Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Neurostimulation
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1427365
This article is part of the Research Topic Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD): epidemiology, clinic, burden and treatment View all 17 articles

Multichannel tDCS with Advanced Targeting for Major Depressive Disorder: A Tele-Supervised At-Home Pilot Study

Provisionally accepted
Giulio Ruffini Giulio Ruffini 1,2*Ricardo N. Salvador Ricardo N. Salvador 2Francesca Castaldo Francesca Castaldo 2Thais Baleeiro Thais Baleeiro 2Joan A. Camprodon Joan A. Camprodon 3Mohit Chopra Mohit Chopra 4Davide B. Cappon Davide B. Cappon 4Alvaro Pascual-Leone Alvaro Pascual-Leone 4
  • 1 Neuroelectrics (United States), Cambridge, United States
  • 2 Neuroelectrics (Spain), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
  • 3 Division of Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 4 Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Proof-of-principle human studies suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) may improve depression severity. This open-label multicenter study tested remotely supervised multichannel tDCS delivered at home in patients (N=35) with major depressive disorder (MDD). The primary aim was to assess the feasibility and safety of our protocol. As an exploratory aim, we evaluated therapeutic efficacy: the primary efficacy measure was the median percent change from baseline to the end of the 4-week post-treatment follow-up period in the observerrated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Mood Rating Scale (MADRS).Methods: Participants received 37 at-home stimulation sessions (30 minutes each) of specifically designed multichannel tDCS targeting the left DLPFC administered over eight weeks (4 weeks of daily treatments plus 4 weeks of taper), with a follow-up period of 4 weeks following the final stimulation session. The stimulation montage (electrode positions and currents) was optimized by employing computational models of the electric field generated by multichannel tDCS using available structural data from a similar population (group optimization). Conducted entirely remotely, the study employed the MADRS for assessment at baseline, at weeks 4 and 8 during treatment, and at 4-week follow-up visits.Results: 34 patients (85.3% women) with a mean age of 59 years, a diagnosis of MDD according to DSM-5 criteria, and a MADRS score ≥20 at the time of study enrolment completed all study visits. At baseline, the mean time since MDD diagnosis was 24.0 (SD 19.1) months. Concerning compliance, 85% of the participants (n=29) completed the complete course of 37 stimulation sessions at home, while 97% completed at least 36 sessions. No detrimental effects were observed, including suicidal ideation and/or behavior. The study observed a median MADRS score reduction of 64.5% (48.6, 72.4) 4 weeks posttreatment (Hedge's g = -3.1). We observed a response rate (≥ 50% improvement in MADRS scores) of 72.7% (n=24) from baseline to the last visit 4 weeks post-treatment. Secondary measures reflected similar improvements.Conclusions: These results suggest that remotely supervised and supported multichannel home-based tDCS is safe and feasible, and antidepressant efficacy motivates further appropriately controlled clinical studies.

    Keywords: tDCS, MDD, tES (transcranial electrical current stimulation), Telemedicine, home tDCS, Multichannel tDCS, Stimweaver, Starstim

    Received: 03 May 2024; Accepted: 10 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ruffini, Salvador, Castaldo, Baleeiro, Camprodon, Chopra, Cappon and Pascual-Leone. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Giulio Ruffini, Neuroelectrics (United States), Cambridge, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.