Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 07 June 2024
Sec. Public Mental Health
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring Mental Health in Vulnerable Populations in Developing Countries View all 32 articles

The prevalence of PTSD and coping strategies among Palestinian mental health professionals during political violence and wartime

  • Faculty of Public Health, Al Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine

Background: In times of war, mental health professionals are at an increased risk of developing psychological problems, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The effects of conflicts or wars on mental health professionals in Palestine and their coping methods of dealing with these challenges remain unknown. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PTSD symptoms and strategies for coping among mental health professionals in Palestine, in light of the ongoing Gaza war and political violence.

Methods: The study utilized a cross-sectional research design. Self-reported questionnaires, including the PCL-5 and Brief COPE scales, were used to gather data. The relationship between the research variables and PTSD symptoms was investigated using frequencies, percentages, bivariate analysis, Pearson correlation, and Pearson’s chi-square test.

Results: A total of 514 participants were recruited, with an estimated prevalence of PTSD of 38.7%. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed that having a prior history of trauma and feeling disabled or unable to deal with your patients during the current Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence increases the likelihood of developing PTSD symptoms. In addition, using venting, self-blame, and behavioral disengagement as coping strategies increases the likelihood of developing symptoms of PTSD. Moreover, using acceptance and substance use as coping strategies reduces the risk of developing PTSD symptoms.

Conclusion: The findings revealed a high prevalence of PTSD symptoms among mental health professionals during wartime and political violence. As a result, mental health professionals need immediate assistance in enhancing their mental wellbeing through supervision, psychotherapy, and comprehensive and continuous training.

1 Background

War has a significant impact on the mental health of the civilian population (1, 2). War destroys communities and families, and it frequently stifles a country’s social and economic development. Furthermore, it has long-term consequences, causing physical and psychological harm to the population (1, 2). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 10% of people who experience traumatic events during armed conflicts will develop serious mental health problems such as depression and anxiety (3). A lack of qualified mental health professionals and inadequate mental health services make it difficult to implement specialized mental health programs tailored to the needs of victims during political conflicts and wars (4).

Mental health professionals are thought to be vulnerable to displaying symptoms resembling posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) through their patients’ stories, even if they were not directly exposed to their clients’ traumatic events (5, 6). This phenomenon, known as vicarious traumatization, can happen when mental health professionals are overly sympathetic to clients who have been through trauma (7). As a result, when faced with obstacles that directly contradict the demands of their profession, mental health professionals may lose their own internal sense of distinction between their personal and professional identities (810). Cohen et al. revealed that one-third of the therapists surveyed believed that disclosing a traumatic experience would be detrimental to the therapist. Furthermore, 20% of the therapists reported that the patients’ traumatic materials triggered painful memories from their own lives, which they found intrusive and difficult. Furthermore, 11% of therapists expressed feelings of helplessness, anxiety, and vulnerability (11).

PTSD is a stress-related syndrome that many people experience after being exposed to severe or potentially fatal traumatic events. It is caused by a psychological inability to cope with and recover from trauma and has both physical and mental consequences (12). There has been little research published on how political violence and war affect the mental health of mental health professionals, particularly in terms of PTSD. Conflict-related mental health research primarily focuses on the general public (13). Veronese and Pepe, for example, conducted a longitudinal study to look into the cumulative network of associations between trauma-related symptoms, professional burnout, and psychological distress among healthcare practitioners working in emergency settings in Gaza and the West Bank. The findings revealed that trauma-related symptoms had a direct relation to professional burnout and psychological distress. However, trauma-related symptoms were more strongly associated with professional burnout than psychological distress (14).

Coping mechanisms have been linked to a variety of mental illnesses, including PTSD (15), which are defined as attempting to avoid or mitigate risk, damage, and loss while also reducing anxiety associated with them. Coping mechanisms include “problem-focused” and “emotion-focused” coping strategies (1618). Recognizing effective coping techniques earlier in the traumatic event may be most important for preventing symptoms, whereas understanding these strategies for managing PTSD symptoms may be highly helpful in guiding treatment interventions (19).

