Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 14 November 2024
Sec. Aging Psychiatry
This article is part of the Research Topic Suicide in Geriatric Populations View all 9 articles

Do early-life circumstances predict late-life suicidal ideation? Evidence from SHARE data using machine learning

  • 1Helsinki Institute for Demography and Population Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Max Planck - University of Helsinki Center for Social Inequalities in Population Health, Helsinki, Finland
  • 3School of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

Background: A number of studies have demonstrated that suicidal ideation in late life is associated with early-life circumstances. However, the importance of early-life circumstances in predicting suicidal ideation is not entirely clear. This study aims to use a machine learning approach to evaluate the importance of 32 early-life circumstances from six domains in predicting suicidal ideation in old age.

Methods: The data in this study come from a cross-national longitudinal survey, the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Participants recalled information on early-life circumstances in SHARE wave 7 and reported suicidal ideation in SHARE wave 8. The XGBoost model was employed to evaluate the importance of 32 circumstances in six domains (early-life socioeconomic status, early-life health and healthcare, early-life relationship, etc.) in predicting the suicidal ideation of middle-aged and older adults over 50.

Results: There were 46,498 participants in this study, of which 26,672 (57.36%) were females and 19,826 (42.64%) were males. XGBoost showed a strong predictive performance, with an area under the curve of 0.80 and accuracy of 0.77. Top predictors were mainly in the domains of childhood relationship, childhood socioeconomic status, childhood health, and healthcare. In particular, having a group of friends most critically influences suicidal ideation in old age.

Discussion: These findings suggest that early-life circumstances may modestly predict suicidal ideation in late life. Preventive measures can be taken to lower the risk of suicidal ideation in middle-aged and older individuals.

1 Introduction

With the aging population increasing all over the world, the suicide of older adults has become a crucial public health problem (1). Large empirical studies have indicated that suicidal ideation is closely associated with completed suicide (2). In Europe, the lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation was 7.8%, and there are significant variations in suicidal ideation by sex among middle-aged and older adults (3, 4). There is a need for knowledge about the causes and prevention of suicidal ideation in older adults. However, most studies exploring the predictors have mainly focused on late-life predictors (5, 6). Previous studies have established strong associations between (7, 8) childhood adversity and the increased likelihood of suicide in late life, including factors like childhood physical health (710), psychological, physical, and sexual abuse (7, 8, 1013), family socioeconomic status (7, 9), parental divorce (10), exposure to holocaust and wars (14, 15), and hunger (16). In particular, childhood physical health, including physical illness and self-reported health, is closely associated with the risk of suicidal ideation in old age (9, 10). For instance, a US study revealed that individuals with poor health in childhood had 1.99 times greater odds of suicidal ideation than healthier counterparts (9). The correlation may stem from the fact that poor health during childhood increases the risk of mental health problems, chronic diseases, and poor social support (1719), all of which can contribute to suicidal ideation in old age. Although the relationship between childhood adversity and suicidal ideation is widely established, the importance of these early-life circumstances in elderly suicide has not been sufficiently explored. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that there are variations in suicidal ideation by sex (2022), pointing out the gender inequality in this phenomenon. The existing literature investigated the associations between early-life circumstances and suicidal ideation in late life mainly using conventional statistical models that struggle to deal with non-linear relationships and high-dimensional problems. Machine learning models show promising potential in coping with such problems and have been widely used in studies of medicine and psychology (2325). So far, machine learning models have been applied to predict suicide using several datasets such as healthcare data, clinical data, registry data, and national survey data (2629). For example, a study of the use of machine learning to predict the suicidal ideation of Korean adults, showed that the predictive performance of machine learning models outperformed conventional statistical models such as the logistic regression model (30). However, these studies applied machine learning models to predict suicidal ideation risk using late-life factors rather than early-life factors, which may make it difficult to comprehensively understand the relative importance of life-course factors in predicting elderly suicidal ideation (31, 32). In addition, these studies mostly utilized single-county datasets.

