Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1427993

The mediating role of subjective social status in the association between objective socioeconomic status and mental health status: Evidence from Iranian national data

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran
  • 2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway
  • 3 Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • 4 Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran, Alborz, Iran
  • 5 Department of Epiemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran
  • 6 Iran University of Medical Sciences, Research Center for Addiction and Risky Behaviors, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Tehran, Alborz, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is identified as a pivotal risk factor for mental health. Objective socioeconomic status (OSS) is measured by tangible resources, whereas subjective social status (SSS) reflects an individual's perception of their OSS. A paucity of literature exists that elucidates the specific psychosocial mechanisms or pathways linking OSS with mental illness via SSS. This research aimed to explore the mediating role of SSS in the OSS-mental health association, utilizing data from the Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS). Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of data from IranMHS, a national survey conducted in 2011 through face-to-face interviews with 7,886 Iranian adults aged 15-64. As part of the original survey, the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) was randomly administered to half of these participants. We focused our analysis on data from 3,759 participants who completed all items of the GHQ-28. OSS was evaluated using education, occupation, wealth, and a combined OSS index, while SSS was measured using the MacArthur Scale. We examined how SSS mediates the associations between OSS factors and GHQ scores, including its four dimensions-somatic symptoms, anxiety and insomnia, social dysfunction, and severe depression-while adjusting for demographic variables and conducting gender-stratified analyses. Results: Among the 3759 respondents, 2157 (57.4%) were women, 2110 (56.1%) lived in urban areas, with an average age of 33.1 years (SD=12.1). SSS mediated the associations between wealth and the overall GHQ score (mediation percentage: 92.3%), education (75.4%), OSS index (66.7%), and occupation (34.0%) on the GHQ score. The most significant mediation effects were observed for wealth on the somatic symptoms, social dysfunction, and depression dimensions, with SSS accounting for more than 80% of these associations.The findings indicate a significant mediating role of SSS in the relationship between OSS and mental health. Enhancing our comprehension of the social determinants that moderate the relationship between objective and subjective socioeconomic status may contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the impact of SES on mental health outcomes.

    Keywords: Objective socioeconomic status, subjective social status, Mental Health, Mediation analysis, Household survey

    Received: 05 May 2024; Accepted: 05 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Nasirpour, Jafari, Habibi Asgarabad, Salehi, Amin-Esmaeili, Rahimi-Movaghar and Motevalian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Mojtaba Habibi Asgarabad, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway
    Seyed Abbas Motevalian, Department of Epiemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1449614535, Alborz, Iran

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.