Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 14 October 2022
Sec. Public Mental Health

Risks of suicide among family members of suicide victims: A nationwide sample of South Korea

\nJihoon Jang,,&#x;Jihoon Jang1,2,3Seong Yong Park,&#x;Seong Yong Park4,5Yeon Yong Kim&#x;Yeon Yong Kim4Eun Ji Kim,Eun Ji Kim1,2Gusang LeeGusang Lee2Jihye SeoJihye Seo2Eun Jin Na,,Eun Jin Na1,2,6Jae-Young ParkJae-Young Park2Hong Jin Jeon,,,,
Hong Jin Jeon1,2,7,8,9*
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • 2Korea Psychological Autopsy Center, Seoul, South Korea
  • 3Department of Psychiatry, Keyo Hospital, Uiwang, South Korea
  • 4Department of Big Data Management, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, South Korea
  • 5Department of Health Administration, Yonsei University Graduate School, Wonju, South Korea
  • 6Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
  • 7Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 8Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 9Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea

Objective: Identifying the risks of completed suicide in suicide survivors is essential for policies supporting family members of suicide victims. We aimed to determine the suicide risk of suicide survivors and identify the number of suicides per 100,000 population of suicide survivors, bereaved families of traffic accident victims, and bereaved families with non-suicide deaths.

Methods: This was a nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea. The data were taken from the Korean National Health Insurance and Korea National Statistical Office between January 2008 and December 2017. The relationship between the decedent and the bereaved family was identified using the family database of the National Health Insurance Data. Age and gender were randomly matched 1:1 among 133,386 suicide deaths and non-suicide deaths. A proportional hazard model regression analysis was conducted after confirming the cumulative hazard using Kaplan–Meier curves to obtain the hazard ratio (HR) of completed suicide in suicide survivors.

Results: Using 423,331 bereaved families of suicide victims and 420,978 bereaved families of non-suicide deaths as the control group, HR of completed suicide in suicidal survivors was found to be 2.755 [95% confidence limit (CL): 2.550–2.977]. HR for wives committing suicide after husbands' suicide was 5.096 (95% CL: 3.982–6.522), which was the highest HR among all relationships with suicide decedents. The average duration from suicide death to suicide of family members was 25.4 months. Among suicide survivors, the number of suicides per 100,000 people was 586, thrice that of people in bereaved families of traffic accident victims and in bereaved families of non-suicide deaths.

Conclusion: The risk of completed suicide was three times higher in suicide survivors than in bereaved families with non-suicide deaths, and it was highest in wives of suicide decedents. Thus, socio-environmental interventions for suicidal survivors must be expanded.

Introduction

Although the suicide rate is declining worldwide, about 800,000 people die each year by suicide. This is equivalent to 10.6 per 100,000 people (1). In Korea, which ranks first in suicide mortality rate among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, the suicide rate has recently increased. In 2019, there were 26.9 suicide deaths per 100,000 people (a total of 13,799 deaths by suicide) (2). According to a recent meta analysis of 18 studies in six countries, the prevalence of exposure to suicide by family members and suicide by friends and colleagues during one's lifetime was 3.9 and 14.53%, respectively (3). One suicide is known to affect from six to 20 people on average, including extended family and coworkers (4, 5).

Family members of suicide victims are at increased risk for physical diseases such as pain, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer (69). They suffer significant complicated grief due to stigmatization, guilt, responsibility, shame, and rejection (1016). Moreover, they experience symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with an increased risk of psychiatric hospitalization (7, 1725). Suicide survivors are at a higher risk for suicide compared to the general population. Their levels of suicide idea, suicide plans, and suicide attempts are 3, 5, 7, and 6 times higher, respectively, than those of the general population (26). Compared to bereavements in sudden deaths from natural causes, the risk of suicide attempts in suicide survivors is known to be 1.65 times higher (27).

There have been studies on completed suicide among family members of suicide victims. Suicide risk increased by 2.58 times in families with a history of completed suicide (28). According to a Swedish study (29), the probability of suicide was more than twice as high in first-degree relatives of 8,396 suicide deaths as in first-degree relatives of 7,568 non-suicide deaths (9.4 and 4.6%, respectively). In a large nested case-control study (30), the risk of a husband committing suicide was 46.2 when the spouse died by suicide, which was three times the risk when the spouse died from causes other than suicide. Parents who lost their children by suicide were twice as likely to commit suicide as those who lost their children through other means (risk: 2.54 and 1.4, respectively) (31). When a sibling committed suicide, the remaining sibling's suicide risk was 2.44 for men and 3.19 for women, which was more than twice that when a sibling died by other means (32). Meanwhile, in South Korea, a large-scale study on the actual completed suicide risk of suicide survivors has not yet been conducted.

To determine the risk of completed suicide among suicide survivors, this study carried out a large-scale analysis of the bereaved families of all suicide deaths in 10 years in South Korea. The hazard ratio (HR) for completed suicide among suicide survivors was explored for each family relationship by establishing bereaved families of non–suicide victims as control group. The average length of time it took to commit suicide was examined. Furthermore, suicides per 100,000 people and the proportion of completed suicides to the number of all deaths in the suicide survivors were compared to those in families with traffic accident deaths and families with deaths other than suicide including traffic accident deaths. The analysis considered surviving family relationships, and the gender of spouses, parents, children, and siblings of the suicide victims.

Materials and methods

Data

This population-based cohort study collected data for analysis from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Statistics Korea. The National Health Information database of the NHIS includes data such as deaths, medical institution treatments, and national examinations. It also provides the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of all citizens. In this study, in addition to the generally provided national health information database, a family database, which could be accessed through policy research, was used to link family relationships between individuals for an in-depth analysis of suicide survivors. Statistics Korea's data on the causes of death are national statistics that provide a standardized cause classification based on the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD). List of people who died between January 2008 and December 2017 was extracted from NHIS data. After identifying the deceased among bereaved family through linking family data, it was sent to Statistics Korea. Through the microdata integrated service of Statistics Korea, the ICD code was linked to the list of deaths. This study was carried out after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center.

Study population

By linking data from the NHIS and Statistics Korea, a 1:1 randomized matching of gender and age was conducted for 133,386 suicide deaths from January 2008 to December 2017. Ages were matched in five groups: under 20, 20–39, 40–59, 60–79, and >80 years old. When linking the family database, cases in which there were two or more bereaved family members related to a spouse's father and mother due to remarriage and cases without bereaved families were removed. Thus, survival analysis was performed for survivors of 126,344 suicide deaths and 125,513 non-suicide deaths.

For bereaved families, the family database of the NHIS was linked. The scope of the bereaved family was limited to spouses, fathers, mothers, brothers, and sisters to increase the reliability of data. The number of suicide victims of suicide survivors was identified by the family relationships of 126,344 suicide victims, excluding those with no survivors or overlapping relationships. The number of suicides was examined by family relationships for 55,747 traffic accident fatalities (V01–V99) and 2,186,890 deaths other than by suicide.

Outcome variable: Suicide

Statistics Korea's data on the cause of death were linked from 2008 to 2017 for the outcome variable of survival analysis as suicide of the bereaved family. According to the ICD, the code X60–X84 classified a death as suicide. Deaths not classified as suicide were defined as non-suicides.

Covariates

Regarding the family of origin, age, gender, health insurance amounts, the national health insurance classification of the subscriber, divided into employee health insurance and local—subscriber health insurance were used as correction variables. Regarding the bereaved families of suicide victims and the bereaved families of non–suicide victims, only age and gender were used as correction variables, because only minimal linkage was possible according to the personal information policy.

Statistical analysis

The duration from non-suicide deaths randomly matched with all suicide deaths to suicide in the bereaved family was investigated. If bereaved family members did not die by committing suicide, the observation period was set until December 2017. The cumulative hazard of completed suicide was examined for the family members of suicide victims and the control group using Kaplan–Meier curves. Since the suicide rate was not high in absolute numbers, the Y-axis was limited to 0.9–1.0. A log-rank test was performed to analyze statistically significant differences between the two curves. Through proportional hazard model regression analysis, the HR of completed suicide among suicide survivors was obtained. In addition, the average time was obtained by calculating the duration from suicide decedents to the suicide death of a family member. This analysis was conducted for suicide decedents and their spouses, fathers, mothers, children, and siblings. All data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute) in this study.

Results

Using 423,331 bereaved families of suicide deaths, along with 420,978 bereaved families of non-suicide deaths as the control group, the proportional hazard assumption was confirmed to be satisfied through Kaplan–Meier curves (Figure 1A). Moreover, the cumulative hazard was expressed through the Kaplan–Meier curve for each family member of suicide victims, including spouses, parents, children, and siblings (Figures 1BF). Considering gender, the proportional hazard assumption was satisfied (Supplementary Figure 1). As a result of the log-rank test, the Kaplan–Meier curve between the two groups showed that the P-values for all family relationships were significantly <0.05.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier cumulative hazard for suicide in suicide survivors and controls. (A) Total suicide survivors. (B) Spouse. (C) Children–father. (D) Children–Mother. (E) Parent–children. (F) Siblings. N, bereaved families of non–suicide deaths; S, bereaved families of suicide deaths.

Proportional hazard model regression analysis was performed according to family relationships to obtain the HR of completed suicide in family members using the bereaved families of non–suicide victims as the control group. The risk of completed suicide in all suicide survivors was found to be about three times higher than that in bereaved families of the non-suicide deaths (Table 1). In terms of family relationships, when a spouse committed suicide, suicide by the remaining spouse had the highest HR, followed by mothers committing suicide after the suicide of a child, the remaining children committing suicide after a parent's suicide, the remaining sibling committing suicide after a sibling's suicide, and fathers committing suicide after a child suicide.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Hazard ratio (HR) of suicide in suicide survivors than in non-suicide survivors.

Regarding the risk of suicide in the spouses, parents, children, and siblings, taking gender into account, the HR for wives completing a suicide attempt when the husband died by suicide was the highest, followed by the HR for daughters committing suicide after a mother's completed suicide. When a sister died by suicide, the HR of other sisters committing suicide was higher than other gender-sibling relationships. When a daughter died by suicide, the mother's suicide HR was higher than the risk of a mother's completed suicide risk in the case of a son's suicide death. Furthermore, the father's risk of suicide when a son died by suicide was higher than the risk of a father's suicide when a daughter died by suicide. Thus, parents had a higher risk of suicide when their children of the same gender died by suicide.

The average duration from suicide decedents to suicide-by-suicide-survivors was found to be 25.4 months. In terms of detailed family relationships, the average duration from suicide of spouse to death of the remaining spouse by suicide was the shortest. The average duration from the suicide of a child to the suicide of the mother was found to be the second shortest, followed by the average duration from the suicide of a parent to the suicide of a child, the average duration from the suicide of a child to the suicide of the father, and the average duration from the suicide of the sibling to the suicide of the remaining sibling.

The number of suicides per 100,000 people among suicide survivors was found to be 586 after exclusion criteria were applied to the data (Table 2). During the 10-year period, the number of suicide deaths among the bereaved families of traffic accident victims was confirmed to be 216 per 100,000 people. In addition, among the bereaved family members of all deaths other than suicide, the number of suicide deaths was 207 per 100,000 people. The proportion of deaths by suicide among the deaths of the family members of suicide victims was 15.5%, which was about three times higher than that for suicide among the bereaved families of traffic accident victims and the bereaved families of those who died through causes other than suicide (Table 3).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Suicide by family relationships among suicide survivors, bereaved families of traffic accident victims, and bereaved families of deaths other than by suicide.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Ratio of suicide deaths among bereaved family deaths by family relationship.

Discussion

The risk of completed suicide among suicide survivors was found to be about three times higher than that among the bereaved families of non–suicide deaths. The average duration from a suicide death to the suicide of family members was about 2 years. In terms of family relationships, the risk was the highest when the family member of a suicide victim was a spouse, followed by the mother, sibling, child, and father. When gender was taken into account in the bereaved relationship, the HR of completed suicide was higher in family members of the same gender. Furthermore, the number of suicides per 100,000 population among suicide survivors was about three times the number of deaths per 100,000 people due to suicide among the bereaved families of traffic accidents and the bereaved families of non-suicide deaths. These results are consistent with previous studies (28, 29) showing that suicide survivors had a high risk of suicide. The results of a nested case-control study (28) in Denmark also showed that the risk of death by suicide was three times higher in the presence of a first-degree completed suicide. Similarly, a large-scale Swedish study (29) found that the suicide rate was twice as high for 33,173 suicide survivors than for 28,945 bereaved families of those who died from causes other than suicide.

The results of this study are also consistent with previous studies (3034) showing that suicide risk was high in the spouses, parents, and siblings of suicide victims. According to a nested case-control Danish study (33), the risk of suicide in the remaining spouse of someone who died by suicide and the death of a spouse due to other causes was 21.69 and 7.65, respectively. In an additional study (30), according to the gender of the remaining spouse, the suicide risk of a husband who lost his wife due to suicide was 4.6 times higher compared to losses due to other reasons. Moreover, the suicide risk of a wife who lost her husband due to suicide was about 4.8 times higher compared to a loss due to other causes. When a child was lost by suicide, the parents' suicide risk was 1.8 times higher than if the loss was due to other causes (31). These results are consistent with those in this study.

People bereaved by a suicide death feel significantly more stigma, shame, responsibility, and guilt than those bereaved by other unnatural sudden deaths (10, 35). In this study, the number of suicide victims per 100,000 population was three times higher in suicide survivors than in families bereaved due to abrupt and unexpected traffic accidents. Similarly, previous studies found that suicide risk was increased in first-degree relatives who had lost a family member by sudden death. Among them, those who lost a family member by suicide had the highest risk of suicide (36). In addition, it is consistent with the results of a recent study (37) that among sudden bereavements, a higher level of perceived stigma was associated with the level of suicide attempt risk, which is 2.7 times higher.

This study was consistent with previous studies showing that the risk of suicide was higher than that of men when the gender of the survivors was women. However, for children who lost their parents by suicide, children of the same gender as their deceased parents had a higher risk of suicide. According to a previous study (34), the risk of suicide for a husband was 3.6 when he lost his wife by suicide, while the risk of suicide for a wife was 4.5 when a husband committed suicide, indicating that the risk of suicide for a wife was higher. The suicide risks of mothers and fathers after losing a child by suicide were 3.47 and 1.90, respectively, implying that mothers were more likely to be affected by suicide (31). These results are consistent with those of the current study. A Swedish study (32) found that the risks of suicide in siblings leading to the suicide of the remaining sibling were 2.44 and 3.15 for males and females, respectively. Women may be more affected by the loss of a family member than men because women value family support and close relationships more than men (38).

Suicide familial aggregation can be explained by genetic and non-genetic factors (39). First, there is a genetic aspect to the cause of such high suicide risk of suicide survivors (4042). According to a review (41), completed suicide was higher in monozygotic twins than in dizygotic twins. Thus, the genetic contribution to suicide is high. Recently, genotypes related to suicide have been revealed (42). According to a recent cohort study in Sweden, the heritability of completed suicide was found to be slightly higher in women than in men (40). This supports the findings of this study that women were more affected by family suicide. In addition to biological factors, familial factors such as disorganization, breakup, and intrafamily violence can increase the risk of suicide. Accordingly, family members of suicide victims who share a dysfunctional familial history might be more vulnerable to suicide (43). In this study, the risk of suicide was the highest for spouses without genetic commonality among all family relationships. The death of a spouse is the highest stressor in life (44). It seems to have a greater impact than the death of other family members.

In this study, the average period from the suicide of a family member to the suicide of a bereaved family member was 25.4 months. The average duration to the suicide of a mother who lost a spouse or child was relatively short, at < 2 years, and it was about 3 years in children, siblings, and fathers. According to previous studies (45, 46), the turning point at which the grief of suicide loss integrates is about 3–5 years, and the duration for suicide survivors to recover from psychiatric symptoms is 3 years. Moreover, the odd ratio of suicide in mothers who lost their children by suicide was the highest at 76.05 during the first month, then decreased to about 4.5 from 1 to 12 month, and remained at around 1.8 after 1 year (31). Active psychiatric treatment intervention and support are needed since the risk of suicide is high for 2–3 years from the time a family member commits suicide.

This study had several limitations. First, when linking data for survival analysis, only age and gender were used as correction variables for suicide survivors due to personal information privacy. Second, the exact date of death could not be confirmed when linking data from the NHIS and Statistics Korea. Thus, cases with the same year and month of death were excluded from the survival analysis. Third, this study was carried out using a Korean population database. Therefore, generalization of the study results to other ethnicities should be done with caution. Fourth, sequelae of intentional self-harm (ICD code Y87.0) and undetermined death (codes Y10–Y32, Y87.2) were classified as non-suicides, not as suicide. Undetermined deaths are not negligible proportion of external deaths in South Korea, therefore suicide may have been underestimated and non-suicides overestimated (47, 48). In future studies, sensitivity analysis having as outcomes undetermined deaths (UD) and the ratio UD/suicide should be performed. Despite these limitations, this study was significant in that it examined the actual risk of suicide death in the spouses, parents, children, and siblings, considering gender by targeting the bereaved families of all suicide victims up to 10 years in Korea. It also identified the period during which the suicide survivors were especially vulnerable to suicide.

In conclusion, the suicide risk of survivors of those who died by suicide over the past 10 years in Korea was confirmed to be about three times higher than the suicide risk of bereaved families of those who died from causes other than suicide. In particular, the risk of suicide for a wife after the suicide of her husband was the highest at 5 times, followed by the suicide risk for a daughter after a mother's suicide at 4.7 times. The number of suicides per 100,000 family members of suicide victims was three times the number of suicides per 100,000 bereaved family members of traffic accident fatalities or the bereaved families of deaths due to causes other than suicide. Furthermore, the average duration of committing suicide for suicide survivors was 2 years. As such, intensive psychiatric treatment intervention and support are needed for the family members of suicide victims in the early stages of loss who are vulnerable to suicide.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center. Written informed consent from the participants' legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

JJ participated in the study design, conceptualization, data interpretation, wrote the first manuscript drafting, and revised new drafts from co-authors. SP, YK, and HJ participated in the study design, data curation, formal analysis, and wrote the manuscript. EK and EN participated in conceptualization, manuscript drafting, and revising of the manuscript. GL, J-YP, and JS participated in the project administration and data presentation. HJ participated in study design and conception, data curation, and manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Development of screening tools for high suicide risk group and evaluation tools of severity of suicide risk, and validation of their effectiveness (HL19C0001) funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, by the Healthcare AI Convergence R&D Program through the National IT Industry Promotion Agency of Korea (NIPA) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (No. S0254-22-1001), and by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (No. HR21C0885). This study used NHIS-NHID data (NHIS-2020-1-530) gathered by Korea's National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). This study was mainly supported by the Interagency Committees of the Korean National Government (Suicide Prevention Action Plans in 2018: 1-1 the Korean National Investigations of 70,000 Suicide Victims Through Police Records).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.995834/full#supplementary-material

References

1. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2019: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals Geneva: World Health Organization. (2019).

Google Scholar

2. Korea S. Annual Report on the Cause of Death Statistics Daejeon: Statistics Korea. (2019).

3. Andriessen K, Rahman B, Draper B, Dudley M, Mitchell PB. Prevalence of exposure to suicide: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. J Psychiatr Res. (2017) 88:113–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.01.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Shneidman ES. Survivors of suicide. Springfield. CC Thomas (1972).

5. Berman AL. Estimating the population of survivors of suicide: seeking an evidence base. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2011) 41:110–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2010.00009.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Spillane A, Larkin C, Corcoran P, Matvienko-Sikar K, Riordan F, Arensman E. Physical and psychosomatic health outcomes in people bereaved by suicide compared to people bereaved by other modes of death: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. (2017) 17:939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4930-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bolton JM, Au W, Leslie WD, Martens PJ, Enns MW, Roos LL, et al. Parents bereaved by offspring suicide: a population-based longitudinal case-control study. JAMA Psychiatry. (2013) 70:158–67. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Huang J, Valdimarsdóttir U, Fall K, Ye W, Fang F. Pancreatic cancer risk after loss of a child: a register-based study in Sweden during 1991–2009. Am J Epidemiol. (2013) 178:582–9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rostila M, Saarela J, Kawachi I. The forgotten griever: a nationwide follow-up study of mortality subsequent to the death of a sibling. Am J Epidemiol. (2012) 176:338–46. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kõlves K, Zhao Q, Ross V, Hawgood J, Spence SH, de Leo D. Suicide and sudden death bereavement in Australia: a longitudinal study of family members over 2 years after death. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2020) 54:89–98. doi: 10.1177/0004867419882490

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Spillane A, Matvienko-Sikar K, Larkin C, Corcoran P, Arensman E. What are the physical and psychological health effects of suicide bereavement on family members? An observational and interview mixed-methods study in Ireland. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e019472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tal Young I, Iglewicz A, Glorioso D, Lanouette N, Seay K, Ilapakurti M, et al. Suicide bereavement and complicated grief. Dial Clin Neurosci. (2012) 14:177–86. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.2/iyoung

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mitchell AM, Kim Y, Prigerson HG, Mortimer-Stephens M. Complicated grief in survivors of suicide. Crisis. (2004) 25:12–8. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.25.1.12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mitchell AM, Kim Y, Prigerson HG, Mortimer MK. Complicated grief and suicidal ideation in adult survivors of suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2005) 35:498–506. doi: 10.1521/suli.2005.35.5.498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Brent D, Melhem N, Donohoe MB, Walker M. The incidence and course of depression in bereaved youth 21 months after the loss of a parent to suicide, accident, or sudden natural death. Am J Psychiatry. (2009) 166:786–94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08081244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Jordan JR. Lessons learned: forty years of clinical work with suicide loss survivors. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Levi-Belz Y, Gilo T. Emotional distress among suicide survivors: the moderating role of self-forgiveness. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 11:341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mitchell AM, Terhorst L, PTSD. symptoms in survivors bereaved by the suicide of a significant other. J Am Psychiatr Nurs Assoc. (2017) 23:61–5. doi: 10.1177/1078390316673716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pitman A, Osborn D, King M, Erlangsen A. Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk. Lancet Psychiatry. (2014) 1:86–94. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70224-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ljung T, Sandin S, Långström N, Runeson B, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H. Offspring death and subsequent psychiatric morbidity in bereaved parents: addressing mechanisms in a total population cohort. Psychol Med. (2014) 44:1879–87. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nyberg T, Hed Myrberg I, Omerov P, Steineck G, Nyberg U. Depression among parents two to six years following the loss of a child by suicide: a novel prediction model. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0164091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Fagundes CP, Brown RL, Chen MA, Murdock KW, Saucedo L, LeRoy A, et al. Grief, depressive symptoms, and inflammation in the spousally bereaved. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2019) 100:190–7. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.10.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Scocco P, Preti A, Totaro S, Corrigan PW, Castriotta C. SOPROXI Team. Stigma, grief and depressive symptoms in help-seeking people bereaved through suicide. J Affect Disord. (2019) 244:223–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Omerov P, Steineck G, Nyberg T, Runeson B, Nyberg U. Psychological morbidity among suicide-bereaved and non-bereaved parents: a nationwide population survey. BMJ Open. (2013) 3:e003108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Miyabayashi S, Yasuda J. Effects of loss from suicide, accidents, acute illness and chronic illness on bereaved spouses and parents in Japan: their general health, depressive mood, and grief reaction. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2007) 61:502–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01699.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Jang J, Lee G, Seo J, Na EJ, Park JY, Jeon HJ. Suicidal attempts, insomnia, and major depressive disorder among family members of suicide victims in South Korea. J Affect Disord. (2020) 272:423–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Pitman AL, Osborn DP, Rantell K, King MB. Bereavement by suicide as a risk factor for suicide attempt: a cross-sectional national UK-wide study of 3432 young bereaved adults. BMJ Open. (2016) 6:e009948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Qin P, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB. Suicide risk in relation to family history of completed suicide and psychiatric disorders: a nested case-control study based on longitudinal registers. Lancet. (2002) 360:1126–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11197-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Runeson B, Asberg M. Family history of suicide among suicide victims. Am J Psychiatry. (2003) 160:1525–6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Agerbo E. Midlife suicide risk, partner's psychiatric illness, spouse and child bereavement by suicide or other modes of death: a gender specific study. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2005) 59:407–12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.024950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Qin P, Mortensen PB. The impact of parental status on the risk of completed suicide. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2003) 60:797–802. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.797

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Rostila M, Saarela J, Kawachi I. Suicide following the death of a sibling: a nationwide follow-up study from Sweden. BMJ Open. (2013) 3:e002618. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Agerbo E. Risk of suicide and spouse's psychiatric illness or suicide: nested case-control study. BMJ. (2003) 327:1025–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Erlangsen A, Runeson B, Bolton JM, Wilcox HC, Forman JL, Krogh J, et al. Association between spousal suicide and mental, physical, and social health outcomes: a longitudinal and nationwide register-based study. JAMA Psychiatry. (2017) 74:456–64. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pitman AL, Osborn DP, Rantell K, King MB. The stigma perceived by people bereaved by suicide and other sudden deaths: a cross-sectional UK study of 3432 bereaved adults. J Psychosom Res. (2016) 87:22–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Hamdan S, Berkman N, Lavi N, Levy S, Brent D. The effect of sudden death bereavement on the risk for suicide. Crisis. (2020) 41:214–24. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pitman A, Rantell K, Marston L, King M, Osborn D. Perceived stigma of sudden bereavement as a risk factor for suicidal thoughts and suicide attempt: analysis of British cross-sectional survey data on 3387 young bereaved adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2017) 14:286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Umberson D, Chen MD, House JS, Hopkins K, Slaten E. The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: are men and women really so different? Am Sociol Rev. (1996) 61:837–57. doi: 10.2307/2096456

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tidemalm D, Runeson B, Waern M, Frisell T, Carlström E, Lichtenstein P. et al. Familial clustering of suicide risk: a total population study of 114 million individuals. Psychol Med. (2011) 41:2527–34. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711000833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Edwards AC, Ohlsson H, Mościcki E, Crump C, Sundquist J, Lichtenstein P, et al. On the genetic and environmental relationship between suicide attempt and death by suicide. Am J Psychiatry. (2021) 178:1060–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20121705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Voracek M, Loibl LM. Genetics of suicide: a systematic review of twin studies. Wien Klin Wochenschr. (2007) 119:463–75. doi: 10.1007/s00508-007-0823-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Coon H, Darlington TM, DiBlasi E, Callor WB, Ferris E, Fraser A, et al. Genome-wide significant regions in 43 utah high-risk families implicate multiple genes involved in risk for completed suicide. Mol Psychiatry. (2020) 25:3077–90. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0282-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Jordan JR. Is suicide bereavement different? A reassessment of the literature. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2001) 31:91–102. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.1.91.21310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. (1967) 11:213–8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Feigelman W, Jordan JR, Gorman BS. How they died, time since loss, and bereavement outcomes. Omega Westport. (2008) 58:251–73. doi: 10.2190/om.58.4.a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Saarinen PI, Hintikka J, Viinamäki H, Lehtonen J, Lönnqvist J. Is it possible to adapt to the suicide of a close individual? Results of a 10-year prospective follow-up study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. (2000) 46:182–90. doi: 10.1177/002076400004600304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Cha ES, Chang SS, Lee WJ. Potential underestimation of pesticide suicide and its impact on secular trends in South Korea, 1991-2012. Inj Prev. (2016) 22:189–94. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Chan CH, Caine ED, Chang SS, Lee WJ, Cha ES, Yip PS, et al. The impact of improving suicide death classification in South Korea: a comparison with Japan and Hong Kong. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0125730. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041781

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: suicide survivor, risk of completed suicide, hazard model regression, South Korea, bereaved family

Citation: Jang J, Park SY, Kim YY, Kim EJ, Lee G, Seo J, Na EJ, Park J-Y and Jeon HJ (2022) Risks of suicide among family members of suicide victims: A nationwide sample of South Korea. Front. Psychiatry 13:995834. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.995834

Received: 16 July 2022; Accepted: 26 September 2022;
Published: 14 October 2022.

Edited by:

Paul W. C. Wong, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Reviewed by:

Karolina Krysinska, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Ricardo Gusmão, University of Porto, Portugal

Copyright © 2022 Jang, Park, Kim, Kim, Lee, Seo, Na, Park and Jeon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hong Jin Jeon, amVvbmhqJiN4MDAwNDA7c2trdS5lZHU=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.