György Purebl
Katharina Schnitzspahn2- 1Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- 2European Alliance Against Depression, Leipzig, Germany
There is considerable evidence that simple, cost-effective, non-pharmaceutical strategies can be readily implemented to improve outcomes in the treatment of depression. It is estimated that 4.4% of the world’s population suffers from depression. Despite being a major public health concern and the availability of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, many depressed people remain undiagnosed and receive no or inappropriate treatment. Several possible underlying factor of treatment gap can be identified in relation to pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy of depression, including side effects, partial remission, treatment-resistant depression and the limited availability of psychotherapy. In addition to developing new therapeutic options, much more could be done to optimise the use of existing therapies, including combining available drug treatments with quick, simple and cost-effective non-pharmacological methods: low-intensity psychological interventions, online self-help tools and lifestyle medicine. In addition to increasing the effectiveness of treatments, prevention is equally important: awareness programs to further reduce the treatment gap, and community dissemination of the life skills that help maintain positive mental health.
Introduction
It is estimated that 4.4% of the world’s population suffers from depression (1). Its prevalence has increased by 54.3% between 1990 and 2013 (2), and in spite of many efforts and millions of euros of investment worldwide, unipolar depression has become the leading cause of disability (3). Despite being a major public health concern and the availability of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, many depressed people remain undiagnosed and receive no or inappropriate treatment (4–6). Several unmet needs can be identified behind these grim figures.
The treatment gap of depression treatment
There is a “negative cascade” in the treatment of depression (7), meaning that although there are many patients with depression, few reach appropriate care, fewer receive appropriate treatment, and even fewer are adherent to treatment—so that only a small fragment of patients benefit from effective treatment. Although socio-economic factors also contribute (8, 9), significant proportion of patients do not seek help for their symptoms on their own, for couple of reasons. Firstly, they feel they are beyond help—hopelessness is a symptom of depression (10). Secondly, stigma and negative beliefs towards mental health services also contribute in the low frequency of help-seeking behavior in depression (11, 12). Thirdly, depressive experience can be widely misperceived (13), sometimes underestimated: some believes that their symptoms are natural feelings resulting from a negative life event. Those who do consult a primary care physician do not usually wish to see a psychiatrist or other kind of mental health professional initially (11), and they reports mainly somatic complaints (14), and the psychological symptoms are less intensive (in the prodromal phase) or kept hidden (15). This presentation of symptoms can be misleading—the depression remains undiagnosed and inappropriate treatment is often used: sleeping pills are prescribed for sleep problems, vitamins are recommended for fatigue, and the somatic symptoms may prompt expensive and unnecessary diagnostic procedures, while the underlying depression is not resolved. Ultimately, only a minority of patients with depression receive appropriate treatment (16). According to the WHO’s World Mental Health Survey, only 56.7% of participants who met the diagnostic criteria for depression reported needing treatment. Of those who recognized their need for treatment, only 71.1% made at least one visit to a health care facility. Of those who finally received treatment, only 41.0% received the minimum standard of care, and only 16.5% of all people diagnosed with depression received minimally adequate treatment (4).
However, antidepressant treatment alone is no guarantee that the patient will receive adequate treatment: under-dosing (17) or low response rates to the first antidepressant regimen (18) are common, which can undermine the fragile optimism and motivation of clients who, by the nature of their condition, are often characterized by hopelessness. Even where treatment is adequate, adherence problems are common (19, 20), with a non-adherence rate of approximately 50% (21)—which may lead to the underestimation of the benefits of antidepressants (22). Treatment may be stopped at early signs of remission (the client thinks there is no need to further treatment) or because of a side effect. In many cases, either being treated with medication or psychotherapy, the reduction of the symptoms, does not bring the change that clients really expect. Full functional recovery and quality of life improvement takes longer than symptom remission (23).
With these factors in mind it appears that most current treatment options, although clinically effective, have significant limitations and often fail to meet patient’s needs or expectations.
Unmet needs about the pharmacological treatment of depression
As with any long-term treatment, it is important for antidepressants to minimize side effects that reduce quality of life, thereby potentially compromising long-term patient compliance. Although there is considerable individual variability in patient response to the detectably different antidepressant molecules (18), the most important side effects of antidepressants according to a recent large-scale longitudinal study has documented that the most problematic antidepressant side effects are weight gain, sexual dysfunction and sleep problems (24). However, achieving higher level of compliance and adherence is not only a matter of side effects: other important factors also include socio-economic status, co-morbidities, physician attitude and communication about side effects. Nevertheless, a better side-effect profile is an important need for both physicians and patients.
Conversely, side effects might be more tolerable if the available antidepressants were more effective at reducing the distressing symptoms of depression. An example is the slow onset of action, common to all conventional antidepressants in varying degrees. Patient adherence and satisfaction would almost certainly improve if antidepressant agents were able to reduce symptoms much more rapidly, spectacularly, and reliably. As it is, up to 30% of patients do not respond satisfactorily to conventional treatment, and designated as treatment-resistant (25).
