Junfan Wei1
Zhengcheng Yun2Yang Zhang1
Xiaoxiao Mei3Li Ba1†Huan Peng4†Na Li4†Meng Li5*Zhu Liu1*
Hanjiao Liu1*- 1The Seventh Clinical Medicine College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China
- 2Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China
- 3School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
- 4Nursing College of Fujian, University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
- 5Nursing Department of The Third People's Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China
Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the learning preferences and habits of medical students during the pandemic home e-learning, and to investigate the incidence of adverse emotions, optimistic character level and coping style. To explore the influencing factors of adverse emotions.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in China from March to June 2022. Medical students were recruited from three universities in China, and a questionnaire survey was conducted. The questionnaires consisted of a “e-learning preferences and habits questionnaire”, life orientation test questionnaire (LOT-R), and simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ). Finally, a total of 492 medical students who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria became the research subjects and completed the survey.
Results: A total of 57.7% believed they experienced no adverse emotions during home e-learning. ① During the COVID-19 pandemic, the score of optimistic personality of medical students was (7.25 ± 1.933), and the score of pessimistic personality was (5.82 ± 2.240). The score of positive coping was (21.75 ± 5.379), and the score of negative coping was (11.75 ± 3.611). ② The occurrence of medical students' adverse emotions during e-learning was influenced by “Whether there is a private, quiet space to study”, “Degree of knowledge mastery”, “Physical discomfort or not”, “Keep a regular schedule or not”, “Optimistic personality tendency”.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the during home e-learning, most medical students have their own learning equipment and can meet their learning needs. Their favorite mobile device to use is a mobile phone, and their favorite method of teaching is to provide course playback. More than half of medical students believe that they have some inconvenience in conducting research during home e-learning. With regard to teacher's real-time screen, the largest number of medical students support teachers turning on live screens so that they feel like they are interacting with the teacher. The preference for blended teaching is highest among medical students. In general, medical students were highly adaptive of the newest e-learning approach. Based on the statistic analysis, the factors that “Whether there is a private, quiet space to study”, “Degree of knowledge mastery”, “Physical discomfort or not”, “Keep a regular schedule or not”, and “Optimistic personality tendency” may be the influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse emotions.
1. Introduction
The emergence of novel coronavirus caused a pandemic that had the potential to result in infectious pneumonia that could lead to acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome and even death (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) named this coronavirus COVID-19 (2). On 30 January 2020 following the recommendations of the Emergency Committee, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) (3). The WHO designated COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020 (4) [as of May 5, 2023, the WHO no longer considered COVID-19 a pandemic (5)]. In order to lower infection rates, several nations throughout the world had adopted physical quarantine measures (6–8).
In this case, the pandemic had a significant impact on traditional face-to-face education. Secretary-General of the United Nations Antonio Guterres (9) stated that as of mid-July 2020, schools in over 160 countries had closed, effecting over 1 billion students. This pervasive and persistent disruption induced by COVID-19 had resulted in a paradigm shift in the delivery of knowledge in global educational systems (10). As instruction plans were derailed (11), the graduation of some medical students was delayed and their commencements postponed (12, 13). But at the same time, the spread of the pandemic had led to the demand for medically-related talent continued to rise (14).
Consequently, some medical schools (15, 16) began to investigate network-based distance education. There were numerous instances of online learning model exploration in China (17). In this phase, various e-learning websites and platforms emerged (18), such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC), Superstar, Tencent and so on. This provided the necessary technical support for home e-learning. Universities were also actively exploring teaching improvement strategies to effectively improve the e-learning effect of medical students (19, 20). The benefits of this newly developed learning paradigm was that students can acquire more precise knowledge with greater efficacy, regardless of time constraints. There are also pertinent surveys indicating that students appreciate this instructional method (21, 22). On the contrary, the abrupt pandemic, the unexpected change of learning mode, and the greater learning pressure that medical students generally face may have a negative effect on their mental health (23).
Optimism is a cognitive construct. The optimistic personality trait refers to a dispositional tendency toward optimism in one's personality, which is primarily characterized by having high expectations for positive outcomes (24). Dispositional optimism is associated with better mental health (25) and physical health-related quality of life (26), better sleep quality, positive adjustment to stressful life events and coping mechanism (27, 28). Pessimistic personality traits, on the contrary, imply dispositional tendency to be more pessimistic, which is manifested by more negative expectations about the future. Different coping styles and personality traits may influence students' reactions to life events or stress, thereby influencing their psychological state, level of satisfaction, and perceptions of online learning.
This study investigated the learning status of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic e-learning, explored the influence of personality traits and coping styles on individuals, and analyzed the influencing factors of medical students' adverse emotions. In order to understand the psychological state of medical students under major public health emergencies, and lay a foundation for the design and improvement of online learning courses for medical students and the promotion of mental health of medical students.
2. Objectives
The overall objective of this study was to explore the learning preferences and habits of medical students during the pandemic home e-learning, and to investigate the incidence of adverse emotions, optimistic character level and coping style. To explore the influencing factors of adverse emotions.
2.1. Specific objectives
(1) To investigate the preferences, habits and of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(2) To explore incidence of adverse emotions among medical students during the pandemic e-learning.
(3) To determine the factors influencing adverse emotions among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to e-learning.
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Study design
This study employed a cross-sectional study design. We chose to use a cross-sectional survey (29) because it is helpful for us to understand the current situation of e-learning, coping styles and personality tendencies among medical students, and to explore the influencing factors of adverse emotions. At the same time, cross-sectional research methods have been used in most studies on e-learning (30, 31) or the mental state (32, 33) of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. An anonymous and confidential online questionnaire was administered to medical students from three universities in China. The technique of convenience sampling was utilized. Due to the difficulty of population circulation caused by the pandemic, we chose this sampling method because it has the advantages of simple operation and easy data collection, and it has been used many times in other status investigation studies (34, 35) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
3.2. Study subjects
This was a cross-sectional survey. The survey was conducted from March to June 2022, which came at a time when most students were conducting home e-learning due to the pandemic. The research involved three universities: Zhengzhou University, Xinxiang Medical College and Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
The participants were recruited with the help of teachers and student leaders at these schools. Inclusion criteria for recruitment were as follows: (1) the student majored in medicine; (2) the student's major adopted e-learning education mode instead of traditional face-to-face school teaching; (3) the place of participation in e-learning was home; (4) participation in this study was on a voluntary basis, and (5) the student had been participating in e-learning for at least 6 months since the pandemic. Exclusion criteria: (1) students who had been diagnosed with a mental illness by a doctor before the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) those who had started their internship, stopped studying, or had not participated in e-learning.
