Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Autism
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1426376

Response inhibition as a critical executive function in differentiating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive attention test study

Provisionally accepted
Kangto Lee Kangto Lee 1,2In Hee Cho In Hee Cho 1,2Jeonghoon Park Jeonghoon Park 1Hangnyoung Choi Hangnyoung Choi 1,2*Keun-Ah Cheon Keun-Ah Cheon 1,2*
  • 1 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2 Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are both associated with impairment in executive function, particularly in complex attention. Although previous studies using clinical assessments have attempted to delineate differences between these disorders, the findings have been inconclusive. Our study aims to elucidate the differences of endophenotype between ASD, ADHD, and their co-occurring condition utilizing a uniform computerized test.Methods: The study included children diagnosed with ASD, ASD co-occurring with ADHD (ASD+ADHD), or ADHD who completed the comprehensive attention test (CAT) at Severance Hospital between October 2013 to May 2023. We excluded children with intellectual disability and comorbid major psychiatric or neurologic disorders possibly affecting attention measurement. The participants were categorized into three groups for the comparative analysis of CAT measures: (a) ASD (n=112), (b) ASD+ADHD (n=155), and (c) ADHD (n=104). The study also conducted an exploratory analysis utilizing multivariate linear regression analysis to examine the association between the CAT measures and parent-reported scales.Results: Notably, the ASD+ADHD and ADHD groups exhibited higher frequency of commission errors (CE) and perseveration errors (PE) compared to the ASD group. In the exploratory analysis, a significant negative association was observed between reaction time (RT) and both the social communication questionnaire (SCQ) and the child behavior checklist (CBCL) externalization scores in the ASD+ADHD and ADHD groups. The ASD+ADHD group tended to show higher standard deviation of reaction time (RTSD) compared to the ASD group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that impaired response inhibition is more pronounced in ADHD compared to ASD. We propose altered visual attention, reflecting response inhibition, may serve as potential endophenotypic markers differentiating ADHD from ASD in attentional assessment. Elevated RTSD in the ASD+ADHD group demonstrates additive pathology, suggesting that the neurological mechanisms underpinning impaired sustained attention may differ between the two conditions.

    Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorders, ADHD, Comorbidity, Children, Executive Function, response inhibition, Comprehensive Attention Test

    Received: 01 May 2024; Accepted: 07 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Lee, Cho, Park, Choi and Cheon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Hangnyoung Choi, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Keun-Ah Cheon, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.