Another vexing problem is that there is no reliable method for predicting which antidepressant will prove effective for a patient, with the result that many patients do not respond to the first choice of medication (18, 26). Moreover, evidence remains inconsistent on the optimal time to wait before switching medications (26, 27). Even after identifying an effective antidepressant agent, an additional problem is residual symptoms that impair quality of life, when a patient terminates treatment after partial remission (28–30). The most common of these are residual sleep disturbances, somatic complaints, fatigue, impaired concentration (29, 30). All of this makes it difficult to return to work and daily life in general, and also increases the risk of relapse.
Despite the broad repertoire of current medicines that work well for a significant proportion of patients, there persists an unacceptably high rate at which these treatment options fall short of effecting full recovery and restoration of quality of life.
Treatment gap in the non-pharmacological treatment of depression
A significant proportion of depressed patients can be treated with evidence-based psychotherapy (31–33). However, access to psychotherapies varies considerably between countries. In some countries, psychotherapy care is well institutionalized and adequately funded; in others, patients face long waiting lists for therapy; and even today, there are countries in Europe where psychotherapy is mostly available only in private practice (34). Cultural stereotypes can also hinder acceptance of psychotherapy—patients simply do not use it, even when other treatment options do not work. Thus, limited access, funding problems and cultural stereotypes result that the potential of evidence-based psychotherapies is not yet being adequately exploited in the treatment of depression.
Bright light therapy (BLT), first mentioned by Aretaeus of Cappadocia in the second century A.D. with its robust chronobiological effect (35), is probably the oldest method for the effective treatment of mood symptoms. Although originally considered a first-line treatment for seasonal affective disorder (SAD), increasing evidence supports its efficacy also in non-seasonal depression (35–37), either as monotherapy (36) or to augment pharmacotherapy (37). Despite its efficacy, the potential of BLT is not fully exploited in daily clinical practice, and the procedure still needs to be standardized in terms of exposure intensity and treatment duration (36).
The sharp rise in the prevalence of depression suggests that lifestyle may play a role in the development of depression. Large body of convincing scientific evidence links risk of depression to sleep deprivation, disrupted circadian rhythms and sedentary lifestyles (38–41). Conversely, sleep management, a healthy diet rich in fish, fruit and vegetables, and regular exercise have strong potential to reduce the risk of depression (39, 40). These factors are also strongly interrelated: regular exercise has important rhythm-entrailing effects, promotes sleep, and is effective in reducing stress. There is considerable evidence that components of a healthy lifestyle produce epigenetic changes similar to antidepressant medication, for example in the BDNF systems (41).
The potential of lifestyle medicine in depression is therefore very promising, but has serious limitations in everyday practice. Achieving lifestyle change is at least as difficult in depressed patients (particularly during the depressive episode) as it is in other major public health concerns.
Overcoming treatment gap I. Advances in the pharmacological treatment of depression
Several recommendations are available for managing partial remission and treatment-resistant depression, from augmentation strategies to optimizing, switching and combining the available antidepressants (42, 43). In addition to pharmacotherapy, various brain stimulation techniques are being developed, ranging from transcranial magnetic stimulation to deep brain stimulation (42, 44).
Pharmacological research also continues to address unmet needs, and new molecules are expected to emerge in pharmacotherapy. Some of these continue the search for fewer side effects and more complete clinical improvement, and the desired goal (for patients, physicians and manufacturers alike) is a compound with rapid onset of action, full recovery potential and minimal side effects. However, a new paradigm has emerged that shifts the focus from symptom reduction to the restoration of a rich emotional life, the remission of cognitive symptoms, a significant change in quality of life and the ability to regain productivity and work capacity as quickly as possible. There are a number of novel therapeutic agents that may have a transformative effect on the day-to-day management of depression (45).
The first and probably the most intensively studied representative is the novel line is ketamine (more precisely its enantiomer, esketamine), a rapid acting NMDA antagonist compound, with convincing antidepressant properties (46–48). So far, esketamine has FDA and EMA approval for the therapy of treatment-resistant depression, and future studies will explore its full potential in the treatment of mood disorders (and perhaps other psychiatric conditions). The next promising object of research is psilocybin, a partial 5HT receptor agonist with strong psychoactive potential (42).
Since an inflammatory model is also hypothesized as a possible contributor to depression symptomatology, potent anti-inflammatory compounds are also knocking on the door of depression medicine: infliximab (a TNF-alpha antibody widely used in inflammatory diseases from rheumatoid arthritis to inflammatory bowel disease) or brexanolole, a progesterone derived compound with neurosteroid properties (approved for the treatment of postpartum depression). In sum, the landscape of pharmacological treatment for depression is set to change significantly in the near future.
