), whereas individuals disinclined towards physical activity were more susceptible to developing MPA compared to their active counterparts (99). Research has demonstrated a decline in MPA levels among both aerobic exercise and Tai Chi groups (Tai Chi and Baduanjin are traditional Chinese aerobic exercises) (100). Impaired executive functioning was identified as a pivotal factor contributing to MPA (101), and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise has been shown to enhance executive functions in individuals with MPA (19), thereby facilitating addictive behaviors (102). Similarly, both basketball and Baduanjin exercises have been found to reduce levels of MPA (103).

6.3 Technological intervention

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) represents a non-invasive neuromodulation technique involving the placement of electrodes at two or more sites on the scalp, where a low-intensity direct current (1.0-2.0 mA) is administered to modulate cortical neuronal activity, effectively mitigating the psychological dependencies associated with addictive behaviors (104). DLPFC was pivotal in response inhibition (105), and stimulation of the DLPFC via tDCS could enhance an individual’s response inhibition capacity, thereby reducing dependency on mobile phones (20).

To furnish a more objective and continuous assessment and intervention, Lee (106) conceptualized a technological intervention dubbed the Smartphone Addiction Management System (SAMS). This system monitored users’ usage of mobile phone applications and transmitted the data to a backend server for analysis. Based on the results, specific feedback interventions were provided. Moreover, preliminary research by another team (13) has revealed that acupuncture therapy can restore the rhythmicity and quantity of representative salivary metabolites in patients with MPA, significantly facilitating sleep disturbances and alleviating symptoms of MPA, marking it as one of the effective therapeutic modalities. Table 2 shows the interventions for MPA.

7 Conclusions

This review of the literature on MPA has explored a wide range of research examining its psychological abnormalities, dysfunctions in the neurobiological reward systems, weakened inhibitory control, cognitive impairments, genetic factors and disruptions in circadian rhythm. The impact of MPA on an individual’s psychophysiological well-being is significant, leading to a range of negative effects, including sleep disturbances and disrupted eating habits.

While a substantial body of research exists on MPA, several knowledge gaps remain. While there is ongoing debate regarding the specific pathology of MPA, including its relationship with anxiety, this review has defined both anxiety and depression as potential risk factors for MPA. Further investigation is needed into the long-term consequences of MPA, particularly its impact on brain development, cognitive function, and overall health outcomes. Additionally, the current research predominantly relies on cross-sectional studies utilizing self-reported data and the subjects are mostly Asians, which limits the ability to definitively establish causality between MPA and its associated factors. Moreover, the diagnostic criteria for MPA require global confirmation, encompassing diverse age groups, including young and elderly populations. We have concluded the review in the graph abstract.

In conclusion, the aim of this review was to provide insights into the emerging disease of Major Depressive Disorder (MPA), contributing to our understanding of its risk factors, pathophysiology, assessment, and treatment. We have presented a comprehensive overview of MPA. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations that may influence the interpretation of these findings. To mitigate these limitations, we recommend that future research extend beyond examining the individual consequences of MPA and investigate its impact on families and society. This necessitates exploring therapeutic interventions that originate from family, societal, and cultural perspectives to implement more widespread and effective preventive measures. Additionally, recognizing the significant influence of genetic factors on the development of addictive behaviors is crucial. While studies have identified genetic polymorphisms and DNA methylation as potential biomarkers, the specific gene markers for MPA remain elusive. Future research should delve into neurobiological and molecular genetics to identify these markers, facilitating the screening of at-risk populations and the development of personalized preventative strategies. By addressing these limitations and focusing on these future directions, research on MPA can contribute to a deeper understanding of this growing public health concern and the development of effective interventions to mitigate its negative consequences.

Author contributions

HY: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the “Xinglin Scholars” Discipline Talent Research Enhancement Program of Chengdu University of TCM (No. MPRC2022023), Chengdu Health Commission Research Project (No. 202317033303). The APC was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 82405158).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Ricoy M-C, Martínez-Carrera S, Martínez-Carrera I. Social overview of smartphone use by teenagers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:15068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215068

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ting CH, Chen YY. Smartphone addiction. In: Adolescent Addiction. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (2020). p. 215–40.