3.3. Instruments
3.3.1. Demographics and under environmental e-learning factors questionnaire
Author-designed, the demographics questionnaire included 12 questions. The 12 questions were gender, grade, family size, category of residence, single-child or not, “whether the e-learning caused excess expenditure,” network status, “whether there was an independent, quiet space at home to provide learning,” “whether there was a failure to attend classes on time,” knowledge mastery degree, “whether there was physical discomfort,” “whether you can keep a regular schedule”.
As for how these 12 questions were determined, we will give the following research and discussion process. First of all, gender, grade, family size, and category of residence were taken into account regarding the general characteristics of the participants. Subsequently, being a single-child in China may lead to coping poorly with stressful situations due to the country's unique policy in this regard (36). So, we thought that might be a contributing factor and asked a question related to whether or not the student was an only child. The next two questions were “network status” and “whether there was an independent, quiet space at home to provide learning”. According to social learning theory, the interaction between environment and learners affects learners' cognitive activities and explicit behaviors (37). In the online education environment, family support and technical ease of use might be two key factors (38, 39). So, we thought that these might have an impact on learning outcomes and then on mood swings, including questions concerning this. The two questions immediately following were “whether there was a failure to attend classes on time” and “knowledge mastery degree”. In the online learning environment, when exposed to specific learning tasks, learners would have a certain degree of learning anxiety (40), such as how to perform well in online learning and obtain satisfactory performance. Learning anxiety could lead to the development of adverse emotions. The last two questions were “whether there was physical discomfort” and “whether succeed in maintaining a regular schedule”. We believed that keeping a regular schedule and good physical health might be the factors affecting mental health (41). Consequently, we considered investigating these two factors with two questions.
3.3.2. E-learning preference and learning habits questionnaire
The author-designed questionnaire was based on a number of interviews with medical students and relevant research (42–47). The questionnaire was designed to investigate students' habits, feelings and preferences during the e-learning. The content involved electronic product selection, teaching interaction methods preference, learning habits and other aspects. The Cronbacha's α in this investigation was 0.702.
The questionnaire was designed on the basis of small-scale interviews with medical students during e-learning and combined with relevant reference transfer. The items of the questionnaire were descriptive questions. We hoped to understand the habits and preferences of medical students during e-learning, so as to improve the satisfaction of medical students in the future. The questionnaire had good reliability, but it was not a strict scale, so the scores were not calculated nor were its items regarded as independent variables in the subsequent statistical analysis of the influencing factors of the incidence of adverse emotions. The survey results would be presented in a mainly narrative and descriptive manner, and the number of people who chose the same option for each question would be counted and expressed as a percentage.
3.3.3. The life orientation test questionnaire (LOT-R)
A study conducted (48) during the COVID-19 pandemic had shown that optimism as a protective factor could reduce the occurrence of adverse emotions such as anxiety, and we believe that optimism may be an influencing factor for the occurrence of adverse emotions. Therefore, we used this questionnaire to measure the score of optimistic personality tendency of medical students. This was a self-administered scale used to test the level of optimistic personality of the participants. This questionnaire was created by psychologists Scheier and Carver (49), and consisted of ten items, each with five possible responses: “strongly disagree,” “disagree,” “uncertain,” “agree,” and “strongly agree”. Participants responded to each item with these five possible answers depending on their level of agreement with that item. For assessment, a 5-point Likert scale is utilized. The specific calculation method was that the answer “strongly disagree” was assigned a score of 0, the answer “disagree” was assigned a score of 1, the answer “uncertain” was assigned a score of 2, the answer “agree” was assigned a score of 3, and the answer “strongly agree” was assigned a score of 4.
The scale included two subscales, which were scored in the following way when calculating the respective scores of the two dimensions. Items 1, 4, and 10 reflected the dispositional optimism tendency, such that the higher the cumulative score on these three items, the more likely respondents were to exhibit optimistic personality traits. Items 3, 7, and 9 reflected the dispositional pessimism tendency, such that the greater the cumulative score on these three items, the more likely the respondent was to display pessimistic personality traits. Items 2, 5, 6, and 8 were irrelevant filling items.
When calculating the total score of this scale, the three items of pessimistic personality tendency were scored in reverse, and they were accumulated with the score of optimistic personality tendency, which was the total score of this scale.
The Chinese version was translated by Lai et al. (50) and conducted on 248 Hong Kong university students, Cronbacha's α = 0.778. In a previous study of 519 medical students studying abroad in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.71 (48). In the present study, the Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.778.
3.3.4. Simplified coping style questionnaire (SCSQ)
Relevant studies (51, 52) had shown that positive coping style was beneficial to the mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Xie (53) adapted and translated this questionnaire into Chinese based on Folkman and Lararus' (54) Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ). Xie's survey of 846 individuals demonstrated that this questionnaire was reliable and valid. In Xie's survey, Cronbacha's α = 0.899.
The questionnaire consisted of 20 items, each of which had four possible responses: “never”, “occasionally”, “sometimes”, and “often”. A four-level score of 0 to 3 Likert scale was used. Items 1 through 12 represented positive coping dimensions. The total score of these 12 items was the positive coping style score. The greater the total score, the more likely respondents were to adopt a positive coping style. Items 13 through 20 were negative coping strategies. The sum of these eight items was the total score of negative coping style. The greater the total score, the greater the likelihood that respondents would adopt a negative coping strategy. In a survey conducted by Yuan et al. (48) on medical students studying abroad in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.91. In this study, the Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.899.
3.4. Data collection method
The data were collected between March and June of 2022. An online questionnaire was used to capture data. Teachers and student leaders helped organize and recruit medical students, and then our team members established a Wechat group to explain the research process and purpose of this study in detail to these medical students through text notice, online meeting or telephone, and informed them that all information provided to the study would be confidential, the questionnaire would be anonymous, and they could voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time.
Then, we used a platform named “Wenjuanxing” (https://www.wjx.cn/app/survey.aspx) to distribute the formal self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire distributed through the “Wenjuanxing” platform included two parts. The first part was an informed consent form, and the second part was a formal self-administered questionnaire. Participants had to sign the informed consent form before filling in the second part of the formal questionnaire.
