Association between stress types and adolescent suicides: findings from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Survey

Objective: This study aims to explore the association between types of stress and suicidal behaviors—ideation and attempts—among Korean adolescents in two distinct years: 2015 and 2020.

Methods: Data were acquired from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey conducted in 2015 and 2020. Participants’ desire for suicide was evaluated by asking questions about suicidal ideation and attempts, during the past year. Types of stress were divided into five categories: none, home, school, academic achievement, and appearance. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the association between variables of interest and dependent variables.

Results: Among the 77,363 adolescents included in this study, 8.8% male and 13.2% female participants had seriously thought about committing suicide, and the rate of male and female participants who tried committing suicide was 1.6% and 2.5%, respectively. While every type of stress was highly associated with suicidal ideation, family and home types of stress had the highest odds ratio (OR), that was statistically significant for both sexes (Male: OR 3.81, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.81 to 5.15; Female: OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.42 to 5.50). Moreover, the OR increased in order of: appearance; academic achievement; school and friends; and family and home, compared to the group that perceived no stress. Suicidal attempts were statistically significant and higher in likelihood, only amongst the female group that experienced stress from family and home (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.67). In comparison to year 2015, suicidal ideation and attempts decreased in year 2020, but participants experiencing stress from family and home had a higher tendency of attempting suicide, though not statistically significant, regardless of their sex (Male: OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.44; Female: OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.4).

Conclusion: Adolescents who experience stress from family and home, or school and friends, are more likely to think about suicide, or carry it out, as compared to those having different causes of stress.

1 Introduction

Adolescence is a stage of life marked by crucial changes—physical, emotional, and behavioral development—that are highly influenced by the surrounding environment, at a particular point in time (1). Recent studies found that adolescence has been prolonged, due to early puberty and delayed timing of adulthood (2). Adolescence is a period when both physical and mental state transits, and there are many common and provisional mental illness that develop at this time such as depersonalization, body dysmorphic disorder, or anorexia. Owing to such chaotic adjustments that teenagers have to go through during adolescence, mental problems that may lead to suicide, have become a social issue in many countries (3, 4). A national representative survey of 10,123 adolescents aged 13 to 18 years conducted in the United States, reported a 31.9%, 19.1%, and 14.3% prevalence for anxiety, behavior, and mood disorders, respectively (5). The World Health Organization estimates that 62,000 adolescents died in 2016 as a result of self-harm, which is the third leading cause of death among those aged 15 to 19 years (6). Moreover, in the United States, the suicide rate among youth aged 10 to 24 years increased 56% between 2007 and 2017, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (7).

From Human Birth Theory by Massimo Fagioli, birth itself is equally healthy state for all individuals, and mental disorders develop exclusively due to postnatal experiences, especially relationship with others from birth to 1 year (8). According to this theory, individuals carry both vitality and annulment at birth. However, depending on the sufficiency of affection post-birth, vitality can be diminished and annulment drive is initiated. This drive is a non-conscious absence of affectivity, and this represents the main factor of mental illness developed later (9). Adolescence is a period of life when we realize and start to build identity of our own. Those who have let down the vitality from lack of caregivers’ affection and safe environment at newborn period may have easily triggered development of mental disorders in adolescence.

In addition to vulnerabilities caused by effects of physical and mental changes, most adolescents are challenged by adverse environmental factors—conflicts with parents, familial discord, academic stress, and school bullying. Previous studies have investigated the factors related to adolescents’ mental health with regard to specific stressors, such as peer rejection and victimization (10), conflicts with parents (11), parental discord (12), and academic failure (13). Stress coming from these sources, particularly from the surrounding environment, have a greater influence on youth than adults (14). Therefore, it is crucial for suicide prevention policies to include measures specifically targeted in coping with such stress factors that teenagers encounter.