In this study, we aimed to leverage XGBoost, a machine learning model, and cross-national survey data, to examine the importance of early-life circumstances in predicting suicidal ideation in late life. In addition, 32 early-life predictors were constructed based on the rich information about life history from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The survey collected various information about individuals through face-to-face computer-aided personal interviews. A range of studies have used SHARE data to identify the risks of suicidal ideation in older adults (3335), but few of them examined the early-life risks. Strengthening the understanding of the life-course predictions of suicidal ideation can enhance targeted prevention measures for older populations who have experienced adverse early-life circumstances.

2 Data and methods

2.1 Data

2.1.1 Participants

The data used in this study come from SHARE, a longitudinal cross-national survey that has been running from 2004 to the present (36). Until 2024, it has covered 28 European countries and Israel, and provided rich information on middle-aged and aged adults in health, social, economic, and other aspects. This study obtained the data of participants who were interviewed in SHARE wave 7 and wave 8 and were aged 50 years or above. After excluding the participants who were aged below 50 years, the final analytical samples consisted of 46,498 participants.

2.1.2 Assessment of suicidal ideation

In SHARE wave 8, participants were asked ‘In the last month, have you felt that you would rather be dead?’ This study constructed a binary variable to assess suicidal ideation. The answer ‘Any mention of suicidal feelings or wish to be dead’ is assigned a value of 1, and the answer ‘No such feelings’ is assigned a value of 0. Previous studies offered evidence for a binary measurement of suicidal ideation of older adults (3335).

2.1.3 Assessment of predictors

Participants were asked to recall their life history in SHARE wave 7. Derived from SHARE wave 7, 32 early-life circumstances were constructed, including six domains: childhood socioeconomic status, childhood health and healthcare, childhood relationship, childhood war, childhood residence conditions, and childhood cognition. Previous studies have shown that these predictors contribute to the occurrence of suicidal ideation in late life (8, 11, 15, 37). Moreover, we included 23 late-life predictors that have been proven to influence suicidal ideation in old age, such as gender, marital status, age, education level, health conditions, and economic situation (5, 38, 39). Detailed descriptions of these predictors can be found in Appendix A, B. Considering the potential high correlation between the predictors, we calculated the correlation matrix for all predictors, which is shown as a heatmap in Appendix D. Additionally, it was observed that the majority of the predictors are not highly correlated.

2.2 Methods

XGBoost, which stands for eXtreme Gradient Boosting, is a powerful machine learning model with exceptional performance and efficiency in classification and regression. This model is based on the gradient boosting framework and good at dealing with large datasets and complex tasks. It has recently been applied to examine the predictors of suicide (4043).

In this study, XGBoost was applied to evaluate the importance of 32 early-life circumstances in predicting suicidal ideation in old age. This model has several unique advantages in prediction compared with conventional linear regression models. First, XGBoost is good at capturing non-linear relationships between predictors and outcomes, which is often missed by linear models. Second, XGBoost can deal with multicollinearity effectively in which features are highly correlated. Third, XGBoost is a non-parametric model and allows the capture of a wider variety of patterns in the data. XGBoost Python package was used to develop the XGBoost model in this study. The ‘xgboost’ library in Python (version 3.10.9) was used to develop the XGBoost model in this study. Figure 1 shows the methodology process, including data pre-processing, model development, and model evaluation.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Methodology process.

2.2.1 Data pre-processing

In this study, the average percentage of missing data across all variables was approximately 11%. Random forest imputation takes into account non-linearities and interactions and does not require the specification of a specific regression model (44). We employed random forest imputation to minimize bias from missing data, ensuring that our analysis remained robust and accurate.

2.2.2 Model development

To evaluate the generalization ability of the XGBoost model, the data of this study was first divided into training data and test data, comprising 70% and 30% of the data, respectively. Parameter tuning was performed exclusively on the training data using 10-fold stratified cross-validation with GridSearchCV, which ensured the balance of the outcome variable across folds. In addition, scale_pos_weight of the XGBoost model was adjusted to further accommodate the class imbalance problem as only a few older adults (5.88%) had suicidal ideation. After identifying the optimal hyperparameters, the model was re-trained on the whole training data. Finally, we evaluated the model’s predictive performance on the test data.