Participants completed the survey anonymously to protect their confidentiality. Some questionnaires had the same answer from the beginning to the end, or the answers were inconsistent, which were considered as invalid questionnaires. All data from invalid questionnaires were eliminated from the analysis of the survey results. In this survey, 512 questionnaires were distributed, 510 were returned, and 492 were valid, for a recovery rate of 96.1%.
3.5. Statistical analysis
SPSS 24.0 is a professional statistical data analysis software. In previous COVID-19-related research (55) of, SPSS 24.0 had a good performance, so the data analysis of this study is conducted by SPSS 24.0. Data entry was performed using the double entry method. Firstly, descriptive statistics (56) were conducted on the demographic characteristics of the respondents, such as e-learning preferences and learning habits, as well as the adoption rate and percentage of count data. Then, the chi-square (57) was used to compare the incidence of adverse emotions under different demographic characteristics. While, the measurement data such as personality traits and coping style scores were expressed as () (48). T test (58) was used to compare the correlation between personality trait scores, coping style scores and the incidence of adverse emotions. Finally, the significant variables in the above chi-square test, T test and Pearson correlation analysis were used as the independent variables for subsequent regression fitting, and the occurrence of adverse emotions was used as the dependent variable for collinearity diagnosis. If there was no serious multicollinearity between the independent variables, binary Logistic regression (59) was used to analyze the factors affecting adverse emotions.
4. Results
4.1. Demographic and under environmental e-learning factors data
Among the 492 participants in this survey, 180 were male, accounting for 36.6% of the total, and 312 were female, accounting for 63.4%. Less than half of the respondents in the survey were postgraduate students (43.9%), and the rest were undergraduates (56.1%). In terms of family size, more than half of the respondents had a family size of 4–5 people (56.7%), followed by about one-third with 3 or fewer people (33.5%) and the smallest number of large families with 5 or more people (9.8%). Most of the respondents lived in rural areas, accounting for nearly half of the total sample (47.2%), and the remaining respondents were divided equally between town (26.4%) and city (26.4%). A quarter (25.0%) of the respondents were the only child in their family. More than half of respondents had incurred additional expenses (55.5%) due to home e-learning during the pandemic, the remaining respondents (44.5%) did not. Most of the respondents (52.2%) had a relatively stable network in their area, followed by a very stable network (28.0%); 16.1% of the respondents had a poor network connection their area, which would affect their study; and 3.7% of the respondents had a poor network signal, which would greatly affect their use. Most of the respondents had a separate, quiet environment at home for study (75.4%), while the rest (24.6%) did not. Nearly one third (31.5%) of the respondents failed to attend class on time, while the remaining 68.5% did not. The degree of knowledge mastery of the most respondents was basically grasped (51.8%), followed by partially mastered (38.4%), and the least was not mastered (9.8%). Nearly two-thirds of the respondents (65.2%) experienced physical discomfort during home e-learning. The remaining respondents had no physical complaints. 62.4% of the respondents could keep a regular schedule, while the remaining 37.6% could not. The demographic data of the study subjects were listed in Table 1 along with the number (N) and the corresponding percentage (%).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants.
4.2. E-learning preference and learning habits of medical students
In this survey, almost all respondents had their own home online learning equipment (98.6%). Regarding mobile devices used during home e-learning, mobile phone (78.9%) and laptop (78.7%) were the most frequently used, while desktop computer (7.1%) was the least frequently used. Most of the study equipment could meet the learning needs (82.7%). For the preferred teaching methods, the highest support rate was providing course playback (66.7%) and providing learning materials such as videos (63.4%), and the lowest support rate was the teacher taking roll call in class (21.1%) and asking students to turn on the camera for supervision (13.4%). As for taking notes in class, “listening to lectures and taking notes” was the most popular choice (37.8%). More than half (64.9%) of the respondents thought that there were some difficulties in scientific research during home e-learning, but it was within the acceptable range. For the view of the teacher's real-time screen, the highest support rate was to open the teacher's real-time screen so that you can feel the interaction with the teacher (32.3%). The proportion of respondents who preferred blended teaching (43.5%) was slightly higher than those who preferred face-to-face teaching (39.6%). Nearly two thirds (66.7%) of the respondents believed that home e-learning had some benefits. 56.7% of the respondents thought that they had no adverse emotions during home e-learning. And most of them (61.4%) thought that emotional problems did not affect their learning. As for the source of adverse emotions, more than one-third (33.7%) of the respondents believed it was due to their frustration regarding their difficulty in being self-disciplined when studying. For the reasons affecting the enthusiasm for class, the highest recognition rate was due to the lack of self-discipline (18.1%), followed by the lack of learning environment (15.7%). About half (49.0%) of the respondents thought that the effect of home-based learning was average. As for the main reason affecting the overall effect of home-based learning, the most recognized reason was the lack of learning atmosphere (42.1%). Other influencing factors included too many other things at home affecting study (56.5%), being affected by the Internet (23.2%), difficult to communicate with family members (22.2%), depressed atmosphere at home (16.5%) and people interrupting study (14.6%). Nearly a third of the respondents (32.3%) believed that the change in work schedule had a negative impact. The specific preferences and habits of medical students during home e-learning are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. E-learning preference and learning habits of medical students.
4.3. Personality traits and coping styles of medical students
Four hundred and ninety two medical students participated in this study, and their LOT-R scores for dispositional optimism tendency were (7.25 ± 1.933) while personality pessimistic tendency were (5.82 ± 2.240), respectively. total score of optimistic personality was (13.62 ± 1.967). in the SCSQ, the positive coping style had a score of (21.75 ± 5.379) and the negative coping style had a score of (11.75 ± 3.611).
4.4. Effect of demographic characteristics on the incidence of adverse emotions
In this study, a total of 492 medical students were examined. Of them, 208 (42.3%) believed they experienced more unpleasant feelings while home e-learning. The findings revealed that: there were statistically significant differences in the number of family members, living environment, excess expenditure, network status in the area, whether there was a separate and quiet space at home for study, knowledge mastery, physical discomfort, and whether to maintain regular work and rest (P < 0.05) when comparing the general information of medical students and the occurrence of adverse emotions under the factors that may lead to adverse emotions. For information, see Table 3.