Google Scholar

3. Billieux J, Maurage P, Lopez-Fernandez O, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Curr Addict Rep. (2015) 2:156–62. doi: 10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mahmoodi H, Nadrian H, Shaghaghi A, Jafarabadi MA, Ahmadi A, Saqqezi GS. Factors associated with mental health among high school students in Iran: does mobile phone overuse associate with poor mental health? J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. (2018) 31:6–13. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Richardson M, Hussain Z, Griffiths MD. Problematic smartphone use, nature connectedness, and anxiety. J Behav Addict. (2018) 7:109–16. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Xiong J, Zhou Z, Chen W, You Z, Zhai Z. Development of the mobile phone addiction tendency scale for college students. Chin Ment Health J. (2012) 26:222–5. doi: 10.1037/t74211-000

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Gao Q, Zheng H, Sun R, Lu S. Parent-adolescent relationships, peer relationships, and adolescent mobile phone addiction: the mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction. Addictive Behav. (2022) 129:107260. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107260

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kim E, Koh E. Avoidant attachment and smartphone addiction in college students: the mediating effects of anxiety and self-esteem. Comput Hum Behav. (2018) 84:264–71. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.037

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Elhai JD, Yang H, Dempsey AE, Montag C. Rumination and negative smartphone use expectancies are associated with greater levels of problematic smartphone use: A latent class analysis. Psychiatry Res. (2020) 285:112845. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112845

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Liu D, Liu X, Long Y, Xiang Z, Wu Z, Liu Z, et al. Problematic smartphone use is associated with differences in static and dynamic brain functional connectivity in young adults. Front Neurosci. (2022) 16:1010488. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1010488

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Cerniglia L, Cimino S, Marzilli E, Pascale E, Tambelli R. Associations among internet addiction, genetic polymorphisms, family functioning, and psychopathological risk: cross-sectional exploratory study. JMIR Ment Health. (2020) 7:e17341. doi: 10.2196/17341

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li T, Chen Y, Xie Y, Tao S, Zou L, Yang Y, et al. Moderating effects of per3 gene DNA methylation on the association between problematic mobile phone use and chronotype among chinese young adults: focus on gender differences. J Behav Addict. (2024) 13:554–64. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yang H, Yang K, Zhang L, Yang N, Mei Y-X, Zheng Y-L, et al. Acupuncture ameliorates mobile phone addiction with sleep disorders and restores salivary metabolites rhythm. Front Psychiatry. (2023) 14:1106100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1106100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mei Y-X, Yang K, Zhang L, Jin Y, Yang N, Yang H, et al. Dysrhythmic saliva microbiota in mobile phone addicts with sleep disorders and restored by acupuncture. Front Psychiatry. (2024) 15:1335554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1335554

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hong F-Y, Chiu S-I, Huang D-H. A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Comput Hum Behav. (2012) 28:2152–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. J Children Media. (2008) 2:93–113. doi: 10.1080/17482790802078565

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kwon M, Lee J-Y, Won W-Y, Park J-W, Min J-A, Hahn C, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (Sas). PloS One. (2013) 8:e56936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kaczkurkin AN, Foa EB. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: an update on the empirical evidence. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2015) 17:337–46. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.3/akaczkurkin

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhou J, Bai Z. Brief moderate-intensity aerobic exercise improves the executive function of Chinese undergraduates regardless of mobile phone addiction: evidence from the antisaccade task. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:849442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.849442

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Bai X, Liu H, Li T, Xu L, Liu X. Enhancing response inhibition behavior through tDCS intervention in college students with smartphone addiction. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:19469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69175-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Randler C, Wolfgang L, Matt K, Demirhan E, Horzum MB, Beşoluk Ş. Smartphone addiction proneness in relation to sleep and morningness–eveningness in German adolescents. J Behav Addict. (2016) 5:465–73. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kardefelt-Winther D. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Comput Hum Behav. (2014) 31:351–4. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kim J-H. Smartphone-mediated communication vs. Face-to-face interaction: two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone. Comput Hum Behav. (2017) 67:282–91. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Van Deursen AJ, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PA. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Comput Hum Behav. (2015) 45:411–20. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Rho MJ, Park J, Na E, Jeong J-E, Kim JK, Kim D-J, et al. Types of problematic smartphone use based on psychiatric symptoms. Psychiatry Res. (2019) 275:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.071