It is important to note that although the pursuit of more advanced compounds and the commitment to broadening the treatment repertoire for depression are very important, the available alternatives are often not fully exploited in daily practice. Outcomes can be further improved by combining antidepressants, augmenting them and adding non-pharmacological treatment options: lifestyle changes, self-help programs, psychological interventions and psychotherapies. Even simple interventions (e.g., behavioral activation, use of decision aids, shared decision making, motivational interviewing) or online self-help tools can improve the matching of therapy to patient preferences and increase the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment (49–51).
Overcoming treatment gap II. Advances in non-pharmacological treatment
In psychotherapy, there is a pressing need for further research to determine which therapeutic methods are effective in depression (31–33). Wider access to evidence-based psychotherapies, too, would certainly be welcome—psychotherapy should not be the privilege of a narrow social group. The emergence of internet-based psychotherapies promise a major advance in this respect. These are easier to combine with pharmacological treatment than face-to-face therapies, as they require much less personal presence. With appropriate motivation, they can be as effective as in-person therapies, but are much more accessible and cost-effective (52–57).
Online guided self-help interventions, such as the iFightDepression® tool (49, 52, 53) from the European Alliance Against Depression (EAAD) can also be a highly accessible and effective treatment addition. The tool uses principles of cognitive behavioral therapy to support self-management of depressive symptoms in individuals with milder forms of depression. The effectiveness of the iFightDepression® tool in reducing depressive symptoms has been demonstrated by a randomized controlled trial with an active control group (50) and another study with a treatment as usual control group (49).
Online self-help tools are not the only simple but effective psychological interventions that can be recommended to clients. There are low-intensity evidence-based in-person psychological interventions that take little time and can easily be delivered by non-specialist healthcare providers. The IAPT (Increase Access to Psychological Therapies) program aims to expand psychotherapy services in the United Kingdom with a stepped care model that starts with single psychoeducational interventions and progresses to specialized psychotherapies. IAPT has developed, implemented and demonstrated the effectiveness of a range of low-intensity psychological interventions, including for more severe forms of depression (58, 59). As a result of its success, IAPT has become a model for the development of similar services in other countries. To make psychological support more accessible in low-and middle-income countries, WHO has also developed a set of simple psychological interventions that can be learned not only by health professionals but also by lay people (60, 61). The use of these tools by non-specialists (e.g., social workers, school teachers, priests or simply motivated lay helpers) can further increase access to psychological help and may serve as a quick first response with considerable preventive potential for more serious mental health problems. In summary, there are many simple psychological interventions that can be learned by any health care professional—or by engaged lay helpers. These are easy to learn, take little time to implement, but are evidence-based, and can significantly increase the professional’s personal effectiveness in successfully treating depressed patients. In addition, wider use of these simple but effective tools may help to identify strategies to improve overall wellbeing and coping with life adversities. These strategies may form the basis of cost-effective community mental health promotion programs.
Another important goal is to integrate lifestyle counselling into psychiatric practice (62, 63), as it has already been done in cardiology and diabetology. Although it may be more difficult to motivate clients with mental health conditions to change their daily diet and sedentary lifestyle, the psychological interventions mentioned above may help to improve cooperation from clients.
Overcoming treatment gap III. Tackling depression at the community level
The “depression pandemic” demands much more from health care than advances in psychiatry. Depression should be recognized in areas of medicine other than psychiatry and primary care. Depressed clients can present in all types of health care settings due to the high prevalence and frequent comorbidities of depression (64–66).
We may go further; responsibility of tackling depression also goes beyond healthcare issue and concerns society as a whole. Knowledge of depression must be communicated to the public to dispel misconceptions, combat stigma and discrimination, and promote lifestyle factors that reduce the risk of depression in general. It is equally important to provide lay people with practical skills to recognise symptoms, support people with depression, facilitate help-seeking behavior and, most importantly, to establish and maintain their own positive mental health. Several awareness campaigns have been carried out in the past to increase knowledge about depression, but the current situation, low treatment rates, stigma and misconceptions associated with depression suggest that something different and more effective is needed.
In addition to public campaigns, there are a number of other (and probably more effective) approaches to increasing knowledge about depression in the community. School-based programs can be effective in providing recognition and support skills training for both teachers and students, as demonstrated for example in the European SEYLE project (67).
Multilevel and multifaceted interventions are another approach. The community-based 4-level intervention from the EAAD which simultaneously addresses depression and suicidality, has been identified as the most promising multifaceted and evidence-based intervention by a recent systematic review (68). It combines evidence-based prevention, education and treatment methods that are tailored to the needs and resources of local communities (53, 69). EAAD’s 4-level approach involves primary care physicians and other primary care health professionals (Level 1), local media and the general public (Level 2), community facilitators (such as social workers, priests, pharmacists, journalists, teachers) and key stakeholders (Level 3) and patients and their relatives (Level 4). It has been successfully adapted to different cultures and health care systems both within and outside of Europe. Being simultaneously active at four intervention levels, it can maximize the synergy between different types of interventions (70). Low-threshold services (such as telephone helplines) and the iFightDepression® tool described above are integral parts of the approach.