Israel’s armed forces in Palestine have ruled over the West Bank and Gaza Strip since 1967. Four wars have broken out in the Gaza Strip in the last 13 years (20). On 7 October 2023, a new war between Israel and Palestine broke out in the Gaza Strip. Thousands of Palestinians have died or been injured (19). Furthermore, there has been a significant increase in Israeli military-related violence in the West Bank (21). Palestinians in the West Bank have suffered from psychological and social traumas in addition to physical traumas as a result of Israel’s border closure, military occupation, and the consequences, which include a collapsing economy, a lack of jobs, altered living conditions, a weak healthcare system, and a lack of hope for a better future (22). Social trauma is defined as incidents that involve severe rejection or humiliation and pose a significant social threat (23). Individuals may experience psychological distress as a result of forced migration, ethnic cleansing, genocide, mass killings, or military defeat (24). Social trauma occurs when the social system fails to fulfill its obligations, such as protecting, assisting, and showing compassion to those experiencing economic hardship, political instability, war, or poverty (25).

Palestine is facing a significant human resource shortage, particularly in the fields of psychiatry, psychology, social work, and mental health nursing. It is worth noting that there are only 38 licensed psychiatrists (26) and 17 nurses working in community mental health facilities for a population of 5.35 million Palestinians (27). Unfortunately, there is no official information available on the number of other mental health specialists, such as social workers, psychologists, counselors, and psychotherapists. According to unpublished data, 709 of them were officially licensed and registered with the Palestinian Ministry of Health (2003). Many psychologists, social workers, and counselors offer mental health services without having a graduate degree in psychotherapy. Despite these distressing incidents, little is known about how mental health professionals become vulnerable to mental illnesses during wartime when they should be caring for their patients and providing psychological and mental health services and interventions to victims and vulnerable individuals. According to Sharkansky et al., most research on the effects of coping during trauma is based on data collected months or years after the index event. This raises the question of whether current symptoms influence coping memory during stress (19). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of PTSD and coping mechanisms among Palestinian mental health professionals during the current Gaza war and political violence. It also sought to investigate the link between PTSD, sociodemographic and psychological factors, and coping strategies. Finally, it sought to examine the factors that influence the onset of PTSD symptoms.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and sampling

The study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey that ran from 22 December 2023 to 1 January 2024. It targeted all Palestinian mental health professionals currently working in Palestine during the ongoing Gaza war and political violence, including psychologists, counselors, social workers, psychiatrists, mental health nurses, and academics specializing in mental health at Palestinian universities. Participants were chosen using convenience and snowball sampling methods. Data were gathered using an anonymous online self-administered survey. Participants were asked to complete an electronic version of the questionnaire, designed using Google Forms. The study link was distributed to participants via a variety of channels, including social media, WhatsApp, emails, and therapy-related organization websites. This was done in response to the Israeli military’s closure and movement restrictions in the West Bank and Jerusalem. Furthermore, participants were asked to share the link with mental health practitioners throughout the country, and 514 from Jerusalem and the West Bank responded.

2.2 Tools and measures

The study used a self-reported questionnaire, which had the following three sections:

2.2.1 A sociodemographic and psychological history data sheet

It gathered data on the participants’ age, gender, marital status, employment status, education, place of residence, place of employment, years of experience, years of employment, and trauma and crisis training at their workplaces and educational institutions. Participants were also asked about psychological changes resulting from the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence compared to the pre-war period, as well as any previous traumatic events. Additionally, they were also questioned about the number of patients they treated during the first 2 months of the current Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence, as well as whether they felt incapable of caring for their patients during the current conflict. Furthermore, they were asked whether the current Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence had a negative impact on their psychological state. Finally, they were asked if they needed training in crisis intervention and treating victims of war and political violence.

2.2.2 Posttraumatic distress symptoms

This section included the PCL-5, a 20-item scale designed to assess PTSD symptoms using the DSM-5 PTSD symptom criteria. Respondents rate each item on a scale of 0 (“not at all”) to 4 (“extremely”) to indicate how much that specific symptom bothered them the previous month. The total score for the 20 items yields an overall symptom severity score (0–80). A PCL-5 cutoff score of 31 to 33 suggests the presence of likely PTSD in any sample (28). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.935.

2.2.3 Coping

This section included the Brief COPE scale, developed by Carver in 1997 (29), consisting of 28 questions. Both cognitive and behavioral coping strategies are included, and respondents indicate whether they have used a coping response on a four-point Likert scale (1 = I have not been doing this at all; 2 = I have been doing this a little bit; 3 = I have been doing this an average amount; 4 = I have been doing this a lot), with higher scores representing more coping strategies used by respondents. The Brief COPE scale assesses the following coping mechanisms: self-distraction, active coping, denial, substance abuse, emotional and instrumental support, behavioral disengagement, venting, positive reframing, planning, humor, acceptance, religion, and self-blame. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.854. The questionnaire was translated into Arabic and then translated back into English. To ensure the accuracy and understandability of the Arabic terminology, it was piloted by 20 mental health professionals and reviewed by five mental health experts.