Korea ranked first in suicide rates among the countries considered, with a 24.6% mortality rate per 100,000 persons, as per the 2019 update (15). Based on an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) report, suicide rates decreased in many countries, including Canada, Finland, and Switzerland, whereas suicide rates greatly increased in Korea during the 1990s to 2017 (16). According to the Korea National Statistical Office, the youth suicide rate increased from 7.7 per 100,000 persons in 2017 to 9.1 per 100,000 persons in 2018 (17). Among OECD member nations, Korea has the highest suicide rates; hence, there have been various studies on suicide, focusing on the different age groups that are prone to suicide (18–20).

Stress is a high potential trigger for adolescents to commit suicide. Given that Korea contributes to a large chunk of the world’s suicide rates, this study will divide stress into categories to identify which stress factor is the most influential. During the pandemic era, many students went through surrounding environmental changes, such as taking online classes and spending a majority of time at home. Thus, when using year 2020 data for analyzing stress of adolescents, comparative studies should be conducted, using previous years’ data. This study’s aim is to explore the association between types of stress and suicidal behaviors—ideation and attempts—in Korean adolescents during 2015 and 2020.

2 Method

2.1 Data

Data used in the study were obtained from the 2015 and 2020 editions of the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS)—a nationwide survey conducted annually to evaluate Korean adolescents’ health behavior status—established in 2005 by the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Participants of year 2015 and 2020 were included in the sample because the question about most affected stress type was asked in those two years. The surveys’ data are used to monitor and estimate the prevalence of diseases in relation to several health factors in the South Korean youth population (21–23).

2.2 Participants

A total of 122,991 adolescents, currently enrolled in Korea’s middle and high schools, responded to the survey. The sample includes adolescents aged 13 to 18, which correspond to middle and high school students in Korean curriculum. In 2015, 797 schools and 68,043 students participated in the survey, and 793 schools with 54,948 students participating in 2020. All schools involved in the survey are located in the 17 regional districts of Korea including metropolitan and rural areas. There were no variable available in the dataset where the schools are located, but students’ residential area was asked, and so we used that variable to set different regions per student. Students were not forced to answer the web-based questionnaire, but they were informed and given time to fill out during class period. Engagement rate was high, average of about 96%, and therefore including 122,991 participants before eliminating those who are not qualified for the study. After adjusting the variables of interest and dependent variables, 116,520 adolescents were included in the study. Those who chose “other than above,” as the answer to the question on type of perceived stress and instead wrote freely and descriptively about their stress, were excluded. After eliminating the missing variables and adding covariates, including confounding variables that could affect the main variables, 77,363 participants were finally included.

Institutional Review Board approval or participants’ informed consent were not required because this study used data from the KYRBS, a secondary dataset accessible to the public, that does not include private material.

2.3 Variables

The two dependent variables related to the concept of suicidal behavior were: suicidal ideation and attempts. The question asked was whether the participants had seriously considered committing suicide, and actually tried to kill themselves in the past year, for which, the response choices were either “yes” or “no.” As suicidal ideation and attempts differed in the severity of desire to commit suicide, two dependent variables were considered.

The main independent variable of interest, in this study, was the type of stress adolescents experienced. From among the seven different reasons for stress—caused by parents, household economy, teachers, friends, academic achievement, health issues, and appearance—based on their commonality of sources, four groups were created—stress coming from home, school, academic achievement, and appearance(self). Later, each of these seven types of stress inducers were analyzed based on the variables of interest through subgroup analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1 Suicide ideation and attempt by stress type stratified by sex.

Covariates, such as sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and health conditions of this study’s participants were controlled. The sociodemographic factors were school grade levels (middle and high school), sex, and self-reported school grades (high, average, and low). The socioeconomic factors were parents’ education levels (under middle school, high school, and university or higher), living region (metropolitan and rural areas), and perceived household income (low, average, and high). Health behaviors included smoking or drinking habits (current and previous), and implementation of physical activities (none, 1 to 4 days a week, and 5 to 7 days a week). Mental health condition was adjusted with feelings of hopelessness (yes, no), given that the dependent variable was suicidal behavior. Lastly, the year variable (2015 and 2020) was adjusted.

2.4 Statistical analysis

To confirm the association between the types of stress inducers and suicidal behaviors—ideation and attempts—the covariates were compared by performing a chi-squared test. Multi logistic regression analysis was carried out for the main analysis. The results were reported using odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs). The data were analyzed and further stratified by sex, using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc; Cary, North Caroline). A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3 Results

Table 1 shows the study population’s general characteristics. Of the 77,363 participants, 37,588 and 39,775 were male and female, respectively. The rate of participants who had seriously thought of committing suicide was noticeably higher in the female group than male group (13.2% versus 8.8%). From the groups with different types of stress, among those who had answered “yes” to suicidal ideation during the past 12 months, stress coming from family and home, or school and friends accounted for the highest rates in both the sexes (male: 15.2% and 13.7%, female: 25% and 20.4%). Nevertheless, in the academic achievement type of stress, the frequency was also the highest, regardless of sex (male: 21,639 out of 37,558, female: 25,094 out of 39,775). Among those who had tried committing suicide, the rate was 1.6% and 2.5% in male and female participants, respectively, and the same pattern (higher rate in female participants) was seen in suicidal ideation. The rate of participants who answered “yes” to suicidal attempts was markedly lower than ideation, but in the midst of the causes of stress, stress originating from family and home, or school and friends showed the highest rate. For ideation too, academic achievement had the most frequency as a stress inducer (male: 21,639 out of 37,588, female: 25,094 out of 39,775).

Table 1

Table 1 General characteristics of the study population.

Table 2 presents the results of logistic regression of factors associated with suicidal ideation and attempts, based on types of stress. With regard to suicidal ideation, every type of stress was highly associated with suicidal ideation and the family and home type of stress had the highest OR for both sexes (male: OR 3.81, 95% CI 2.81 to 5.15; female: OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.42 to 5.50). Moreover, the OR increased based on the order of appearance, academic achievement, school and friends, and family and home, as compared to the group that perceived no stress. Every type of stress was statistically significant and had a high OR in both male and female participants. Compared to the 2015 male participants, the 2020 ones were less likely to have suicidal ideation (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95). Conversely, only the female group that had to cope with stress from family and home, had suicidal attempts that were statistically significant with high ORs (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.67). Attempted suicide was slightly different from suicidal ideation, in that, it showed that stress induced by academic achievement was less likely to be related to suicide attempts, representing the lowest OR in both sexes (male: OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.69; female: OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.75). Further, the male group’s ORs were statistically significant, while having reduced likelihood. A finding similar to suicide ideation was that compared to the 2015 participants, the 2020 ones were less likely to attempt suicide in the male group (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92).

Table 2

Table 2 Results of factors associated with suicidal ideation and attempt by stress type.

Table 3 presents numerical values of the subgroup analysis, stratified by the independent variables. For male participants, in all the covariates, the highest OR was observed when the family and home type of stress was the cause for suicidal ideation, with reference to adolescents with no stress inducers. For female participants, except fathers and mothers’ education levels being under middle school, which had the highest OR in stress coming from school and friends, every other covariate had the highest likelihood of suicidal ideation when stress emanated from family and home. The same tendency was observed in suicidal attempts. In fact, parents’ education levels affect suicidal behavior, as seen in Table 3. Interestingly, the lower the parents’ education levels, the less likely children are to have suicidal ideation and attempts. Compared to the group that perceived no stress, the overall ORs were above 1.00 (reference) in the groups where parents’ education levels were college or above. This trend is seen in male and female groups in both suicidal ideation and attempts.

Table 3

Table 3 The results of subgroup analysis stratified by independent variables.

Table 4 is yet another independent subgroup analysis, focusing on the two years: 2015 and 2020, used in this study. Keeping 2015 as a reference, and by applying an interaction term between the years and the types of stress, the propensity of suicidal ideation and attempts were analyzed. In comparison to year 2015, both suicidal ideation and attempts decreased in year 2020. Nevertheless, only those whose stress came from parents or home had a higher tendency to attempt suicide, regardless of sex (male: OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.44; female: OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.4). Figure 1 depicts the results of subgroup analysis among the independent variables, stratified by the variable of interest, which was divided into smallest units, on the basis of all seven answer choices to the question on: Which type of stress did participants suffer from the most? By comparing the two dependent variables, as well as visualizing it into a figure, the difference in results is clearer: suicide ideation is affected more by the type of stress, and suicide attempt was profoundly less likely to occur in the female group, compared to high ORs in ideation.

Table 4

Table 4 Result of stress type in association with suicidal behavior by year.

4 Discussion

The present study used the group with no stress as a point of reference to investigate the types of stress experienced by adolescents and its association with suicidal behaviors, such as ideation and attempts. The findings revealed that suicidal ideation was significantly related to all types of stress—including family and home, school and friends, academic achievement—and manifested itself in both male and female participants. Whereas an increased likelihood of attempting suicide was seen only in the group whose stress emanated from family and home, as compared to the group that reported having no stress. Among the different types of stress, stress from family and home was also the highest in relation to suicidal attempts in the male group. Nevertheless, male participants who experienced stress mainly from academic achievements showed a decreased likelihood of committing suicide, and the results were statistically significant. A comparison of the two years, 2015 and 2020, revealed that in year 2020, the likelihood of suicidal ideation and attempts decreased for every stress cause, except stress from family and home.

Previous studies show a relationship between academic failure and suicidal behaviors in adolescents (24, 25). According to these studies, along with rapid industrialization and modernization come obstacles for social welfare, that are extremely challenging and demanding. They require the whole structural framework of education, including high school and the college entrance exams to be tempered, to ease the educational burden on students. In fact, this was not in alignment with this study, because Table 2 shows that for suicidal attempts, the male group who picked academic achievement as the biggest cause for their stress, had decreasing OR, which was statistically significant.

This study also found that adolescents whose parents’ education levels were below middle school had decreased ORs compared to those whose parents had graduated from college or achieved education above that level, as shown in Table 3. This could relate to the context stated above relating to students’ academic pressure. Parents with high educational levels would expect their children to pursue similar or relatively higher levels of education, as compared with parents who were less educated (26, 27). These related studies indicate that parents’ education, occupation, and family economic status influence children’s studies, and are one of the most important factors, besides school. Moreover, it is likely that parents who have high education levels tend to be more strict and in control, and may have more conflict with their children while growing up (28, 29). Furthermore, this study also found that male adolescents were more likely to attempt suicide through Figure 1. According to WHO, completed suicide was 4 times more in male than in female in 2014 regarding the adolescents in Ireland. Also, while male are more likely to complete suicide, attempts are more frequently made in female (30). Previous studies claim that male are less sensitive in recognizing their stress or depressive mood caused by stress and neglect. It is called gender paradox, and this is also combined with male adolescents consciously concerned about the expected masculinity male should carry (31).

Relating the results with the theory that was mentioned in the introduction, as Human Birth Theory explains, the absence of affection from a caregiver, usually a parent, at the early stages of child’s life could cause the start of pathological cycle of mental disease that range from personality disorder to severe mood diseases, or even psychotic illnesses (9). Therefore, for those who have deficiency in non-conscious affection have hard time building a healthy relationship not only with parents, but also other human beings. This describes the result of this study; compared to those who do not get much stress, those who have stress coming from family and home have the highest odds of having suicidal ideas in both male and female, and second highest were those who get most stress from school and friends. In the basis of lack of vitality, these students have trouble forming a relationship with others, and the particular phase, adolescence, is a stage when these annulment trait outbursts into psychological problems, causing mood disorders or even psychotic illnesses.

As per this study’s results, stress from family and home were the most influential causes of stress that prompted adolescents to consider and commit suicide. According to a previous study, parent-child conflicts appear to be a salient precipitating factor for children who show suicidal behavior. Moreover, among children who committed suicide, family conflicts, particularly, parent-child conflicts were the most commonly reported precipitants. Many studies have discovered that conflicts within the family are the most crucial factors for children resorting to suicidal behavior (32–34). Going back to the human birth theory, those who had trouble receiving affection at the newborn period are likely to have trouble receiving it at the adolescence. After the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019, because of its highly contagious characteristics, many countries implemented regulations, such as social distancing or lockdowns. Many students went through substantial environmental changes in their daily lives, such as taking classes online and spending most of their time at home. Therefore, school closures may have affected adolescents’ mental health (35). Spending most time at home could be fatal for those in child abuse or severe neglect of children. Hence, there should be targeted policies to prevent adolescent suicides and find ways to manage those who have trouble with their families or home settings, especially in the pandemic era, when staying home is inevitable owing to social distancing restrictions.

There are several therapeutic interventions in order to treat the pathological conditions that may lead to self-harm in adolescence. One of the best known psychotherapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy has base theory that unconscious thoughts influence human behavior (36). Psychodynamic psychotherapies include therapeutic methods such as analysis of dreams, resistance, defense mechanisms (37). This method is focused on the cooperation between the therapist and the patient working together in order to understand the unconscious world of the patient. On the other hand, dialectical behavior therapy(DBT) includes not only individual psychotherapy, but also family as team consultation with therapist. Moreover, DBT has specific clinical focus on emotional dysregulation, self-harm, and interpersonal difficulties (38). These therapeutic methods were scientifically proven to be effective through numerous studies and experiments. The treatment and prevention methods for suicidal behaviors during adolescence continue to evolve, and there are many other approaches other than those stated above as well. It is crucial to understand the factors contributing to the development of suicidal behaviors in young individuals, thus personalized methods can be applied.

4.1 Limitations

This study had a few limitations. First, given the cross-sectional design, we were unable to track adolescents with different types of stress by individuals, over a continuous time period. Second, because the survey comprised self-reporting, it might have had untruthful answers, especially for suicidal attempts. Nevertheless, there are multiple previous studies using the same data, which successfully produced results that are reliable (39, 40). This very data were used in various research that investigated the association between one another. Thirdly, the secondary data was obtained from KYRBS and not collected by the researchers. Therefore, some variables that we wished to consider in the analysis were not included as they were unavailable in the data set. For example, when asked about the type of stress, in 2020, “other” was one of the options, and answers could be written in descriptive form. Therefore, in 2020, the number of participants decreased significantly because participants who chose the “other” had to be excluded. Lastly, this study did not investigate the psychopathology at the base of the suicidal ideation or behavior. Partially, depression was mentioned, but no other psychiatric disorders were discussed. This study was to search the association between stress types and suicidal behavior, so external stress for an adolescent was the main focus, but in the future, a detailed explanation of the mechanisms of how stress leads to suicidal behavior and related mental disorders should be provided.

4.2 Conclusion

Adolescents whose stress emanates from family and home, or school and friends, are more likely to consider or attempt suicide than those who have different causes of stress. Policies that target prevention of adolescent suicides are needed. Moreover, these policies must focus on finding ways to support those adolescents who have trouble in family or home settings, especially in the pandemic era when staying at home and social distancing is inevitable. Further studies should be conducted as the future cohort studies. Tracking down the same individual for the study period and comparing each groups would increase the reliability of the results.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.kdca.go.kr/yhs/home.jsp Korean Adolescent Health Behavior Survey by Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention. This study used data from the KYRBS, a secondary dataset accessible to the public, that does not include private material.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

SK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YP: Writing – review & editing. HJ: Writing – review & editing. E-CP: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express deep gratitude to the KYRBS and KDCA for the foundation of the study data and allowed to use the data for research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Viner RM, Ozer EM, Denny S, Marmot M, Resnick M, Fatusi A, et al. Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet. (2012) 379:1641–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2018) 2:223–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Maris R. The adolescent suicide problem. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. (1985) 15:91–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.1985.tb00644.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Greydanus DE, Bacopoulou F, Tsalamanios E. Suicide in adolescents: A worldwide preventable tragedy. Keio J Med. (2009) 58:95–102. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.95

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Merikangas KR, He J-p, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in US adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2010) 49:980–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Organization WH. Adolescent mental health. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health (Accessed October 17 2021).

Google Scholar

7. Curtin SC, Heron MP. Death rates due to suicide and homicide among persons aged 10–24: United States, 2000–2017. CDC Stacks (Public Health Publications). (2019). Available at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/81944/cdc_81944_DS1.pdf.

Google Scholar

8. Fagioli F, Telesforo L, Dell’Erba A, Consolazione M, Migliorini V, Patane M, et al. Depersonalization: An exploratory factor analysis of the Italian version of the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale. Compr Psychiatry. (2015) 60:161–7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Maccari S, Polese D, Reynaert M-L, Amici T, Morley-Fletcher S, Fagioli F. Early-life experiences and the development of adult diseases with a focus on mental illness: the human birth theory. Neuroscience. (2017) 342:232–51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Klomek AB, Sourander A, Gould M. The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. Can J Psychiatry. (2010) 55:282–8. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Marmorstein NR, Iacono WG. Major depression and conduct disorder in youth: Associations with parental psychopathology and parent–child conflict. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2004) 45:377–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00228.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Pilowsky DJ, Wickramaratne P, Nomura Y, Weissman MM. Family discord, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring: 20-year follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2006) 45:452–60. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000198592.23078.8d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. McCarty CA, Mason WA, Kosterman R, Hawkins JD, Lengua LJ, McCauley E. Adolescent school failure predicts later depression among girls. J Adolesc Health. (2008) 43:180–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Jankord R, Solomon MB, Albertz J, Flak JN, Zhang R, Herman JP. Stress vulnerability during adolescent development in rats. Endocrinology. (2011) 152:629–38. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Development(OECD) OfEC-oa. Suicide rates. Available online at: https://data.oecd.org/healthstat/suicide-rates.htm (Accessed 10-17 2021).

Google Scholar

16. Indicators O. Health at a Glance. United States: Centers for Diesease Control and Prevention (2019). Available at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/81944/cdc_81944_DS1.pdf.

Google Scholar

17. Kim SH, Jeong SH, Park E-C, Jang S-I. Association of cigarette type initially smoked with suicidal behaviors among adolescents in Korea from 2015 to 2018. JAMA network Open. (2021) 4:e218803–e. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kim H, Choi S-H, Lee S-E, Lee CW, Maeng S, Kim W-H, et al. Variables affecting attitudes toward suicide among the adolescent population. J Nervous Ment Dis. (2021) 209:59–64. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001258

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shin Y, Lee C-J, Kim K. Communication about suicide, perceived social support, and suicidal intention in Korean adults. J Health communication. (2021) 26:480–90. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1962435

