Tashalee R. Brown1,2†
Madeline O. Jansen1,2†A. Ning Zhou3,4Dominic Moog5Hui Xie6
Katherine V. Liebesny7
Kevin Y. Xu8,9
Binx Y. Lin4,7*‡
Wisteria Y. Deng10*‡- 1Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- 2Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- 3San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, United States
- 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
- 5Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- 6Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- 7Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Carilion Clinic - Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
- 8School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
- 9Department of Psychiatry, Division of Addiction Science, Prevention and Treatment, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- 10Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Background: Incidence rates of autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and gender dysphoria (GD) are rising not only in the general population, but particularly among children, adolescents, and young adults with eating disorders (EDs). While ED rates have risen during the COVID pandemic, trends in co-occurring autism, ADHD, and GD have yet to be investigated in detail or at scale by way of large electronic medical record data.
Objectives: To investigate trends in rates of co-occurring autism, ADHD, and GD among children, adolescents, and young adults with EDs in years prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We utilized a de-identified multinational electronic health records database (TriNetX) with 48,558 individuals aged 5-26 diagnosed with eating disorders (EDs) at least twice between 2017 and 2022. The primary predictor variable differentiated between the years of each person’s index (first) ED diagnosis (2017-2019 vs. 2020-2022). The primary outcome variable was the rate of new co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses of autism, ADHD, and GD in the year following each patient’s first ED diagnosis. We applied propensity score-matched multivariable logistic regressions to compare primary outcomes between 2017-2019 and 2020-2022.
Results: Our analysis included 17,445 individuals diagnosed with EDs in 2017-2019 (8% autism, 13.5% ADHD, 1.9% GD) and 31,113 diagnosed with EDs in 2020-2022 (8% autism, 14.6% ADHD, 3.2% GD). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 17,202 individuals from the 2017-2019 cohort were matched to peers mirroring the 2020-2022 cohort. Those diagnosed in 2020-2022 showed a 19% (aOR[95%CI]=1.19[1.07-1.33]), 25% (aOR=1.25[1.04-1.49]), and 36% (aOR=1.36[1.07-1.74]) increase in odds for autism, ADHD, and GD diagnoses, respectively, within the 365 days after the index EDs diagnosis, compared to the 2017-2019 cohort.
Discussion: Rates of autism, ADHD, and GD are significantly higher in individuals with ED in the post-pandemic 2020-2022 cohort in comparison to the pre-pandemic 2017-2019 cohort, even after controlling for baseline levels of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses. Such findings reveal a critical gap in our current understanding of the totality of ways in which COVID-19 may have impacted the onset and clinical course of EDs, autism, ADHD, and GD among children, adolescents, and young adults.
Introduction
Eating disorders (EDs) have been increasing in incidence in the United States (U.S.) since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (1), with resultant prevalence and severity posing an unprecedented impact upon those affected (2, 3). Unfortunately, there has been a dearth of research examining the risk of co-occurring psychiatric conditions among individuals affected by EDs. This is an important research gap because prior studies suggest that nearly half of all individuals with EDs also have co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses (4). Furthermore, the successful treatment of EDs often requires diligent attention to the screening, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of co-occurring psychiatric conditions (5). Lastly, co-occurring psychiatric conditions in those with EDs often correspond with increased ED symptom burden and worse outcomes (6, 7).
The high prevalence of co-occurring depressive-, anxiety-, and obsessive-compulsive disorder-spectrum illnesses in individuals with EDs is well-known and well-documented in the scientific literature to date (8, 9). Yet, data over the last 10 years has shown that EDs also highly co-occur with autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In particular, autism and ADHD have historically been overlooked in existing ED literature. In nationally representative samples in the U.S., ADHD was found to be robustly associated with EDs, both in lifetime and across past 12-month analyses (10). In fact, one five-year prospective study found that girls with ADHD were nearly four-times more likely to develop EDs than peers without ADHD (11). Recent reports have highlighted that the prevalence of autism is significantly higher in those with EDs, compared to the general population (12–14). Studies also indicated the overlapping traits between autism and ED at clinical and potentially mechanistic levels (13, 15–17)For example, repeating patterns of behavior shared in autism and ADHD might be the bridge to disordered eating. Furthermore, studies have shown that greater severity of co-occuring ADHD symptoms correspond to higher rates of ED treatment discontinuation (18). The severity of ED symptoms may also be exacerbated by co-occurring autism (19) and GD (20).