Table 3. Independent variables with significant results in the comparison of the incidence of adverse emotions among different demographic characteristics (P < 0.05).
4.5. Correlation analysis of personality traits, coping styles and the incidence of adverse emotions in medical students
There were significant differences in the scores of optimistic personality tendency and positive coping style between medical students who had experienced adverse emotions and those who had not (P < 0.05). Figure 1 shows a boxplot of the personality tendencies and coping styles of medical students with different emotional conditions. When the participants were divided into groups according to whether they had adverse emotions or not, there were no statistically significant differences in pessimistic personality tendency and negative coping style between different groups. See Table 4 for details.
Figure 1. Boxplot of the personality tendencies and coping styles of medical students with different emotional conditions. (A) Shows the comparison of optimistic disposition score and pessimistic disposition score between medical students with and without adverse emotions. (B) Shows the comparison of positive coping style scores and negative coping style scores between medical students with and without adverse emotions.
Table 4. The relationship between personality traits, coping style and the presence or absence of adverse emotions.
4.6. The elements that affect medical students' emotions
4.6.1. Variables that were significant in univariate analysis were assigned values
Between the medical students who experienced negative feelings and those who did not (P < 0.05), there were significant variations in the scores of optimistic personality inclination and positive coping style. For information, see Table 5.
Table 5. Variables assigned for binary logistic regression.
4.6.2. Binary logistic regression analysis of the occurrence of adverse emotions
Variables with significant results of chi-square test, T test and Pearson correlation test were used as independent variables (“Family size”, “Category of residence”, “Whether excess expenditure is incurred”, “Network status in the area”, “Whether there is a separate, quiet learning environment”, “Degree of knowledge mastery”, “Physical discomfort”, “Keep a regular schedule or not”, “Optimistic personality tendency”, “Positive coping style”), and “Whether adverse emotions occurred” was used as the dependent variable. Collinearity diagnostic method was used to determine whether there was multicollinearity between independent variables. The results showed that VIF values were all <5, indicating that there was no serious multicollinearity between independent variables. Binary logistic regression could be performed.
The significant variables in the univariate analysis were assigned in accordance with Table 5 and binary logistic regression analysis (input method) was performed with the “whether adverse emotions occurred” as the dependent variable. The outcomes revealed that the chi square value of the total model's significance test was 120.065, surpassing the significance threshold of 0.01 (P = 0.000), according to the results. The regression model fit was extremely good, as evidenced by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test score of 7.135, P = 0.522 > 0.05, which did not approach the significance threshold. Table 6 presents the binary logistic regression results. In order to make the data clear and visible, Figure 2 shows the radar chart of significant influencing factors in the regression analysis of adverse emotions. For all individuals, the percentage of correct predictions from this binary logistic regression was 74.4%. According to the results, “Whether there was a private, quiet space to study” (P = 0.005), “Degree of knowledge mastery” (P = 0.000), “Physical discomfort” (P = 0.000), “Keep a regular schedule or not” (P = 0.000) and “Optimistic personality tendency” (P = 0.002) were the influencing factors of adverse emotions. Tables 5, 6 include information in this regard.
Table 6. Results of binary logistic regression analysis of the occurrence of medical students' adverse emotions.
Figure 2. Radar chart of significant influencing factors of adverse emotions.
5. Discussion
The purpose of this study was to understand the habits, preferences and adverse emotions of medical students in the pandemic period of home e-learning. To investigate the personality traits and coping styles of medical students in the pandemic period. And explored the influencing factors of medical students' adverse emotions during this period. We speculated that the occurrence of adverse emotions might be related to personality traits and coping styles. The discussions will proceed sequentially in the order of study objectives.
5.1. E-learning preferences and learning habits of medical students
Nearly all respondents (98.6%) had their own learning equipment. At the same time, most of the respondents (82.7%) thought that their existing learning equipment could meet their learning needs. This showed that medical students' needs for learning equipment could be basically satisfied during home e-learning.
According to the survey results, the learning tool with the highest use rate of home e-learning during home e-learning among the respondents are mobile phones (78.9%) and laptops (78.7%). This suggests that mobile phones and laptops may be the most common learning devices used by medical students during home e-learning. This might be as a result of the portability and ease of use of smartphones and laptops. In addition, more technical assistance and app development were dependent on smartphones (60). This might also be a reason for the high rate of mobile phone usage.
The highest levels of preference for a particular teaching method were for “Provide course playback” (66.7%) and “Provide videos and learning materials” (63.4%). Course replays, learning videos, and learning materials were essentially online learning resources that students can use on their own. Based on this survey, it is evident that providing accessible resources during online teaching probably was the way medical students preferred.
Based on the respondents' responses to the question “What do you think about the real-time screen of teachers?” 24.6% of the respondents to this question agreed that “The real-time screen of teachers' teaching is better and has a sense of reality”, 32.3% of the respondents believed that “It is better to have a real-time screen of teachers teaching, and feel that they are interacting with teachers”. From this we can see that more than half of the students (56.9%) wanted to be able to see a real-time video of their teacher during home e-learning. The reason is that it is more realistic or gives students a sense of interaction. This indicates that medical students prefer to be able to meet the teacher during the online teaching process, which they feel is more realistic and conducive to effective interaction. Another study (18) of online medical teaching in China during the COVID-19 pandemic also showed that interaction through online chat or video made online teaching more attractive to students.
Furthermore, the survey also revealed that only 15.7% of the respondents reported not encountering any difficulties in scientific research during the period of home e-learning. Among the remaining respondents, 64.7% believed that home e-learning presented challenges in scientific research but could be overcome, while 19.5% of the students found it highly inconvenient. This indicates that the convenience of most medical students to do research may be affected to some extent, but most students think that this inconvenience is still acceptable.
The results of the survey showed that only 16.5% of the students thought that the home e-learning mode was bad for the overall learning effect, while 68.9% of the students thought that this learning mode was beneficial in some aspects. This indicates a high acceptance of the online teaching model among students and is similar to the results of a systematic review (61). In addition, 43.5% of the students were in favor of the implementation of blended teaching methods in the future. This is similar to the research results of Yu et al. (62), that is, blended teaching has the highest support rate and significant learning effect.