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wang W, Xu H, Li S, Jiang Z, Sun Y, Wan Y. The impact of problematic mobile phone use and the number of close friends on depression and anxiety symptoms among college students. Front Psychiatry. (2024) 14:1281847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1281847

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wei X, An F, Liu C, Li K, Wu L, Ren L, et al. Escaping negative moods and concentration problems play bridge roles in the symptom network of problematic smartphone use and depression. Front Public Health. (2023) 10:981136. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.981136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zou L, Wu X, Tao S, Yang Y, Zhang Q, Hong X, et al. Functional connectivity between the parahippocampal gyrus and the middle temporal gyrus moderates the relationship between problematic mobile phone use and depressive symptoms: evidence from a longitudinal study. J Behav Addict. (2022) 11:40–8. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Kim J-H, Seo M, David P. Alleviating depression only to become problematic mobile phone users: can face-to-face communication be the antidote? Comput Hum Behav. (2015) 51:440–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.030

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Vidal-Ribas P. The paradox of reward processing in the association between irritability and depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2023) 62:853–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.05.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. West R, Ash C, Dapore A, Kirby B, Malley K, Zhu S. Problematic smartphone use: the role of reward processing, depressive symptoms and self-control. Addictive Behav. (2021) 122:107015. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107015

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. You Z, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Xu Y, Chen X. How does self-esteem affect mobile phone addiction? The mediating role of social anxiety and interpersonal sensitivity. Psychiatry Res. (2019) 271:526–31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.040

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Li X, Li W, Liu M, Xiao W, Zhou H. How does shyness affect Chinese college students' Tendency to mobile phone addiction? Testing the mediating roles of social anxiety and self-control. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:902425. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902425

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Crozier WR. Shyness and self-esteem in middle childhood. Br J Educ Psychol. (1995) 65:85–95. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01133.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Asendorpf JB. Beyond social withdrawal: shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Hum Dev. (1990) 33:250–9. doi: 10.1159/000276522

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Xiao W, Zhou H, Li X, Lin X. Why are individuals with alexithymia symptoms more likely to have mobile phone addiction? The multiple mediating roles of social interaction anxiousness and boredom proneness. Psychol Res Behav Manage. (2021) 2021:1631–41. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S328768

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cheung M-C, Lai JS, Yip J. Influences of smartphone and computer use on health-related quality of life of early adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:2100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Elhai JD, Yang H, Fang J, Bai X, Hall BJ. Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to problematic smartphone use severity in chinese young adults: fear of missing out as a mediator. Addictive Behav. (2020) 101:105962. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.020

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tao Y, Tang Q, Wang S, Zou X, Ma Z, Zhang L, et al. The impact of long-term online learning on social anxiety and problematic smartphone use symptoms among secondary school students with different levels of fear of missing out: evidence from a symptom network and longitudinal panel network analysis. J Behav Addict. (2024) 13:102–19. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Koca F, Saatçı F. The mediator role of fear of missing out in the parent-adolescent relationship quality and problematic internet use. Int J Ment Health Addict. (2022) 20:1897–912. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00822-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Volkow ND, Morales M. The brain on drugs: from reward to addiction. Cell. (2015) 162:712–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Li X, Li Y, Wang X, Hu W. Reduced brain activity and functional connectivity during creative idea generation in individuals with smartphone addiction. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2023) 18:nsac052. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsac052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Pyeon A, Choi J, Cho H, Kim J-Y, Choi IY, Ahn K-J, et al. Altered connectivity in the right inferior frontal gyrus associated with self-control in adolescents exhibiting problematic smartphone use: A fMRI study. J Behav Addict. (2021) 10:1048–60. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Horvath J, Mundinger C, Schmitgen MM, Wolf ND, Sambataro F, Hirjak D, et al. Structural and functional correlates of smartphone addiction. Addictive Behav. (2020) 105:106334. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106334

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Han SW, Kim CH. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying internet/smartphone addiction: A preliminary fMRI study. Tomography. (2022) 8:1781–90. doi: 10.3390/tomography8040150