The work environment, where people spend much of their time, is a significant source of daily stress and challenges (71, 72). Workplace-based mental health promotion therefore has a large and under-exploited potential for tackling depression. There have been some effective programs for addressing depression-related issues at work (73–76), but workplace mental health programs are not available to the majority of workers, especially in small and medium enterprises. Reviewing and evaluating the experiences of previous initiatives, the EU-based MENTUPP program offers a multi-level approach in three sectors (healthcare, construction, ICT), targeting both clinical and non-clinical manifestations of depression, anxiety and stress-related problems, and promoting a non-stigmatizing, mutually supportive working environment. The MENTUPP Hub, an online platform presenting interactive psycho-educational materials, toolkits and links to additional resources, is a key element of the program (77). The preliminary results of MENTUPP demonstrate that workplace-based interventions have the potential to improve mental health and employees’ wellbeing (78).
To successfully tackling depression (and mental disorders in general) there is a clear need for more psychoeducational activities in the places where people spend most of their time and interact with each other—in schools, workplaces and other community settings. Rather than only focusing depression-related issues, these psychoeducational activities should also work the life skills of maintaining positive mental health.
Unanswered questions and future dilemmas
Many people with depression are difficult to treat, despite the fact that there are numerous available and evidence-based treatments. This in itself is evidence that depression is a very heterogeneous condition, underlining the importance of personalized treatment. A major step forward would be the ability to predict which individual combination of therapeutic modalities will result in a rapid and complete recovery for each patient. This could be approached using a number of technologies that may be available in the near future, involving practical pharmacogenomics, more advanced knowledge of the inflammatory, hormonal, etc. processes involved in depression, the individual cognitive psychological characteristics. All of these could be usefully incorporated into a comprehensive measure for predicting therapeutic response. Other important questions are how the many approaches may be integrated into a cost-effective framework, and how, amid the simultaneous use of many therapeutic modalities, a balance may be found between highly personalized therapy and quality-controlled, guideline-driven treatment protocols.
There are some promising initiatives for integrating the different approaches into multi-modal treatment regimes. Many of these approaches can be channeled into a comprehensive framework via the concept of a transformative treatment model for mood disorders (79). Transformative models involve trait and state symptom characteristics, possible staging models, predisposing elements and possible future trajectories of the course of depression (80–82). Treatment response in this approach, goes beyond reduction and functional recovery to take account of exacerbations, relapses and other specific indicators such as hospital admissions, number of psychotropic medications and self-harm behavior (79–82). Evaluation of the multimodal approach and incorporation of predictive measures may also be feasible in naturalistic studies (82, 83) and multifaceted community interventions (68–70).
Prevention is an area that demands at least as much emphasis as therapy, if not more. Much promising research has already been published, providing (albeit limited) evidence of the potential beneficial effects of various lifestyle factors. There are several questions need to be answered. What are the key life skills and positive psychology concepts (e.g., savoring and creative and executive efficiency) that help to maintain positive mental health (84)? How can these skills be transferred and scaled up to community level? What are the ecological aspects of depression (and mental disorders in general) the effect of a person’s disconnection from nature, and how can the natural environment and access to green spaces contribute to prevention and treatment (85–87)? Recent reviews focus on how spirituality, a fundamental human dimension, relates to the pathology of depression and how spirituality may or may not be protective (88, 89)? A number of exciting research projects are emerging on these topics, and the number of models which possibly contribute to depression (and its prevention) is increasing. What all these new models have in common is that they are complex and emphasize the profiling of multiple factors (68, 70, 79, 83, 84, 87). Approaches that focus on the role of a single factor (e.g., a particular substance or a single psychological model) are likely to be less successful in the future understanding of depression.
Limitations
This paper aims to review the progress and future directions of possible responses to the treatment gap of depression, but is not a systematic review. The references are mainly based on recent work, include systematic reviews, and there may be relevant studies that may not be mentioned here. For these reasons, the paper does, not have definitive recommendations on the response to treatment gap. Nonetheless, it should help to formulate more precise questions for the research and development of treatments of depression in the near future.
Depression—and mental disorders in general—is a growing public health concern with significant socio-economic implications, and we have attempted to give an overview of the many parallel efforts to prevent and treat depression. Instead of running in parallel, these would be much more effective if they work together taking full advantage of the synergies.
The increasing number of mental health problems demand more than targeted mental health promotion programs and the expansion of available mental health services. Mental health can also be improved through activities in other sectors, including social care, child and family welfare and legislation. These sectors are particularly well-placed to provide early interventions, especially in in high-risk groups, and rapid treatment for those already suffering from mental disorders. Prevention is crucial, but barriers to treatment for those already struggling with severe mental disorders must also be removed. Available mental health services must therefore be scaled up and mental health in general given higher priority, all of which naturally demands increased funding.