2.2.3 Model evaluation

We used a range of indicators to evaluate the predictive performance of the XGBoost model. These indicators include the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score.

2.2.4 Feature importance

In this study, the XGBoost model provides the importance of each feature by calculating each feature’s importance score. This is based on the ‘gain’ method.

3 Results

3.1 Descriptive analysis

In this study, the total number of final analytic samples was 46,498. Of these participants, 2,736 (5.88%) individuals aged 50+ years reported having suicidal ideation in the last month, whereas 43,762 (94.12%) did not. To assess whether there were statistically significant differences in the bivariate relationships between having suicidal ideation and not having suicidal ideation with other variables in the study, we conducted a t-test for continuous variables and a chi-squared test for categorical variables. The mean age of participants with suicidal ideation was 73.75 years (SD = 10.25), which was higher than those without at 70.19 years (SD = 9.23). Females (7.09%) exhibited higher rates of ideation than males (4.27%), and the prevalence was notably higher among widowed (10.71%), divorced (7.86%), and separated (7.97%) individuals than among married ones (4.24%). Education also played an important role, with those having less than an upper secondary education showing the highest ideation rate (8.38%) and those with tertiary education showing the lowest rate (3.75%). Although differences between urban (5.81%) and rural (6.03%) participants were not significant, living in nursing homes was associated with a significantly higher rate of suicidal ideation (14.73%). Across countries, the prevalence ranged from 3.35% in Northern Europe to 6.86% in Western Europe. Overall, participants who are female, unmarried, widowed, or divorced, have lower levels of education, and live in nursing homes and Western European countries, are more susceptible to harboring suicidal ideation. Detailed characteristics of the sample refer to Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The demographic characteristics of participants in this study.

3.2 The prediction of suicidal ideation

The XGBoost model demonstrated robust predictive ability on the test data for predicting suicidal ideation among middle-aged and aged individuals. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC score of 0.80, accuracy of 0.77, sensitivity of 0.69, specificity of 0.77, PPV of 0.16, NPV of 0.98, and F1 score of 0.25. The best parameters were a learning_rate of 0.05 and a maximum depth of 3,200 estimators. Details regarding the importance of early-life and late-life predictors can be found in Appendix C. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive ability of the XGBoost model only using early-life predictors, with an AUC score of 0.64, an accuracy of 0.65, a sensitivity of 0.56, a specificity of 0.65, a PPV of 0.09, an NPV of 0.96, and an F1 score of 0.15, which are somewhat lower than those using early-life and late-life predictors together.

3.3 Variable importance

Table 2 presents the importance and ranking of 32 early-life circumstances from six domains in the XGBoost prediction model. In the domain of childhood socioeconomic status, the father education level had the highest importance, suggesting the important role of father education level in children’s suicidal ideation in old age. However, a family’s financial situation during childhood had no obvious effect. It concludes that some socioeconomic circumstances, including parental education and breadwinner occupation, are crucial and others, such as family financial difficulty, may not be direct predictors of suicidal ideation. In the domain of childhood health and healthcare, self-reported health status and access to healthcare resources, such as receiving vaccinations and regularly visiting a dentist, were the strongest predictors, emphasizing the critical role of early health intervention and preventive healthcare in mitigating suicidal ideation in late life. In the domain of childhood war, early exposure to war World War I and World War II had a lower importance in predicting suicidal ideation in old age than most predictors from the domain of childhood health and healthcare. In the domain of childhood relationship, childhood friendship had the most critical effect in prediction, including whether having a group of friends and whether feeing lonely. Living with father during childhood was also a significant predictor. In the domain of childhood residence conditions, the importance of having a cold running water supply ranked first, indicating the importance of basic amenities in affecting children’s future mental health. In the domain of childhood cognition, academic performance in mathematics and language ranked 12 and 10, respectively, suggesting that early cognitive development can influence late suicidal ideation.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The importance of early-life circumstances in suicidal ideation prediction.

We further utilized the XGBoost model to identify the ten most crucial early-life circumstances contributing to suicidal ideation among middle-aged (50–59) and older individuals (60+), as detailed in Table 3. There was heterogeneity between the two age groups. For instance, the mother education factor was more predictive for middle-aged individuals than for older adults. The predictive performance of the model by age groups is shown in Appendix E.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Top 10 early-life circumstances for middle-aged and aged individuals.