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Ahn J, Lee D, Namkoong K, Jung Y-C. Altered functional connectivity of the salience network in problematic smartphone users. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:636730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.636730

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Yoo JH, Chun J-W, Choi MR, Cho H, Kim J-Y, Choi J, et al. Caudate nucleus volume mediates the link between glutamatergic neurotransmission and problematic smartphone use in youth. J Behav Addict. (2021) 10:338–46. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Wallis JD. Orbitofrontal cortex and its contribution to decision-making. Annu Rev Neurosci. (2007) 30:31–56. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094334

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Lee D, Namkoong K, Lee J, Lee BO, Jung Y-C. Lateral orbitofrontal gray matter abnormalities in subjects with problematic smartphone use. J Behav Addict. (2019) 8:404–11. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.50

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Cho IH, Yoo JH, Chun J-W, Cho H, Kim J-Y, Choi J, et al. Reduced volume of a brainstem substructure in adolescents with problematic smartphone use. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2021) 32:137. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.210007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Chun J-W, Choi J, Kim J-Y, Cho H, Ahn K-J, Nam J-H, et al. Altered brain activity and the effect of personality traits in excessive smartphone use during facial emotion processing. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:12156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08824-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kerns JG. Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an fMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the simon task. Neuroimage. (2006) 33:399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Yamada RG, Ueda HR. The circadian clock ticks in organoids. EMBO J. (2022) 41:e110157. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021110157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Natale V, Cicogna P. Morningness-eveningness dimension: is it really a continuum? Pers Individ Dif. (2002) 32:809–16. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00085-X

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Kauderer S, Randler C. Differences in time use among chronotypes in adolescents. Biol Rhythm Res. (2013) 44:601–8. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2012.721687

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Walsh SP, White KM, Hyde MK, Watson B. Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accident Anal Prev. (2008) 40:1893–900. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zhao C, He J, Xu H, Zhang J, Zhang G, Yu G. Are “Night owls” or “Morning larks” More likely to delay sleep due to problematic smartphone use? A cross-lagged study among undergraduates. Addictive Behav. (2024) 150:107906. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107906

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Bağcı H, Horzum MB. The relationship of smartphone addiction with chronotype and personality structures in university students. Biol Rhythm Res. (2022) 53:1917–31. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2022.2051302

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Srinivasan V, Smits M, Spence W, Lowe AD, Kayumov L, Pandi-Perumal SR, et al. Melatonin in mood disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry. (2006) 7:138–51. doi: 10.1080/15622970600571822

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Li X, Yu J, Jiang S, Fang L, Li Y, Ma S, et al. Circadian rhythms of melatonin and its relationship with anhedonia in patients with mood disorders: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. (2024) 24:165. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05606-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Foulkes L, McMillan D, Gregory AM. A bad night's sleep on campus: an interview study of first-year university students with poor sleep quality. Sleep Health. (2019) 5:280–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Cui G, Yin Y, Li S, Chen L, Liu X, Tang K, et al. Longitudinal relationships among problematic mobile phone use, bedtime procrastination, sleep quality and depressive symptoms in Chinese college students: A cross-lagged panel analysis. BMC Psychiatry. (2021) 21:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03451-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Zhang MX, Wu AM. Effects of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among chinese university students: the mediating role of self-regulation and bedtime procrastination. Addictive Behav. (2020) 111:106552. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106552

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Andrzejak R, Poreba R, Poreba M, Derkacz A, Skalik R, Gac P, et al. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Ind Health. (2008) 46:409–17. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.46.409

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Cooper M, Reilly EE, Siegel JA, Coniglio K, Sadeh-Sharvit S, Pisetsky EM, et al. Eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine: an overview of risks and recommendations for treatment and early intervention. Eat Disord. (2022) 30:54–76. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2020.1790271

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Tayhan Kartal F, Yabancı Ayhan N. Relationship between eating disorders and internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Eating Weight Disorders-Studies Anorexia Bulimia Obes. (2021) 26:1853–62. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01027-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Li S, Cui G, Yin Y, Tang K, Chen L, Liu X. Prospective association between problematic mobile phone use and eating disorder symptoms and the mediating effect of resilience in chinese college students: A 1-year longitudinal study. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:857246. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Kim Y, Park JY, Kim SB, Jung I-K, Lim YS, Kim J-H. The effects of internet addiction on the lifestyle and dietary behavior of Korean adolescents. Nutr Res Pract. (2010) 4:51–7. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.1.51