While EDs have been historically posited to affect cisgender women (i.e. those whose gender aligns with their assigned sex at birth) more than cisgender men (21), such statements fall short in recognizing the needs of gender diverse individuals (i.e. those whose identified gender does not align with their assigned sex at birth). Indeed, recent research has raised concerns about the rising rates of EDs among gender diverse cohorts (22–24). These findings highlighting a high co-occurrence between EDs and gender diversity are further supported by recent work indicating significantly higher rates of EDs in gender non-binary youth (i.e. those whose gender identity is outside the male/female binary) compared to cisgender peers, with some studies estimating the prevalence rate of ED as high as 18% in transgender youth (22). The increased risk of EDs in gender diverse individuals is particularly multifactorial and complex; for example, ED behaviors may be associated with body dissatisfaction or serve to alter physical features to be more in line with an individual’s gender identity (23, 24).
To our knowledge, there is little research that uses large real-world data to evaluate trends in the diagnoses of co-occurring psychiatric conditions among gender diverse individuals with EDs during the COVID-19 pandemic, even as research has shown significant increases in the youth diagnosed with autism (25), ADHD (26), and gender dysphoria (GD) (27) in the U.S. Procuring descriptive data on trends in co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses in people with EDs represents a crucial first step towards developing targeted interventions to improve treatment outcomes in gender diverse individuals with EDs, especially in the post COVID-19 era. The present study seeks to use a multi-national real-time administrative claims database for over 118 million enrollees (private, public insurance) to evaluate changes in the prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses in people with EDs, with a focus on autism, ADHD, and GD. Such changes will be evaluated across timepoints prior to and following the COVID-19 Pandemic in order to assess its impact upon diagnostic trends among an U.S. Youth population.
Methods
Overview
The TriNetX databases are a federated multinational research network that captures de-identified real-time electronic health records from inpatient and outpatient settings, covering over 118 million people across 84 healthcare organizations (>90% U.S. based) (28). The data, while rich, lacks detailed geographic (i.e., patient zip codes and addresses) and institutional (i.e., provider and setting type) information for the purposes of safeguarding real-time protected health information. Detailed information on the TriNetX data’s privacy-preserving procedures for enriching clinical EHR data with closed claims and institutional mortality have been previously described (28). The TriNetX data uses privacy-preserving record linkage procedures to create a longitudinal EHR dataset that avoids counting individuals multiple times. Given the use of deidentified secondary data, our analysis was determined to be non-human subjects research from the IRB review at Carillon Clinic.
Population and variables
Our population comprised of individuals aged 5-26 years diagnosed with eating disorders (ICD-10-CM: F50). The predictor variable was pre- versus post-COVID-19 outbreak timing of ED diagnosis, using January 1, 2020 as the threshold separating the two time periods. Two cohorts were curated: (1) individuals receiving ED diagnoses at least twice [to improve the validity of ICD diagnoses (29)] between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, and (2) individuals receiving ED diagnoses at least twice between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. The outcome variable was the diagnosis of co-occurring psychiatric conditions from day 0 to day 365 following the index event (first ED diagnosis within the timeframe).
