Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry, 28 May 2024
Sec. Anxiety and Stress Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic The Interplay of Stress, Health, and Well-being: Unraveling the Psychological and Physiological Processes - Volume II View all 7 articles

Exploring the concept and management strategies of caring stress among clinical nurses: a scoping review

Amir Hossein Goudarzian,&#x;Amir Hossein Goudarzian1,2†Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi&#x;Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi3†Hamid Sharif-Nia,&#x;Hamid Sharif-Nia4,5†Bahar FarhadiBahar Farhadi6Elham Navab*&#x;Elham Navab7*†
  • 1Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of nursing and midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • 3Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing and Basic Sciences, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 4Psychosomatic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • 5Department of Nursing, Amol Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • 6School of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran
  • 7Department of Critical Care and Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Objective: The concept of caring stress and its specific management has received less attention than other dimensions of stress in nurses. Therefore, to clarify the concept of caring stress, a scoping review study was designed. This scoping review aimed to investigate the concept of caring stress among clinical nurses and examine the strategies used for its management.

Methods: This review employed a scoping review methodology to comprehensively map the essential concepts and attributes of the phenomenon by drawing on a wide range of sources. International databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scientific Information Database (SID) were searched to gather relevant studies published until October 1, 2023. MESH terms included “caring stress”, “care”, “stress”, “nurse”, and “stress management” were used. Two reviewers independently collected data from full-text papers, ensuring that each paper underwent assessment by at least two reviewers.

Results: Out of 104,094 articles initially searched, 22 articles were included in this study. High workloads, transmitting the infection, stressful thoughts, stressful emotions, and stressful communications were the significant concepts and factors of caring stress among nurses. Also, rest breaks during patient care shifts, playing music in the ward, and denial of critical situations were examples of positive and negative coping and management ways to reduce caring stress.

Conclusion: Effective stress management strategies can lead to better patient care and safety. Stressed nurses are more likely to make errors or become less vigilant in their duties, impacting patient outcomes. By addressing caring stress, clinical practice can prioritize patient well-being. Further research is required to delve deeper into this critical issue concerning nurses in the future.

1 Introduction

Nursing is a stressful profession that can affect both the physical and mental health of nurses. This stress stems from dealing with difficult and emotionally challenging situations, such as caring for critically ill patients, managing family emotions, and heavy workloads (1). Stress impacts nursing performance, job satisfaction, and patient outcomes.

Nursing is a very stressful profession worldwide, with high rates of emotional, mental, and physical injury, and job dissatisfaction (2). Over 50% of nurses experience high stress levels at work, making it more stressful than other healthcare professions because of their direct involvement in patient care (3).

Stress can have serious effects on nurses, both physically and mentally. It can cause health issues like high blood pressure and depression, leading to absenteeism and reduced productivity (2). Research shows that stressed nurses are more likely to make mistakes and decrease patient satisfaction. It is crucial to address stress in nursing to improve patient care and nursing performance (4, 5).

The stress concepts discussed so far have covered all stressors in the nursing job environment including occupational stress, environmental stress, and mental or emotional stress (2). While occupational stress may stem from workload demands and administrative pressures, caring stress primarily emerges from the emotional toll of empathizing with patients’ suffering and witnessing their struggles firsthand (6). Unlike environmental stressors that may arise from the physical conditions of the workplace, caring stress manifests from the intense interpersonal dynamics inherent in nursing care.

Additionally, while mental or emotional stress can result from personal life challenges, caring stress is deeply rooted in the professional realm, often triggered by the ethical dilemmas, moral distress, and emotional fatigue that nurses encounter while providing patient care (7). Caring stress underscores the unique burden borne by nurses as they navigate the delicate balance between compassion and self-care in their demanding roles (8). However, the core principle of the nursing profession revolves around patient care, and the notion of caring stress specifically encompasses stressors related to this aspect.

Based on available databases, the prevalence of caregiver stress has not yet been assessed. Nurses often face caring stress for various reasons, such as direct interaction with patients and their families, managing multiple patients simultaneously, and dealing with the unstable conditions of hospitalized patients (9, 10). The persistence and chronicity of caring stress can lead to physical consequences, including increased blood pressure, cardiovascular diseases, and sleep disturbances, as well as psychological effects, such as depression and anxiety. Ultimately, it affects the nurse’s quality of life and the quality of patient care (11).

Nurses experience caring stress due to complex patient cases, ethical dilemmas, emotional and psychological burdens, rapid decision-making, and responsibility for patient outcomes. Stress is a constant presence in their daily work (12). Caring stress extends into communication challenges, the scope of practice, and the advocacy of patient rights, presenting an array of challenges that nurses navigate daily (13).

One of the best ways to prevent or mitigate the mentioned consequences is the management of caring stress in nurses (4, 14). Caring stress management is considered one of the methods to achieve happiness and job satisfaction in the social and professional context. It means that nurses, through better stress management and adherence to psychological health principles, create the best conditions for happiness and job satisfaction (15). The management of caring stress can be viewed (from a philosophical standpoint) as both an individual and social process situated within the societal value system. For example, in Aristotle’s philosophy, “happiness” is regarded as the ultimate goal of human life (16). In this sense, happiness includes satisfaction, joy, and a sense of both spiritual and physical well-being (17).

So, the management of caring stress is regarded as a pathway toward attaining happiness, job satisfaction, and overall social well-being. It means that nurses, through better stress management and adherence to psychological health principles, create the best conditions for increasing mental health and job satisfaction (10, 15). Therefore, from a philosophical perspective, the management of caring stress is considered a key concept and process in achieving happiness, job satisfaction, peace, and purpose in the lives of individuals (18).

In the realm of nursing, the concept of caring stress management signifies the adoption of strategies and approaches designed to mitigate and regulate professional stress within the nursing work environment (19). So far, several systematic reviews have been carried out on stress in nursing (2022). Most studies on nursing stress have focused on job stress related to factors like shift changes, high workload, and staff shortages. However, a universal source of stress for nurses worldwide is caring for patients. This type of stress, known as caring stress, involves the challenges and stressors nurses face while delivering direct patient care. Despite its importance, this aspect has not been thoroughly researched by scholars (23).

