Maryellen Gibson
Colleen Anne Dell
Darlene Chalmers
Grace Rath1- 1One Health and Wellness Office, Department of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- 2Faculty of Social Work, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
- 3The Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science and Justice Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
In recent years, there has been a global advancement in the offering of canine-assisted interventions (CAI) in prisons. However, these programs have focused primarily on the benefits to the dogs involved and not on the impact on the participants. The authors of this perspective study have been running a CAI program with therapy dogs, called PAWSitive Support, in a Canadian federal prison since 2016. Thoughts from the program facilitators and interviews with prison staff indicate that the program, and specifically the therapy dogs, provides a unique and integrated source of comfort, support, and love for participants. These benefits are consistent with those seen in CAI programs outside of prisons. Unique to the prison setting appears to be an improvement in participant–staff relations. The therapy dogs have helped participants to experience comfort and consequently express their emotions. This seems to contribute to their recognition of support within the prison system and specifically developing trust with staff. Additionally, the dogs have helped to create an experience of the feeling of love within the prison, interpreted as the feeling of being cared for, which is rare for this population. The authors suggest that the integration of a therapy dog intervention in prison could be a novel harm reduction strategy to address issues related to prisonization and associated mental health concerns, including substance use. This consideration can offer unique insight into the field of forensic psychiatry about providing compassionate care to patients.
1. Introduction
During a presentation on canine-assisted interventions (CAIs) for the International Forensic Psychiatry Lecture Series in 2022 (1), Dr. Dell (who is an author of this study) was struck by a comment made by the series chair: Forensic psychiatry should provide more compassionate care to its patients. This idea has also been suggested in other studies within the forensic psychiatry field (2, 3) as well as in discussions surrounding prisons (4, 5). During her presentation, Dr. Dell suggested that with recent global advancements in the offering of CAIs, this may be one way for forensic psychiatry to consider the provision of more compassionate care to patients.
There is evidence to suggest that interacting with animals can have a positive impact on human health (6–9). This is supported by research specifically focused on animal-assisted interventions (8, 10–14), which “are goal-oriented and structured interventions that intentionally incorporate animals for the purpose of therapeutic gains and improved health and wellness” (15). Animal-assisted interventions are implemented in a variety of settings, such as retirement facilities, university campuses, and prisons. In prisons, CAIs can include training programs for shelter dogs to be rehomed, intensive training for service dogs, canine boarding and grooming services, and programs involving therapy dogs.
Therapy dogs involved in CAIs are friendly companion animals who, alongside a human handler, have passed a test enabling them to visit with individuals who do not have regular access to a dog and can benefit from their comfort, support, and love (16–19). While therapy dog programs commonly result in comfort, support, and love, these outcomes are not clearly defined (19). For instance, university students have defined love with therapy dogs as reciprocal and gaining positive feelings during visits, while support is understood as the creation of a relaxing environment to help students feel less stressed (20). Therapy dogs have also been found to provide comfort, soothe distress, and create a supportive environment where participants feel safe (21). Moreover, therapy dogs have been perceived to offer unconditional and non-judgmental love toward strangers, something not commonly found in initial human-to-human interactions (21–25).
Program evaluation research has demonstrated that CAIs implemented in correctional facilities can have a positive effect on both the institutional atmosphere and participant behavior (8, 26–30). Such interventions can lead to a calmer prison environment, alleviate tensions, and decrease levels of aggression and infraction rates (31–34). The few systematic reviews of CAIs that exist have found that these types of programs can decrease stress and anxiety experienced by participants, improve their levels of self-esteem, and improve participant–staff relations in the short term (27, 29, 35, 36). CAIs can also improve the ability of participants to develop relationships with other humans, including prison staff, through the creation of a trusting and caring relationship with a dog (29, 37). This development of relationships has been found to translate from the connection with the dog into recognition of personal feelings and emotions leading to better conduct within correctional environments (38).
In the realm of substance use research, companion animals and CAIs have been found to increase clients' experiences of connection and care with another being. These feelings of connection, support, love, and comfort can be seen to influence addiction and mental health outcomes including benefiting positive thinking patterns, improved emotional states, and positive attachments and style of attachment (7, 39–41). In 2017, a national survey of Canadians living in recovery found that 88% of respondents identified animals or pets as a support in their recovery journey from substance use with 44% noting animals or pets as important in sustaining their recovery (42). Research is building to suggest that the human–animal bond, the mutually beneficial relationship and connection between humans and animals, can positively influence attachment patterns, a noted factor in substance use recovery (39, 43).
Historically, prisons in Canada, as in many other places, have been designed with a focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation (44, 45). This trend has continued into the present day, with some experts suggesting that it has intensified over the past decade (46, 47). Many correctional institutions operate within a culture of violence, trauma, mistrust, and survival, which can have harmful psychological effects on individuals in these environments (46, 48). This culture and its associated norms can lead to an internalization process called “prisonization” (8, 27, 46, 49, 50). Studies have found that prisonization can contribute to an increase in feelings of stress, anxiety, hypervigilance, distrust, emotional restraint, emotional withdrawal, diminished self-worth, and an overall decline in perceived mental health status (46, 48). There is a considerable representation of mental health concerns within the prison environment with some members of this population requiring forensic psychiatric support (51).
A CAI that involves therapy dogs has the potential to provide prisoners with a distinctive form of comfort, support, and love. Although there is no standard definition of compassionate care at present in healthcare, there seem to be important elements including an aim to reduce the pain, suffering, and harm experienced by a patient and treating patients with compassion, kindness, respect, and dignity (52–54). These elements align closely with harm reduction principles as well, which aim to promote the wellbeing, rights, and dignity of individuals regardless of their socio-economic status, health condition, or location (55, 56). This study reflects on a CAI called PAWSitive Support that has been offered at Drumheller Institution, a medium security prison, in Alberta, Canada, since 2016. Staff have been involved throughout the program's development, providing a unique lens to consider the program's implications. In this perspective study, interviews by the program facilitators with Drumheller Institution staff offer insight into how the PAWSitive Support participants experienced a sense of comfort, support, and love; each contributed to a more affable environment to live and potentially develop within. Based on the staffs' insight and our team's experiences, it is our opinion that CAIs involving therapy dogs could be an innovative harm reduction strategy for addressing issues related to prisonization and associated mental health concerns, including substance use. It is difficult, if not impossible, for individuals to personally develop in an inhospitable environment. This consideration can offer unique insight into the field of forensic psychiatry about providing compassionate care to their patients.
2. The PAWSitive support canine-assisted learning program
PAWSitive Support is a canine-assisted learning program that aims to improve the wellbeing of participants through human–canine interaction. It was first delivered at the request of the Warden of Drumheller Institution in response to an increasing number of illicit drug overdoses. The program was developed by Dr. Colleen Dell from the University of Saskatchewan and Dr. Darlene Chalmers from the University of Regina and is grounded in an evidence-based experiential learning approach (57). The program curriculum includes objective-driven activities that are designed to promote human development skills, personal growth, and overall mental health, including addiction recovery. The program involves hands-on work with the program therapy dogs through structured activities that incorporate basic canine training, information about dogs, and the human–animal bond, as well as unstructured time for play and relaxation.
The program is offered over 4 intensive days and includes a follow-up session 6 months later. The 4-day program was designed around space availability. The follow-up sessions were less structured in nature than the initial program and allowed the program participants to reconnect with the program dogs, facilitators, and each other. After completing the program, the participants were invited to return and act as peer mentors. In this role, the peer mentors guided new program participants through the process, offered their insights or ideas on interacting with the program dogs, and supported the current participants in reflecting on the impact of the program on their experiences within prison. The first group of participants consisted of five individuals with a history of substance use, most of whom were serving life sentences. All participants liked dogs, were assessed as non-violent and non-aggressive at the time of the intervention, and had no history of animal abuse. The dogs involved in the program—Kisbey, a loving mature boxer, Subie, an emotionally attuned boxer, and Anna-Belle, a stubborn but affectionate English bulldog—were selected for their friendly personalities and ability to provide comfort, support, and love to those they interact with. They also worked as therapy dogs in their local community. The dogs were assessed for their health, they had basic obedience skills, and their welfare was paramount throughout the program's offering. Two program facilitators, Dr. Colleen Dell and Dr. Darlene Chalmers, led the program activities.
3. Insight and future directions for forensic psychiatry
The two program facilitators conducted eight interviews and a focus group with five prison staff members (including administration, front-line, and programming staff) who were associated with the case files of the first five PAWSitive Support participants. The eight individual interviews were conducted between one staff member and one facilitator, with the focus group having both facilitators present. These took place immediately after the program began and then approximately every 6 months over a 2-year period after the program ended to determine program impacts. The interviews and focus groups were semi-structured to allow for insights from the staff members to be collected beyond the experiences or knowledge of the facilitators and varied in length from 24 min to 89 min. The transcripts of these interviews were analyzed using flexible inductive coding methods to identify the program's overall impacts, following the methods outlined by Deterding and Waters (58). Ethics exemption was granted by the University of Saskatchewan Human Research Ethics Board, given the evaluative focus of the project. The incorporation of animals in a therapeutic capacity was approved by the University of Saskatchewan Animal Research Ethics Board.
Three main themes emerged from the analysis, which were described as prison-specific therapy dog-facilitated experiences of comfort, support, and love. This was not surprising, given that these are common therapy dog program outcomes outside of a prison context. Unique here is that these are staff-identified insights, whereas the majority of the extant literature focuses on participant experiences. Thus, focusing our perspective article on how these three concepts are perceived uniquely within a prison-specific context by staff can be a potentially important contribution to forensic psychiatry and allied professions.
3.1. Comfort
According to the staff, the program has a temporary impact on the prison environment for the participants. They explained that the prison environment is typically characterized by hypervigilance, fear, and projected strength as participants feel the need to hide any signs of vulnerability to stay safe and maintain status. However, the presence of the program dogs helped ease these tensions and alter the prison environment. Staff observed that participants were able to “let their guard down” and “show vulnerability” without fear of judgment. One staff member shared the following:
Staff 2: So this morning when we were sitting outside, Participant 1 and Participant 2 were sitting chatting and Participant 1 said, and it was just something that came out, and he said “I don't even feel like I am in prison right now…I feel like I am cured.”
Another staff member similarly shared the following:
Staff 1: Same with Participant 5. He's like, he's got gang affiliations, he's quite high ranking in his gang, so for him to let that down [his guard] a little bit, is big.
Additionally, the staff observed that the sense of comfort facilitated by the non-judgmental comforting presence of the dogs allowed participants to experience and express emotions that they would not normally, and for some, had not done in a very long time.
Staff 3: So that's some empathy, which again would be huge for Participant 4. Cause that's a big issue for him. Cause he can't show it, you know, you get so used to being that, you know look at me, the big tough guy… he probably, probably a place he hasn't been since I would say he was a child.
3.1.1. Comfort—insight for forensic psychiatry
Participating in the program offered participants a sense of comfort to explore their emotions and feelings with reduced fear of judgment. The culture and norms within the prison, alternatively, can create a disconnection between a participant and their emotions. This is especially important to substance-using individuals as disconnection from emotions and difficulty regulating them can lead to increased substance use (59, 60). In order to reduce the harm surrounding prisonization and how it can impact substance use, principles of compassionate care can be learned from the therapy dogs in this CAI. Recognizing complex emotions with compassion is a key element of compassionate care while reducing stigma reflects key principles of harm reduction as well (54, 61).
In forensic psychiatry, comfort is a key element to build rapport and trust with patients and is crucial for effective treatment (62–64). Animal-assisted interventions, with their attention to establishing participant comfort, have been found to be an effective and efficient way to achieve a therapeutic working alliance (23, 65, 66). Promoting comfort is also an anxiety management technique applied by forensic psychiatrists as is the promotion of relaxation, empathy, and fearlessness (67).
Our team has developed a Top 10 Resource for service providers, including in forensic psychiatry, to access evidence-informed outcomes that recognize the beneficial role of animals in the lives of individuals facing substance use concerns. Recognition of the positive benefits of human–animal interaction by service providers is a key, although under-recognized, way to build comfort with program clients. The resource is available at https://colleendell.com/top10.
3.2. Support
The staff members observed that having PAWSitive Support therapy dogs in the prison contributed to creating a supportive environment, which resulted in stronger relationships between the participants and prison staff. One staff shared (Staff 1) “More than anything probably [the program] is what motivated him but like, I think this helped him, like I said with his anxiety and with probably staying sober… and definitely helped with his relationship with staff.”
The staff members noted that the presence of therapy dogs during the program increased the participants' recognition of being supported within the institution, which in turn facilitated the development of trusting relationships between the participants and the staff.
Staff 1: He seemed to have more trust with me. Like cause when he came to me about getting out of the gang, it was like he came to the door… then he closed the door and “what do you think about maybe a transfer, so I can maybe distance myself, you know?”
Staff also thought that the program participants' trust with them was strengthened when they saw that prison staff supported the program, such as when one of the therapy dogs was permitted to visit a participant in the segregation unit.
Facilitator 1: Instead of fighting the institution… [the participants began] seeing it as something that was supporting them, and even… taking [therapy dog] to see [Participant 4] in] Seg yesterday,
Staff 1: You took [therapy dog]? Oh my gosh, that must have been so big for [Participant 4] …. I can't believe you got in there, that is amazing.
3.2.1. Support—insight for forensic psychiatry
The therapy dogs provided a positive and supportive alternative to the traditional prison environment. This had a positive impact on the participants' relationships with the institutional staff. Research has shown that supportive relationships and strong therapeutic alliances can reduce the risk of substance use for patients in recovery (68, 69). Supportive relationships that advocate for the rights and dignity of clients also strongly align with compassionate care and harm reduction (52, 70). While there is little research on the concept of support within forensic psychiatry, some studies have shown that staff taking an interest in patients' progress can lead to lower levels of distress (71, 72). Additionally, the recovery literature emphasizes the importance of a supportive environment for exploring client therapeutic change. There is quite a bit of literature on the importance of the therapeutic alliance in forensic psychiatry, where it has been found to be a key element in developing a patient-centered practice and achieving better outcomes for patients (73–75).
Our team has created a resource in collaboration with the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction to help professionals incorporate animals into their practice to create a more supportive and client-centered environment. This resource includes common definitions in the field, a video series, and a resource guide on how to become animal-informed as a practitioner. This resource also incorporates the voices of people with lived experience of substance use whose animals supported them in their recovery, reflecting the harm reduction tenant of respecting the expertise of people with lived and living experience (55). You can access this resource at https://colleendell.com/pawsitivecanine.
3.3. Love
The staff reflected that participants in the PAWSitive Support program expressed gratitude for being a part of it and had positive feelings toward the prison for allowing them to take part in it. They felt that the institution cared for them and that they mattered. This is not a common sentiment within the broader culture of prisons.
Facilitator 1: One thing that came out really strong from everybody… was that they saw [Correctional Service Canada] as supporting and caring about them. Which was surprising to me, is not how I was really thinking about it but to allow the program into here, and to allow them to participate in it, they saw as, maybe CSC really does care.
Additionally, the staff observed that the program participants' interactions with the therapy dogs were non-judgmental, trusting, and loving. It provided them with an opportunity to see themselves beyond the externally and internally imposed labels of “criminal,” “lifer,” or “gang member.”
Staff 4: [Participant 4] was very surprised, somebody would do that for him, because he's a bad guy, he's in prison, “well those dogs don't know that I've done bad things, and they still love me,” they're jumping on them, they're licking them, they're hugging them, and to have that love with no strings attached, because they can't do anything for you, they can't do anything for the dogs, and they know that, but still the dogs love them. And you guys took time out of your world and your life, but there's a lot of other things you could be doing, and they see that too, like “wow, they actually came in here, and wanna spend this time with us, wow, maybe I'm not so bad. Maybe I am okay.”
3.3.1. Love—insight for forensic psychiatry
Evidence-based literature tends to avoid discussing the concept of love. However, within the context of the PAWSitive Support program, institutional staff identified love as the participants' feeling of being cared for and valued. The concept of “mattering” is explored more commonly in literature than love. Research indicates that not feeling like one matters can contribute to increased criminal activity, mental health issues such as depression and suicidal tendencies, and a greater likelihood of substance use (76–79). Not feeling loved for and experiencing isolation within a prison environment can exacerbate these feelings (13, 80, 81). Harm reduction and compassionate care both reflect a need to address these experiences of isolation and support individuals without judgment (53, 61).
Our team is active on social media platforms (@PAWSitiveCanineConnections) and the Internet (www.colleendell.com), where access to our front-line experiences, research outcomes, and participant testimonials are regularly shared. This includes access to the Animal Memories magazine our office co-led in the development of, and which the Commissioner of Correctional Service Canada identified as “a remarkable collection of inmate stories about the importance of animals in their lives” (38). You can access the magazine at https://www.flipsnack.com/harperg/animal-memories.html.
4. Concluding remarks on therapy dogs, compassionate care, and harm reduction
Offering compassionate care in a prison setting is challenging, and establishing trust between participants and staff and within an institutional environment can seem impossible. One possible way to enhance the quality of care in forensic psychiatry is to take into account the insights of the Drumheller Institution staff and thoughts from PAWSitive Support facilitators who work with participants in this prison canine-assisted intervention program. According to the staff, the program's therapy dogs create a distinct and integrated sense of comfort, support, and love for participants—all elements of compassionate care. This, in turn, helps to establish some trust between participants and staff as well as the institution. Improving staff-participant relations is beneficial to creating a therapeutic alliance that supports participants' overall wellbeing and addresses the negative impacts of prisonization, such as substance use. By integrating this knowledge about human–animal interaction and insights into compassionate care into its practice, forensic psychiatry may be able to create a more positive and supportive environment for its patients, leading to better therapeutic outcomes, harm reduction for prisonization, and an improved standard of care.
It must also be noted that ensuring the welfare of the participating program dogs is crucial to a program's success. This is central to the offering of the PAWSitive Support program. Future research should consider collecting data over a longer term and include pre- and post-intervention measures, including mental health and substance use-specific outcome indicators. At the same time, moderating factors on outcomes need to be fully accounted for, such as participants' mental health symptoms and length of incarceration.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The perspective study involving human participants was reviewed and given ethics exemption by the University of Saskatchewan Human Research Ethics Board given its evaluation focus. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by University of Saskatchewan Animal Research Ethics Board. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
MG wrote the original draft of this manuscript. MG and CD contributed to the conceptualization and editing of the manuscript. CD, DC, GR, and MM all contributed sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revisions and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge funding support from the Office of One Health and Wellness, Department of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, and the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse.
Acknowledgments
The authors of this manuscript would like to acknowledge the prison staff members and participants who took part in this project. Without their willingness to work with us and share their experience, this study would not be possible. Furthermore, the authors would like to acknowledge the therapy dogs, Anna-Belle, Kisbey, and Subie, who provided their expertise to the intervention outlined in this study. While you have now passed, your impact will never be forgotten.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no financial conflict of interest but wish to note that they acted as the program facilitators for the project presented in this manuscript.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Ryland H. Welcome to the FORUM: A New Patient and Clinician Reported Outcome Measure for Forensic Mental Health Services. Saskatoon, SK: International Forensic Psychiatry Lecture Series (2022).
2. Frost L, Scott H, Mia A, Priest H. “Everyone needs to be cared for”: exploring care from the perspective of prison officers working with young adult offenders. (2021) 22:38–57. doi: 10.1080/24732850.2021.1945835
3. Maruna S. Why do they hate us? Making peace between prisoners and psychology. Int J Off Therapy Comp Criminol. (2011) 55:671–5. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11414401
4. Tait S. A typology of prison officer approaches to care. Eur J Criminol. (2011) 8:440–54. doi: 10.1177/1477370811413804
5. Walsh E, Freshwater D, Fisher P. Caring for prisoners: towards mindful practice. J Res Nurs. (2012) 18:158–68. doi: 10.1177/1744987112466086
6. Hodgson K, Kim FA, Monavvari A. Pets' impact on your patients' health: leveraging benefits and mitigating risk. J Am Board Family Med. (2015) 28:526–34. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.04.140254
7. Husband A, Ahmed A, Dell CA. An exploratory case study of the impact of psychiatric service dogs on problematic substance use among PTSD-diagnosed veterans. (2019) 25:113–7. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2019.1664663
8. Renck Jalongo M. Introduction: Building a Rationale for Prison Dog Programs. In M Renck Jalongo (Ed), Prision Dog Programs: Renewal and Rehabilitatron in Correctional Facilities (pp 1–16) Springer. (2019). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_1
9. Williamson L, Dell CA, Osgood N, Chalmers D, Lohnes C, Carleton N, et al. Examining changes in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and substance use among a sample of canadian veterans working with service dogs: an exploratory patient- oriented longitudinal study. J Veterans Stud. (2021) 7:194. doi: 10.21061./jvs.v7i1.194
10. Beseres M. Unintended rehabilitation: A comparative analysis of prison animal programs (Masters of Social Work). St. Catherine University, St. Paul, MN, United States. (2017). Available online at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1709&context=ssw_mstrp
11. Hill L. A touch of the outside on the inside: the effect of animal contact on the pains/strains of imprisonment. J Offender Rehabil. (2020) 59:433–55. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2020.1808558
12. Kunz-Lomelin A, Nordberg A. Assessing the impact of an animal-assisted intervention for jail inmates. J Offender Rehabil. (2020) 59:65–80. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2019.1697786
13. Smith HP. A rescue dog program in two maximum-security prisons: a qualitative study. J Offender Rehabil. (2019) 58:305–26. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2019.1596189
14. Turner WG. The experiences of offenders in a prison canine program. Fed Probat. (2007) 71:38–43.
15. Pet Partners. Beginner's Guide to Animal-Assisted Intervention Terminology. (2019). Available online at: https://petpartners.org/blog/a-beginners-guide-to-animal-assisted-intervention-terminology/ (accessed January 20, 2023).
16. Alliance of Therapy Dogs. A Therapy Dog vs a Service Dog. (n.d.). Available online at: https://www.therapydogs.com/service-dog-vs-therapy-dog/ (accessed February 27, 2023).
17. American Humane Society. Definition of a Service Dog vs. Emotional Support Animal vs. Therapy Dog. (n.d.). Available online at: https://www.americanhumane.org/app/uploads/2018/05/Definition-of-Service-Dog_3_7_18.compressed.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023).
18. American Kennel Club. What Is a Therapy Dog? (n.d.) Available online at: https://www.akc.org/sports/title-recognition-program/therapy-dog-program/what-is-a-therapy-dog/ (accessed February 27, 2023).
19. St. John Ambulance. (n.d.). Therapy Dog, Become a Volunteer. Available online at: https://www.sja.ca/en/community-services/therapy-dog-program (accessed November 9, 2022).
20. Dell C, Chalmers D, Gillett J, Rohr B, Nickel C, Campbell L, et al. PAWSing student stress: a pilot evaluation study of the St. John ambulance therapy dog program on three university campuses in Canada. Can J Counsel Psychotherapy. (2015) 49:332. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.223
21. Young JS. Pet therapy: dogs de-stress students. J Christ Nurs Quart Pub Nurses Christ Fellowship. (2012) 29:217–21. doi: 10.1097/CNJ.0b013e31826701a7
22. Dell CA, Goodfellow H, Chalmers D. Animal Memories. (2019). Available online at: https://www.flipsnack.com/harperg/animal-memories.html (accessed April 24, 2023).
23. Matuszek S. Animal-facilitated therapy in various patient populations: systematic literature review. Holist Nurs Pract. (2010) 24:187–203. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181e90197
24. Mims D, Waddell R. Animal assisted therapy and trauma survivors. J Evid Inform Soc Work. (2016) 13:452–7. doi: 10.1080/23761407.2016.1166841
25. Willis DA. Animal therapy. Rehabil Nurs. (1997) 22:78–81. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1997.tb01738.x
26. Antonio ME, Davis RG, Shutt SR. Dog training programs in pennsylvania's department of corrections: perceived effectiveness for inmates and staff. Soc Animals. (2017) 25:475–89. doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341457
27. Furst G. The empirical evidence supporting dog trainign programs for incarcerated people. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prison Dog Programs: Renewal and Rehabilitation in Correctional Facilities (pp. 17–36). Springer. (2019). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_2
28. Collica-Cox K, Furst G. Implementing successful jail-based programming for women: a case study of planning parenting, prison and pups—Waiting to “Let the Dogs In”. Journal of Prison Education Re-Entry. (2019) 5:101–19. doi: 10.25771/69dq-j070
29. Aufderheide C, Renck Jalongo M. Celebrating achievements of prison dog programs. In M. Renck Jalongo (Ed.), Prision Dog Programs: Renewal and Rehabilitation in Correctional Facilities (pp. 275–304). Springer. (2019). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_14
30. Smith HP, Smith H. A qualitative assessment of a dog program for youth offenders in an adult prison. Public Health Nursing. (2019) 36:507–13. doi: 10.1111/phn.12622
31. Britton DM, Button A. Prison Pups: assessing the effects of dog training programs in correctional facilities. J Family Soc Work. (2008) 9:79–95. doi: 10.1300/J039v09n04_06
32. Flynn E, Combs KM, Gandenberger J, Tedeschi P, Morris KN. Measuring the psychological impacts of prison-based dog training programs and in-prison outcomes for inmates. Prison J. (2019) 224–239. doi: 10.1177/0032885519894657
33. Fournier AK, Geller ES, Fortney EV. Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behav Soc Iss. (2007) 16:89–105. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v16i1.385
34. Haynes M. Pet Therapy: program lifts spirits, reduces violence in institution's mental health unit | Office of justice programs. Corr Today. (1991) 53:120–2.
35. Cooke BJ, Farrington DP. The effectiveness of dog-training programs in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Prison J. (2016) 96:854–76. doi: 10.1177/0032885516671919
36. Villafaina-Domínguez B, Collado-Mateo D, Merellano-Navarro E, Villafaina S. Effects of dog-based animal-assisted interventions in prison population: a systematic review. Animals. (2020) 10:2129. doi: 10.3390/ani10112129
37. Thomas R, Matusitz J. Pet therapy in correctional institutions: a perspective from relational-cultural theory. J Evid Inform Soc Work. (2016) 13:228–35. doi: 10.1080/23761407.2015.1029840
38. Dell C, Chalmers D, Stobbe M, Rohr B, Husband A. Animal-assisted therapy in a Canadian psychiatric prison. Int J Prison Health. (2019) 15:209–31. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-04-2018-0020
39. Dell CA, Butt P. Recognizing the role of companion animals in addiction recovery. Can J Addict. (2023) 14:6–8. doi: 10.1097/CXA.0000000000000175
40. Kosteniuk B, Dell CA, Cruz M, Chalmers D. An experiential approach to prisoners who use substances. J Forensic Nurs. (2023) 1–7. doi: 10.1097./JFN.0000000000000435
41. Kosteniuk BM, Dell CA. How companion animals support recovery from opioid use disorder: an exploratory study of patients in a methadone maintenance treatment program. Aporia. (2020) 12:91–108. doi: 10.18192/aporia.v12i1.4841
42. Mcquaid RJ, Malik A, Moussouni K, Baydack N, Stargardter M, Morrisey M, et al. Life in Recovery from Addiction in Canada (Technical Report). Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. (2017). Available online at: www.ccsa.ca (accessed November 11, 2022).
43. American Veterinary Medical Association. Human-animal bond. (n.d.). Available online at: https://www.avma.org/one-health/human-animal-bond (accessed June 18, 2021).
44. Morris N, Rothman DJ. The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Society—Google Books. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (1995).
45. Strange C. The undercurrents of penal culture: punishment of the body in mid-twentieth-century Canada. Law and History Review. (2001) 19:343–85. doi: 10.2307/744133
46. Haney C. The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment. (2001). Available online at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/psychological-impact-incarceration-implications-post-prison-adjustment-0#N_2_ (accessed January 20, 2023).
47. Haney C. Prison effects in the era of mass incarceration. Prison J. (2012) 3:003288551244860. doi: 10.1177/0032885512448604
48. Miszewski K, Miałkowska-Kozaryna M. Discussion about the problem of prisonization based on our own research. Resocjalizacja Polska. (2020) 19:309–23.
49. Naderi N. Prisonization. Encyclop Criminol Crim Just. (2013) 1–5. doi: 10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj124
50. Paterline BA, Orr D. Adaptation to prison and inmate self-concept. J. Psychol. Behav. Sci. (2016) 4:2374–99. doi: 10.15640/jpbs.v4n2a6
51. Cameron C, Khalifa N, Bickle A, Safdar H, Hassan T. Psychiatry in the federal correctional system in Canada. BJPsych Int. (2021) 18:42–6. doi: 10.1192/bji.2020.56
52. Crawford P, Brown B, Kvangarsnes M, Gilbert P. The design of compassionate care. J Clin Nurs. (2014) 23:3589–99. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12632
53. Dewar B. Cultivating compassionate care. Nurs Stand. (2013) 27:48–55. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.04.27.34.48.e7460
54. Tehranineshat B, Rakhshan M, Torabizadeh C, Fararouei M. Compassionate care in healthcare systems: a systematic review. J Nat Med Assoc. (2019) 111:546–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.04.002
55. Denis-Lalonde D, Lind C, Estefan A. Beyond the buzzword: a concept analysis of harm reduction. Res Theory Nurs Pract. (2019) 33:310–23. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.33.4.310
56. Marlatt GA. Harm reduction: come as you are. Addict Behav. (1996) 21:779–88. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(96)00042-1
57. Chalmers D, Dell C, Dixon J, Rath G. Chapter 25 PAWSitive Support : A Canine Assisted Learning Program to Support Prisoners in Healing from Substance Use. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars (2023).
58. Deterding NM, Waters MC. Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociol Method Res. (2018) 50:708–39. doi: 10.1177/0049124118799377
59. Hemming L, Pratt D, Shaw J, Haddock G. Prison staff's views and understanding of the role of emotions in prisoner suicide and violence. J Foren Psychiatry Psychol. (2020) 31:868–88. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2020.1807584
60. Kun B, Demetrovics Z. Emotional intelligence and addictions: a systematic review. Sub Use Misuse. (2010) 45:1131–60. doi: 10.3109/10826080903567855
61. Harm Reduction International. (n.d.). What is Harm Reduction. Available online at: from https://hri.global/what-is-harm-reduction/ (accessed November 1, 2022).
62. Collins R, Lincoln R, Frank MG. The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. (2002). Available online at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/psylaw9&id=75&div=11&collection=journals (accessed January 20, 2023).
63. Goldenson J, Josefowitz N. Remote forensic psychological assessment in civil cases: considerations for experts assessing harms from early life abuse. Psychol Inj Law. (2021) 1:3. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09404-2
64. Risan P, Binder PE, Milne RJ. Emotional intelligence in police interviews—Approach, training and the usefulness of the concept. (2016) 16:410–24. doi: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1234143
65. Dell CA, Mills S, Goodfellow H, Cruz M. Practice innovations a novel approach to supporting student mental health in the university classroom with therapy dogs. Can J Commun Mental Health. (2022) 41:10. doi: 10.7870/cjcmh-2022-010
66. Donnelly V, Lynch A, Devlin C, Naughton L, Gibbons O, Mohan D, et al. Therapeutic alliance in forensic mental health: coercion, consent and recovery. Ir J Psychol Med. (2011) 28:21–8. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700011861
67. Leigh-Hunt N, Perry A. A systematic review of interventions for anxiety, depression, and PTSD in adult offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. (2015) 59:701–25. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13519241
68. Meier PS, Barrowclough C, Donmall MC. The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: a critical review of the literature. Addiction. (2005) 100:304–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00935.x
69. Stevens E, Jason LA, Ram D, Light J. Investigating social support and network relationships in substance use disorder recovery investigating social support and network relationships in substance use disorder recovery. Substance Abuse. (2015) 36:396–9. doi: 10.1080./08897077.2014.965870
70. Pauly B. Harm reduction through a social justice lens. Int JDrug Policy. (2008) 19:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.005
71. Day A, Casey S, Vess J, Huisy G. Assessing the therapeutic climate of prisons. Crim Just Behav. (2012). 39:156–68. doi: 10.1177/0093854811430476
72. Luke RJ, Daffern M, Skues JL, Trounson JS, Pfeifer JE, Ogloff JRP, et al. The effect of time spent in prison and coping styles on psychological distress in inmates. Prison J. (2020) 2021:60–79. doi: 10.1177/0032885520978475
73. Cordess C. Building and Nurturing a Therapeutic Alliance with Offenders. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy (pp. 75–86). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. (2002). Available online at: https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=HZ8fSSIAJNoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA75&dq=therapeutic+alliance+forensic+psychiatry&ots=l4shvUc07f&sig=jvqo0HgMqsjIVXaAAhNwfeaphP4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=therapeuticallianceforensicpsychiatry&f=false (accessed February 13, 2023).
74. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. (2000) 51:1087–110. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8
75. Nyman M, Hofvander B, Nilsson T, Wijk H. Mental health nurses' experiences of risk assessments for care planning in forensic psychiatry. Int J Forensic Ment Health. (2020) 19:103–13. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2019.1646356
76. Elliott GC, Colangelo MF, Gelles RJ. Mattering and suicide ideation: establishing and elaborating a relationship. Soc Psychol Quar. (2016) 68:223–38. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800303
77. Lewis DM. A matter for concern: young offenders and the importance of mattering. Deviant Behav. (2016) 38:1318–31. doi: 10.1080./01639625.2016.1197659
78. Pavelich AR. Exploring Mattering and the Human-Animal Bond: The Impact of Service Dogs for Military Veterans at High Risk for Suicide [University of Saskatchewan]. (2021). Available online at: www.servicedogresearch.ca (accessed January 20, 2023).
79. Schmidt CJ, Caldwell CH, Heinze JE, Stoddard SA. Examining the Role of Interpersonal and Societal Mattering in the Health and Wellbeing of Rural Adolescents. University of Michigan. (2018).
80. Goomany A, Dickinson T. The influence of prison climate on the mental health of adult prisoners: a literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. (2015) 22:413–22. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12231
Keywords: prisonization, animal-assisted interventions, therapy dog, canine-assisted interventions, harm reduction, compassionate care, incarceration
Citation: Gibson M, Dell CA, Chalmers D, Rath G and Mela M (2023) Unleashing compassionate care: canine-assisted intervention as a promising harm reduction approach to prisonization in Canada and its relevance to forensic psychiatry. Front. Psychiatry 14:1219096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1219096
Received: 08 May 2023; Accepted: 10 July 2023;
Published: 03 August 2023.
Edited by:
Barna Konkolý Thege, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, CanadaReviewed by:
Cindy Stern, University of Adelaide, AustraliaKyrsten Grimes, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Canada
Copyright © 2023 Gibson, Dell, Chalmers, Rath and Mela. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maryellen Gibson, bWFyeWVsbGVuLmdpYnNvbiYjeDAwMDQwO3VzYXNrLmNh