To focus on active psychiatric conditions that were present at the time of first ED diagnosis and later, we excluded prior outcome measures (aka. historical psychiatric diagnoses or conditions in remission) preceding the new ED diagnoses. Baseline covariates in the propensity score matching analysis included demographics (age, race and ethnicity, gender) and the diagnosis of co-occurring psychiatric conditions in the one year prior to the first ED diagnosis (i.e., autism, ADHD, GD, generalized anxiety disorder, mood disorders such as depression and bipolar disorder, substance use disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder). ICD-10-CM codes are detailed in the online supplement.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analyses were conducted using HIPAA-compliant analytical tools that are built into the TriNetX interface. Propensity scores have been employed to match people pre-pandemic (2017-2019) with similar individuals during the pandemic on sociodemographic (i.e., age, sex, ethnicity, race) and clinical characteristics (i.e., mood disorders, anxiety-spectrum disorders, substance use disorders) in an effort to mitigate confounding by indication (9, 30, 31). A full listing of variables used for propensity score estimation is shown in Table 1, where covariate balance is assessed via absolute standardized differences. We used the greedy nearest neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations. Adjusted multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses between the pre- and post-2020 cohorts.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of cohorts 1 year before index event.
The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and RECORD-PE (Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data Statement for Pharmacoepidemiology) guidelines were followed. The data in the manuscript was queried on January 8, 2024. We used 2-sided P values with a <.05 threshold for statistical significance.
Results
Univariate and descriptive analyses
Table 1 represents a total of 17,445 individuals with ED diagnoses in 2017-2019 and 31,113 individuals with ED diagnoses in 2020-2022 in this study. The mean age at the time of index (first) ED diagnosis was 13.9 years (Standard Deviation [SD]=4.9) in the 2017-2019 cohort and 15.3 years (SD=4.7) in the 2020-2022 cohort. 74.2% (n=12,951, 2017-2019) and 78.7% (n=24,481, 2020-2022) were female. Approximately 68% in both cohorts (n=11,839/17,445, 2017-2019 and n=20,989/31,113, 2020-2022 respectively) were White (Hispanic or non-Hispanic).
Overall, the diagnosis of co-occurring psychiatric conditions within the 365 days prior to an ED diagnosis was prevalent. Of the most common co-occurring conditions, over 40% in both cohorts (n=7,038/17,445, 2017-2019 and 14,307/31,113, 2020-2022) had diagnoses of mood disorders (i.e., major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder), and approximately 20% had diagnoses for generalized anxiety disorder (n=3,333/17,445, 2017-2019 and n=7,571/31,113, 2020-2022). The third most common disorder was ADHD, with 13.5% in the 2017-2019 cohort (n=2,352/31,113) and 14.6% in the 2020-2022 cohort (n=4,551/31,113). Autism was also relatively common, with over 8% for both cohorts (n=1,514/17,445 in the 2017-2019 cohort and n=2,514/31,113 in the 2020-2022 cohort).
While 1.9% of individuals with EDs received a diagnosis of GD in the 2017-2019 cohort (n=329/17,445), this figure was almost doubled in the 2020-2022 cohort (3.2%; n=989/31,113). Substance use disorder diagnoses increased from 5.4% (n=946/17,445) in the 2017-2019 cohort to 7.4% (n=2,298/31,113) in the 2020-2022 cohort, with cannabis use disorder being the most common substance use disorder (3.4%, n=599/17,445 and 4.4%, 1375/31,113, respectively). Only about 1% of the sample had co-occurring alcohol use disorder (1.3%, 224/17,445 in the 2017-2020 cohort; 1.5%, 474/31,113, in the 2020-2022 cohort). Whereas 1.4% (246/17,445) of the 2017-2019 cohort had diagnoses of nicotine use disorders, this figure was 2.6% (813/31,113) in the 2020-2022 cohort.
Multivariable analyses
After propensity score matching, 17,202 individuals with EDs in the 2017-2019 cohort were matched to peers with the same demographic and psychiatric diagnostic profile as peers in the 2020-2022 cohort. With an absolute standardized differences threshold of 0.1 indicating covariate balance between groups (32), Table 2 shows that after matching, the 2020-2022 cohort exhibited significantly elevated rates of autism, ADHD, and GD compared to peers in the 2017-2019 cohort. Specifically, individuals with EDs in the 2020-2022 cohort showed a 36% (aOR=1.36[1.07-1.74]) increased odds of having new diagnoses of GD in the 365 days following their first EDs diagnosis. Likewise, individuals in the 2020-2022 cohort showed a 19% (aOR=1.19[1.07-1.33]) and 25% (aOR=1.25[1.04-1.49]) increase in odds of ADHD and autism diagnoses in the 365 days following the index EDs diagnosis, compared to peers in the 2017-2019 cohort.
Table 2. Comparison of Co-occurring Psychiatric Conditions365 days following the index diagnoses with 365-day washout (2020-2022 vs. 2017-2019).
Discussion
This analysis uses multinational real-world data to characterize trends in the prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric conditions in children, adolescents, and young adults with EDs. Prior research has suggested that rates of autism, ADHD, and GD diagnoses are rising across general U.S. population since the onset of COVID-19. While autism, ADHD, and GD are thought to be particularly prevalent in those with EDs, there is little research examining related diagnostic trends since the start of the pandemic. We thus identified matched counterparts between individuals with EDs in 2017-2019 and those in 2020-2022 with regard to similarities in psychiatric diagnostic profiles prior to receiving an ED diagnosis. Overall, our results suggest that rates of autism, ADHD, and GD are significantly higher in children, adolescents, and young adults with ED diagnoses in the pandemic 2020-2022 cohort compared to those in the pre-pandemic 2017-2019 cohort. Such findings remain consistent even after controlling for baseline levels of psychiatric diagnoses.
Reasons underlying these findings are likely to be complex and therefore warrant further dedicated investigation. For example, social distancing restrictions reduced healthcare access for many people with EDs, and many individuals experienced a significant worsening of ED, mood, and anxiety symptoms during the pandemic (33, 34). Yet, this data suggests that children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with autism, ADHD, and GD may have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. It is well known that the lockdown and home isolation contributed to major changes in the lifestyles of youth and their parents, with marked changes to daily routines, complicated by limited physical space (35), and challenges with returning to in-person schooling after extended time at home, all of which may have contributed to increased identification of autistic traits among those who were previously undiagnosed. For children who already had an autism diagnosis, the pandemic caused disruptions to therapy and education (36), as well as to support networks for caregivers (35). Likewise, for those with undiagnosed ADHD, COVID-19 often led to significant challenges in online learning, motivation, decreased access to physical activity and social outlets, and worsening externalizing behaviors, all of which may have contributed to an uptick in diagnosis (37). Furthermore, the COVID-19 crisis contributed to decreased (38) and interrupted access to gender affirming care (39) for transgender and gender diverse individuals, as well as reduced access to in-person gender affirming spaces such as school- and community-based support and advocacy groups. Gender diverse youth in unsupportive home environments may have experienced more identity-related stress and familial conflict, while those in supportive home environments may have had increased opportunities to explore and consolidate their gender identity, leading to increased recognition of the need for gender affirming medical care. Finally, social media use (i.e., TikTok) may also be playing a role in such trends, leading to more awareness of autism and ADHD, as well as higher visibility of gender diverse populations, as adolescents and young adults seek mutual support online during social distancing and lockdown (40–42).
