The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1417784
Resources, Support, and Integration as Potential Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Blended Therapy in the Routine Care of Inpatients: A Qualitative Study
Provisionally accepted- 1 University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 2 Clienia AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
- 3 University of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 4 Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 5 University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
While research on blended therapy (BT), i.e. the combination of face-to-face and digital treatment, has grown rapidly, integrating BT into routine practice remains limited, especially in inpatient settings. This study seeks to investigate the potential barriers healthcare providers and patients are confronted with in implementing BT to inpatients. Here, a retrospective, explorative qualitative research design was employed to gain insights into the experiences of healthcare professionals and inpatients in a real-world clinical setting. Specifically, we utilized semi-structured interviews to explore three key aspects:time resources, organizational support, and integration. A total of 11 therapists and 6 patients were interviewed. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to examine the implementation of blended therapy in the routine care of inpatients. We found that therapists emphasized several barriers including overwhelming workloads with insufficient time allocated for the work with the digital tools, inadequate time adjustments, a lack of ongoing training, and the necessity for a welldefined concept and setting of how to implement blended therapy. Interestingly, fewer barriers were reported by patients, who viewed the e-mental health platform as a valuable addition to their standard therapy. They also judged guidance and integration by their therapists as satisfactory and appreciated the adaptability offered in managing their workload in a flexible setting.
Keywords: blended therapy1, inpatient2, qualitative study3, implementation4, resources5, support6, integration7, barrier8
Received: 15 Apr 2024; Accepted: 27 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Gupta, Leuba, Seifritz, Berger and Kawohl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Nikita Gupta, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.