Figure 2 shows the importance of the top 10 early-life predictors in suicidal ideation. The majority of the top 10 predictors were from the domains of childhood relationship (having a group of friends, feeling lonely for friends, and living with father), childhood socioeconomic status (father education and living arrangement), and childhood health and healthcare (vaccination and regularly visiting the dentist). This highlights that predictors during childhood are strongly linked to suicidal ideation in late life.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Importance of top 10 early-life circumstances predictors for suicidal Ideation.

4 Discussion

This study applied the XGBoost model to evaluate the importance of 32 early-life circumstances in predicting suicidal ideation in middle-aged and aged European and Israeli populations using cross-national data. Seventy percent of the study data was used to train the prediction model and 30% was used to assess the trained model. Scale_pos_weight of XGBoost was used to handle the class imbalance problem and 10-fold cross-validation was used to deal with overfitting problem. The performance indicators show the good predictive ability of the XGBoost model, with an AUC of 0.80 and accuracy of 0.77. The results demonstrate that the top predictors are mainly in the domains of childhood relationship, childhood socioeconomic status, childhood health and healthcare, and, especially, whether having a group of friends, which have the most critical influence on suicidal ideation in old age.

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to shed light on the relative importance of 32 early-life circumstances from six different domains, leveraging the advantages of the XGBoost predictive model. Some findings align with previous studies emphasizing the importance of childhood socioeconomic status, childhood health and healthcare, childhood resident conditions, and early-life war exposure in predicting suicidal ideation among older adults (8, 11, 15, 37). This study also provides new findings, such as the high importance of childhood friendship and childhood cognition in predicting late suicidal ideation, which lacked sufficient attention in previous studies. Related studies attempted to explore the associations between early-life peer relationships, childhood cognitive function, and mental health in old age (45, 46), but there are still few studies exploring the influence of these childhood factors on late-life suicidal ideation. This study is beneficial in providing new evidence for the targeted and precise intervention to mitigate some lasting effects of early-life circumstances in later suicidal ideation. Additionally, this study emphasized the significance of exploring the causes of suicidal ideation from the life-course perspective.

The top 10 factors among 32 early-life circumstances may inform suicide prevention efforts. These top factors belong to five domains: childhood socioeconomic status, childhood health and healthcare, childhood relationship, childhood residence conditions, and childhood cognition. First, in the domain of childhood relationship, having a group of friends is associated with better social support and mental health. Empirical studies demonstrated that a lack of such a network can lead to loneliness and social barriers, which are known risk factors for suicidal ideation in adulthood (6, 47). This study identified having a group of friends as the most crucial early-life factor for predicting suicidal ideation, aligning with these studies. Therefore, encouraging children to build friendships is crucial in reducing the risk of suicidal thoughts later in life. Feeling lonely is also a critical factor that can lead to persistent mental health problems, including suicidal ideation. Evidence revealed the association between childhood loneliness and a long-term disruption in mental health that extends into adulthood (48). Addressing loneliness in children and adolescents is vital in preventing suicidal behaviors in adulthood. Living with a father provides stable emotional support and healthy socialization patterns. It was demonstrated that a fatherless childhood is associated with higher risks of mental health (49). This suggests that maintaining a supportive family environment is crucial for suicide prevention.

Second, in the domain of childhood health and healthcare, vaccinations had a long-term impact on health. A study found that vaccinations before the age of 15 have positive associations with cognitive and educational outcomes (50), which may decrease the risks of mental health. Thus, improving access to vaccinations is beneficial for indirectly decreasing suicide risk. Early health conditions persistently impact health outcomes in late life. Poor health in childhood is associated with higher odds of work-limiting disability and chronic health conditions (51), which may increase the suicide risk. In terms of suicide prevention, addressing early health concerns allows for timely interventions that may decrease the risk of later suicidal ideation. Regular dental visits indicate a family’s exposure to preventive care. Evidence shows that regular dental visits during childhood positively impacts the quality of life in old age (52). Improving the availability of preventive care for children may lower the risk of suicide in old age.