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Lonergan AR, Bussey K, Fardouly J, Griffiths S, Murray SB, Hay P, et al. Protect me from my selfie: examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence. Int J Eating Disord. (2020) 53:755–66. doi: 10.1002/eat.23256

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Wang J, Hao Q-H, Peng W, Tu Y, Zhang L, Zhu T-M. Relationship between smartphone addiction and eating disorders and lifestyle among chinese college students. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1111477. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111477

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Wardzinski EK, Jauch-Chara K, Haars S, Melchert UH, Scholand-Engler HG, Oltmanns KM. Mobile phone radiation deflects brain energy homeostasis and prompts human food ingestion. Nutrients. (2022) 14:339. doi: 10.3390/nu14020339

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Kim S-E, Kim J-W, Jee Y-S. Relationship between smartphone addiction and physical activity in Chinese international students in Korea. J Behav Addict. (2015) 4:200–5. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Derakhshanrad N, Yekaninejad MS, Mehrdad R, Saberi H. Neck pain associated with smartphone overuse: cross-sectional report of a cohort study among office workers. Eur Spine J. (2021) 30:461–7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06640-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Zhuang L, Wang L, Xu D, Wang Z, Liang R. Association between excessive smartphone use and cervical disc degeneration in young patients suffering from chronic neck pain. J Orthopaedic Sci. (2021) 26:110–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.02.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Lee S, Kang H, Shin G. Head flexion angle while using a smartphone. Ergonomics. (2015) 58:220–6. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.967311

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Liu S, Lan Y, He G, Chen B, Jia Y. The associations between problematic smartphone use and blood pressure among 2,573 aged 9–17 years students in Shanghai, China. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:904509. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.904509

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Kim J, Hwang Y, Kang S, Kim M, Kim T-S, Kim J, et al. Association between exposure to smartphones and ocular health in adolescents. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. (2016) 23:269–76. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2015.1136652

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Regier DA, Kuhl EA, Kupfer DJ. The DSM-5: classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry. (2013) 12:92–8. doi: 10.1002/wps.20050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. (2009) 1:237–44. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology Behav. (2005) 8:39–51. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Kwon M, Kim D-J, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One. (2013) 8:e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Kim D, Lee Y, Lee J, Nam JK, Chung Y. Development of korean smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth. PloS One. (2014) 9:e97920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097920

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Toda M, Monden K, Kubo K, Morimoto K. Mobile phone dependence and health-related lifestyle of university students. Soc Behav Personality: an Int J. (2006) 34:1277–84. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.10.1277

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Hooper V, Zhou Y. "Addictive, dependent, compulsive? A study of mobile phone usage", In: 20th Bled eConferenceeMergence: Mergin and Emerging Technologies, Processes and Institutions; Jun 4-6; Bled, Slovenia (2007).

Google Scholar

85. Koo HY. Development of a cell phone addiction scale for Korean adolescents. J Korean Acad Nurs. (2009) 39:818–28. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.6.818

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Ha JH, Chin B, Park D-H, Ryu S-H, Yu J. Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. CyberPsychology Behav. (2008) 11:783–4. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0096

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Rutland JB, Sheets T, Young T. Development of a scale to measure problem use of short message service: the SMS problem use diagnostic questionnaire. CyberPsychology Behav. (2007) 10:841–4. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9943

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Yen C-F, Tang T-C, Yen J-Y, Lin H-C, Huang C-F, Liu S-C, et al. Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. J Adolescence. (2009) 32:863–73. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Walsh SP, White KM, Young RM. Needing to connect: the effect of self and others on young people's involvement with their mobile phones. Aust J Psychol. (2010) 62:194–203. doi: 10.1080/00049530903567229

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Pawłowska B, Potembska E. Gender and severity of symptoms of mobile phone addiction in polish gymnasium, secondary school and university students. Curr Problems Psychiatry. (2011) 12:433–8.