Author contributions
GP: Writing – original draft. KS: Review and presentation of available literature about multi-level community-based program. EZ: Review and presentation of available literature about BLT and TMS and contribution of the elaboration of the final structure of the MS.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Open access funding provided by Semmelweis University and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 848137. The material presented and views expressed here are the responsibility of the author(s) only. The EU Commission takes no responsibility for any use made of the information set out. The funder of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express gratitude and acknowledge the contributions of all members and advisors of the MENTUPP Consortium (Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1 World Health Organization . Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates World Health Organization (2017) Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254610.
2 Vos, T, Barber, RM, Bell, B, Bertozzi-Villa, A, Biryukov, S, Bolliger, I, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. (2015) 386:743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4
3 Freidrich, MJ . Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide. JAMA. (2017) 317:1517–01. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3826
4 Thornicroft, G, Chatterji, S, Evans-Lacko, S, Gruber, M, Sampson, N, Aguilar-Gaxiola, S, et al. Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries. Br J Psychiatry. (2017) 210:119–24. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.188078
5 Araya, R, Zitko, P, Markkula, N, Rai, D, and Jones, K. Determinants of access to health care for depression in 49 countries: a multilevel analysis. J Affect Disord. (2018) 234:80–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.092
6 Strawbridge, R, McCrone, P, Ulrichsen, A, Zahn, R, Eberhard, J, Wasserman, D, et al. Care pathways for people with major depressive disorder: a European brain council value of treatment study. Eur Psychiatry. (2022) 65:e36:1–21. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.28
7 Pence, BW, O’Donnell, JK, and Gaynes, BN. The depression treatment cascade in primary care: a public health perspective. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2012) 14:328–35. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0274-y
8 Saxena, S . Disparity between burden and budget for mental health. Lancet Public Health. (2019) 4:e75–6. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30238-X
9 Evans-Lacko, S, Aguilar-Gaxiola, S, Al-Hamzawi, A, Alonso, J, Benjet, C, Bruffaerts, R, et al. Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychol Med. (2018) 48:1560–71. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003336
10 Eigenhuis, E, Waumans, RC, Muntingh, AD, Westerman, MJ, van Meijel, M, Batelaan, NM, et al. Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behavior in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0247516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247516
11 Aguirre Velasco, A, Cruz, IS, Billings, J, Jimenez, M, and Rowe, S. What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviors for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. (2020) 20:1–22. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0
12 Wijeratne, C, Johnco, C, Draper, B, and Earl, J. Doctors’ reporting of mental health stigma and barriers to help-seeking. Occup Med. (2021) 71:366–74. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqab119
13 Cao, C, Hu, L, Xu, T, Liu, Q, Koyanagi, A, Yang, L, et al. Prevalence, correlates and misperception of depression symptoms in the United States, NHANES 2015–2018. J Affect Disord. (2020) 269:51–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.031
14 Liu, P, Tu, H, Zhang, A, Yang, C, Liu, Z, Lei, L, et al. Brain functional alterations in MDD patients with somatic symptoms: a resting-state fMRI study. J Affect Disord. (2021) 295:788–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.143
15 Benasi, G, Fava, GA, and Guidi, J. Prodromal symptoms in depression: a systematic review. Psychother Psychosom. (2021) 90:365–72. doi: 10.1159/000517953
16 Boenisch, S, Kocalevent, RD, Matschinger, H, Mergl, R, Wimmer-Brunauer, C, Tauscher, M, et al. Who receives depression-specific treatment? A secondary data-based analysis of outpatient care received by over 780,000 statutory health-insured individuals diagnosed with depression. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2012) 47:475–86. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0355-y
17 Boehlen, FH, Freigofas, J, Herzog, W, Meid, AD, Saum, KU, Schoettker, B, et al. Evidence for underuse and overuse of antidepressants in older adults: results of a large population-based study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2019) 34:539–47. doi: 10.1002/gps.5047
18 Cipriani, A, Furukawa, TA, Salanti, G, Chaimani, A, Atkinson, LZ, Ogawa, Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. (2018) 391:1357–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7
19 Rush, AJ, and Thase, ME. Improving depression outcome by patient-centered medical management. Am J Psychiatry. (2018) 175:1187–98. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040398
20 Dell’Osso, B, Albert, U, Carrà, G, Pompili, M, Nanni, MG, Pasquini, M, et al. How to improve adherence to antidepressant treatments in patients with major depression: a psychoeducational consensus checklist. Ann Gen Psychiatry. (2020) 19:61–8. doi: 10.1186/s12991-020-00306-2
21 Sansone, RA, and Sansone, LA. Antidepressant adherence: are patients taking their medications? Innov Clin Neurosci. (2012) 9:41.