2.3 Ethical approval and consent to participate

All research methods were carried out following the Helsinki Declaration. The Al Quds University Research Ethical Committee (Ref. No. 347/REC/2023) and the Palestinian Ministry of Health both approved the study. This online survey was intended to be anonymous. The survey started with written information about its purpose and intended use of the data. By completing the questionnaire, participants gave their informed consent to participate in the study.

2.4 Data analysis

The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). The descriptive analysis for all study variables is reported in the form of frequencies and percentages and chi-square test was performed. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between PTSD symptoms and coping strategies. Furthermore, a multivariate regression analysis was carried out, and the results were given as an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence range. The adjusted model included all potential study confounders as well as factors associated with PTSD. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered a significant association.

3 Results

In this study, 514 people answered the questionnaire. Table 1 shows that the majority of participants were women (67.9%), married (73.7%), and aged 30 to 50 (65.6%). The majority (60.1%) had a bachelor’s degree and were employed as psychologists or counselors (66.0%).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants.

Table 2 shows that 58.4% of participants had been working in mental health for at least 6 years. Furthermore, 70.4% of participants reported a worsening of their psychological state due to the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence compared to their pre-war state. Furthermore, 43.0% of participants reported treating patients affected by the current Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence during the first 2 months of the war, while 47.7% reported treating 1 to 15 patients in the first 2 months of the Gaza war. Furthermore, 31.5% reported feeling disabled or unable to care for their patients during the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence. Furthermore, 78.6% of participants said they needed crisis intervention training to treat victims of war and political violence, and the majority (89.5%) said the current Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence had a negative impact on their mental health.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Psychological status and history of the participants.

Table 3 shows that 38.7% of the sample met the clinical cutoff for PTSD (a score greater than 33), indicating that they are at high risk of receiving a clinical diagnosis of PTSD.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 The prevalence of PTSD symptoms.

3.1 Associations between respondent characteristics and psychological history and PTSD symptoms

The chi-square test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference in PTSD categories based on respondent characteristics and other variables. Table 4 shows that there were significant relationships between PTSD symptoms and age, number of years of experience in the mental health field, participants who reported that the current Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence had a negative impact on their psychological state, participants who stated that their psychological status was worse now as a result of the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence compared to the pre-war period, and participants who reported feeling disabled or unable to care for their patients during the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 Associations between respondent characteristics and psychological factors and PTSD symptoms.

3.2 Associations between coping strategies and PTSD

Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between PTSD symptoms and coping strategies. Table 5 reveals very weak positive correlations between PTSD symptoms and information support (r = 0.116, p = 0.008), planning (r = 0.150, p = 0.001), emotional support (r = 0.104, p = 0.018), humor (r = 0.112, p = 0.011), and self-distraction (r = 0.165, p ≤ 0.001). Moreover, the study found weak positive correlations between PTSD symptoms and venting (r = 0.278, p ≤ 0.001), self-blame (r = 0.302, p ≤ 0.001), denial (r = 0.249, p ≤ 0.001), and behavioral disengagement (r = 0.277, p ≤ 0.001). Finally, the results showed a very weak negative correlation between PTSD symptoms and acceptance (r = −0.089,p = 0.043).

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5 Associations between coping strategies and PTSD.

3.3 Multivariate logistic regression for determinants of PTSD

Table 6 shows the factors that may contribute to the development of PTSD symptoms. Participants who reported feeling disabled or unable to deal with their patients during the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence were nearly three times more likely to develop PTSD than those who did not report feeling this way (OR = 2.992, CI: 1.946–4.601, p = 0.001). Furthermore, participants who had experienced traumatic events before the Gaza war were significantly more likely to develop PTSD symptoms than those who had not (OR = 1.757, CI: 1.082–2.854, p = 0.023). Participants who used venting (OR = 1.461, CI: 1.242–1.719, p ≤ 0.001), self-blame (OR = 1.339, CI: 1.145–1.564, p ≤ 0.001), and behavioral disengagement (OR = 1.368, CI: 1.150–1.628, p ≤ 0.001) as coping mechanisms were more likely to develop PTSD symptoms compared to those who used other strategies. Finally, the utilization of acceptance (OR = 0.669, CI: 0.540–0.830, p = 0.003) and substance use (OR = 0.669, CI: 0.540–0.830, p < 0.001) as coping strategies was associated with a reduced likelihood of experiencing symptoms of PTSD.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6 Multivariate logistic regression for determinants of PTSD.