Google Scholar

91. Merlo LJ, Stone AM, Bibbey A. Measuring problematic mobile phone use: development and preliminary psychometric properties of the pump scale. J Addict. (2013) 2013:912807. doi: 10.1155/2013/912807

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Zhou Y, Zhang X, Liang J-C, Tsai C-C. (2014). "The relationship between parents addicted to mobile phone and adolescent addicted to the internet", In: Workshop Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2014. (2014), 484–8.

Google Scholar

93. Lin Y-H, Chang L-R, Lee Y-H, Tseng H-W, Kuo TB, Chen S-H. Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory (Spai). PloS One. (2014) 9:e98312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Khalily MT, Bhatti MM, Ahmad I, Saleem T, Hallahan B, Ali S-e, et al. Indigenously adapted cognitive–behavioral therapy for excessive smartphone use (IACBT-ESU): A randomized controlled trial. Psychol Addictive Behav. (2021) 35:93. doi: 10.1037/adb0000677

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Tang YY, Yang L, Leve LD, Harold GT. Improving Executive Function and Its Neurobiological Mechanisms through a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: Advances within the Field of Developmental Neuroscience. Child Dev Perspect. (2012) 6:361–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00250.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Lan Y, Ding J-E, Li W, Li J, Zhang Y, Liu M, et al. A pilot study of a group mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for smartphone addiction among university students. J Behav Addict. (2018) 7:1171–6. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Choi E-H, Chun MY, Lee I, Yoo Y-G, Kim M-J. The effect of mind subtraction meditation intervention on smartphone addiction and the psychological wellbeing among adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:3263. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093263

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Auhuber L, Vogel M, Grafe N, Kiess W, Poulain T. Leisure activities of healthy children and adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:2078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122078

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Pereira FS, Bevilacqua GG, Coimbra DR, Andrade A. Impact of problematic smartphone use on mental health of adolescent students: association with mood, symptoms of depression, and physical activity. Cyberpsychology Behavior Soc Networking. (2020) 23:619–26. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0257

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Zhang K, Guo H, Zhang X, Yang H, Yuan G, Zhu Z, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise or tai chi chuan interventions on problematic mobile phone use and the potential role of intestinal flora: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res. (2024) 170:394–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.01.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Gao L, Zhang J, Xie H, Nie Y, Zhao Q, Zhou Z. Effect of the mobile phone-related background on inhibitory control of problematic mobile phone use: an event-related potentials study. Addictive Behav. (2020) 108:106363. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106363

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Yang G, Shangguan R, Ke Y, Wang S. The influence of acute aerobic exercise on craving degree for university students with mobile phone dependency: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:8983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158983

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Xiao T, Jiao C, Yao J, Yang L, Zhang Y, Liu S, et al. Effects of basketball and baduanjin exercise interventions on problematic smartphone use and mental health among college students: A randomized controlled trial. Evidence-Based Complementary Altern Med. (2021) 2021:8880716. doi: 10.1155/2021/8880716

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Fecteau S, Agosta S, Hone-Blanchet A, Fregni F, Boggio P, Ciraulo D, et al. Modulation of smoking and decision-making behaviors with transcranial direct current stimulation in tobacco smokers: A preliminary study. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2014) 140:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Chen T, Wang H, Wang X, Zhu C, Zhang L, Wang K, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves response inhibition. Int J Psychophysiol. (2021) 162:34–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.01.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Lee H, Ahn H, Choi S, Choi W. The sams: smartphone addiction management system and verification. J Med Syst. (2014) 38:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-0001-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mobile phone addiction, assessment, mechanism, treatment, pathophysiology

Citation: Li J and Yang H (2024) Unveiling the grip of mobile phone addiction: an in-depth review. Front. Psychiatry 15:1429941. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1429941

Received: 09 May 2024; Accepted: 13 September 2024;
Published: 02 October 2024.

Edited by:

Paolo Enrico, University of Sassari, Italy

Reviewed by:

Siddharth Sarkar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Federico Zorzi, University of Cagliari, Italy
Paolo Follesa, University of Cagliari, Italy

Copyright © 2024 Li and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hong Yang, eWFuZ2hvbmdAY2R1dGNtLmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.