22 Adli, M, and Hegerl, U. Do we underestimate the benefits of antidepressants? Lancet. (2014) 383:1361–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60534-1
23 van der Voort, TY, Seldenrijk, A, van Meijel, B, Goossens, PJ, Beekman, AT, Penninx, BW, et al. Functional versus syndromal recovery in patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. (2015) 76:e809–14. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09548
24 Saha, K, Torous, J, Kiciman, E, and De Choudhury, M. Understanding side effects of antidepressants: large-scale longitudinal study on social media data. JMIR Ment Health. (2021) 8:e26589. doi: 10.2196/26589
25 McLachlan, G . Treatment resistant depression: what are the options? BMJ. (2018) 363:k5354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k535430563939
26 Bschor, T, Kern, H, Henssler, J, and Baethge, C. Switching the antidepressant after nonresponse in adults with major depression: a systematic literature search and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. (2016) 79:20627. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16r10749
27 Boyce, P, Hopwood, M, Morris, G, Hamilton, A, Bassett, D, Baune, BT, et al. Switching antidepressants in the treatment of major depression: when, how and what to switch to? J Affect Disord. (2020) 261:160–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.082
28 Paykel, ES . Partial remission, residual symptoms, and relapse in depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2008) 10:431–7. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2008.10.4/espaykel
29 Xiao, L, Feng, L, Zhu, XQ, Feng, Y, Wu, WY, Ungvari, GS, et al. Comparison of residual depressive symptoms and functional impairment between fully and partially remitted patients with major depressive disorder: a multicenter study. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 261:547–53. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.020
30 Conradi, HJ, Ormel, J, and De Jonge, P. Presence of individual (residual) symptoms during depressive episodes and periods of remission: a 3 years prospective study. Psychol Med. (2011) 41:1165–74. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001911
31 Cuijpers, P, Karyotaki, E, Reijnders, M, and Ebert, DD. Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2018) 28:21–30. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000057
32 Munder, T, Flückiger, C, Leichsenring, F, Abbass, AA, Hilsenroth, MJ, Luyten, P, et al. Is psychotherapy effective? A re-analysis of treatments for depression. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2019) 28:268–74. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000355
33 Cuijpers, P, Karyotaki, E, de Wit, L, and Ebert, DD. The effects of fifteen evidence-supported therapies for adult depression: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Res. (2020) 30:279–93. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1649732
34 Woelbert, E . Psychotherapy for mental illness in Europe: an exploration on the evidence base and the status quo In: JRC science and policy report : Publications Office of the European Union (2015) Available at: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC94870/psychotherapy%20for%20mental%20illness%20in%20europe.pdf
35 Oldham, MA, and Ciraulo, DA. Bright light therapy for depression: a review of its effects on chronobiology and the autonomic nervous system. Chronobiol Int. (2014) 31:305–19. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.833935
36 Al-Karawi, D, and Jubair, L. Bright light therapy for nonseasonal depression: meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Affect Disord. (2016) 198:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.016
37 Penders, TM, Stanciu, CN, Schoemann, AM, Ninan, PT, Bloch, R, and Saeed, SA. Bright light therapy as augmentation of pharmacotherapy for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. (2016) 18:26717. doi: 10.4088/PCC.15r0190610.4088/JCP.14m09376
38 Sarris, J, O’Neil, A, Coulson, CE, Schweitzer, I, and Berk, M. Lifestyle medicine for depression. BMC Psychiatry. (2014) 14:1–3. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-107
39 Firth, J, Solmi, M, Wootton, RE, Vancampfort, D, Schuch, FB, Hoare, E, et al. A meta-review of “lifestyle psychiatry”: the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. (2020) 19:360–80. doi: 10.1002/wps.20773
40 Wong, VW, Ho, FY, Shi, NK, Sarris, J, Chung, KF, and Yeung, WF. Lifestyle medicine for depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord. (2021) 284:203–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.012
41 Lee, JS, Jaini, PA, and Papa, F. An epigenetic perspective on lifestyle medicine for depression: implications for primary care practice. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2022) 16:76–88. doi: 10.1177/1559827620954779
42 Voineskos, D, Daskalakis, ZJ, and Blumberger, DM. Management of treatment-resistant depression: challenges and strategies. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2020) 16:221–34. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S198774
43 Papakostas, GI, Fava, M, and Thase, ME. Treatment of SSRI-resistant depression: a meta-analysis comparing within-versus across-class switches. Biol Psychiatry. (2008) 63:699–704. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.08.01017919460
44 Lan, XJ, Yang, XH, Qin, ZJ, Cai, DB, Liu, QM, Mai, JX, et al. Efficacy and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. (2023) 14:14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244289
45 Borbély, É, Simon, M, Fuchs, E, Wiborg, O, Czéh, B, and Helyes, Z. Novel drug developmental strategies for treatment-resistant depression. Br J Pharmacol. (2022) 179:1146–86. doi: 10.1111/bph.15753
46 Vasiliu, O . Esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: a review of clinical evidence. Exp Ther Med. (2023) 25:111. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11810