Furthermore, researchers have primarily focused on reviewing stress-reducing interventions for managing caring stress (24, 25). However, since most researchers have traditionally focused on occupational stress (20, 22), it is necessary to shift the approach and give more attention to caring stress, as well as exploring methods for managing it. This scoping review study will be the first to examine management aspects based on caring stress.

A scoping review method has been chosen as a rapid review approach (26) to expedite the synthesis of existing research evidence. Moreover, we have chosen to conduct a scoping review based on our initial investigations, which have revealed the considerable breadth of the subject area being studied. Therefore, a scoping review will aid in refining the pool of available studies by conducting a comprehensive and systematic literature search (26). This search will serve as a foundational resource for potential future systematic reviews, specifically tailored to address more precise inquiries, such as the prevalence of caring stress, its underlying reasons, and other aspects relevant to developing a comprehensive assessment scale for this concept among nurses.

The concept of caring stress and its specific management has received less attention compared to other dimensions of stress in nurses. Therefore, to clarify the concept of caring stress, a scoping review study was designed. This review study is essential for tackling the urgent issue of caring stress within the nursing profession. It has far-reaching implications for nurse well-being, patient care quality, and the sustainability of the nursing workforce. By summarizing the latest evidence-based practices and offering guidance for healthcare policies and leadership, this study can contribute to a more compassionate and effective healthcare system.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design

This review employed a scoping review methodology to comprehensively map the essential concepts and attributes of the phenomenon by drawing on a wide range of sources (27). The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, with further refinements made in accordance with the guidelines outlined by Peters, Godfrey (28). It also followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to ensure transparency and rigor in the reporting process (29).

2.2 Review question(s)

The primary goal and its associated subsidiary inquiries served as the guiding framework for this review. The fundamental objective of this scoping review was to aggregate and visually depict the findings reported in the global literature about caring stress and its management. Caring stress, operationally defined, represents a specific form of stress experienced by nurses in connection with their patient care duties (more concise than occupational stress).

The following are the sub-questions that constitute the specific objectives of this study:

● What are the aspects and reasons of caring stress in nurses?

● What are the aspects of caring stress management in nurses?

Moreover, the PICO format specified the population as nurses, the intervention as management strategies for dealing with caring stress, and the outcome as understanding the concept of caring stress and identifying effective management strategies for nurses.

2.3 Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched international databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Scientific Information Database (SID), to gather relevant studies published until October 1, 2023. MESH terms such as “caring stress,” “care,” “stress,” “nurse,” and “stress management,” were utilized with the use of ‘OR’ and ‘AND’ operators for evaluating the selected databases. Details regarding the search strategy are presented in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Searching procedure.

First, duplicate studies from the initial search were removed after selected studies were entered into the Endnote software. Two researchers with doctoral degrees (AHG and EN) obtained original articles and then carefully evaluated them for inclusion. Studies needed to meet the following criteria for inclusion: 1) use nursing population; 2) use caring stress concept or stress management in title or abstract; and 3) published in English and Farsi languages. Studies that 1) studied job, occupational, or environmental stress; 2) had an insufficient sample size (<50 participants) exception for pilot and qualitative studies [because of small power, but pilot and qualitative studies typically commence with smaller sample sizes (30)] 3) were unable to download the full text of the article; 4) were written in languages other than English or Farsi were excluded; and 5) systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Grey literatures (e.g., dissertations, conference proceedings, reports) were not searched. The phases of article selection were based on PRISMA guidelines (version 2020) and are shown in Figure 1 (31).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Prisma diagram.

2.4 Data extraction

Two reviewers conducted independent data collection from full-text papers, ensuring that each paper was assessed by at least two reviewers. The collected data was then compiled for reporting using a structured data extraction process. This extracted information included publication details, author information, research methods, study population, the main concept being investigated, contextual information, and the key findings.

3 Results

Out of a total of 104,094 articles initially searched, 22 articles were included in this study based on the defined criteria (6, 1214, 3249). Table 1 and Figure 1 provide detailed information on the stages of article search.

3.1 Characterizes of articles

Based on what is observable in Table 2, the studies were conducted in two main categories: cross-sectional and qualitative. The geographical distribution of the studies was diverse and comprehensive, with articles selected from Australia (n = 1), Brunei (n = 1), Brazil (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), China (n = 2), England (n = 1), France (n = 1), Iran (n = 4), Jordan (n = 1), Malaysia (n = 1), Poland (n = 1), South Korea (n = 1), South Africa (n = 1), Taiwan (n = 2), United States (n = 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Main information of articles about care stress of nurses.

The qualitative studies had sample sizes ranging from 8 (48) to 38 nurses (13), while the quantitative studies ranged from 75 (9) to 792 nurses (12). The age range of the nurses included in these studies was between 17 (12) and 66 years (46). Furthermore, all the studies used various tools to assess stress in nurses. Among these tools, the Nursing Stress Scale (33), Nurse Stress Checklist (12), and the Expanded Nursing Stress Scale (49) were more specialized for evaluating nurses’ stress.

3.2 High workloads

Based on the summary of studies, one of the most notable and commonplace stressors among nurses is workload. Multiple researchers (as indicated in Table 1) have pointed out factors such as “Time management in providing care” (3739, 46), “care coordination time” (13, 33, 40, 44), and “the participant cannot finish what is assigned to do in terms of nursing work” (6, 12, 41). These factors refer to the core concept of “High workloads.” High workload results from various reasons, including a shortage of nurses, a large number of patients, and a lack of medical equipment (such as face mask, and latex gloves) that could facilitate nursing tasks.

In a study, a researcher conveyed from participants, “It’s the staffing shortages and the skill mix shortages … people still keep coming in the doors, irrespective of what [the] workload is … There’s very little downtime for nursing staff anymore.…It’s fast paced activity. So that’s a major stressor.” (13). Or in another study a nurse revealed “…When the epidemic started, we didn’t have access to special gear for COVID-19 protection and had to care for the infected with minimum equipment, in regular masks and uniforms …” (14).

However, it’s important to highlight that a significant portion of the nurse’s workload is due to the multiple needs of patients and a large number of patients, which can be considered as caring stress (13, 37). When faced with excessive work pressure, nurses may struggle to perform their duties correctly, follow principles, and respond promptly to the patient’s needs (13). High workloads can lead to decreased motivation, reduced quality of work life, increased risk of nursing errors, and patient harm (44).