Our work adds unique value to the existing research in several ways. First, our study covers a wide age range with samples from children and adolescents to young adults. Prior work in this area has mostly examined narrower age ranges, and there is a concerning lack of data on ED dynamics across the life span (43). While it is helpful to evaluate ED prevalence across developmental stages separately, it can be extremely informative to build a more holistic understanding of the overarching trends across psychosocial development. Such a granular approach allows for the identification of diagnostic patterns and capturing risk trajectories. Second, our study is strengthened by its attention to gender diverse youth. The association between GD and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as autism and ADHD, has been a topic of interest, along with the possible stigma such co-occurrence incurs for gender diverse individuals. NDDs have been found to be higher in transgender and gender diverse individuals compared to their cisgender peers (25, 44). We thus hope to draw attention to an emerging public health struggle as many states fail to meet the needs of gender diverse individuals, especially in the presence of co-occurring NDDs and EDs among this population. While NDDs and GD may precede the diagnosis of ED, our study captures the increasing emergence of novel autism, ADHD, and GD diagnoses among individuals seeking ED treatment during the COVID pandemic. This suggests the presence of specific populations for whom changes in eating behaviors may be signs of undiagnosed NDDs or GD. Future work is encouraged to consider the different subjective experiences and clinical presentations of NDDs and EDs for gender diverse individuals. For example, gender diverse individuals may exhibit disordered eating behaviors to alter their gender expression (e.g., eating more to increase/decrease curves or look more feminine/masculine). Gender-diverse individuals with NDDs may face greater challenges when seeking gender affirming care, such as the threat of clinicians erroneously attributing gender diversity to a manifestation of NDDs rather than GD due to lack of awareness, training, and experience delivering gender affirming care for youth with NDDs (45). Both clinicians and researchers are urged to increase their awareness of the heterogeneous clinical presentations and diverse clinical needs, especially for patients ranging from children to young adults. The presence of EDs and NDDs in gender diverse people should not preclude access to medically necessary gender affirming care.
There are several important limitations to consider. First, we cannot rule out misclassification bias in the analyses of administrative data. While we infer that the first episode of treatment marked by an ED diagnosis represents the first ED diagnosis, it is plausible that patients may have received diagnoses earlier in time but were not captured in the database. To avoid further misclassification, we did not separate the subtypes of ED. Thus, the current study might not be best fitting to elucidate the heterogeneity of ED presentations. Similarly, the diagnoses of autism and ADHD may be at risk of misclassification in the presence of depression and anxiety (46, 47). Second, the TriNetX data only permits retrospective analyses of an observational cohort, limiting our ability to infer causation. Further, the TriNetX dataset lacks refinement capabilities due to its built-in interface, intended to protect protected health information. For instance, whereas studies have found that many patients with EDs struggled with a heightened burden of posttraumatic symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to their peers (48), detailed data on psychological vulnerabilities cannot be measured via an administrative dataset. Third, the individuals diagnosed with GD likely did not represent all the gender diverse people in this dataset. Fourth, despite our attempt to use multivariable adjustments, residual confounding is likely, and this data should be viewed as preliminary steps for in-depth future analyses. Fifth, while we are unable to restrict our data analysis to specific countries, >90% of the TriNetX data comes from the USA. We would still like to acknowledge the potentially heterogenous experience of COVID during the assessed period, given the differential public health policies and social norms by region or states. Further, our analyses may not capture data from racially minoritized communities who do not have access to the health care required for inclusion in an administrative dataset. Further, our analyses may not capture data from racially minoritized communities who do not have access to the health care required for inclusion in an administrative dataset. TriNetX only captures individuals seeking treatment and we also excluded those who had NDDs and GD before their ED diagnosis, as such, our findings may not be generalizable to those without access to care amid the myriad of barriers to healthcare access or a larger population. That said, the present study is strengthened by its unique ability to provide real-time population-level estimates.
Conclusions
In summary, this retrospective cohort study examined a large de-identified multinational database of real-time electronic health records. The present analysis represents one of the largest and most comprehensive studies of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses in individuals with EDs to date, depicting an elevated incidence of autism, ADHD, and GD in children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with ED in the pandemic era.
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: This administrative claim data is contracted with our institution for confidentiality. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Martha Tenzer mmtenzer@carilionclinic.org.
Author contributions
TB: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MJ: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. DM: Writing – review & editing. HX: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. KL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. KX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision. BL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WD: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. KX’s work was supported by K12 DA041449, P50 MH122351, and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Psychiatric Research Fellowship. BL was an APA/APA Foundation Public Psychiatry Fellow at the time of publication. MJ is supported in part by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Pilot Award for Early Career Investigators.
Acknowledgments
Patricia Cavazos-Rehg PhD and Laura Bierut MD of the NIDA K12 Program of Washington University for obtaining funding to support effort for personnel (KX). Mattie Tenzer from Carilion Clinic’s Health Analysis Research Team for technical support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the APA or APA Foundation. Mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1402312/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Information | We conducted propensity score-matched analyses that evaluate the risk of psychiatric diagnoses in the 365 days AFTER the index ED diagnosis. To accomplish this, people with EDs (above) and peers without EDs (below) are MATCHED with demographics and prior history of psychiatric diagnoses in the 365 days preceding the index date.
References
1. Straub L, Bateman BT, Vine S, Huybrechts KF. Prevalence of mental health diagnoses in commercially insured children and adolescents in the US before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e2314415. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14415
2. Meier K, van Hoeken D, Hoek HW. Review of the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the occurrence of eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatr Nov. (2022) 35:353–61. doi: 10.1097/Yco.0000000000000815
3. Lin BY, Moog D, Xie H, Ching-Fang SC, Wisteria D, Erin M, et al. The prevalence of eating disorders in children, adolescents, and young adults, 2017-2022: an analysis of real-time administrative data. Gen Psychiatry. (2024), e101584. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2024-101584
4. Momen NC, Plana-Ripoll O, Yilmaz Z, Thornton LM, McGrath JJ, Bulk CM, et al. Comorbidity between eating disorders and psychiatric disorders. Int J Eat Disorder. (2022) 55:505–17. doi: 10.1002/eat.23687
5. Herzog DB, Nussbaum KM, Marmor AK. Comorbidity and outcome in eating disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. (1996) 19:843–59. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70385-3
6. Lydecker JA, Grilo CM. Psychiatric comorbidity as predictor and moderator of binge-eating disorder treatment outcomes: an analysis of aggregated randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med Dec. (2022) 52:4085–93. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001045
7. McNamara N, Wakefield JRH, Cruwys T, Potter A, Jones BA, McDevitt S. The link between family identification, loneliness, and symptom severity in people with eating disorders. J Community Appl Soc. (2022) 32:949–62. doi: 10.1002/casp.2606
8. Hambleton A, Pepin G, Le A, Maloney D, National Eating Disorder Research Consortium, Toy S, et al. Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature. J Eat Disord. (2022) 10:132. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00654-2
9. Lin BY, Liu A, Xie H, Eddington S, Moog D, Xu KY. Co-occurring psychiatric disorders in young people with eating disorders: An multi-state and real-time analysis of real-world administrative data. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2024) 90:30–4. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.06.009
10. Ziobrowski H, Brewerton TD, Duncan AE. Associations between ADHD and eating disorders in relation to comorbid psychiatric disorders in a nationally representative sample. Psychiat Res. (2018) 260:53–9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.026
11. Biederman J, Ball SW, Monuteaux MC, Surman CB, Johnson JL, Zeitlin S. Are girls with ADHD at risk for eating disorders? Results from a controlled, five-year prospective study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. (2007) 28:302–7. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3180327917
12. Westwood H, Tchanturia K. Autism spectrum disorder in anorexia nervosa: an updated literature review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2017) 19:41. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0791-9
13. Carpita B, Muti D, Cremone IM, Fagiolini A, Dell’Osso L. Eating disorders and autism spectrum: links and risks. CNS Spectrums. Jun. (2022) 27:272–80. doi: 10.1017/S1092852920002011
14. Dell’Osso L, Carpita B, Gesi C, Cremone IM, Corsi M, Massimetti E, et al. Subthreshold autism spectrum disorder in patients with eating disorders. Compr Psychiat. (2018) 81:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.11.007
15. Karjalainen L, Råstam M, Paulson-Karlsson G, Wentz E. Do autism spectrum disorder and anorexia nervosa have some eating disturbances in common? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2019) 28:69–78. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1188-y