47 Monahan, K, Weyandt, L, and Shepard, E. Diversity inclusion in clinical trials investigating esketamine for depression: a systematic review. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. (2023) 31:584–92. doi: 10.1037/pha0000601
48 Fava, M, Jha, MK, and Papakostas, GI. Rapidity of symptom improvement with intranasal esketamine for major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. (2023) 84:21r14086. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21r14086
49 Varga, A, Czeglédi, E, Tóth, MD, and Purebl, G. Effectiveness of iFightDepression® online guided self-help tool in depression—a pilot study. J Telemed Telecare. (2022) 18:1357633X221084584. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221084584
50 Oehler, C, Scholze, K, Driessen, P, Rummel-Kluge, C, Görges, F, and Hegerl, U. How are guide profession and routine care setting related to adherence and symptom change in iCBT for depression?—an explorative log-data analysis. Internet Interv. (2021) 26:100476. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100476
51 Wang, X, and Feng, Z. A narrative review of empirical literature of behavioral activation treatment for depression. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:845138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.845138
52 Justicia, A, Elices, M, Cebria, AI, Palao, DJ, Gorosabel, J, Puigdemont, D, et al. Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression. BMC Psychiatry. (2017) 17:143. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1306-2
53 Hegerl, U, and Oehler, C. Promises and risks of web-based interventions in the treatment of depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2022) 22:161–8. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/uhegerl
54 Cuijpers, P, Noma, H, Karyotaki, E, Cipriani, A, and Furukawa, TA. Effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive behavior therapy delivery formats in adults with depression: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2019) 76:700–7. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268
55 Massoudi, B, Holvast, F, Bockting, CL, Burger, H, and Blanker, MH. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of e-health interventions for depression and anxiety in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2019) 245:728–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.050
56 Carli, V, Petros, NG, Hadlaczky, G, Vitcheva, T, Berchialla, P, Bianchi, S, et al. The NEVERMIND e-health system in the treatment of depressive symptoms among patients with severe somatic conditions: a multicentre, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. (2022) 48:101423. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101423
57 Schröder, J, Berger, T, Westermann, S, Klein, JP, and Moritz, S. Internet interventions for depression: new developments. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2022) 18:203–12. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.2/jschroeder
58 Wakefield, S, Kellett, S, Simmonds-Buckley, M, Stockton, D, Bradbury, A, and Delgadillo, J. Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 years of practice-based evidence. Br J Clin Psychol. (2021) 60:1–37. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12259
59 Bower, P, Kontopantelis, E, Sutton, A, Kendrick, T, Richards, DA, Gilbody, S, et al. Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ. (2013) 346:346. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f540
60 Dawson, KS, Bryant, RA, Harper, M, Tay, AK, Rahman, A, Schafer, A, et al. Problem management plus (PM+): a WHO transdiagnostic psychological intervention for common mental health problems. World Psychiatry. (2015) 14:354–7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20255
61 World Health Organization . WHO menu of cost-effective interventions for mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization (2021).
62 Piotrowski, MC, Lunsford, J, and Gaynes, BN. Lifestyle psychiatry for depression and anxiety: beyond diet and exercise. Lifestyle Med. (2021) 2:e21. doi: 10.1002/lim2.21
63 Marx, W, Manger, SH, Blencowe, M, Murray, G, Ho, FY, Lawn, S, et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of lifestyle-based mental health care in major depressive disorder: World Federation of Societies for Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Australasian Society of Lifestyle Medicine (ASLM) taskforce. World J Biol Psychiatry. (2023) 24:333–86. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2022.2112074
64 van der Feltz-Cornelis, C, Allen, SF, Holt, RIG, Roberts, R, Nouwen, A, and Sartorius, N. Treatment for comorbid depressive disorder or subthreshold depression in diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. (2021) 11:e01981. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1981
65 Kleykamp, BA, Ferguson, MC, McNicol, E, Bixho, I, Arnold, LM, Edwards, RR, et al. The prevalence of psychiatric and chronic pain comorbidities in fibromyalgia: an ACTTION systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2021) 51:166–74. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.10.006
66 Bode, H, Ivens, B, Bschor, T, Schwarzer, G, Henssler, J, and Baethge, C. Hyperthyroidism and clinical depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. (2022) 12:362. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02121-7
67 Pompili, M, O’Connor, RC, and Van Heeringen, K. Suicide prevention in the European region. Crisis. (2020) 41:S8–S20. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000665
68 Linskens, EJ, Venables, NC, Gustavson, AM, Sayer, NA, Murdoch, M, MacDonald, R, et al. Population-and community-based interventions to prevent suicide: a systematic review. Crisis. (2022) 44:330–40. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000873
69 Gilissen, R, Steendam, M, Elzinga, E, van der Burgt, M, and Beekman, A. Community prevention: improving suicide prevention through the creation of local suicide prevention action networks In: Suicide risk assessment and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2022). 1–13.