3.3 Transmitting the infection

One of the crucial and often overlooked aspects of nursing is the risk of disease transmission. Multiple researchers have pointed out factors such as the “risk of contracting HIV infection” (37), “infection protection” (6), “likelihood of transmission to the family” (14, 45), “unforeseen exposure to infectious droplets” (45), and “likelihood of getting infected” (45). The risk of contracting a disease is one of the most persistent stressors related to patient care. The risk of infection threatens the nurse and their family. In a study, a researcher conveyed from a nurse, “…I was really worried that I could be the source of infection to my 60-year-old parents …”

Despite of the precautionary measures (50), this factor is particularly stressful for nurses working in special care units and for patients with diseases such as HIV and HBV (37). The stress resulting from the fear of infection can lead to nurses avoiding close contact with patients, increasing the likelihood of errors in patient assessment and reducing the quality of care provided (14).

3.4 Stress-producing thoughts

Nurses experience situations at various intervals that deeply affect their emotions. “Death and dying” is one of the circumstances that nurses frequently experience as a form of caring stress in hospitals. Witnessing a patient’s death can lead to grief, sorrow, and even a sense of the illness affecting the nurse personally (33). It may also instill the thought that a similar fate could befall other patients, which can be a continuous source of stress for nurses (44). In a study, a researcher conveyed from a nurse, “Last 2 days, patient was alright. He could talk. And then suddenly he is dying. Yesterday, I talked to him he was very happy … Because I have many medical problems as well, I think maybe I can also be like that. I have to be aware, like today we are happy, we are still alive, I can do my work, and then tomorrow, I can change very fast” (44).

Another aspect of stressful thoughts is the lack of sufficient knowledge and awareness about a disease (14). A knowledge gap regarding a disease, its stages, and transmission methods can lead to stress among nurses and, ultimately, the potential for inadequate care delivery. Additionally, the fear of providing appropriate and quality care and making incorrect decisions related to patient care is another factor related to caring stress (49). Similar to other healthcare professionals, nurses, due to their high workload, are at risk of making errors in decision-making and prioritizing decisions related to the nursing process (14). However, under certain conditions, this risk can constantly occupy a nurse’s mind and lead to caring stress.

However, one of the challenging dimensions is the moral stressors in patient care (35, 47). Nurses consistently encounter a range of challenges that may exert ethical pressure on them. Ethical challenges such as Euthanasia, patient requests for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, conflicts between the patient’s care needs, the nurse’s desires, and the organization’s requirements are among the most significant ethical challenges that nurses encounter (47). Harvey and Tapp (35) conveyed from a nurse, “I almost begged the resident physician to stop the resuscitation; everyone wanted him to stop. Why is he not stopping this? Why are you making us do this? I don’t want to do this anymore because the patient is so clearly dead. In my career as an ICU nurse, I have learned that I want to respect you in life and in death”.

3.5 Stress-producing emotions

One of the significant issues that hospital staff, especially nurses, often face is patient violence towards healthcare providers (37, 48). This problem is particularly prevalent in emergency departments. These individuals are vulnerable to psychological and physical harm, making them susceptible to stress, especially in such situations. Some nurses may not be emotionally prepared to deal with these conditions in a hospital, and this lack of readiness can also increase the potential for stress among nurses (48).

Another aspect to consider is the nurse’s satisfaction in patient care (40). Nurses feel satisfied after providing care and witnessing the improvement in the patient’s condition. However, it’s possible that this situation could develop into a recurring pattern of obsessive thoughts for the nurse, ultimately resulting in caring stress (44). In a study, a researcher conveyed from a nurse, “Sometimes I feel sad because I can’t help all of them. Even though we have only 8 patients, I can’t see them for the whole day … I feel stressed when I can’t help them to fulfill their needs…. What I do is I just avoid her. I can’t help her. I’ve tried my best but I can help her much. It’s difficult” (44).

Also, being judged by the patient can create potential stress in the care process (47). A suitable therapeutic relationship, devoid of judgment, from the nurse to the patient and vice versa, can cultivate a positive, stress-free connection, thereby contributing to the patient’s well-being.

3.6 Stressful communications

Nurses engage in more direct interactions with patients in a hospital setting compared to other healthcare professionals (46), and these interactions can occasionally be stressful for the nurse due to a multitude of reasons (44). In emergency departments, where patient families are often present, sometimes in significant numbers, alongside the patient, it can be stressful for nurses and even lead to care disruptions (39). This is according to a nurse’s statement in a study, “Some relatives can be very fussy. ‘‘Oh, nurse, how is the situation? How about this one?’’ or ‘‘Nurse, why is it like that?’’ They call us and ask, ‘‘Why? Why? Why?’’ on everything! We explain to them but they are still not satisfied. They still can’t understand” (44).

It’s worth noting that patients who do not follow the nurse’s instructions and recommendations can also cause stress for the nurse. Non-compliance with nursing instructions by the patient can be perceived as a threat to the patient’s health, and the nurse, as the person responsible and accountable for the patient’s well-being, may view it as a threat (48). Therefore, this can lead to nurses experiencing caring stress. Schoombee, van der Merwe (48) said “sometimes, because when the patient doesn’t cooperate, you as a sister or a nurse know what the consequences could be when they don’t cooperate”.

Furthermore, interactions with patients in need of emergency care, such as those with extensive bleeding or cardiac resuscitation, can be highly stressful (39). Nurses unaware of the patient’s condition and status are more susceptible to stress than others (6). For example, a newly hired nurse or a nurse receiving a new patient may experience more stress than other situations.

It’s worth noting that the handover procedure has been identified as a stressor in the review of a study (13). This process, which occurs at the end of a work shift to transfer the patient to another nurse, is crucial because it involves the safe and effective transfer of patient care and their condition. However, it can sometimes lead to stress, especially in less experienced nurses, as it is a sensitive and vital aspect of patient care (51).

3.7 Other stressful events

Among other extracted factors, researchers have highlighted the role of a nurse’s experience level (38), the development of advanced equipment and devices in patient care (sometimes the use of these equipment can be challenging and stressful for nurses) (38), the nurse’s responsibilities and accountability (39), limitations impacting patient care in critical care units (such as complexity of cases, and emotional impact) (6), and inconsistencies in patient information and medical histories (45). These factors can all contribute to the stress experienced by nurses in their roles.

3.8 Caring stress management

Researchers have proposed multiple strategies for managing caring stress, as outlined in Table 2. These strategies include considering rest breaks during patient care shifts (13), playing music in the ward (13), providing education and enhancing therapeutic communication skills for nurses, personal and professional growth efforts, promoting a positive mindset at the end of a crisis or adverse event (14), improving problem-solving skills, seeking assistance from colleagues during stressful situations (37), embracing critical or stressful situations and working towards appropriate change (42), humor (47), using religion or spirituality to reduce stress, proper and effective use of medical devises to aid nursing activities (42), self-distraction (42), increasing encounters with patients who have recovered (which alleviates stress by observing a declining trend in the disease) (45), fostering optimism that the disease won’t transmit to the nurse (45), having self-confidence and belief in personal abilities, and enhancing social support (47). Additionally, strategies such as emotion suppression (37), denial of critical situations, substance use, and self-blame (42) were mentioned as negative coping mechanisms.

4 Discussion

According to the results of the present study, several factors can elevate the risk of caring stress among nurses.

4.1 Care workloads

Many previous studies have indicated that workload has a significant effect on caring stress (6, 13, 33, 37, 48). High workloads significantly impact nurses’ stress levels. The constant pressure to meet patient care demands, manage administrative tasks, and handle the emotional toll of nursing can lead to intense stress and strain.

This high stress can take a toll on both their physical and emotional well-being. Nurses often struggle to balance work and personal life, which further adds to their stress (37). Furthermore, nurses may find it challenging to maintain the same level of care, which can result in reduced quality of patient care and cause additional stress as they worry about patient outcomes (52).

High workloads are a primary factor contributing to nurse burnout, characterized by extreme stress, cynicism, and decreased job satisfaction. Burnout exacerbates the stress experienced by nurses, making it a critical concern for healthcare organizations (53). High workloads frequently lead to moral distress among nurses, as they are unable to deliver the planned care to their patients. This moral distress intensifies their stress and may erode their sense of purpose in the nursing profession (35).

The stress resulting from high workloads can have adverse health consequences for nurses, including sleep disturbances, an increased susceptibility to chronic illnesses, and mental health challenges. Therefore, addressing the stress of nurses due to high workloads is crucial for the well-being of healthcare professionals and directly affects the quality of patient care (54). Healthcare organizations must take proactive measures to mitigate these stressors, foster a supportive work environment, and prioritize the mental and physical well-being of their nursing staff.

4.2 Transmitting infections

Transmitting infections in a healthcare setting places immense stress on nurses. Previous research findings have confirmed that the fear of transmitting infections plays a significant role in contributing to caring stress among nurses (6, 14, 37). There were no contradictory results about the effect of fear of transmitting the infection. The fear of transmitting infections significantly impacts the caring stress experienced by nurses, manifesting in various ways within their professional and personal lives. This fear often stems from the inherent risk of exposure to infectious diseases in healthcare settings, especially during pandemics or outbreaks.

Constant vigilance to adhere to infection control protocols, including wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) and maintaining strict hygiene measures, adds layer of stress to their already demanding roles (55). Furthermore, the fear of unknowingly transmitting infections to vulnerable patients or loved ones outside of work can cause emotional strain and heightened anxiety among nurses. This fear affects their mental well-being and influences their decision-making processes and interactions with patients, potentially leading to burnout and decreased quality of care (6).

The constant fear of contracting or spreading infectious diseases creates a challenging work environment. Strict adherence to infection control measures, including wearing personal protective equipment and practicing rigorous hand hygiene, adds to the mental and physical burden (14). The emotional toll of witnessing patients’ suffering and the potential loss of life intensifies the stress. Isolation from patients and their families, combined with ethical dilemmas and heightened workloads, exacerbates the stress endured by nurses. Additionally, the personal risk nurses may pose to their families when returning home after caring for infectious patients adds to their anxiety (45).

To alleviate this stress, healthcare organizations should provide comprehensive support, including education and training, mental health resources, effective communication, and providing resources and personal protective equipment. It’s crucial to recognize and address the stressors nurses face in dealing with the transmission of infections and to prioritize their well-being in these challenging situations (56).

4.3 Stressful thoughts

Researchers have unveiled that the fear of patient death, encounters with patients having complex or rare medical conditions, and decisions related to patient care are significant factors contributing to the caring stress experienced by nurses (14, 33, 44, 47, 49).

The fear of patient death is a profound emotional source of caring stress for healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. Healthcare providers often develop strong emotional bonds with their patients, making the fear of losing a patient a highly distressing experience (49). The emotional attachment they form can foster empathy and compassion but also exposes them to the emotional toll of witnessing patient suffering and, in some cases, death. Patient deaths, especially when they are unexpected or perceived as premature, can trigger feelings of grief and loss among nurses.

The sadness, despair, and profound sense of emptiness accompanying such losses can accumulate over time. In settings where healthcare professionals encounter frequent deaths, this accumulation of grief can lead to a form of cumulative stress, known as “compassion fatigue” (57). Furthermore, when healthcare professionals are unable to prevent patient deaths or provide the level of care, they believe their patients deserve due to factors beyond their control, they may experience moral distress. Moral distress arises when one’s values and ethical principles are compromised, creating internal conflict and a sense of powerlessness. This internal struggle amplifies the emotional stress experienced by healthcare professionals.

Nurses often encounter patients with complex and rare medical conditions. When they lack sufficient knowledge and awareness about a specific disease, it can lead to feelings of insecurity and anxiety. They may experience fear of making mistakes or providing suboptimal care (14). The need to quickly acquire knowledge about an unfamiliar disease or condition can be overwhelming, especially when nurses are already dealing with a heavy workload. This added pressure can intensify their stress (58). On the other hand, ethical stressors frequently emerge when nurses are faced with challenging decisions concerning patient care. They may face situations where they should balance patient autonomy, beneficence, and justice, which can create moral dilemmas (59). Ethical conflicts can lead to moral distress when nurses feel unable to act in a way that aligns with their moral and ethical values. This distress can be emotionally draining and contribute to caring stress (35).

Healthcare organizations should recognize and validate the emotional challenges nurses face. Offering access to counseling services, debriefing sessions, and peer support can help nurses cope with their emotional stress (42). Ensuring manageable workloads and staffing levels can reduce the emotional burden on nurses. Adequate staffing allows nurses to focus on providing quality care rather than feeling overwhelmed by excessive responsibilities.

4.4 Stressful emotions

Another significant factor influencing caring stress, unanimously agreed upon by all researchers, is aggressive behavior from patients and the necessity to provide care without judgment (37, 47, 48). Aggressive behavior exhibited by patients, such as verbal outbursts, threats, physical aggression, or agitation, can create a challenging and often hostile work environment for nurses. These situations can be unpredictable and require immediate and effective responses. The safety of both the nurse and the patient is a significant concern when dealing with aggressive behavior (37).

Nurses may harbor concerns for their safety, as well as the safety of their colleagues and other patients. This constant fear can lead to high levels of stress. Coping with the aggression of patients can take a severe emotional toll on nurses. They may experience various emotions, including fear, frustration, anger, helplessness, and even sadness (60). These emotions can accumulate over time, contributing to caring stress. Nurses often require training in de-escalation techniques and conflict resolution to effectively manage aggressive patient behavior. Having the skills to defuse potentially volatile situations can help reduce the emotional impact of dealing with such behavior.

One of the core principles of nursing is to provide care without judgment. Nurses are ethically and professionally bound to treat all patients respectfully and without bias, regardless of their backgrounds, beliefs, or lifestyles (47). In healthcare, nurses encounter patients with diverse and complex medical histories. These histories may include substance use disorders, past criminal activity, or unconventional lifestyles. The need to withhold judgment while caring for such patients can be challenging. Balancing the commitment to non-judgmental care with personal values and beliefs can take an emotional toll on nurses. They may grapple with their own biases, prejudices, or discomfort when caring for patients whose lifestyles or choices they do not fully understand or agree with (61).

Training in de-escalation techniques and strategies for handling aggressive patient behavior can help nurses to reduce stress. Equip nurses with the skills to defuse tense situations and cope with the emotional impact of aggression. Encourage a non-judgmental and inclusive organizational culture that respects diversity and emphasizes providing care without bias (47). Ensure that nurses have access to support systems and resources, such as counseling services, peer support, and debriefing sessions, to help them manage the emotional challenges of their work (37).

4.5 Stressful communications

Distressing news to patients and their relatives, providing medical advice to patients, and encountering life-threatening situations are among the main stress-inducing communications that many researchers assert have a significant impact on the caring stress experienced by nurses (9, 13, 34, 36, 39).

Nursing often involves delivering difficult or distressing news to patients and their relatives. Discussions about terminal illnesses, end-of-life care decisions, or adverse treatment outcomes can be emotionally draining for nurses. They may absorb the emotional burden of these conversations, leading to feelings of sadness and empathy fatigue (39). Stressful interactions with patients or their relatives may arise from disagreements, misunderstandings, unrealistic expectations, or emotional distress. Nurses should often act as mediators, addressing conflicts and maintaining a calm and professional demeanor. This role can be challenging and contribute to their overall stress (62). Nurses are expected to provide care with empathy and compassion, yet they must also maintain professionalism. Balancing these aspects can be demanding, requiring them to show understanding and support while adhering to clinical guidelines and maintaining emotional detachment (63). This emotional labor can add to their stress.

Nurses often invest considerable time and effort in providing patients with medical advice and treatment plans. When patients do not comply with these recommendations, nurses may experience frustration and concern. They may fear non-compliance could lead to worsened health outcomes or complications (48). Educating patients about their conditions, treatment options, and the importance of following medical advice is a fundamental aspect of nursing care. However, nurses may encounter challenges in patient education, such as language barriers, low health literacy, or resistance to accepting the advice given (64). Nurses often develop a strong sense of responsibility for their patients’ well-being. When patients do not adhere to medical advice, nurses may worry about the potential negative consequences. This concern for patient outcomes can be a significant source of stress.

Life-threatening situations, such as cardiac arrests, respiratory distress, or trauma cases, require nurses to make rapid, critical decisions. The urgency and high-stakes nature of these situations can lead to acute stress. Nurses must act quickly and efficiently to provide life-saving care, leaving little time for reflection (39). Life-threatening situations often involve intense emotions, such as fear, anxiety, and the need to comfort distressed patients and their families. Nurses may absorb these emotions while striving to maintain a calm and reassuring presence. Coping with the emotional intensity of these situations can be emotionally exhausting (39). Nurses who are regularly exposed to traumatic events, such as unsuccessful resuscitation attempts, multiple patient deaths, or severe injuries, are at risk of developing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The emotional toll of witnessing life-threatening situations can lead to long-term psychological distress, further intensifying caring stress (65).

Communication and conflict resolution training can help nurses handle difficult conversations with patients and their families more effectively, reducing the emotional burden (42). Nurses should have access to debriefing sessions and emotional support services to help them process the stress and emotions related to challenging patient interactions and life-threatening situations (14). Healthcare organizations can develop patient education resources that are easily understandable, culturally sensitive, and designed to promote compliance with medical advice.

4.6 Cultural factors

Based on the findings, studies from a diverse range of countries were included. Cultural factors play a pivotal role in shaping the perceptions of caring stress and the coping mechanisms nurses utilize. One key aspect is the cultural definition and interpretation of caring stress itself. Cultural norms and expectations regarding work, family, and societal roles can profoundly influence how nurses perceive and label stressors in their professional and personal lives (66). For instance, in some cultures, there may be a strong emphasis on individual resilience and stoicism, leading nurses to downplay or internalize their stressors rather than seek external support.

Additionally, cultural beliefs about health, illness, and the role of healthcare professionals may impact how nurses perceive their caring stressors. Furthermore, cultural differences in communication styles and social support networks can influence the coping strategies adopted by nurses (46). Some cultures may prioritize seeking support from family and community networks, while others may prioritize seeking support from colleagues or formal mental health services. Moreover, cultural values related to hierarchy and authority within healthcare settings may affect nurses’ willingness to seek help or express vulnerability (36).

Another significant dimension in cultural factors is the presence of migrated nurses. The experiences of migrated nurses within the framework of cultural factors significantly influence the manifestation and management of caring stress in clinical settings (67). Cultural differences in caregiving norms, communication styles, and patient-provider interactions can exacerbate the challenges faced by migrated nurses, leading to heightened levels of caring stress. Migrated nurses may encounter unfamiliar cultural practices, language barriers, and differing patient expectations, which can contribute to feelings of uncertainty and frustration in their caregiving roles (68).

Additionally, acculturative stressors such as adapting to new work environments, navigating complex healthcare systems, and experiencing discrimination further compound caring stress among migrated nurses (67). Understanding and addressing these cultural dynamics are essential for implementing effective strategies to support migrated nurses in managing caring stress and promoting their overall well-being in diverse healthcare settings (69). Overall, by acknowledging and comprehending these cultural influences, healthcare organizations can enhance their support for nurses in managing stress and fostering their well-being.

4.7 Caring stress and COVID-19

The pandemic has exponentially increased the workload and complexity of care, leading to heightened physical, emotional, and psychological strain among nursing professionals. With limited resources, ever-changing protocols, and the constant fear of exposure to the virus, nurses have grappled with unprecedented challenges in delivering quality care while safeguarding their well-being (70). The continual exposure to suffering, loss, and trauma has contributed to a surge in compassion fatigue and burnout, further exacerbating the toll on their mental health. Despite these adversities, nurses have demonstrated unparalleled resilience, dedication, and compassion in the face of adversity, underscoring their invaluable role as frontline heroes in the battle against COVID-19 (71).

4.8 Limitations and strength

The scoping review may be limited to studies published in a specific language or from particular geographic regions. This could exclude valuable research from other linguistic or cultural contexts, leading to language bias. Scoping reviews may not systematically search gray literature sources, such as conference abstracts, theses, or government reports, which could contain relevant information. This could lead to a publication bias. Findings from this study may not be generalizable to all nursing contexts, as they are influenced by the specific studies included in the review. The diversity of healthcare settings, cultural factors, and nurse populations can limit the external validity of the findings.

It’s worth noting that there has been limited qualitative and quantitative research in nursing caring stress and its management. This is the first study that has focused solely on a review of care stressors. As more studies are conducted worldwide on this topic, it becomes possible to expand the evidence base and perform more in-depth reviews. This will help further our understanding of the specific stressors that nurses face and the most effective strategies for managing and mitigating those stressors in the healthcare setting.

4.9 Implications in clinical practice and policy changes

Effective stress management strategies can lead to better patient care and safety. Stressed nurses are more likely to make errors or become less vigilant in their duties, impacting patient outcomes. By addressing caring stress, clinical practice can prioritize patient well-being. Burnout is a significant concern among healthcare professionals, including nurses. High levels of caring stress contribute to burnout and can lead to staff turnover. Stress management techniques can help retain experienced nurses and reduce the costs associated with recruiting and training new staff.

Supporting nurses in managing caring stress is essential for patient care and effective for well-being of healthcare professionals. This can increase job satisfaction, mental health, and overall quality of life for nurses. Stress can impact team dynamics and communication within healthcare teams. By addressing caring stress and providing support, clinical practice can foster a more collaborative and supportive work environment, which is crucial for effective patient care.

Policy changes should advocate for the implementation of recognition and reward systems that acknowledge the efforts of clinical nurses in managing caring stress. Healthcare policies should encourage integrating technology solutions to support nurses in managing caring stress. This may include developing mobile applications for stress tracking and management, virtual support platforms, and telehealth services for accessing mental health support remotely.

According to the results, high workloads, fear of transmitting infections, stressful thoughts, emotional strain, and challenging communications emerged as the major concepts and factors contributing to stress among nurses. Also, some essential ways to manage and diminish stress were presented. Further research is needed to delve deeper into this important issue concerning nurses in the future.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

AG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AN: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HS: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EN: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer MP declared a shared affiliation with the authors to the handling editor at the time of review

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Internal Med. (2012) 172:1377–85. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Babapour A-R, Gahassab-Mozaffari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. Nurses’ job stress and its impact on quality of life and caring behaviors: a cross-sectional study. BMC nursing. (2022) 21:75. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00852-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Adriaenssens J, De Gucht V, Maes S. The impact of traumatic events on emergency room nurses: Findings from a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. (2012) 49:1411–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhang X-j, Song Y, Jiang T, Ding N, Shi T-y. Interventions to reduce burnout of physicians and nurses: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medicine. (2020) 99:e20992. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang M, Murphy B, Cabanilla A, Yidi C. Physical relaxation for occupational stress in healthcare workers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Occup Health. (2021) 63:e12243. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Huang Y, Yu L. Sources of care stress of nursing staff for patients with infectious diseases during the prevalence of covid-19: A case study of some regional teaching hospitals in southern Taiwan. Healthcare. (2021) 9:462. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Betke K, Basińska MA, Andruszkiewicz A. Sense of coherence and strategies for coping with stress among nurses. BMC nursing. (2021) 20:107. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00631-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Liu Y, Aungsuroch Y, Gunawan J, Zeng D. Job stress, psychological capital, perceived social support, and occupational burnout among hospital nurses. J Nurs Scholarship. (2021) 53:511–8. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12642

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cavalheiro AM, Moura Junior DF, Lopes AC. Stress in nurses working in intensive care units. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. (2008) 16:29–35. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692008000100005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Woo YW, Kim KH, Kim KS. Death anxiety and terminal care stress among nurses and the relationship to terminal care performance. Korean J Hospice Palliative Care. (2013) 16:33–41. doi: 10.14475/kjhpc.2013.16.1.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Singh C, Cross W, Munro I, Jackson D. Occupational stress facing nurse academics—A mixed-methods systematic review. J Clin Nursing. (2020) 29:720–35. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li Y-S, Liu C-F, Yu W-P, Mills MEC, Yang B-H. Caring behaviours and stress perception among student nurses in different nursing programmes: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Practice. (2020) 48:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102856

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Happell B, Dwyer T, Reid-Searl K, Burke KJ, Caperchione CM, Gaskin CJ. Nurses and stress: recognizing causes and seeking solutions. J Nurs Manag. (2013) 21:638–47. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Hosseini Moghaddam M, Mohebbi Z, Tehranineshat B. Stress management in nurses caring for COVID-19 patients: a qualitative content analysis. BMC Psychol. (2022) 10:124. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00834-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Green AA, Kinchen EV. The effects of mindfulness meditation on stress and burnout in nurses. J Holistic Nursing. (2021) 39:356–68. doi: 10.1177/08980101211015818

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rogers ME. An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia, USA: F A Davis Co; (1971). doi: 10.1097/00000446-197110000-00051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Grace PJ, Uveges MK. Nursing ethics and professional responsibility in advanced practice. Burlington, Massachusetts, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning (2022).

Google Scholar

18. Shalev AY. Stress management and debriefing: Historical concepts and present patterns. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press (2000).

Google Scholar

19. Yasmin H, Khalil S, Mazhar R. COVID 19: Stress management among students and its impact on their effective learning. Int Technol Educ J. (2020) 4:65–74.

Google Scholar

20. Mohammadi M, Vaisi-Raygani A, Jalali R, Salari N. Prevalence of job stress in nurses working in Iranian hospitals: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression study. J Health Saf at Work. (2020) 10:119–28.

Google Scholar

21. Salmon G, Morehead A. Posttraumatic stress syndrome and implications for practice in critical care nurses. Crit Care Nurs Clinics. (2019) 31:517–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2019.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Friganović A, Selič P, Ilić B. Stress and burnout syndrome and their associations with coping and job satisfaction in critical care nurses: a literature review. Psychiatria Danubina. (2019) 31:21–31.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

23. Jiaru J, Yanxue Z, Wennv H. Incidence of stress among emergency nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. (2023) 102:e31963. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031963

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chesak SS, Cutshall SM, Bowe CL, Montanari KM, Bhagra A. Stress management interventions for nurses: critical literature review. J Holistic Nursing. (2019) 37:288–95. doi: 10.1177/0898010119842693

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Perera CK, Pandey R, Srivastava AK. Role of religion and spirituality in stress management among nurses. psychol Stud. (2018) 63:187–99. doi: 10.1007/s12646-018-0454-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, Strifler L, Ghassemi M, Ivory J, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. (2015) 13:224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Pollock D, Davies EL, Peters MD, Tricco AC, Alexander L, McInerney P, et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. J Advanced Nursing. (2021) 77:2102–13. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H. Scoping reviews. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020). Available at: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL.

Google Scholar

29. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Internal Med. (2018) 169:467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. VanVoorhis CW, Morgan BL. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials quantitative Methods Psychol. (2007) 3:43–50. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Moola S, Ehlers VJ, Hattingh S. Critical care nurses' perceptions of stress and stress-related situations in the workplace. Curationis. (2008) 31:74–83. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v31i2.989

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hamaideh SH, Ammouri A. Comparing Jordanian nurses’ job stressors in stressful and non-stressful clinical areas. Contemp Nurse. (2011) 37:173–87. doi: 10.5172/conu.2011.37.2.173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Vahedian-Azimi A, Hajiesmaeili M, Kangasniemi M, Fornés-Vives J, Hunsucker RL, Rahimibashar F, et al. Effects of stress on critical care nurses: a national cross-sectional study. J Intensive Care Med. (2019) 34:311–22. doi: 10.1177/0885066617696853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Harvey G, Tapp DM. Exploring the meaning of critical incident stress experienced by intensive care unit nurses. Nurs Inquiry. (2020) 27:e12365. doi: 10.1111/nin.12365

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ibrahim MA, Isa KQ, Haji-Idris H-A, Nawi S-H, Teo YC, Abdul Rahman H, et al. Spiritual coping with stress among emergency and critical care nurses: A cross-sectional study. Community Ment Health J. (2020) 56:287–93. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00486-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pan C, Wang H, Chen M, Cai Y, Li P, Xiao C, et al. Stress and coping in nurses taking care of people living with HIV in Hunan, China: a descriptive qualitative study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2022) 18:303. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S341151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Vioulac C, Aubree C, Massy ZA, Untas A. Empathy and stress in nurses working in haemodialysis: a qualitative study. J Advanced Nursing. (2016) 72:1075–85. doi: 10.1111/jan.12899

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Callaghan P, Tak-Ying SA, Wyatt PA. Factors related to stress and coping among Chinese nurses in Hong Kong. J Advanced Nursing. (2000) 31:1518–27. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01434.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Okunogbe A, Meredith LS, Chang ET, Simon A, Stockdale SE, Rubenstein LV. Care coordination and provider stress in primary care management of high-risk patients. J Gen Internal Med. (2018) 33:65–71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4186-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Siqueira A, Teixeira ER, DAdOd C, Santiago FB, Kirby EEF, Neves LML. COVID-19 in oncology palliative care: psychological stress from the perspective of psychodynamics at work. Ann Palliative Med. (2021) 10:5260–9. doi: 10.21037/apm

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kowalczuk K, Shpakou A, Hermanowicz JM, Krajewska-Kułak E, Sobolewski M. Strategies for coping with stress used by nurses in Poland and Belarus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:867148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Shim JA, Jeong SY. Stress, COVID-19 related knowledge, attitude, and infection control performance of nurses at long-term care hospitals. Nurs Health Sci. (2023) 25:247–56. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Beng TS, Chin LE, Guan NC, Yee A, Wu C, Pathmawathi S, et al. The experiences of stress of palliative care providers in Malaysia: A thematic analysis. Am J Hospice Palliative Medicine®. (2015) 32:15–28. doi: 10.1177/1049909113503395

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Rouhbakhsh A, Badrfam R, Nejatisafa A-A, Soori M, Sharafi SE, Etesam F, et al. Health care Professionals' perception of stress during COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: a qualitative study. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 12:804637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.804637

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Garcia GPA, Marziale MHP. Satisfaction, stress and burnout of nurse managers and care nurses in Primary Health Care. Rev da Escola Enfermagem da USP. (2021) 55:1–8. doi: 10.1590/s1980-220x2019021503675

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Lipp AJ, Fothergill A. Nurses in abortion care: Identifying and managing stress. Contemp Nurse. (2009) 31:108–20. doi: 10.5172/conu.673.31.2.108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Schoombee JC, van der Merwe JM, Kruger L-M. The stress of caring: the manifestation of stress in the nurse-patient relationship. Soc Work/Maatskaplike Werk. (2005) 41:388–408. doi: 10.15270/41-4-318

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Hajiseyedrezaei SR, Alaee N, Zayeri F. Survey of Status Stress among Nurses that Working in Critical Care Units at Hospitals of Tehran City, 2019. Nurs Midwifery J. (2020) 18:1–10.

Google Scholar

50. Lim SH, Bouchoucha SL, Aloweni F. Evaluation of infection prevention and control preparedness in acute care nurses: Factors influencing adherence to standard precautions. Infection Dis Health. (2021) 26:132–8. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Bradley S, Mott S. Handover: faster and safer? Aust J Advanced Nursing. (2012) 30:23–32.

Google Scholar

52. Chang L-Y, Hsiu-Hui Y. The relationship between nursing workload, quality of care, and nursing payment in intensive care units. J Nurs Res. (2019) 27:1–9. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Diehl E, Rieger S, Letzel S, Schablon A, Nienhaus A, Escobar Pinzon LC, et al. The relationship between workload and burnout among nurses: The buffering role of personal, social and organisational resources. PloS One. (2021) 16:e0245798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Dall’Ora C, Ball J, Reinius M, Griffiths P. Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Hum Resour Health. (2020) 18:41. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Wang X, Jiang X, Huang Q, Wang H, Gurarie D, Ndeffo-Mbah M, et al. Risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers: a retrospective study of a nosocomial outbreak. Sleep Medicine: X. (2020) 2:100028. doi: 10.1016/j.sleepx.2020.100028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Natividad MJB, Aljohani KA, Roque MY, Gamboa HM. Feelings, stress, and coping of nurses amidst COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia. Sudan J Med Sci. (2021) 16:285–300. doi: 10.18502/sjms.v16i2.9295

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zheng R, Lee SF, Bloomer MJ. How nurses cope with patient death: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. J Clin Nursing. (2018) 27:e39–49. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13975

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Admi H, Moshe-Eilon Y, Sharon D, Mann M. Nursing students' stress and satisfaction in clinical practice along different stages: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. (2018) 68:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Jansen T-L, Hem MH, Dambolt LJ, Hanssen I. Moral distress in acute psychiatric nursing: Multifaceted dilemmas and demands. Nurs Ethics. (2020) 27:1315–26. doi: 10.1177/0969733019877526

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Pekurinen V, Välimäki M, Virtanen M, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J. Work stress and satisfaction with leadership among nurses encountering patient aggression in psychiatric care: a cross-sectional survey study. Administration Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. (2019) 46:368–79. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-00919-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Abdelhadi N, Drach-Zahavy A, Srulovici E. The nurse’s experience of decision-making processes in missed nursing care: A qualitative study. J Advanced Nursing. (2020) 76:2161–70. doi: 10.1111/jan.14387

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Yliluoma P, Palonen M. Telenurses’ experiences of interaction with patients and family members: nurse–caller interaction via telephone. Scandinavian J Caring Sci. (2020) 34:675–83. doi: 10.1111/scs.12770

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Yao X, Shao J, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang C, Lin Y. Does workplace violence, empathy, and communication influence occupational stress among mental health nurses? Int J Ment Health Nurs. (2021) 30:177–88. doi: 10.1111/inm.12770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Molina-Mula J, Gallo-Estrada J. Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Dighe SV. Occupational stress among nurses. Int J Sci Healthcare Res. (2020) 5:25–9.

Google Scholar

66. Uzun Ö, Sevinç S. The relationship between cultural sensitivity and perceived stress among nurses working with foreign patients. J Clin nursing. (2015) 24:3400–8. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12982

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Pung LX, Goh YS. Challenges faced by international nurses when migrating: an integrative literature review. Int Nurs Review. (2017) 64:146–65. doi: 10.1111/inr.12306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Majda A, Zalewska-Puchała J, Cholewa K, Bodys-Cupak I, Kamińska A. The impact of migration on polish nurses–pilot study. Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku/Nursing 21st Century. (2018) 17:5–11. doi: 10.2478/pielxxiw-2018-0009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Pressley C, Newton D, Garside J, Simkhada P, Simkhada B. Global migration and factors that support acculturation and retention of international nurses: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. (2022) 4:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Nashwan AJ, Abujaber AA, Villar RC, Nazarene A, Al-Jabry MM, Fradelos EC. Comparing the Impact of COVID-19 on Nurses' Turnover Intentions before and during the Pandemic in Qatar. J Pers Med. (2021) 11:1–10. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060456

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Nashwan AJ, Abujaber AA, Mohamed AS, Villar RC, Al-Jabry MM. Nurses' willingness to work with COVID-19 patients: The role of knowledge and attitude. Nurs Open. (2021) 8:695–701. doi: 10.1002/nop2.674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: care, stress, workload, nurse, emotions, mental health

Citation: Goudarzian AH, Nikbakht Nasrabadi A, Sharif-Nia H, Farhadi B and Navab E (2024) Exploring the concept and management strategies of caring stress among clinical nurses: a scoping review. Front. Psychiatry 15:1337938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1337938

Received: 13 November 2023; Accepted: 10 May 2024;
Published: 28 May 2024.

Edited by:

Edgar Galindo, University of Evora, Portugal

Reviewed by:

Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Maryam Sattarzadeh-Pashabeig, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Ananth Nazarene, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar

Copyright © 2024 Goudarzian, Nikbakht Nasrabadi, Sharif-Nia, Farhadi and Navab. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elham Navab, elhamnavab2@gmail.com

ORCID: Amir Hossein Goudarzian, orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-101X
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi, orcid.org/0000-0002-3970-4158
Hamid Sharif- Nia, orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-3710
Elham Navab, orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-5095

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.