4 Discussion

The mental health of mental health professionals in Palestine is a pressing issue since they are responsible for providing long-term support to the Palestinian population. The current study found that more than one-third of Palestinian mental health professionals (38.7%) are at high risk of receiving a clinical diagnosis of PTSD. This finding is considered high when compared to other studies in the literature review. For example, the prevalence of PTSD among healthcare professionals ranged between 0% and 30% (30, 31), whereas it varied between 0% and 17% among mental health professionals (32, 33). Furthermore, a study in Botswana by Olashore et al. showed that 18.4% of mental health professionals experienced PTSD (34). Vicic and Motta found that the percentage of mental health professionals who experienced secondary trauma ranged between 23% and 27% (35). In addition, Jacobowitz reported that 9%–10% of mental health professionals had PTSD (36). Variations in prevalence between studies could be attributed to differences in methodology approaches, cultural influences on reporting, and transparency in scale questions answered (37). Furthermore, the severe and ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict, as well as recurring wars, may cause enormous suffering and significant harm to the mental health of Palestinian mental health workers. According to research, the prevalence of PTSD in conflict and war zones increased as the conflict lasted longer (38). Furthermore, it argues that the term “posttraumatic stress disorder” originated in Western culture and specifically refers to the traumatic experiences that soldiers face in combat. Their concerns are unlikely to originate from a sense of immediate physical threat or danger. However, flashbacks and nightmares feel very real to anyone who has experienced them; they maintain a sense of current threat, which is what maintains PTSD. In contrast, for a Palestinian whose home has been specifically targeted, the threat of another attack is real. As a result, the concept of a “post” phase may be inappropriate because the trauma is repeated, persistent, and ongoing (39). Therefore, further research is needed to assess the fundamental mechanisms and theories behind the emergence of mental health problems associated with persistent and long-lasting trauma in the Palestinian population (39).

Mental health professionals who exhibit PTSD symptoms have a higher rate of absenteeism, turnover, and ineffective treatment of patients (40). Furthermore, if PTSD symptoms are not treated, they may become emotionally detached, reducing their ability to provide responsive, empathetic, and caring support to clients. As a result, it is critical to consider the possibility that mental health professionals have PTSD and to provide them with psychological support and interventions at work.

The current study further found that prior exposure to traumatic events could predict the development of PTSD, which is consistent with previous studies (4143). According to Adams and Riggs’ research in the United States, 38.7% of psychologists had experienced personal trauma (44). A study by Breslau et al. revealed that repeated trauma exposure has more negative consequences than a single exposure (45). Emotional distress is experienced by mental health professionals immediately after a traumatic event and up to a year later (8) as a result of widespread poverty, hunger, harm, and economic and societal downturns, as well as emotions of loss, fear, anguish, and sadness (1, 46). Thabet et al. found that major depression and PTSD often coexist and can exacerbate each other’s symptoms (47). Lindsay’s study of Palestinian mental health professionals found that experiencing war as a victim or survivor increased stress and anger in mental health professionals, which contradicted their professional values (48).

Furthermore, the current study found that mental health professionals who felt incapable of caring for their patients as a result of the ongoing Gaza war and Israeli–Palestinian political violence were at a high risk of developing PTSD. This finding is consistent with previous research (9, 11, 49). Eidelson et al. reported that half of the therapists felt unprepared for their wartime jobs (46). According to Batten and Orsillo, some therapists believed their efficacy had declined, and many were tired of hearing about the same traumatic event repeatedly (49). On the other hand, Veronese et al. revealed that Palestinian mental health professionals experienced moderate psychological distress while maintaining a strong sense of coherence (50). However, the current level of violence is unprecedented in previous wars or periods of political violence, which may explain some of the study’s findings. This war may also have an impact on how mental health professionals perceive their own compromised competence. Furthermore, providing psychological interventions during large-scale traumatic events may cause distress among mental health workers (51). For example, following 9/11, the vast majority of aid workers in the United States stated that they felt helpless due to the challenges posed by the large number of people attempting to manage severe suffering (46).

In addition, the current study found that participants who used venting, self-blame, and behavioral disengagement as coping mechanisms were more likely to develop PTSD symptoms than those who used other coping strategies. Carver classified behavioral disengagement, venting, self-distraction, self-blame, and substance abuse as maladaptive strategies (52). Similarly, other studies showed that people with PTSD frequently engage in ineffective coping strategies such as venting, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame (15, 50, 52). The use of these coping strategies causes increased stress responses (53). For example, Viana Machado et al. revealed that self-blame is strongly associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms because people who have strong feelings of responsibility and frequently engage in self-criticism may have a maladaptive coping strategy (50). Other researchers argue that because of their education and experience, health professionals may engage in a variety of maladaptive coping strategies to function for the benefit of others (54).