Third, in the domain of childhood residence conditions, residential conditions such as access to cold running water affect children’s mental and physical health. Research has shown that poorer residential conditions are linked to adult mortality (53). Therefore, improving early residential conditions is an effective strategy for reducing long-term health issues, ultimately aiding in suicide prevention. Fourth, in the domain of childhood socioeconomic status, father education often correlates with the family’s socioeconomic status, in which higher education levels can decrease the risks of depression and other mental health problems (54). Focusing on individuals from disadvantaged childhood socioeconomic backgrounds may reduce their risk of developing suicidal ideation. Difficult living arrangements, including living in an orphanage and being fostered by another family, may cause emotional and behavioral problems, increasing long-term psychological stress. Evidence has proven the associations between living in an orphanage and cognitive disease in late life (55). Early intervention measures of paying more attention to children with difficult living arrangements can reduce adult mental health issues. Finally, in the domain of childhood cognition, early language performance has an impact on late-life health. A study has shown that low linguistic ability in early life is a strong predictor of poor cognitive function in late life (56). Enhancing language performance may improve social interactions and psychological adjustments, thus reducing suicide risk.

The study has strengths in four aspects. First, it used a large set of early-life circumstances from six domains, providing a comprehensive analysis of how different early-life circumstances contribute to the risk of suicidal ideation in old age. Second, this study used the cross-national data that included the majority of European countries, rather than data of a single country, enhancing the generalizability of the identified early-life risks. Finally, this study considered the heterogeneity of the importance of early-life circumstances for late-life ideation among middle-aged individuals and older adults, which is crucial for designing targeted interventions based on age.

There are several limitations to this study. First, the information about suicidal ideation was self-reported by participants, and early-life circumstances were based on the participants’ recall, which may introduce information bias. Second, there was a survival bias in this study as individuals with adverse early-life circumstances may have died earlier and therefore were not included in the study. Third, this study identified the association between early-life circumstance and late-life suicide rather than examining the causality. Additionally, the XGBoost predictive model was developed using SHARE data that primarily includes high-income countries. It is uncertain whether the model will be robust when applied to data from middle- and low-income countries.

5 Conclusion

In this study, the findings illustrate that early-life circumstances play a crucial role in predicting suicidal ideation in late life, especially the predictors in the domains of childhood relationship, childhood socioeconomic status, and childhood health and healthcare. The predictors identified in this study were in line with previous studies, reaffirming the long-term effect of early-life circumstances on suicidal ideation. In addition, this study highlights the promise of machine learning models in identifying the risk for suicidal ideations. Based on our findings, several preventive measures can be helpful to lower the risk of suicidal ideation in late life. On one hand, early-life stage interventions are crucial. For example, encouraging children to build friendships, improving access to preventive care such as vaccinations, improving early health conditions, and improving residential conditions, may contribute to lowering the risk of suicidal ideation in late life. On the other hand, the identified key early-life circumstances, such as the top ten circumstances, may be used to screen older populations for further diagnoses and care. However, there is the heterogeneity of the importance of early-life circumstances for late-life ideation between middle-aged individuals and older adults. The heterogeneity is crucial for designing age-specific interventions when screening susceptible populations.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: SHARE (the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe), https://share-eric.eu/.

Ethics statement

The Ethics Committee of the University of Mannheim approved the ethical review for SHARE waves 1 to 4, and the Ethics Council of the Max Planck Society approved the ethical review for SHARE wave 4 and its continuation.