70 Harris, FM, Maxwell, M, O'Connor, R, Coyne, JC, Arensman, E, Coffey, C, et al. Exploring synergistic interactions and catalysts in complex interventions: longitudinal, mixed methods case studies of an optimised multi-level suicide prevention intervention in four European countries (Ospi-Europe). BMC Public Health. (2016) 16:268. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2942-z
71 Harvey, SB, Modini, M, Joyce, S, Milligan-Saville, JS, Tan, L, Mykletun, A, et al. Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. (2017) 74:301–10. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104015
72 Niedhammer, I, Bertrais, S, and Witt, K. Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. (2021) 47:489–508. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3968
73 Hogg, B, Medina, JC, Gardoki-Souto, I, Serbanescu, I, Moreno-Alcázar, A, Cerga-Pashoja, A, et al. Workplace interventions to reduce depression and anxiety in small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. (2021) 290:378–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.071
74 Hogg, B, Moreno-Alcázar, A, Tóth, MD, Serbanescu, I, Aust, B, Leduc, C, et al. Supporting employees with mental illness and reducing mental illness-related stigma in the workplace: an expert survey. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2023) 273:739–53. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01443-3
75 Tóth, MD, Ihionvien, S, Leduc, C, Aust, B, Amann, BL, Cresswell-Smith, J, et al. Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to reduce mental health related stigma in the workplace: a systematic review. BMJ Open. (2023) 13:e067126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067126
76 Gray, P, Senabe, S, Naicker, N, Kgalamono, S, Yassi, A, and Spiegel, JM. Workplace-based organizational interventions promoting mental health and happiness among healthcare workers: a realist review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:4396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224396
77 Arensman, E, O’Connor, C, Leduc, C, Griffin, E, Cully, G, Ní Dhálaigh, D, et al. Mental health promotion and intervention in occupational settings: protocol for a pilot study of the MENTUPP intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020947
78 Fotini, T, Evelien, C, Hans, DW, Ella, A, Benedikt, A, Arlinda, CP, et al. Outcome assessment of a complex mental health intervention in the workplace. Results from the MENTUPP pilot study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. (2023) 96:1149–65. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01996-3
79 Papp, M, Cubała, WJ, Swiecicki, L, Newman-Tancredi, A, and Willner, P. Perspectives for therapy of treatment-resistant depression. Br J Pharmacol. (2022) 179:4181–200. doi: 10.1111/bph.15596
80 Brouwer, A, and Carhart-Harris, RL. Pivotal mental states. J Psychopharmacol. (2020) 35:319–52. doi: 10.1177/026988112095963
81 McAllister-Williams, RH, Arango, C, Blier, P, Demyttenaere, K, Falkai, P, Gorwood, P, et al. The identification, assessment and management of difficult-to-treat depression: an international consensus statement. J Affect Disord. (2020) 267:264–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.023
82 Bartova, L, Dold, M, Kautzky, A, Fabbri, C, Spies, M, Serretti, A, et al. Results of the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD)—basis for further research and clinical practice. World J Biol Psychiatry. (2019) 20:427–48. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2019.1635270
83 Chae, WR, Nagel, JM, Kuehl, LK, Gold, SM, Wingenfeld, K, and Otte, C. Predictors of response and remission in a naturalistic inpatient sample undergoing multimodal treatment for depression. J Affect Disord. (2019) 252:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.044
84 Zábó, V, Csiszar, A, Ungvari, Z, and Purebl, G. Psychological resilience and competence: key promoters of successful aging and flourishing in late life. Geroscience. (2023) 7:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00856-9
85 Wood, C, Wicks, C, and Barton, J. Green spaces for mental disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2023) 36:41–6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000830
86 Callaghan, A, McCombe, G, Harrold, A, McMeel, C, Mills, G, Moore-Cherry, N, et al. The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: a scoping review. J Ment Health. (2021) 30:179–93. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1755027
87 Xu, J, Liu, N, Polemiti, E, Garcia-Mondragon, L, Tang, J, Liu, X, et al. Effects of urban living environments on mental health in adults. Nat Med. (2023) 29:1456–67. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02365-w
88 Braam, AW, and Koenig, HG. Religion, spirituality and depression in prospective studies: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. (2019) 257:428–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.063
Keywords: depression, unmet need, treatment gap, prevention, pharmacological treatment, psychotherapy, synergism
Citation: Purebl G, Schnitzspahn K and Zsák É (2023) Overcoming treatment gaps in the management of depression with non-pharmacological adjunctive strategies. Front. Psychiatry. 14:1268194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1268194
Edited by:
Glenn Hartelius, Attention Strategies Institute, United StatesReviewed by:
Hirofumi Hirakawa, Oita University, JapanSherry-Anne Muscat, Alberta Hospital Edmonton, Canada
Copyright © 2023 Purebl, Schnitzspahn and Zsák. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: György Purebl, purebl.gyorgy@gmail.com