16. Spek AA, van Rijnsoever W, van Laarhoven L, Kiep M. Eating problems in men and women with an autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. (2020) 50:1748–55. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03931-3
17. Adams KL, Mandy W, Catmur C, Bird G. Potential mechanisms underlying the association between feeding and eating disorders and autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2024) 162:105717. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105717
18. Testa G, Baenas I, Vintró-Alcaraz C, Granero R, Aguera Z, Sanchez I, et al. Does ADHD symptomatology influence treatment outcome and dropout risk in eating disorders? A longitudinal study. J Clin Med. (2020) 9. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072305
19. Boltri M, Sapuppo W. Anorexia nervosa and autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. (2021) 306:114271. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114271
20. Nagata JM, Ganson KT, Austin SB. Emerging trends in eating disorders among sexual and gender minorities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2020) 33:562–7. doi: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000645
21. Arikawa AY, Ross J, Wright L, Elmore M, Gonzalez AM, Wallace TC. Results of an online survey about food insecurity and eating disorder behaviors administered to a volunteer sample of self-described LGBTQ+ young adults aged 18 to 35 years. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. (2021) 121:1231–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.09.032
22. Coelho JS, Suen J, Clark BA, Marshall SK, Geller J, Lam PY. Eating disorder diagnoses and symptom presentation in transgender youth: a scoping review. Curr Psychiat Rep. (2019) 21:107. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1097-x
23. Jones BA, Haycraft E, Bouman WP, Brewin N, Claes L, Arcelus J. Risk factors for eating disorder psychopathology within the treatment seeking transgender population: the role of cross-sex hormone treatment. Eur Eat Disord Rev Mar. (2018) 26:120–8. doi: 10.1002/erv.2576
24. Jones BA, Haycraft E, Murjan S, Arcelus J. Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in trans people: A systematic review of the literature. Int Rev Psychiatr. (2016) 28:81–94. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1089217
25. Maenner MJ, Warren Z, Williams AR, Binder DA, Durkin MS, Esler A, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years — Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ. (2023) 72:1–14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1
26. Xu GF, Strathearn L, Liu BY, Yang BR, Bao W. Twenty-year trends in diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among US children and adolescents, 1997-2016. JAMA Netw Open. (2018) 1:e181471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1471
27. Sun CF, Xie H, Metsutnan V, Draeger JH, Lin Y, Hankey MS, et al. The mean age of gender dysphoria diagnosis is decreasing. Gen Psychiat. (2023) 36:e100972. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2022-100972
28. Palchuk MB, London JW, Perez-Rey D, Drebert ZJ, Winer-Jones JP, Thompson CN, et al. A global federated real-world data and analytics platform for research. JAMIA Open. (2023) 6:ooad035. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad035
29. Rector TS, Wickstrom SL, Shah M, Greeenlee NT, Rheault P, Rogowski J, et al. Specificity and sensitivity of claims-based algorithms for identifying members of Medicare+ Choice health plans that have chronic medical conditions. Health Serv Res. (2004) 39:1839–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00321.x
30. Guo JM, Li X, He JL, Ai M, Gan Y, Zhang Q, et al. A propensity score matching study: The prevalence of mental health problems among pregnant women at first antenatal care increased in Chongqing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1142461. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1142461
31. Overall NC, Howard C, Osborne D, PietroMonaco PR, Satherley N, Sibley CG. Applying propensity score matching to assess the impact of the pandemic on intimate relationships. Soc Pers Psychol. (2023) 17. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12747
32. Austin PC. Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Commun Stat-Simul C. (2009) 38:1228–34. doi: 10.1080/03610910902859574
33. Cooper M, Reilly EE, Siegel JA, Coniglio K, Sadeh-Sharvit S, Pisetsky EM, et al. Eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine: an overview of risks and recommendations for treatment and early intervention. Eat Disord Jan-Feb. (2022) 30:54–76. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2020.1790271
34. Devoe DJ, Han A, Anderson A, Katzman DK, Patten SB, Soumbasis A, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorders: A systematic review. Int J Eat Disorder. Jan. (2023) 56:5–25. doi: 10.1002/eat.23704
35. Tokatly Latzer I, Leitner Y, Karnieli-Miller O. Core experiences of parents of children with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Autism. May. (2021) 25:1047–59. doi: 10.1177/1362361320984317
36. Genova HM, Arora A, Botticello AL. Effects of school closures resulting from COVID-19 in autistic and neurotypical children. Front Educ. (2021) 6:761485. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.761485
37. Sibley MH, Ortiz M, Gaias LM, Reyes R, Joshi M, Alexander D, et al. Top problems of adolescents and young adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Psychiatr Res Apr. (2021) 136:190–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.009
38. Jarrett BA, Peitzmeier SM, Restar A, Adamson T, Howell S, Baral S, et al. Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: A multi-national, cross-sectional study of transgender and nonbinary people. PloS One. (2021) 16:e0254215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254215
39. Kidd JD, Jackman KB, Barucco R, Dworkin JD, Doleful C, Naval TV, et al. Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of transgender and gender nonbinary individuals engaged in a longitudinal cohort study. J Homosex. (2021) 68:592–611. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1868185
40. Alper M, Rauchberg JS, Simpson E, Guberman J, Feinberg S. TikTok as algorithmically mediated biographical illumination: Autism, self-discovery, and platformed diagnosis on #autisktok. New Media Soc. (2023). doi: 10.1177/14614448231193091
41. MacKinnon KR, Kia H, Lacombe-Duncan A. Examining tikTok’s potential for community-engaged digital knowledge mobilization with equity-seeking groups. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e30315. doi: 10.2196/30315
42. Yeung A, Ng E, Abi-Jaoude E. TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A cross-sectional study of social media content quality. Can J Psychiat. Dec. (2022) 67:899–906. doi: 10.1177/07067437221082854
43. Ward ZJ, Rodriguez P, Wright DR, Austin SB, Long MW. Estimation of eating disorders prevalence by age and associations with mortality in a simulated nationally representative US cohort. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e1912925. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12925
44. Warrier V, Greenberg DM, Weir E, Buckingham C, Smith P, Lai M, et al. Elevated rates of autism, other neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diagnoses, and autistic traits in transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:3959. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17794-1
45. Hadland SE, Solomon ED, Guss CE. Affirming care for autism and gender diversity. Pediatrics. (2023) 152:e2023061813. doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061813
46. Fusar-Poli L, Brondino N, Politi P, Aguglia E. Missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses of adults with autism spectrum disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2022) 272:187–98. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01189-w
47. Kentrou V, Livingston LA, Grove R, Hoekstra RA, Begeer S. Perceived misdiagnosis of psychiatric conditions in autistic adults. eClinicalMedicine. (2024) 71. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102586
48. Meneguzzo P, Sala A, Merlino L, Ceccato E, Santonastaso P. One year of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with eating disorders, healthy sisters, and community women: evidence of psychological vulnerabilities. Eating Weight Disord - Stud Anorexia Bulimia Obes. (2022) 27:3429–38. doi: 10.1007/s40519-022-01477-5
Keywords: eating disorder, autism, ADHD, gender dysphoria, children, adolescent and young adult, real-world data
Citation: Brown TR, Jansen MO, Zhou AN, Moog D, Xie H, Liebesny KV, Xu KY, Lin BY and Deng WY (2024) Co-occurring autism, ADHD, and gender dysphoria in children, adolescents, and young adults with eating disorders: an examination of pre- vs. post-COVID pandemic outbreak trends with real-time electronic health record data. Front. Psychiatry 15:1402312. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1402312
Received: 27 March 2024; Accepted: 25 July 2024;
Published: 20 August 2024.
Edited by:
Giorgio Di Lorenzo, University of Rome Tor Vergata, ItalyReviewed by:
Christian Popow, Medical University of Vienna, AustriaPaolo Meneguzzo, University of Padua, Italy
Elmira Ismaylova, Concordia University, Canada
Copyright © 2024 Brown, Jansen, Zhou, Moog, Xie, Liebesny, Xu, Lin and Deng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Binx Y. Lin, yezhe.lin@foxmail.com; Wisteria Y. Deng, wisteria.deng@yale.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship