Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1181739
This article is part of the Research Topic Mental Health, Epidemiology and Machine Learning View all 15 articles

Applying neural network algorithms to ascertain reported experiences of violence in routine mental healthcare records and distributions of reports by diagnosis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 3 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 4 Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, West Bromwich, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Experiences of violence are important risk factors for worse outcome in people with mental health conditions; however, they are not routinely collected be mental health services, so their ascertainment depends on extraction from text fields with natural language processing (NLP) algorithms. Applying previously developed neural network algorithms to routine mental healthcare records, we sought to describe the distribution of recorded violence victimisation by demographic and diagnostic characteristics. We ascertained recorded violence victimisation from the records of 60,021 patients receiving care from a large south London NHS mental healthcare provider during 2019. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted to investigate variation by age, sex, ethnic group, and diagnostic category (ICD-10 F chapter sub-headings plus posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a specific condition). Patients with a mood disorder (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 1.55-1.72), personality disorder (4.03, 3.65-4.45), schizophrenia spectrum disorder (1.84, 1.74-1.95) or PTSD (2.36, 2.08-2.69) had a significantly increased likelihood of victimisation compared to those with other mental health diagnoses. Additionally, patients from minority ethnic groups (1.10 (1.02-1.20) for Black, for Asian compared to White groups) had significantly higher likelihood of recorded violence victimisation. Males were significantly less likely to have reported recorded violence victimisation (0.44, 0.42-0.45) than females. We thus demonstrate the successful deployment of machine learning based NLP algorithms to ascertain important entities for outcome prediction in mental healthcare. The observed distributions highlight which sex, ethnicity and diagnostic groups had more records of violence victimisation. Further development of these algorithms could usefully capture broader experiences, such as differentiating more efficiently between witnessed, perpetrated and experienced violence and broader violence experiences like emotional abuse.

    Keywords: natural language procecessing, Victimisation, mental health records, CrIS, Violence

    Received: 07 Mar 2023; Accepted: 14 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Mason, Bhavsar, Botelle, Chandran, Li, Mascio, Sanyal, Kadra-Scalzo, Roberts, Williams and Stewart. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ava Mason, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.