Author contributions

XZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HW: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by China Scholarship Council, award number 202106140038; University of Helsinki provides article processing charges.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Transnational Access Visits (TAV) as part of the COORDINATE project (Grant Agreement Number: 101008589) and European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research for their invaluable support in providing training on data related to this research. This training significantly enhanced our understanding of the dataset used in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1426876/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Corna LM, Cairney J, Streiner DL. Suicide ideation in older adults: Relationship to mental health problems and service use. Gerontologist. (2010) 50:785–97. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq048

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Hubers AAM, Moaddine S, Peersmann SHM, Stijnen T, Van Duijn E, van der Mast RC, et al. Suicidal ideation and subsequent completed suicide in both psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations: A meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2018) 27:186–98. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Bernal M, Haro JM, Bernert S, Brugha T, de Graaf R, Bruffaerts R, et al. Risk factors for suicidality in Europe: Results from the ESEMED study. J Affect Disord. (2007) 101:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lukaschek K, Engelhardt H, Baumert J, Ladwig KH. No correlation between rates of suicidal ideation and completed suicides in Europe: Analysis of 49,008 participants (55+ years) based on the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Eur Psychiatry. (2015) 30:874–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.07.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Cabello M, Miret M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Caballero FF, Chatterji S, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, et al. Cross-national prevalence and factors associated with suicide ideation and attempts in older and young-and-middle age people. Aging Ment Health. (2020) 24:1533–42. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1603284

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bennardi M, Caballero FF, Miret M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Haro JM, Lara E, et al. Longitudinal relationships between positive affect, loneliness, and suicide ideation: age-specific factors in a general population. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2019) 49:90–103. doi: 10.1111/SLTB.12424

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bruffaerts R, Demyttenaere K, Borges G, Haro JM, Chiu WT, Hwang I, et al. Childhood adversities as risk factors for onset and persistence of suicidal behaviour. Br J Psychiatry. (2010) 197:20–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.074716

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bruwer B, Govender R, Bishop M, Williams DR, Stein DJ, Seedat S. Association between childhood adversities and long-term suicidality among South Africans from the results of the South African Stress and Health study: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. (2014) 4. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004644

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Jung JH, Lee H. Childhood adversity and passive suicidal ideation in later life in the United States: does religious attendance matter? J Relig Health. (2023) 62:3739–59. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01917-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Stansfeld SA, Clark C, Smuk M, Power C, Davidson T, Rodgers B. Childhood adversity and midlife suicidal ideation. Psychol Med. (2017) 47:327–40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sachs-Ericsson N, Corsentino E, Rushing NC, Sheffler J. Early childhood abuse and late-life suicidal ideation. Aging Ment Health. (2013) 17:489–94. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.758236

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Behr Gomes Jardim G, Novelo M, Spanemberg L, von Gunten A, Engroff P, Nogueira EL, et al. Influence of childhood abuse and neglect subtypes on late-life suicide risk beyond depression. Child Abuse Negl. (2018) 80:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Enns MW, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, De Graaf R, Ten Have M, Sareen J. Childhood adversities and risk for suicidal ideation and attempts: A longitudinal population-based study. Psychol Med. (2006) 36:1769–78. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008646

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Clarke DE, Colantonio A, Heslegrave R, Rhodes A, Links P, Conn D. Holocaust experience and suicidal ideation in high-risk older adults. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. (2004) 12:65–74. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200401000-00009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kovnick MO, Young Y, Tran N, Teerawichitchainan B, Tran TK, Korinek K. The impact of early life war exposure on mental health among older adults in northern and central Vietnam. J Health Soc Behav. (2021) 62:526–44. doi: 10.1177/00221465211039239

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Stickley A, Koyanagi A, Inoue Y, Leinsalu M. Childhood hunger and thoughts of death or suicide in older adults. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. (2018) 26:1070–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bergmans RS, Smith J. Associations of mental health and chronic physical illness during childhood with major depression in later life. Aging Ment Health. (2022) 26:1813–20. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1958143

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Latham K. The “Long arm” of childhood health: linking childhood disability to late midlife mental health. Res Aging. (2015) 37:82–102. doi: 10.1177/0164027514522276

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Upenieks L, Schafer MH, Mogosanu A. Does childhood religiosity delay death? J Relig Health. (2021) 60:420–43. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00936-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chin YR, Lee HY, So ES. Suicidal ideation and associated factors by sex in Korean adults: A population-based cross-sectional survey. Int J Public Health. (2011) 56:429–39. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0245-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nowotny KM, Peterson RL, Boardman JD. Gendered contexts: variation in suicidal ideation by female and male youth across U.S. States. J Health Soc Behav. (2015) 56:114–30. doi: 10.1177/0022146514568350