Moreover, in this study, participants who used acceptance and substance use as coping mechanisms were less likely to develop PTSD symptoms. One study found that using acceptance as a coping mechanism reduced PTSD symptoms, while alcohol increased stress responses (55). Woodward et al. found that those with higher levels of emotional nonacceptance experienced the most severe PTSD symptoms (55). Sinnott et al. showed that acceptance had the greatest potential for reducing PTSD by giving people a sense of control over their own lives (56). When confronted with situations over which they believe they have little control, people prefer to accept rather than intervene directly (57). Active acceptance allows a person to redirect their energy away from a situation in which additional effort would be futile and instead focus it on other, more effective actions (58). Other studies have identified acceptance as a maladaptive coping mechanism. Kearns et al. showed that increased use of acceptance coping strategies was linked to a higher risk of developing severe PTSD symptoms. Acceptance strategies in stressful situations may indicate learned helplessness, leading to worsening PTSD symptoms (59). However, Sinnott’s research revealed no link between acceptance and PTSD symptoms (56).

Finally, the current study found that substance use increases the risk of developing PTSD symptoms. Other studies found a link between substance use and PTSD (60, 61). Individuals suffering from PTSD may turn to substance abuse to alleviate the recurring distressing memories and intrusive symptoms associated with the disorder, such as negative thoughts, flashbacks, or pain. This is related to the self-medication hypothesis because people use substances to alleviate the psychological stress caused by PTSD symptoms (62). While this coping mechanism may temporarily relieve trauma symptoms, it has the potential to result in long-term PTSD (63). Additionally, Chilcoat and Breslau found that people with PTSD are more likely to develop a substance use disorder (45). Roberts et al. (2016) proposed that, due to their education and experience, health professionals may engage in a variety of maladaptive coping strategies to function for the wellbeing of others (54).

This research had limitations. Convenience sampling and cross-sectional designs impose limitations on the capacity to establish causal relationships. Additionally, there is a possibility of reporting bias due to the utilization of a self-reported questionnaire. Given that recruitment was carried out via platforms such as Google Docs and WhatsApp, it is likely that mental health professionals currently employed in the affected area, including the Gaza Strip, do not have access to or the opportunity to make use of this technology. As a result, this circumstance may affect the sample’s representativeness. Notwithstanding these limitations, the present study’s results provide insight into the psychological wellbeing of mental health professionals residing in regions affected by conflict. This study makes a significant contribution to the existing literature by being the first to evaluate PTSD in mental health professionals from Palestine during periods of armed conflict and political violence.

4.1 Implications of the study

As a result, professionals must develop effective coping strategies early in their careers to reduce the risk of developing PTSD. Furthermore, mental health professionals with PTSD should learn these techniques to aid in their successful reintegration. However, teaching these skills to others is difficult. To fully internalize and demonstrate the acquired skills, the individual must actively engage in using these techniques and discussing personal experiences, as well as examples from other people’s lives (52). Thus, supervision may be required for mental health professionals who use immature defense mechanisms, especially when dealing with countertransference reactions. Furthermore, training sessions or seminars can help mental health practitioners understand their typical defense style and how it affects them and their ability to provide therapy (44).

To improve the competence and professional wellbeing of Palestinian mental health professionals, Palestinian universities, and mental health institutions should establish comprehensive and long-term courses and training programs. These initiatives seek to empower professionals while instilling a sense of autonomy and self-esteem. Furthermore, mental health professionals should receive psychological support, treatment, and supervision at the workplace to overcome their negative emotions. We need more research to understand how war and political violence affect healthcare workers on the job, particularly when they become victims rather than caregivers. More qualitative and quantitative research is required to fully understand coping strategies for dealing with traumatic events.

5 Conclusions

The study found that PTSD symptoms are common among Palestinian mental health professionals. Feeling disabled or unable to care for patients during a political conflict or war, as well as a history of trauma, increases the risk of developing PTSD symptoms. In addition, using venting, self-blame, and behavioral disengagement as coping mechanisms increases the likelihood of developing PTSD symptoms. Additionally, using acceptance and substance use as coping mechanisms reduces the risk of developing PTSD symptoms. Consequently, mental health professionals need immediate assistance in enhancing their mental wellbeing through supervision, psychotherapy, and comprehensive and continuous training.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Al Quds University Research Ethical Committee (Ref No: 347/REC/2023). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

MA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MAT: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review and editing. LF: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all Palestinian mental health professionals for their participation in the study and for Ahmad. A. Daqqa for his assistance in data analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Murthy RS, Lakshminarayana R. Mental health consequences of war: a brief review of research findings. World Psychiatry. (2006) 5:25–30.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

2. Musisi S, Kinyanda E. Long-term impact of war, civil war, and persecution in civilian populations-conflict and post-traumatic stress in african communities. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 11:20. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sayers J. The world health report 2001 — Mental health: new understanding, new hope. Bull World Health Organ. (2001). 79(11):1085.

Google Scholar

4. Morina N, Rushiti F, Salihu M, Ford JD. Psychopathology and wellbeing in civilian survivors of war seeking treatment: a follow up study. Clin Psychol Psychother. (2010) 17:79–86. doi: 10.1002/cpp.673

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Beck C. Secondary traumatic stress in nurses: Asystematic review. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. (2011) 25:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2010.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Chouliara Z, Hutchison C, Karatzias T. Vicarious traumatisation in practitioners who work with adult survivors of sexual violence and child sexual abuse: Literature review and directions for further research. Counselling Psychother Res. (2009) 9:47–56. doi: 10.1080/14733140802656479

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. McCann L, Pearlman L. Vicarious traumatization: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. J Traumatic Stress. (1990) 3:131–49. doi: 10.1007/BF00975140

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dekel R, Baum N. Intervention in a shared traumatic reality: A new challenge for social workers. Br J Soc Work - BRIT J Soc WORK. (2010) 40:1927–44. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp137

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tosone C, Nuttman-Shwartz O, Stephens T. Shared trauma: When the professional is personal. Clin Soc Work J. (2012) 40:231–9. doi: 10.1007/s10615-012-0395-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Tosone C, McTighe P, Bauwens J. Shared traumatic stress among social workers in the aftermath of hurricane katrina. Br J Soc Work. (2015) 45:1313–29. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct194

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Cohen E, Roer-Strier D, Menachem M, Fingher-Amitai S, Israeli N. “Common-fate”: Therapists’ benefits and perils in conducting child therapy following the shared traumatic reality of war. Clin Soc Work J. (2015) 43:77–88. doi: 10.1007/s10615–014-0499–9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, TX: American Psychiatric Association (2013).

Google Scholar

13. Volodymyr. V, Violetta. S. Impact of mental health on the academic productivity of university students during the war. Conference: grundlagen der modernen wissenschaftlichen forschung (2023). doi: 10.36074/logos-27.10.2023.66.u

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Veronese G, Pepe A. Psychological distress, professional burnout, and trauma in Palestinian health care helpers: A two-wave quantitative longitudinal study. Psychol Trauma. (2022) 14:523–34. doi: 10.1037/tra0000941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cofini V, Carbonelli A, Cecilia MR, Binkin N, Di Orio F. Post traumatic stress disorder and coping in a sample of adult survivors of the Italian earthquake. Psychiatry Res. (2015) 229:353–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health andSocial Behav. (1980) 21:219–39. doi: 10.2307/2136617

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1989) 56:267. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer (1984).

Google Scholar

19. Sharkansky EJ, King DW, King LA, Wolfe J, Erickson DJ, Stokes LR. Coping with Gulf War combat stress: Mediating and moderating effects. J Abnormal Psychol. (2000) 109:188–97. doi: 10.1037/0021–843X.109.2.188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Filiu JP. The twelve wars on gaza. J Palestine Stud Taylor Francis. (2014) 44:(1). doi: 10.1525/jps.2014.44.1.52

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. OCHA. reported impact since 7 October 2023 (2024). Available online at: https://www.ochaopt.org/.