The survey showed that 42.3% of the students had adverse emotions during the home e-learning process. At the same time, 61.4% of the respondents believe that emotional problems do not affect learning. This suggests that medical students were highly adaptable to home e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is contrary to the findings of a meta-analysis (63) of the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress in students during distance learning. This may be due to the fact that the study was conducted late in the day, and the students have largely adapted to the learning style of online instruction. It could also be because the study looked at all college students, whereas this one looked at medical students. Because of a deeper understanding of the novel coronavirus among medical students and more comprehensive knowledge of infection prevention than ordinary college students, they may be less likely to have adverse emotions such as anxiety and fear.
Among the main causes of adverse emotions considered by students, the most recognized one was difficulty in self-discipline when studying (33.7%). However, a study (64) on nursing students' adverse emotions such as anxiety and inattention during COVID-19 showed that their adverse emotions mainly came from worrying about being infected. Second was the worry of struggling to cope with school. Similar results were obtained in a separate survey (65) of students who participated in online education during the COVID-19 pandemic, which also showed that the main source of adverse emotions such as anxiety was fear of becoming infected. The reason for such different results may be due to the fact that the two surveys were conducted in the early stage of the pandemic development in this area, when our general knowledge of the novel coronavirus was not high and there was a lack of effective prevention and control methods. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pandemic prevention and control had become the norm, fear of infection, which ranked first (64) in previous studies, declined and fear of difficulty coping with school became the most important source of adverse emotions. Therefore, the main source of adverse emotions of students studying online at home at this stage was learning anxiety (40) caused by difficulty in being self-disciplined when studying. However, further studies are needed to verify this hypothesis.
Students thought that the following were the primary reasons impacting the success of their home e-learning: lack of learning atmosphere (42.1%); restlessness (31.5%); lack of communication with peers (12.8%); and anxiety about the unfolding of the pandemic (6.3%). It is clear that the major factors affecting learning are a lack of a conducive environment and restlessness. Lack of a learning environment will make students lose school supervision, become affected by the learning environment around them, even causing learners to feel lonely (66) and lower their engagement and academic achievement (67). Other influencing factors include difficulty in communicating with family members, depressed atmosphere at home, and disturbance at home, among which the most recognized is that too many things at home affect study. This is consistent with the findings of Dost et al. (68).
5.2. The personality traits and coping styles of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic
The survey's findings revealed that the optimistic personality tendency score for medical students was (7.25 ± 1.933), while personality pessimistic tendency score was (5.82 ± 2.240), respectively. Total score of optimistic personality was (13.62 ± 1.967). The total score of optimistic personality was similar to Kupcewicz et al. (69) in a survey of Polish nursing students during COVID-19. The score was higher than that of Song et al. (70) in a survey of stroke patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This result may be understandable because nursing belongs to the category of medicine, so the life orientation test questionnaire (LOT-R) scores of nursing students (69) in previous study was similar to those of medical students in our survey. It had been suggested that quality of life has an effect on optimism ratings (71), which may account for the medical students had higher LOT-R scores than stroke patients.
This study found that during the period of COVID-19, the simplified coping style questionnaire (SCSQ) score of positive coping style of medical students was (21.75 ± 5.379), and the score of negative coping style was (11.75 ± 3.611). The score of positive coping style in this study was slightly lower than the result of Li et al.'s (72) survey on 6027 college students in China. The negative coping score was substantially higher than that of other studies (33, 72) and comparable to the negative coping score obtained by Huan et al. (73) in the survey of rural inhabitants conducted for the COVID-19. The reason for this result may be due to the different time when we conducted the survey compared to the other surveys (33, 72). Our survey coincided with the second wave of COVID-19 in China. The differences in the scores of negative coping styles may be due to the different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic when the survey was conducted. This difference may also be due to the fact that the respondents and the regions where the studies were conducted were not exactly the same.
Individuals who are accustomed to adopt positive coping styles when encountering difficulties are more likely to seek solutions to problems (51, 52) and face difficulties through behavioral change or cognitive reconstruction. Therefore, college students, who tend to adopt positive coping styles, may undergo cognitive reconstruction when facing the sudden change of teaching methods, and are good at discovering some advantages of home learning that are not found in classroom teaching, such as saving travel time, replaying courses, and more diverse learning materials. They simultaneously proactively modified their approach to learning by actively embracing online learning techniques such as utilizing electronic notes, accessing online answer resources, and engaging in discussions within virtual classrooms. Through positive behavior change and psychological adjustment, these students found that home online learning was not an insurmountable problem, and thus formed positive expectations for learning effect, that is, optimistic personality tendency (24). Optimistic students tend to view the development trend of the pandemic and the effect of home-based online learning positively, thereby reducing the occurrence of adverse emotions.
Therefore, college students, who tend to adopt positive coping styles, undergo cognitive reconstruction when facing the sudden change of teaching methods, and are good at discovering some advantages of home learning that are not found in classroom teaching, such as saving travel time, replaying courses, and more diverse learning materials. Through positive behavior change and psychological adjustment, these students found that home online learning was not an insurmountable problem, and thus formed positive expectations for learning effect, that is, optimistic personality tendency (24). Optimistic students tend to view the development trend of the pandemic and the effect of home-based online learning positively, thereby reducing the occurrence of adverse emotions. Tendency and negative coping style. This is consistent with the findings of Almansa et al. (32).
5.3. The elements that affect medical students' emotions
According to the results of chi-square analysis, gender had no effect on the occurrence of adverse emotions. This is consistent with a study (74) conducted among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, grade had no effect, too. This was consistent with the results of another survey (48) on anxiety and depression symptoms of overseas medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast to another study (36), the effect of being a single-child on adverse emotions status was not significant in this study. The reason for this discrepancy may be due to the different regions in which the study was conducted. Because the cultural background of each region is different, the attitude toward the only child is also different.
Although in the chi-square test, family size, category of residence, extra cost, local network status and positive coping style were the influencing factors of the occurrence of adverse emotions, but in the binary Logistic regression with the occurrence of adverse emotions as the dependent variable, the influence of these factors on the occurrence of adverse emotions became insignificant. This may be due to the interaction between these factors and other independent variables.
Regression analysis revealed that the degree of knowledge mastery, the presence of physical discomfort, the ability to maintain a regular work and rest schedule, and the availability of a separate, quiet space at home to listen to lectures, optimistic personality tendency were the main influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse emotions. This revealed that the importance of the home environment for emotional states during home-based learning. It influences students' emotions and alters their learning experiences. When learning from home, as opposed to a school library or study room, distractions such as noise, interruptions from others, and other issues might make it difficult to focus on the task at hand. This can potentially lead to feelings of anxiety and frustration.
In addition, students may underestimate their knowledge due to new teaching techniques, a lack of textbooks, and other factors, which may cause them to feel anxious, worried, and other feelings. At the same time, this is accompanied by long hours of sitting, working, studying and looking at screens. The respondents may feel physically uncomfortable or even in a state of sub-health. Many times, these bodily discomforts (75) lead to unpleasant personal experience and even create adverse emotions. Difficulty in being self-disciplined when studying, lack of supervision, or concern over the spread of the disease during home study may also prevent many students from maintaining regular work and rest schedules. Adverse emotions are frequently brought on by irregular work and rest schedules and the sleep disturbance they induce (75).
Additionally, the scores of the optimistic personality tendency and the positive coping style of the medical students with adverse emotions were significantly lower than those of the group without adverse emotions, indicating that in the face of the sudden pandemic and the change in learning style, the optimistic are more likely to see the positive side of things from the reality that cannot be changed, consider problems from a positive perspective, and find benefits.
6. Conclusion
In conclusion, this study demonstrates the preferences, habits among medical students during the pandemic home e-learning. The number of medical students who did not have adverse emotions was more than that of those who did, and most of them thought that their emotional problems did not affect their study, showed that medical students had a good adaptability to home e-learning during pandemic. Based on the statistic analysis, the factors that “Whether there is a private, quiet space to study”, “Degree of knowledge mastery”, “Physical discomfort or not”, “Keep a regular schedule or not”, and “Optimistic personality tendency” may be the influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse emotions.
7. Recommendation
This study suggests that, for the most part, the medical students studied were able to adapt well to their home e-learning. What hindered this adaptability most was unstable internet connections, a lack of self-discipline in their studies, and being without a private and quiet working environment. It is recommended that if students want to improve their experience with home e-learning they should focus on making positive changes to these hindrances. Finally, it is also important to consciously cultivate students' optimistic disposition, which may require the joint efforts of students themselves, families, schools and so on.
8. Limitation
In the present study, we took into account that there are many kinds of adverse emotions, especially for the participants themselves are not aware of what adverse emotions they are experiencing, but this negative experience is easy to feel. Therefore, in order to identify the medical students with adverse emotions more comprehensively, we did not use the self-rating anxiety scale or the self-rating depression scale, which is widely used in other studies (74, 76). The disadvantages of this approach are also obvious. We only know that subjects have adverse emotions during home study during the COVID-19 pandemic, but we do not know what kind of adverse emotions they are, which needs further research and a more perfect research design to verify. In addition to this, the proportion of postgraduate students in the subject group of medical students in our study is relatively high, which exceeds the proportion of postgraduate students in the normal group of medical students, which may have an impact on the results of the study, and then affect the representability of this study to the whole medical student group. Last but not least, although another study considered the cause of students' adverse emotions (64), this factor was not considered in the design of the questionnaire in this study, so it is unknown whether the bad emotions of medical students came from problems with home e-learning or with the pandemic itself; this also represents a limitation of this study.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Baoan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
HL, ZL, and ML were mainly responsible for the study design and guidance. JW and ZY were primarily responsible for data collection and wrote the manuscript. YZ and XM were mainly responsible for collating the data. LB, HP, and NL were mainly involved in the statistical analysis. All authors read and discussed the manuscript, reached consensus, and participated in revising the manuscript to form the final draft. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Zhiqi Zhang, Dr. Lei Dong, and Dr. Lin Gao for their guidance in writing and drawing this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in wuhan, china. Lancet. (2020) 395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Naming the Coronavirus Disease (covid-19) and the Virus that Causes it. (2020). Available online at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it (accessed March, 2023).
3. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O'Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. Corrigendum to “world health organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)”. Int. J. Surg. (2020) 77:217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.036
4. Director-General W. Who Director-General's Statement on IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Coronavirus (2019-ncov) [EB/OL]. (2019). Available online at: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus-(2019)-ncov (accessed March, 2023).
5. World Health Organization (WHO). Statement on the Fifteenth Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee Regarding the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic [EB/OL]. (2005). Available online at: https://www.Who.Int/europe/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-%282005%29-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-%28covid-19%29-pandemic (accessed March, 2023).
6. Steffens I. A hundred days into the coronavirus disease (covid-19) pandemic. Euro surveillance: bulletin. Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles. (2020) 25:14. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.14.2000550
7. Baloch S, Baloch M A, Zheng T, Pei X. The coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic. Tohoku J Exp Med. (2020) 250:271–8. doi: 10.1620/tjem.250.271
8. Melnick ER, Ioannidis JPA. Should governments continue lockdown to slow the spread of covid-19? BMJ. (2020) 369:m1924. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1924
9. Lederer em. Un Chief Says 1 Billion Students Affected by Virus Closures. In: Ap News. (2020). Available online at: https://apnews.Com/article/virus-outbreak-antonio-guterres-united-nations-669072556f5a2502f587541ad82a275c (accessed March, 2023).
10. Peimani N, Kamalipour H. Online education and the covid-19 outbreak: a case study of online teaching during lockdown. Educ Sci. (2021) 11:72. doi: 10.3390/educsci11020072
11. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of covid-19. JAMA. (2020) 323:2131–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5227
12. Daniel SJ. Education and the covid-19 pandemic. Prospects. (2020) 49:91–6. doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
13. Haroon Z, Azad AA, Sharif M, Aslam A, Arshad D, Rafiq S. Covid-19 era: Challenges and solutions in dental education. J Coll Physi Surg–Pakistan: JCPSP. (2020) 30:129–31. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.Supp2.129
14. Forni G, Mantovani A. Covid-19 vaccines: Where we stand and challenges ahead. Cell Death Differ. (2021) 28:626–39. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9
15. Sochima Vincent E, Mamah N, Chioma M, Nweke P. Impact of e-learning on academic performance of postgraduate students in higher institutions in nigeria. J Eng Appl Sci. (2020) 15:2863–8. doi: 10.36478/jeasci.2020.2863.2868
16. Ganji J, Shirvani MA, Motahari-Tabari N, Tayebi T. Design, implementation and evaluation of a virtual clinical training protocol for midwifery internship in a gynecology course during covid-19 pandemic: a semi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. (2022) 111:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105293
17. Yang C, Xu D. Predicting student and instructor e-readiness and promoting e-learning success in online efl class during the covid-19 pandemic: a case from china. PLoS ONE. (2023) 18:e0284334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284334
18. Su B, Zhang T, Yan L, Huang C, Cheng X, Cai C, et al. Online medical teaching in china during the covid-19 pandemic: Tools, modalities, and challenges. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:797694. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.797694
19. Yihan W, Chen-Lin L, Lijun Y, Xiaoxia L, Jin-yan H. Investigation on the effect of online teaching in medical colleges and teaching improvement strategies in the post-epidemic era. Res Med Teach Coll. Univers. (2022) 12:22–7. doi: 10.3868/i.issn.2095-1582.2022.02.005
20. Yang Y, Wang E, Zhang L, Zu Y. Investigation and research on online learning satisfaction of medical students and influencing factors in post-epidemic situation. Heilongjiang Sci. (2021) 12:162–4. doi: 10.3969/i.issn.1674-8646.2021.23.068
21. Hertling SF, Back SA, Kaiser M, Loos FM, Schleußner E, Graul I. Students' and lecturers' perspectives on the implementation of online learning in medical education due to covid-19 in Germany: a cross-sectional pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne). (2023) 10:1145651. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1145651
22. Ortega-Donaire L, Bailén-Expósito J, Álvarez-García C, López-Medina IM, Álvarez-Nieto C, Sanz-Martos S. Satisfaction of online university education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare. (2023) 11:10. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101421
23. Philippe FL, Houle I. Cognitive integration of personal or public events affects mental health: examining memory networks in a case of natural flooding disaster. J Pers. (2020) 88:861–73. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12531
24. Leslie-Miller CJ, Waugh CE, Cole VT. Coping with covid-19: the benefits of anticipating future positive events and maintaining optimism. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:646047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646047
25. Zayas A, Merchán-Clavellino A, López-Sánchez JA, Guil R. Confinement situation of the Spanish population during the health crisis of COVID-19: Resilience mediation process in the relationship of dispositional optimism and psychological well-being. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126190
26. Sardella A, Lenzo V, Bonanno GA, Basile G, Quattropani MC. Expressive flexibility and dispositional optimism contribute to the elderly's resilience and health-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:4. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041698
27. Stiegelis HE, Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, van der Zee KI, Buunk BP, van den Bergh ACM. Cognitive adaptation: a comparison of cancer patients and healthy references. Br J Health Psychol. (2003) 8:303–18. doi: 10.1348/135910703322370879
28. Ramirez-Maestre C, RosaLopez-Martinez, Alicia E, Serrano-Ibanez, Elena R., Ruiz-Parraga, Gema T., Peters Madelon Goal adjustment and well-being: the role of optimism in patients with chronic pain. Ann Behav Med. (2019) 53:7. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay070
29. Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest. (2020) 158:S65–s71. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
30. Kipp M. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the acceptance and use of an e-learning platform. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:21. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111372
31. Xu Y, Chen C, Feng D, Luo Z. A survey of college students on the preference for online teaching videos of variable durations in online flipped classroom. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:838106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838106
32. Almansa JFF, Trivilin T, Hutz CS, de Almeida RMM, Vazquez ACS, de Freitas CPP. The mental health of Brazilian students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of gratitude, optimism, and hope in reducing anxiety. Trends Psychiat Psychother. (2022). doi: 10.47626/2237-6089-2022-0496
33. Tan T, Liu W, Zhao Q, Hou Y, Yang Y, Wu X, et al. Anxiety, depression, psychological stress and coping style in medical postgraduates in southeastern china when restricted to commuting between the campus and hospital during the covid-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:1035075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1035075
34. Tahir MJ, Malik NI, Ullah I, Khan HR, Perveen S, Ramalho R, et al. Internet addiction and sleep quality among medical students during the covid-19 pandemic: a multinational cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0259594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259594
35. Zheng R, Zhou Y, Fu Y, Xiang Q, Cheng F, Chen H, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among nurses during the outbreak of covid-19 in china: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. (2021) 114:103809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103809
36. Wu H, Li H, Li X, Su W, Tang H, Yang J, et al. Psychological health and sleep quality of medical graduates during the second wave of covid-19 pandemic in post-epidemic era. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:876298. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.876298
37. Zhang W, Xiong S, Zheng Y, Wu J. Response efficacy and self-efficacy mediated the relationship between perceived threat and psychic anxiety among college students in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:5. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052832
38. Xian X, Zhang Y, Bai A, Zhai X, Hu H, Zhang J, et al. Association between family support, stress, and sleep quality among college students during the covid-19 online learning period. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 20:1. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010248
39. Yeh CY, Tsai CC. Massive distance education: Barriers and challenges in shifting to a complete online learning environment. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:928717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928717
40. Yu Q, Xu D, Huang R. English learning anxiety of chinese rural junior high school students under the online class mode. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1156092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1156092
41. Marelli S, Castelnuovo A, Somma A, Castronovo V, Mombelli S, Bottoni D, et al. Impact of covid-19 lockdown on sleep quality in university students and administration staff. J Neurol. (2021) 268:2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10056-6
42. Sun J, Tong M, Liu Q, Shi Y, Yao H. Exploration of the black box mechanism of presence in home-based online education–an investigation from higher education. Modern distance education. (2021) (5):11.
43. Laar R A, Ashraf M A, Ning J, Ji P, Fang P, Yu T, et al. Performance, health, and psychological challenges faced by students of physical education in online learning during covid-19 epidemic: a qualitative study in china. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). (2021) 9:8. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081030
44. Nandi A, Xhafa F, Subirats L, Fort S. Real-time emotion classification using eeg data stream in e-learning contexts. Sensors. (2021) 21:1589. doi: 10.3390/s21051589
45. Liu J, Yi Y, Wang X. Influencing factors for effective teaching evaluation of massively open online courses in the covid-19 epidemics: an exploratory study based on grounded theory. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:964836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964836
46. Zhu H, Xu J, Wang P, Bian J, Zhao Z, Liu H, et al. The irreplaceable role of medical massive open online courses in china during the covid-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. (2023) 23:323. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04315-z
47. Border S, Woodward C, Kurn O, Birchall C, Laurayne H, Anbu D, et al. Working in creative partnership with students to co-produce neuroanatomy e-learning resources in a new era of blended learning. Anat Sci Educ. (2021) 14:417–25. doi: 10.1002/ase.2090
48. Yuan L-L, Lu L, Wang X-H, Guo X-X, Ren H, Gao Y-Q, et al. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depressive symptoms among international medical students in china during covid-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:761964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.761964
49. Scheier M F, Carver C S, Bridges M W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1994) 67:1063–78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063
50. Lai CC, Him C, Lee W, Wu H. The utility of the revised life orientation test to measure optimism among Hong Kong Chinese. Int J Psychol. (1998) 33:45–56. doi: 10.1080/002075998400600
51. Huang Y, Su X, Si M, Xiao W, Wang H, Wang W, et al. The impacts of coping style and perceived social support on the mental health of undergraduate students during the early phases of the covid-19 pandemic in China: a multicenter survey. BMC Psychiatry. (2021) 21:530. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03546-y
52. Li Z, Yi X, Zhong M, Li Z, Xiang W, Wu S, et al. Psychological distress, social support, coping style, and perceived stress among medical staff and medical students in the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:664808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.664808
53. Xie Y. A preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the simple coping style scale. Chinese J Clini Psychol. (1998) 2:53–4.
54. Folkman S, Lazarus R, Lazarus RS. Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1988). doi: 10.1037/t06501-000
55. Koran N, Berkmen B, Adalier A. Mobile technology usage in early childhood: Pre-covid-19 and the national lockdown period in north cyprus. Educ Info Technolog. (2022) 27:321–46. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10658-1
56. Prevalence and influencing factors on fatigue of first-line nurses combating with covid-19 in china: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Curr Med Sci. (2020) 40:625–35. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2226-9
57. Alnajjar D, Najjar H A, Rousan N A. Covid 19 symptoms analysis of decesaed and recovered cases uding chi square. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2020) 24:11428–31. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23636
58. Demirkaya H, Aslan M, Güngör H, Durmaz V, Sahin D. Covid-19 and quitting jobs. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:916222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916222
59. Simegn W, Dagnew B, Yeshaw Y, Yitayih S, Woldegerima B, Dagne H. Depression, anxiety, stress and their associated factors among ethiopian university students during an early stage of covid-19 pandemic: an online-based cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0251670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251670
60. Lellis-Santos C, Abdulkader F. Smartphone-assisted experimentation as a didactic strategy to maintain practical lessons in remote education: Alternatives for physiology education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adv Physiol Educ. (2020) 44:579–86. doi: 10.1152/advan.00066.2020
61. Naciri A, Radid M, Kharbach A, Chemsi G. E-learning in health professions education during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. (2021) 18:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27
62. Yu Z, Xu W, Sukjairungwattana P. Meta-analyses of differences in blended and traditional learning outcomes and students' attitudes. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:926947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926947
63. Xu T, Wang H. High prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress among remote learning students during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a meta-analysis. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:1103925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1103925
64. Fitzgerald A, Konrad S. Transition in learning during covid-19: Student nurse anxiety, stress, and resource support. Nursing forum. (2021) 56:298–304. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12547
65. Korneeva E, Strielkowski W, Krayneva R, Sherstobitova A. Social health and psychological safety of students involved in online education during the covid-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:21. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113928
66. Peng P, Hao Y, Liu Y, Chen S, Wang Y, Yang Q, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of mental problems in medical students during covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2023) 321:167–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.040
67. Mizani AC, Hendryadi H, Salamah S, Sari SR. Loneliness, student engagement, and academic achievement during emergency remote teaching during COVID-19: the role of the god locus of control. Human Social Sci Communicat. (2022) 9:305. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01328-9
68. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the covid-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 uk medical students. BMJ Open. (2020) 10:42378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378
69. Kupcewicz E, Rachubińska K, Gaworska-Krzemińska A, Andruszkiewicz A, Kuzmicz I, Kozieł D, et al. Loneliness and optimism among polish nursing students during the covid-19 pandemic: the mediatory role of self-efficacy. Healthcare. (2022) 10:6. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10060971
70. Song Y, Cui C, Jia Y, Zhang W, Meng L, Sznajder KK, et al. Family functioning and optimism as protective factors of life satisfaction among stroke patients during the covid-19 epidemic in shenyang, china. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:738634. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.738634
71. Zheng Q, Wang K, Zhou Y, Lei Y, Huang Y, Feng L. The mediating effect of self-esteem and optimism on health-related quality of life and depression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Nurs Res. (2021) 35:6. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.04.006
72. Li N, Fan L, Wang Y, Wang J, Huang Y. Risk factors of psychological distress during the covid-19 pandemic: the roles of coping style and emotional regulation. J Affect Disord. (2021) 299:326–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.026
73. Huan R, Ran D, Xiaoju C. Analysis of rural residents' knowledge, attitude, practice and coping style on COVID-19. J Chengdu Med Coll. (2020) 15:173–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2257.2020.02.010
74. Chen F, Zheng D, Liu J, Gong Y, Guan Z, Lou D. Depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun. (2020) 88:36–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.061
75. Yao Y, Wang L, Chen Y, Kang Y, Gu Q, Fang W, et al. Correlation analysis of anxiety status and sub-health status among students of 13-26 years old. Int J Clin Exp Med. (2015) 8:9810–4.
Keywords: e-learning, coping styles, personality traits, medical students, COVID-19 pandemic
Citation: Wei J, Yun Z, Zhang Y, Mei X, Ba L, Peng H, Li N, Li M, Liu Z and Liu H (2023) The status of e-learning, personality traits, and coping styles among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Front. Psychiatry 14:1239583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1239583
Received: 13 June 2023; Accepted: 04 September 2023;
Published: 25 September 2023.
Edited by:
Samer El Hayek, Erada Center for Treatment and Rehab, United Arab EmiratesReviewed by:
Samar Ahmed Amer, Zagazig University, EgyptCarol Nash, University of Toronto, Canada
Joseph Lobo, Independent Researcher, Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines
Copyright © 2023 Wei, Yun, Zhang, Mei, Ba, Peng, Li, Li, Liu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hanjiao Liu, liuhanjiao000@163.com; Zhu Liu, 191633201@qq.com; Meng Li, 1697912083@qq.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work