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Assarsson R, Petersen S, Högberg B, Strandh M, Johansson K. Gender inequality and adolescent suicide ideation across Africa, Asia, the South Pacific and Latin America–a cross-sectional study based on the Global School Health Survey (GSHS). Glob Health Action. (2018) 11:77–86. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1663619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Vélez JI. Machine learning based psychology: Advocating for a data-driven approach. Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). (2021) 14:6–11. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5365

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2019) 19:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Dwyer DB, Falkai P, Koutsouleris N. Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2018) 14:91–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Boudreaux ED, Rundensteiner E, Liu F, Wang B, Larkin C, Agu E, et al. Applying machine learning approaches to suicide prediction using healthcare data: overview and future directions. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:707916/BIBTEX. doi: 10.3389/FPSYT.2021.707916/BIBTEX

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Shin D, Kim K, Lee SB, Lee C, Bae YS, Cho WI, et al. Detection of depression and suicide risk based on text from clinical interviews using machine learning: possibility of a new objective diagnostic marker. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:801301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.801301

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Chou PH, Wang SC, Wu CS, Horikoshi M, Ito M. A machine-learning model to predict suicide risk in Japan based on national survey data. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:918667/BIBTEX. doi: 10.3389/FPSYT.2022.918667/BIBTEX

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chen Q, Zhang-James Y, Barnett EJ, Lichtenstein P, Jokinen J, D’Onofrio BM, et al. Predicting suicide attempt or suicide death following a visit to psychiatric specialty care: A machine learning study using Swedish national registry data. PloS Med. (2020) 17:e1003416. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Oh B, Yun JY, Yeo EC, Kim DH, Kim J, Cho BJ. Prediction of suicidal ideation among Korean adults using machine learning: A cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Investig. (2020) 17:331. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0270

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kim J, Gwak DH, Kim S, Gang M. Identifying the suicidal ideation risk group among older adults in rural areas: Developing a predictive model using machine learning methods. J Adv Nurs. (2023) 79:641–51. doi: 10.1111/JAN.15549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. De La Garza ÁChecktae, Blanco C, Olfson M, Wall MM. Identification of suicide attempt risk factors in a national US survey using machine learning. JAMA Psychiatry. (2021) 78:398–406. doi: 10.1001/JAMAPSYCHIATRY.2020.4165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Zhuo LB, Yao W, Yan Z, Giron MST, Pei JJ, Wang HX. Impact of effort reward imbalance at work on suicidal ideation in ten European countries: The role of depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. (2020) 260:214–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Stolz E, Fux B, Mayerl H, Rásky É, Freidl W. Passive suicide ideation among older adults in Europe: A multilevel regression analysis of individual and societal determinants in 12 countries (SHARE). Journals Gerontol - Ser B psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2016) 71:947–58. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Cabello M, Rico-Uribe LA, Martinez-Ávila JC, Sánchez-Niubò A, Caballero FF, Borges G, et al. The role of ageing in the wish to be dead: Disentangling age, period and cohort effects in suicide ideation in European population. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2021) 30:e17. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Börsch-Supan A, Team on behalf of the SCC, Brandt M, Hunkler C, Kneip T, Korbmacher J, et al. Data resource profile: the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int J Epidemiol. (2013) 42:992–1001. doi: 10.1093/IJE/DYT088

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kwak M, Ahn S. Childhood adversity predicted suicidal ideation in older age: Results from a National Survey in Korea. Aging Ment Health. (2020) 24:1141–8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1616161

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Stephenson M, Prom-Wormley E, Lannoy S, Edwards AC. The temporal relationship between marriage and risk for suicidal ideation. J Affect Disord. (2023) 343:129–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lee H, Seol KH, Kim JW. Age and sex-related differences in risk factors for elderly suicide: Differentiating between suicide ideation and attempts. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2018) 33:e300–6. doi: 10.1002/gps.4794

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Rus Prelog P, Matić T, Pregelj P, Sadikov A. A pilot predictive model based on COVID-19 data to assess suicidal ideation indirectly. J Psychiatr Res. (2023) 163:318–24. doi: 10.1016/J.JPSYCHIRES.2023.05.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Haghish EF, Czajkowski NO, von Soest T. Predicting suicide attempts among Norwegian adolescents without using suicide-related items: a machine learning approach. Front Psychiatry. (2023) 14:1216791. doi: 10.3389/FPSYT.2023.1216791

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kumar V, Sznajder KK, Kumara S. Machine learning based suicide prediction and development of suicide vulnerability index for US counties. NPJ Ment Health Res. (2022) 1:3. doi: 10.1038/S44184-022-00002-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Nielsen SD, Christensen RHB, Madsen T, Karstoft KI, Clemmensen L, Benros ME. Prediction models of suicide and non-fatal suicide attempt after discharge from a psychiatric inpatient stay: A machine learning approach on nationwide Danish registers. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2023) 148:525–37. doi: 10.1111/ACPS.13629

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Shah AD, Bartlett JW, Carpenter J, Nicholas O, Hemingway H. Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: A CALIBER study. Am J Epidemiol. (2014) 179:764–74. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Yang L. Childhood neighbourhood quality, peer relationships, and trajectory of depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older Chinese adults. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2024), 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02612-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Gale CR, Cooper R, Craig L, Elliott J, Kuh D, Richards M, et al. Cognitive function in childhood and lifetime cognitive change in relation to mental wellbeing in four cohorts of older people. PloS One. (2012) 7:e44860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044860

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Chang Q, Chan CH, Yip PSF. A meta-analytic review on social relationships and suicidal ideation among older adults. Soc Sci Med. (2017) 191:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Xerxa Y, Rescorla LA, Shanahan L, Tiemeier H, Copeland WE. Childhood loneliness as a specific risk factor for adult psychiatric disorders. Psychol Med. (2023) 53:227–35. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Culpin I, Heuvelman H, Rai D, Pearson RM, Joinson C, Heron J, et al. “Father absence and trajectories of offspring mental health across adolescence and young adulthood: Findings from a UK-birth cohort.” Journal of Affective Disorders (2022) 314:150–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Oskorouchi H, Sousa-Poza A, Bloom DE. The long-term cognitive and schooling effects of childhood vaccinations in China. SSRN Electronic J. (2020). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3568311

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Haas SA. The long-term effects of poor childhood health: An assessment and application of retrospective reports. Demography. (2007) 44:113–35. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Hajek A, König HH, Buczak-Stec E, Rose LM, Kretzler B, Spinler K, et al. Regular childhood dental visits, health-related factors and quality of life in later life. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2022) 99:104585. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104585

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Dedman DJ, Gunnell D, Davey Smith G, Frankel S. Childhood housing conditions and later mortality in the Boyd orr cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). (2001) 55:10–15. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.1.10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Maglica T, Ercegovac IR, Ljubetić M. Family characteristics as determinants of mental health in adolescents. Eur J Ment Health. (2021) 16:7–30. doi: 10.5708/EJMH.16.2021.2.1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Donley GAR, Lönnroos E, Tuomainen TP, Kauhanen J. Association of childhood stress with late-life dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: The KIHD study. Eur J Public Health. (2018) 28:1069–73. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Snowdon DA, Kemper SJ, Mortimer JA, Greiner LH, Wekstein DR, Markesbery WR. Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer’s disease in late life: Findings from the Nun Study. JAMA. (1996) 275:528–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.7.528

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: childhood adversity, suicide in older adults, mental health of older adults, XGBoost, artificial intelligence, life course, health aging, social determinants of health

Citation: Zong X and Wang H (2024) Do early-life circumstances predict late-life suicidal ideation? Evidence from SHARE data using machine learning. Front. Psychiatry 15:1426876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1426876

Received: 02 May 2024; Accepted: 16 September 2024;
Published: 14 November 2024.

Edited by:

Vincenzo De Luca, University of Toronto, Canada

Reviewed by:

Xenia Gonda, Semmelweis University, Hungary
Linda Ahrenfeldt, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Gail Harmata, The University of Iowa, United States

Copyright © 2024 Zong and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xu Zong, xu.zong@helsinki.fi

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.