The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Addictive Disorders
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1257112
This article is part of the Research Topic Tobacco Use, Cessation and Related Disparities Among People Living with Substance Use Disorders and People Living with Mental Illness, Volume II View all 4 articles
"Holding on to Hope": Follow up qualitative findings of a tobacco treatment intervention for people experiencing mental health conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1 La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- 2 The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- 3 St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 4 Mind Australia Limited, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- 5 Wellways Australia, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia
- 6 Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- 7 Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 8 The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- 9 University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- 10 University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- 11 Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 12 Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- 13 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Background: Mental health service users are more likely to smoke tobacco and are as likely to make quit attempts as people not experiencing SMI, but they are less likely to succeed.Quitting tobacco can be harder for people experiencing SMI due to higher levels of nicotine dependence, more severe withdrawal, and many other complex factors. The Quitlink study was a randomised controlled trial combining a tailored 8-week Quitline intervention delivered by dedicated Quitline counsellors plus combination nicotine replacement therapy for people who experience SMI. The purpose of this paper is to report on the medium-and longer-term findings from interviews conducted at 5 and 8 months.Methods: As a part of the broader Quitlink study, participants were invited to qualitative interviews at 2, 5 and 8 months following recruitment, in line with quantitative follow-up time points. Interviews were conducted with 28 participants in the Quitlink trial (intervention group n = 12, control group n = 16). Interviews were transcribed and analysed with a thematic analysis methodology using NVivo 12. Key themes were determined using inductive coding.Six key themes were identified. These included: internal/external attributions for tobacco smoking, social relationships and relapse, the role of hopefulness in quitting, the role of clinicians in initiating and maintaining a quit attempt, increasing cessation literacy, and efficacy of the study intervention. Overall, findings suggested that participants' quit attempts were often precarious and vulnerable, but active support and feelings of social connectedness were key to supporting participants to initiate a quit attempt and maintain gains.Conclusions: People who experience SMI can make attempts to quit smoking tobacco with support from clinicians and social networks. Connectedness and hope are significant enablers of making and sustaining quit attempts.The Quitlink trial was registered with ANZCTR (www.anzctr.org.au): ACTRN12619000244101 prior to the accrual of the first participant and updated regularly as per registry guidelines.
Keywords: Tobacco treatment, Quitline, Peer worker, mental illness, severe mental illness, Smoking Cessation
Received: 12 Jul 2023; Accepted: 22 Oct 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Zirnsak, McCarter, McKinlay, Guillaumier, Cocks, Brasier, Hayes, Baker, Baird, Bonevski, Borland, Castle, Forbes, Kelly, Segan, Sweeney, Turner, Williams and Brophy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tessa-May Zirnsak, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.