Google Scholar

22. Farhat T, Ibrahim S, Abdul-Sater Z, Abu-Sittah G. Responding to the Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza: Damned if You do … Damned if You don't! Ann Glob Health. (2023) 89:53. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Hardarson JP, Gudmundsdottir B, Valdimarsdottir AG, Gudmundsdottir K, Tryggvadottir A, Thorarinsdottir K, et al. Appraisals of social trauma and their role in the development of post-traumatic stress disorder and social anxiety disorder. Behav Sci (Basel). (2023) 13:577. doi: 10.3390/bs13070577

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Volkan VD. ―Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: an aspect of large-group identity. Group Anal. (2001) 34:79–97. doi: 10.1177/05333160122077730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hernández de Tubert R. Social trauma: the pathogenic effects of untoward social conditions. Int Forum Psychoanalysis. (2006) 15:151–56. doi: 10.1080/08037060500526037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Palestinian Ministry of Health. State of Palestine Ministry of Health Child and Adolescent Mental Health, National Health Strategy 2023–2028 (2023). Available online at: https://site.moh.ps/Content/Books/7nV6BevAx3csVSIXvu8A4NaEzUDUxmGIPsowVjwZNidXaUJyomJe7c_7dHoHom7Mc8LrmKz6RGy9R6yCRNfdWQFtygtYZk5oVdTEiO1xo1L6.pdf.

Google Scholar

27. Marie M. Resilience of nurses who work in community mental health workplaces in West Bank- Palestine. Cardiff University (2015), UK.

Google Scholar

28. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, Palmieri PA, Marx BP, Schnurr PP. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) (2013). Available online at: www.ptsd.va.gov.

Google Scholar

29. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. (1997) 4:92–100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Sendler DJ, Rutkowska A, Makara-Studzinska M. How the exposure to trauma has hindered physicians’ capacity to heal: Prevalence of PTSD among healthcare workers. Eur J Psychiatry. (2016) 30:321–34.

Google Scholar

31. Mealer ML, Shelton A, Berg B, Rothbaum B, Moss M. Increased prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in critical care nurses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2007) 175:693–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200606-735OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Richter D, Berger K. Post-traumatic stress disorder following patient assaults among staff members of mental health hospitals: a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Psychiatry. (2006) 6:15. doi: 10.1186/1471–244X-6–15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Jacobowitz W. The rate of PTSD in hospital-based psychiatric healthcare workers: A descriptive cross-sectional design study. Ann Psychiatry Ment Health. (2015) 3:1039.

Google Scholar

34. Olashore AA, Akanni OO, Molebatsi K, Ogunjumo JA. Post-traumatic stress disorder among the staff of a mental health hospital: Prevalence and risk factors. South Afr J Psychiatry. (2018) 24:1222. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v24i0.1222

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Vicic R, Motta R. Variables associated with secondary traumatic stress among mental health professionals. Traumatology. (2017) 23:196–204. doi: 10.1037/trm0000065

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Jacobowitz W. PTSD in psychiatric nurses and other mental health providers: A review of the literature. Issues Ment Health nursing. (2013) 34:787–95. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2013.824053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Lauvrud C, Nonstad K, Palmstierna T. Occurrence of post traumatic stress symptoms and their relationship to professional quality of life (ProQoL) in nursing staff at a forensic psychiatric security unit: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2009) 7:31. doi: 10.1186/1477–7525-7–31

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Hoppen TH, Priebe S, Vetter I, Morina N. Global burden of post-traumatic stress disorder and major depression in countries affected by war between 1989 and 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health. (2021) 6:e006303. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021–006303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jabr S. What Palestinians experience goes beyond the PTSD label . Available online at: https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/what-palestinians-experience-goes-beyond-ptsd-label.

Google Scholar

40. Salmon G, Morehead A. Posttraumatic stress syndrome and implications for practice in critical care nurses. Crit Care Nurs Clinics North America. (2019) 31:517–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2019.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Cougle JR, Resnick H, Kilpatrick DG. Does prior exposure to interpersonal violence increase risk of PTSD following subsequent exposure? Behav Res Ther. (2009) 47:1012–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Delahanty DL, Raimonde AJ, Spoonster E, Cullado M. Injury severity, prior trauma history, urinary cortisol levels and acute PTSD in motor vehicle accident victims. J Anxiety Disord. (2003) 17:149–64. doi: 10.1016/S0887–6185(02)00185–8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Liu H, Petukhova MV, Sampson NA, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Andrade LH, et al. Association of DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder with traumatic experience type and history in the world health organization world mental health surveys. JAMA Psychiatry. (2017) 74:270–81. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3783

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Adams SA, Riggs SA. An exploratory study of vicarious trauma among therapist trainees. Training Educ Prof Psychol. (2008) 2:26–34. doi: 10.1037/1931-3918.2.1.26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Breslau N, Chilcoat HD, Kessler RC, Davis GC. Previous exposure to trauma and PTSD effects of subsequent trauma: results from the Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Am J Psychiatry. (1999) 56:902–7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.902

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Eidelson RJ, D’Alessio GR, Eidelson JI. The impact of September 11on psychologists. Prof Psychology: Res Pract. (2003) 34:144 – 50. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.2.144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Thebet AA, Abed Y, Vostanis P. Comorbidity of PTSD and depression among refugee children during war conflict. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Disciplines. (2004) 45:533–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00243.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Lindsay J. The impact of the 2nd IIntifada: an exploration of the experiences of Palestinian psychosocialcounselors and social workers. Illness Crisis Loss. (2007) 15:137–53. doi: 10.1177/105413730701500206

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Batten V, Orsillo M. Therapist reactions in the context of collective trauma. Behav Ther. (2002) 25:36–40.

Google Scholar

50. Viana MaChado A, Volchan E, Figueira I, Aguiar C, Xavier M, Souza GGL, et al. Association between habitual use of coping strategies and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample of college students: A Bayesian approach. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0228661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Veronese G, Pepe A. Sense of coherence mediates the effect of trauma on the social and emotional functioning of Palestinian health providers. Am J Orthopsychiatry. (2014) 84:597–606. doi: 10.1037/ort0000025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Rice VJ, Overby C, Boykin G, Jeter A, Villarreal J. How do I handle my life now? Coping and the post traumatic stress disorder checklist—Military version. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. (2014) 58:1252–6. doi: 10.1177/1541931214581261

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Nuttman-Shwartz O, Dekel R. Ways of coping and sense of belonging in the face of a continuous threat. J traumatic stress. (2009) 22:667–70. doi: 10.1002/jts.20463

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Roberts M, Caruso J, Toughill E, A. Sturm B. Coping, personality and post traumatic stress disorder in nurses affected by super storm sandy. Open J Nurs. (2016) 6:643–57. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2016.69068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Woodward E, Viana A, Trent E, Raines E, Zvolensky M, Storch E. Emotional nonacceptance, distraction coping and PTSD symptoms in a trauma-exposed adolescent inpatient sample. Cogn Ther Res. (2020). 44(2):412–9. doi: 10.1007/s10608–019-10065–4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Sinnott S, Park C, Huedo-Medina T. Cognitive coping reduces posttraumatic stress symptoms, especially in the context of self-blame. J Aggression Maltreatment Trauma. (2022) 31:1–20. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2022.2061879

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. David JP, Suls J. Coping efforts in daily life: Roleof Big Five traits and problem appraisals. J Per-sonality. (1999) 67:265–94.

Google Scholar

58. Nakamura Y, Orth U. Acceptance as a coping reaction: adaptive or not? Swiss J Psychol. (2005) 64:281–92. doi: 10.1024/1421–0185.64.4.281

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Kearns NT, Contractor AA, Weiss NH, Blumenthal H. Coping strategy utilization among posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity and substance use co-occurrence typologies: A latent class analysis. psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. (2021) 13:929–39. doi: 10.1037/tra0000964

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Gould F, Jones MT, Harvey PD, Reidy LJ, Hodgins G, Michopoulos V, et al. The relationship between substance use, prior trauma history, and risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder in the immediate aftermath of civilian trauma. J Psychiatr Res. (2021) 144:345–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.10.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Badour CL, Blonigen DM, Boden MT, Feldner MT, Bonn-Miller MO. A longitudinal test of the bi-directional relations between avoidance coping and PTSD severity during and after PTSD treatment. Behav Res Ther. (2012). 50(10):610–6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Mazer D, Haden SC. Posttraumatic stress symptoms, aggression, and substance use coping among young adults. J Aggression Maltreatment Trauma. (2014) 23:1020–37. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2014.964434

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Ullman S, Relyea M, Peter-Hagene L, Vasquez A. Trauma histories, substance use coping, PTSD, and problem substance use among sexual assault victims. Addictive behaviors. (2013) 38:2219–23. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: war, coping strategies, PTSD, mental health professionals, Palestine

Citation: Ahmead M, Abu Turki M and Fawadleh L (2024) The prevalence of PTSD and coping strategies among Palestinian mental health professionals during political violence and wartime. Front. Psychiatry 15:1396228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1396228

Received: 05 March 2024; Accepted: 30 April 2024;
Published: 07 June 2024.

Edited by:

Jacob Owusu Sarfo, University of Cape Coast, Ghana

Reviewed by:

Kevin T. Hansen, Lawson Health Research Institute, Canada
Aseel Hamid, University College London, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2024 Ahmead, Abu Turki and Fawadleh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Muna Ahmead, munaahmead@yahoo.com

These authors contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.