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jang S-Y, Cha Y, Lee JC, Kim H, Kim K-J, Choy W. Population-based analysis for risk of suicide death in elderly patients after osteoporotic fracture: a nested case-control study. J Korean Med Sci. (2021) 36:e225. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kim H, Park J, Lee S, Lee SA, Park E-C. Association between energy drink consumption, depression and suicide ideation in Korean adolescents. Int J Soc Psychiatry. (2020) 66:335–43. doi: 10.1177/0020764020907946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Jeong W, Kim YK, Joo JH, Jang S-I, Park E-C. The association of smoking exposure at home with attempts to quit smoking and cessation success: A survey of South Korean adolescents who smoke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:4129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jang S-I, Lee K-S, Park E-C. Relationship between current sleep duration and past suicidal ideation or attempt among Korean adolescents. J Prev Med Public Health. (2013) 46:329. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.6.329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kim KM. What makes adolescents psychologically distressed? Life events as risk factors for depression and suicide. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2021) 30:359–67. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01520-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ruiz EH. Post-industrial challenges in modern South Korea: educational pressures and their impact on young people. Online J Mundo Asia Pacifico. (2021) 10:24–42. doi: 10.17230/map.v10.i18.02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Ahmad S, Jan AR. The effects of parents education on their daughters higher education in Khyber pukhtoonkhwa, Pakistan. J Soc Sci Rev. (2021) 1:13–25. doi: 10.54183/jssr.v1i2.5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Shi Y, Han X, Cao X, Liu R, Gu P. Investigation on the influence of parents’ education level on children’s education——Take Dakutu Village, a minority village in Minhe County as an example. Transactions. (2021) 3:26–32. doi: 10.23977/trance.2021.030205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Aunola K, Nurmi JE, Onatsu-Arvilommi T, Pulkkinen L. The role of parents’ self-esteem, mastery-orientation and social background in their parenting styles. Scandinavian J Psychol. (1999) 40:307–17. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.404131

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chang M. Cultural differences in parenting styles and their effects on teens’ self-esteem, perceived parental relationship satisfaction, and self-satisfaction. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States: Carenegie Mellon University (2007).

Google Scholar

30. Barrigon ML, Cegla-Schvartzman F. Sex, Gender, and Suicidal Behavior. In: Baca-Garcia E. (eds) Behavioral neurobiology of suicide and self harm. current topics in behavioral neurosciences, vol 46. Springer, Cham (2020). doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_165

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. O’Beaglaoich C, McCutcheon J, Conway PF, Hanafin J, Morrison TG. Adolescent suicide ideation, depression and self-esteem: relationships to a new measure of gender role conflict. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Shagle SC, Barber BK. Effects of family, marital, and parent-child conflict on adolescent self-derogation and suicidal ideation. J Marriage Family. (1993), 964–74. doi: 10.2307/352776

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Brent DA, Baugher M, Bridge J, Chen T, Chiappetta L. Age-and sex-related risk factors for adolescent suicide. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (1999) 38:1497–505. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Dervic K, Brent DA, Oquendo MA. Completed suicide in childhood. Psychiatr Clinics North America. (2008) 31:271–91. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2008.01.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lee J. Mental health effects of school closures during COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2020) 4:421. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30109-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Halstensen K, Gjestad R, Luyten P, Wampold B, Granqvist P, Stålsett G, et al. Depression and mentalizing: A psychodynamic therapy process study. J Couns Psychol. (2021) 68:705. doi: 10.1037/cou0000544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Mechler J, Lindqvist K, Carlbring P, Topooco N, Falkenström F, Lilliengren P, et al. Therapist-guided internet-based psychodynamic therapy versus cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescent depression in Sweden: a randomised, clinical, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Digital Health. (2022) 4:e594–603. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00095-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. McCauley E, Berk MS, Asarnow JR, Adrian M, Cohen J, Korslund K, et al. Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents at high risk for suicide: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. (2018) 75:777–85. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lee SY, Park E-C, Han K-T, Kim SJ, Chun S-Y, Park S. The association of level of internet use with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in South Korean adolescents: a focus on family structure and household economic status. Can J Psychiatry. (2016) 61:243–51. doi: 10.1177/0706743716635550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Choi J, Cho H, Lee S, Kim J, Park E-C. Effect of the online game shutdown policy on internet use, internet addiction, and sleeping hours in Korean adolescents. J Adolesc Health. (2018) 62:548–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar