- 1Unit for Research in Legal Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 2Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Introduction: Recently, the literature has shown that Cannabis Use (CU) was a risk factor for Violent Behavior (VB) in patients with psychosis, and those in the early phase of psychosis (EPP). These findings are relevant because of the high prevalence of CU in this EPP, and the potential for prevention during this phase of illness. However, there is still a lack of clear explanations, supported by empirical evidence, about what underlies the link between CU and VB against other.
Method: This viewpoint reviews the scientific literature on the link between CU and VB, and the involvement of impulsivity in this relationship. This last point will be addressed at clinical and neurobiological levels.
Results: Recent studies confirmed that CU is particularly high in the EPP, and is a risk factor for VB in the EPP and schizophrenia. Studies have also shown that impulsivity is a risk factor for VB in psychosis, is associated with CU, and may mediate the link between CU and VB. Research suggests a neurobiological mechanism, as CU affects the structures and function of frontal areas, known to play a role in impulsive behavior.
Conclusion: Scientific evidence support the hypothesis of an involvement of impulsivity as a variable that could mediate the link between CU and aggression, particularly, when CU has an early onset. However, this hypothesis should be confirmed with longitudinal studies and by taking into account confounding factors. The studies highlight the relevance of early prevention in the EPP, in addition to interventions focusing on psychotic disorders.
Introduction
A significant number of studies have shown that, compared to the general population, people suffering from psychosis (1–5), and particularly those in the Early Phase of Psychosis (EPP) (6–10), show a high prevalence of violent behaviors (VB) against others. This association is robust, observed in various countries (11, 12).
Patients in EPP are known to be at high risk for VB, as compared to those in later phases of the illness (9, 13). Various early intervention programs have been developed in recent years for EPP (14–18), leading to better psychopathological and social outcomes. The benefits of these programs in reducing VB seem however limited [as highlighted by longitudinal studies (19–21)], probably due to the predominant focus on psychopathological and functional levels, leaving aside VB prevention (9, 19, 22, 23). In addition to the treatment of psychotic disorders in early intervention programs, the prevention of these behaviors needs to be addressed to reduce harmful effects, both in victims and patients themselves. This would reduce their stigmatization, long-term detention in prisons unsuited to their pathology, and difficulties regarding reintegration into society.
This prevention should be based on assessments and interventions that target dynamic risk factors for VB. Dynamic risk factors are those that are likely to change during treatment, as compared to “static” factors, which cannot be modified by treatment (24). Research has identified positive symptoms, substance use, impulsivity, comorbid antisocial personality disorder, lack of insight, hostility, anger, and emotional instability (25–37) as potential dynamic risk factors for VB. Recently, various results have shown that cannabis use (38–40) (CU) could also play a role in the risk of VB. This finding is particularly relevant due to the high prevalence of CU in EPP and the potential for prevention during this phase of the disease.
However, there is still a lack of empirical evidence to explain what underlies the link between CU and VB. Data from the literature and our own research led us to explore impulsivity as a mediating variable that might underlie this link. In this viewpoint, we present the main evidence available in the literature on the links between CU and VB against others, and then discuss the possible involvement of impulsivity in this relationship. This latter point will be addressed at both the clinical and neurobiological levels. We will conclude this article by discussing the value of early prevention of VB in the EPP.
Cannabis Use and Violent Behavior in the Early Phase of Psychosis
Until the last few years, there has been a lack of interest regarding the effects of CU on VB. This lack of attention may be related to the fact that CU was perceived as a means of enhancing positive emotions, or calming users, rather than stimulating them (41). The study of the impact of CU on VB is very recent (38–40), and probably related to cannabis legalization procedures in different countries, the increase in THC levels, or in relation to the first research specifically showing relationship between cannabis and VB (42, 43).
The use of various substances (without distinction) is known to be a key dimension in the risk for VB and recidivism (28, 44), particularly in people suffering from psychosis. Cannabis is the most widely used recreational drug in the world among young people (18–25 years) (43) and is particularly prevalent among young people with psychotic disorders (45, 46), and mainly in the EPP. In the latter group, high rates of CU (29–38%) are evidenced, which can have both clinical and neurobiological deleterious consequences. Moreover, in subgroups of violent patients with psychosis, our literature review shows elevated levels of CU: ranging from 40 to 49% in chronic patients (47–49), 44 to 64% in EPP (20, 50–52), and reaching a rate of 70% in a sample of 2,102 prisoners at high risk for developing psychosis (53).
The results of two recent meta-analyses (38, 54) on adolescents and young adults on the one hand, and people with severe mental illnesses on the other hand, have shown significant results regarding the link between CU and violence. Among young people (54), a moderate association was found between CU and VB with an Odd Ratio (OR) of 2.11 (including OR of 2.15 for cross sectional studies and 2.02 for longitudinal studies). The results remained significant after controlling for important confounding factors. This study has showed that early and persistent cannabis users experience more mental health problems and delinquency than others.
Results from a second meta-analysis (38) suggest that CU and cannabis misuse significantly increase VB among people with severe mental illnesses (OR of 2 for CU; 5.8 for cannabis misuse, 4.7 for mixed use, and 2.82 for studies that have adjusted for confounding factors). Specifically, in chronic patients with psychosis (40, 55), CU has been shown to be associated with violence, even after controlling for confounding factors such as other substance use, impulsivity, psychopathic traits, personality disorders (39), affective symptoms, and verbal IQ (56). For example, in a birth cohort study, schizophrenic patients with CU have been found to be 3.8 times more likely to be violent than control subjects (3). A recent longitudinal study (57) of 965 patients showed that persistent CU induces subsequent VB, after controlling for stimulants and alcohol use.
In the EPP, CU, even at low dose (50), has been associated with violence (58) and severe violence (52). Some studies have shown that this association was not found for other drugs (51, 52), and could be potentiated by the precocity of the consumption (59). It seems also that dose-response (39, 46, 60, 61), trajectory of consumption (56), and persistence of CU (39) could be important variables in the association between CU and VB. In studies conducted in prisoners (53) and in the general population (61), it has been shown that the average age at which the violent patients started using cannabis was 15 years [two years earlier than the non-violent patient group (62)], and that the precocity of CU was a risk factor for VB (62).
Despite recent evidence on the link between CU and VB in psychosis, the relationship needs to be further explored, as there are still contradictory results, some studies not finding a link between CU and VB (38, 63). These contradictory results may be due to theoretical limitations, such as differing definitions and assessments of violence; or methodological limitations, such as: the predominance of cross-sectional or retrospective studies, the failure to account for confounding factors (i.e., previous delinquent behavior, co-morbid personality disorders, dose of used substance, etc.), the lack of longitudinal studies with repeated assessments over time and on short follow-up periods, which are necessary to assess the short and long term effects of CU, and the direction or bi-direction of the associations. On this matter, two recent studies (56, 57) support unidirectionality but need to be confirmed by others. It should also be noted the scarcity of data on offender samples, or lack of objective and detailed data on the CU characteristics such as type, dose, and frequency of use (38). Moreover, there are insufficient empirically data of what underlies this relationship (38, 39, 63).
Explanatory Hypotheses of the Link Between Cannabis Use and Violent Behavior
Several hypotheses have been proposed to understand the link between CU and VB. A first involves pharmacological explanations, with CU chemically dysregulating emotion processes, which could contribute to the development of VB (40, 46, 61, 64, 65). This mechanism has also been related to the type, amount, and frequency of CU (38), or withdrawal symptoms (63). A second hypothesis suggests that CU may predispose to VB (61, 66, 67) through the induction of depersonalization and feeling of persecution. A third hypothesis suggests that pre-existing adolescent conduct disorders (12, 68) or predisposition for aggression (54) could also lead to early CU and VB. For example, Rioux et al. (59) have shown that delinquency at age 12 and associations with deviant peers is associated to early onset of CU, which in turn predicts violence. Other hypotheses suggest that the lifestyle of individuals and some interpersonal and contextual factors (69), such as subcultures, may encourage both violence and drug abuse (69). Or, that the interaction with a delinquent environment, may predispose to CU, and, in turn, CU may contribute to delinquency and illicit trafficking (69), suggesting a complex and reciprocal relationship between these factors (61). In the deviance theory, violence and CU are both considered as deviant behaviors in the context of a “general deviance syndrome.” Violence and CU would in this case not be causally linked, but rather associated to a common dimension, such as antisocial personality disorder. In this line, biopsychosocial hypotheses (69) suggest that a combination of interactions between distal (for example, family history of substance use) and proximal biopsychosocial factors (for example, emotional arousal) would constitute the pathways by which CU may be related to violence.
In addition to these elements, and if we focus specifically on psychosis, CU may also be associated with other dimensions that have all been related to VB (34, 37), and which can mediate this relationship. These include reduced insight and adherence to treatment (40, 52, 70–72), increased anxiety, anger, hostile attribution bias, suspiciousness, and positive symptoms (40, 73). CU may exacerbate these dimensions, and particularly positive psychotic symptoms, which in turn may increase VB (46, 64, 74). One dimension frequently mentioned as mediating this relationship is impulsivity (35, 40, 61, 75). In line with some literature data (50, 76) and the results of our own research, we hypothesize that the latter factor, impulsivity, may be a mediating the effect of CU on VB. We argue that impulsivity (41) could be an intermediate variable in the relationship between CU and VB, simultaneously inducing consumption through its inhibitory defect (50, 76), and be impacted by consumption in a self-feeding mechanism (77).
Role of Impulsivity in the Relationship Between Cannabis Use and Violent Behavior in Psychosis
Impulsivity and Violent Behavior in Psychosis
Initially studied in offenders with personality disorders, impulsivity has recently been the focus of work in psychosis, showing its importance in this pathology (78–83). A meta-regression analysis of risk factors for VB in psychosis (EPP or chronic patients) found that, among several dynamic psychopathological risk factors, high impulsivity was an important one (34, 35). Several studies have shown the impact of impulsivity on VB with different populations [chronic patients (34–36, 84, 85), EEP patients (37, 50, 86), and forensic populations (85)] and different measures of impulsivity (clinical self-report or hetero-report and behavioral scales) (73, 86–88). In the EEP, prospective cohort studies have also shown that impulsivity is associated with serious aggression (37, 50), either directly or indirectly. Several authors suggest that the relationship between impulsivity and VB may be mostly indirect (89) and mediated by other factors, like early conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder (81), psychopathic trait, affective instability and negative emotions (73), as well as positive symptoms (78, 79). In addition, substance use is frequently highlighted as a dimension that may also underlie this link (78, 81, 90).
Impulsivity and Cannabis Use in Psychosis
Clinical Domain
In the general population, it has been shown that impulsivity can be associated with substance use, both in its early onset (59) and in its persistence over time (91). Impulsivity is one of the most important factors underlying CU, and impulsivity-related traits may be markers and predictors of substance use (92). It has also been suggested that impulsivity may increase susceptibility to drug or facilitate an “uncontrolled response” to drug use (93). A recent review on impulsivity in a forensic population showed that impulsivity could be simultaneously a determinant and a consequence of substance abuse (77, 94).
In psychosis, it is not yet known whether it is the pre-existing impulsive trait that drives the use or whether it is the use that increases impulsivity (76, 78, 95). Various authors show that patients who use cannabis are more impulsive (76, 79, 96) than those who do not. Repeated CU may also increase impulsivity (97–100) and impulsivity is thought to play a key role in the development and maintenance of drug dependence, including cannabis (70, 78, 98, 101–103).
In a longitudinal cohort, and after controlling for various other dynamic factors (other substances and psychopathological factors), we found that CU is one of the two main risk factors associated with severe violence in the EPP. It has an impact on VB independently, but also in association with impulsivity (52). A second study analyzed the relationship between CU, its precocity, and impulsivity levels over the course of a three-year treatment program, in violent and non-violent groups of patients. The results showed (75) that there was a significant increase of impulsivity during treatment in the violent patient group whose patients are early cannabis users, i.e., who started CU before age 15. This is to be contrasted with results of the violent patients who started CU after 15 years of age, and non-violent patients, whose impulsivity levels remained stable during the program.
Neurobiological Domain
Over the past decade, research has shown increased interest in identifying neurobiological factors, such as genetic influences, neurotransmission, or brain structures and circuitry, which may explain the association between drug use and impulsivity.
Neurobiological research on neurotransmitters examined levels of glutamate, GABA, dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine in brain structures associated with impulsivity and drug use as potential factors explaining the relationship between impulsivity and CU (104). This research has shown that fluctuations in certain levels of neurotransmitters can alter reward control and may be critical for drug compulsion (104, 105). For instance, glutamate levels in the dorsal ACC have been associated with delay discounting in drug users, leading to the idea that regulation of glutamate levels may alter the reward processing and thus minimize drug reinforcement. In addition, norepinephrine has also been associated with impulsive behavior and addictions because of its impact on the reward effects of addictive behavior (106). In a clinical study, regulation of norepinephrine levels by adrenergic modulators was reported to have an effect on cessation of drug use, by reducing pivotal elements such as stress-induced craving and the effect of drug alerts (107). Finally, serotonin levels have been linked to drug use and impulsivity.
Neurobiological research on the genetic side has identified CNR1 as a promising candidate to explain the relationship between CU and impulsivity. CNR1 is a cannabinoid receptor-related gene that has been linked to CU (108). Interestingly, one study examined whether impulsivity and CU related problems can be explained by CNR1 genes. Specifically, CNR1 variation appears to moderate the relationship between the degree of impulsivity and CU related problems (e.g., social relationships, self-esteem, motivation and productivity, as well as work and finances). Moreover, CU with higher levels of impulsivity associated with CNR1 risk variants showed a higher risk of developing CU related problems. Although this is only one of the findings of genetic research attempting to explain the association between CU and impulsivity, and that many other genes may also be promising candidates, such as CADM2 or FAAH (109), this provides an example of the potential of studying genes to explain the association between impulsivity and CU.
Further research focused on the link between CU and the structures and functions of brain areas related to action control (110, 111). Research that focused on the link between CU and impulsivity-related brain structures reported structural alterations, such as decreased cortical volume, in cannabis users (112–116). Structural abnormalities were also reported in patients suffering from schizophrenia, in the EPP (117–122), chronic psychotic patients (123), as well as in subjects at high risk for developing psychosis (124, 125). In these populations, the literature suggests that, due to genetic factors, the prefrontal areas (OFC, Dorso-Lateral Pre-frontal Cortex, DLPFC, and Anterior Cingulate Cortex, ACC) and the cerebellum, which have also been reported to play a critical role in impulsive behavior (126–130), appeared to be extremely sensitive to CU. Furthermore, there is evidence that this may be particularly the case in early life CU (131). The authors explain that, in contrast to adulthood, adolescence is a period of neuromaturation, which renders the brain particularly vulnerable to the effects of drugs (132).
Finally, some research tried to model impulsive behavior through fronto-striatal circuits. This research reported that impulsive individuals have a more active fronto-striatal network than non-impulsive individuals (133–137). Importantly, this has been reported in both patients with psychosis and healthy participants. The fronto-striatal circuits that are involved in action control include fibers that project from the prefrontal cortex areas through the basal ganglia and end in the motor cortex. Aron and Poldrack (138) suggested three fronto-striatal networks, each with a specific role in action control: the hyperdirect pathway (stop of programmed action), the direct pathway (action initiation) and the indirect pathway (action termination). The hyperdirect pathway—due to its role in the suppression of any programmed action—appears to be of major interest. Indeed, a dysfunction of this pathway should lead to difficulties in controlling action suppression and thus result in impulsive behaviors. More relevantly, some studies reported that drug use was related to fronto-striatal circuit alterations (139–141), giving rise to the hypothesis that cannabis and impulsivity may be linked through the effect of cannabis on such circuits.
Discussion
Overall, the hypothesis of an involvement of impulsivity in the relationship between CU and VB seems probable and should be further explored at the neurobiological and clinical levels. Neurobiological research has shown how genes, neurotransmitters, gray matter volume, and brain circuitry may be behind the link between cannabis and impulsivity. Three results seem particularly insightful. First abnormal concentrations of neurotransmitters in certain areas seem to play a crucial role in impulsivity, triggering difficulties in discounting delay, which plays a critical role in compulsive drug use. Second, research on brain areas and circuits associated with impulsivity suggests that drug use is associated with different levels of brain volume. This appears to be particularly pronounced in schizophrenia and in early drug users. Third, better specification of fronto-striatal circuits indicated relation to impulsivity, which could be particularly relevant to understand the link between impulsivity and CU.
While these are promising research findings, most of them focused on general drug use and were not specific to CU. In this vein, most of this research focused on the relationship between drug compulsive process, neurobiological factors and impulsivity leading. Although we might concede that drug compulsion should be a common process in alcohol, cocaine, and cannabis use, it would be important to focus on the specific neurobiological factors behind the relationship between CU and impulsivity. Moreover, the direction of the association between CU, impulsivity, and neurological factors is not yet clear. Researchers suggest that long-term consumption alters the structures and functions of frontal areas known to play a role in impulsive behavior, such as the motor inhibition region (110). This in turn would lead to increased levels of impulsivity. Other research on neurotransmitters or genes suggests that neurobiological changes in neurotransmitters or genes responsible for impulsivity may confer a higher risk for drug use. According to this view, the link between impulsivity and CU would be the result of an increased risk of CU in individuals who are more impulsive due to neurobiological factors.
Consequently, further research is needed to understand how CU and impulsivity are linked through neurobiological factors. Future research should focus on the longitudinal aspect of CU and neurobiological components. In particular, it would be important to examine the development of impulsivity—related brain areas or circuits, for instance, and the scores of impulsivity in users and non-users over time. Moreover, research should separate schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic patients, as studies show that CU and brain structures related to impulsivity are closely related in patients suffering from schizophrenia.
At clinical level, the hypothesis of an involvement of impulsivity in the relationship between CU and VB should also be explored in more depth. This should be done on the basis of longitudinal studies (too scarce) and by monitoring the evolution of impulsivity and consumption (with repeated assessments). The interactions between these two dimensions and with VB should be assessed, as well as the directionality or bi-directionality of these associations [which remains debated in studies targeting young adults (54)]. Longitudinal studies should take into account possible confounding or mediating factors (mentioned above in the sections on the links between VB and CU), on the one hand, and VB and impulsivity, on the other hand. In addition to violence-specific factors, a recent review (142) of longitudinal studies investigating the impact of CU on global outcomes in psychosis, recommends that factors such as the type of psychosocial intervention received by the patients, medication adherence, and the type of antipsychotic medication prescribed should be taken into account.
The study of the involvement of impulsivity in the relationship between CU and CV should also take into account the different subgroups of violent patients (81, 143). Within the two main subgroups identified in studies (81, 143), i.e., patients with or without early conduct disorders, impulsivity and CU could play a role, but in different ways, in the processes leading to VB. The subgroup with early conduct disorders (including antisocial behavior and substance use) may involve these factors early in the life course of patients and in a complex and reciprocal way. More, in this profile, impulsivity and substance use may also reflect (or be associated with) co-morbid personality disorders, especially anti-social ones (13, 144). In the subgroup of patients without early conduct disorder, who display VB at the time of onset of psychotic disorders, the link between CU, impulsivity and VB could be exacerbated by psychotic symptoms (73). Conversely, CU may exacerbate impulsivity and symptoms, which in turn increase the risk of VB.
Studies have shown that patients respond differently to treatment depending on their profile (143, 145). So, early intervention programs in psychosis could implement an identification of patients with early conduct disorders, high impulsivity and CU, as well as trace the onset of CU to identify early and persistent users. The use of tools to assess risk factors for VB [such as the HCR20 (146, 147)], CU and impulsivity, could be useful. Recent studies have shown the feasibility and value of these tools into mental health services. This could contribute to increase the preventive aspect of such programs.
In order to reduce VB, recent literature has shown the interest and relevance of targeting the factors associated with these behaviors, in addition to interventions targeting psychotic disorders (148). The “Integrated treatment” (149) [for example including motivational approach, cognitive-behavioral methods, or group counseling (150)] focuses on both substance use and psychosis and has been shown to be effective. Assessment of the level of impulsivity and subsequent interventions to reduce it [e.g., with cognitive-behavioral therapies, cognitive remediation, management of stressful situations as well as some anti-psychotic treatments (73, 150)] would also be necessary. However, there are not yet longitudinal studies, conducted with strict randomized controlled trials, demonstrating the effects of these interventions on impulsivity levels in this population.
Examining these issues is of primary importance, not only to reduce VB but also to ensure better psychopathological outcomes for patients, better care outcomes, and better insertion into society.
Author Contributions
VM wrote the manuscript with the contribution of DF. ED-G revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Hodgins S, Piatosa MJ, Schiffer B. Violence among people with schizophrenia: phenotypes and neurobiology. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. (2013) 17:329–68. doi: 10.1007/7854_2013_259
2. Wallace C, Mullen PE, Burgess P. Criminal offending in schizophrenia over a 25-year period marked by deinstitutionalization and increasing prevalence of comorbid substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. (2004) 161:716–27. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.716
3. Arseneault L, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor P, Silva PA. Mental disorders and violence in a total birth cohort: results from the Dunedin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2000) 57:979–86. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.10.979
4. Hodgins S. Mental disorder, intellectual deficiency, and crime: evidence from a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1992) 49:476–83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820060056009
5. Tiihonen J, Isohanni M, Räsänen P, Koiranen M, Moring J. Specific major mental disorders and criminality: a 26-year prospective study of the 1966 Northern Finland birth cohort. Am J Psychiatry. (1997) 154:840–5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.6.840
6. Spidel A, Lecomte T, Greaves C, Sahlstrom K, Yuille JC. Early psychosis and aggression: predictors and prevalence of violent behaviour amongst individuals with early onset psychosis. Int J Law Psychiatry. (2010) 33:171–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.03.007
7. Chang WC, Chan SSI, Hui CLM, Chan SKW, Lee EHM, Chen EYH. Prevalence and risk factors for violent behavior in young people presenting with first-episode psychosis in Hong Kong: a 3-year follow-up study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2015) 49:914–22. doi: 10.1177/0004867415603130
8. Winsper C, Singh SP, Marwaha S, Amos T, Lester H, Everard L, et al. Pathways to violent behavior during first-episode psychosis: a report from the UK National EDEN Study. JAMA Psychiatry. (2013) 70:1287–93. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2445
9. Large MM. and Nielssen O. Violence in first-episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. (2011) 125:209–20. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.11.026
10. Large MM, Dall B, Nielssen OB. Risk assessment for violence and self-harm in first episode psychosis and the need for early psychosis intervention services. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2014) 48:94–5. doi: 10.1177/0004867413489176
11. Hodgins S, Cree A, Alderton J, Mak T. From conduct disorder to severe mental illness: associations with aggressive behaviour, crime and victimization. Psychol Med. (2008) 38:975–87. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002164
12. Hodgins S. Quelles sont les données de la littérature concernant la violence hétéro-aggressive chez les personnes ayant une psychopathie associée à une schizophrénie ou à un trouble de l'humeur. Audition publique Paris HAS textes d'experts. Paris (2010). p. 101–23.
13. Winsper C, Ganapathy R, Marwaha S, Large M, Birchwood M, Singh SP, et al. Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of aggression during the first episode of psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2013) 128:413–21. doi: 10.1111/acps.12113
14. McGorry PD, Edwards J, Mihalopoulos C, Harrigan SM, Jackson HJ. EPPIC an evolving system of early detection and optimal management. Schizophr Bull. (1996) 22:305–26. doi: 10.1093/schbul/22.2.305
15. Malla A, Malla A, Norman R, McLean T, Scholten D, Townsend L, et al. Canadian programme for early intervention in non-affective psychotic disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2003) 37:407–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01194.x
16. Addington J, Leriger E, Addington D. Symptom outcome 1 year after admission to an early psychosis program. Canad J Psychiatry. (2003) 48:204–7. doi: 10.1177/070674370304800309
17. Baumann PS, Elowe J, Mebdouhi N, Solida A, Conus P. Formulation de cas dans la psychose débutante: Quels outils pour le travail en équipe? Canad J Psychiatry. (2017) 62:457–64. doi: 10.1177/0706743717703641
18. Baumann PS, Crespi S, Marion-Veyron R, Solida A, Thonney J, Favrod J, et al. Treatment and early intervention in psychosis program (TIPP-Lausanne): implementation of an early intervention programme for psychosis in Switzerland. Early Interv Psychiatry. (2013) 7:322–8. doi: 10.1111/eip.12037
19. Stevens H, Agerbo E, Dean K, Mortensen PB, Nordentoft M. Reduction of crime in first-onset psychosis: a secondary analysis of the OPUS randomized trial. J Clin Psychiatry. (2013) 74:e439–44. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08156
20. Hodgins S, Calem M, Shimel R, Williams A, Harleston D, Morgan C, et al. Criminal offending and distinguishing features of offenders among persons experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. (2011) 5:15–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00256.x
21. Hodgins S, Cree A, Khalid F, Patel K, Sainz-Fuentes R, Shortt M, et al. Do community mental health teams caring for severely mentally ill patients adjust treatments and services based on patients' antisocial or criminal behaviours? Eur Psychiatry. (2009) 24:373–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.009
22. Hodgins S, Müller-Isberner R, Freese R, Tiihonen J, Repo-Tiihonen E, Eronen M, et al. A comparison of general adult and forensic patients with schizophrenia living in the community. Int J Forensic Ment Health. (2007) 6:63–75. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2007.10471250
23. Huda A. Cognitive–behavioural interventions in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. (2005) 186:445. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.5.445
24. Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, Hart S. HCR-20: Assessing the risk for violence (Version 2). Vancouver, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University (1997).
25. Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Van Dorn RA, Elbogen EB, Wagner HR, Rosenheck RA, et al. A national study of violent behavior in persons with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2006) 63:490–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.490
26. Elbogen EB, Johnson SC. The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the National epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2009) 66:152–61. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.537
27. Witt K, Lichtenstein P, Fazel S. Improving risk assessment in schizophrenia: epidemiological investigation of criminal history factors. Br J Psychiatry. (2015) 206:424–30. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.144485
28. Fazel S, Långström N, Hjern A, Grann M, Lichtenstein P. Schizophrenia, substance abuse, and violent crime. JAMA. (2009) 301:2016–23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.675
29. Putkonen A, Kotilainen I, Joyal CC, Tiihonen J. Comorbid personality disorders and substance use disorders of mentally ill homicide offenders: a structured clinical study on dual and triple diagnoses. Schizophr Bull. (2004) 30:59–72. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007068
30. Bjørkly S. Empirical evidence of a relationship between insight and risk of violence in the mentally ill—a review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. (2006) 11:414–23. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.006
31. Moulin V, Palix J, Alameda L, Gholamrezaee MM, Baumann PS, Gasser J, et al. Insight et comportements violents dans une cohorte de patients souffrant de premiers épisodes de psychose. Canad J Psychiatry. (2018) 63:20–9. doi: 10.1177/0706743717718173
32. Silverstein SM, Del Pozzo J, Roché M, Boyle D, Miskimen T. Schizophrenia and violence: realities and recommendations. Crime Psychol Rev. (2015) 1:21–42. doi: 10.1080/23744006.2015.1033154
33. Nielssen OB, Malhi GS, McGorry PD, Large MM. Overview of violence to self and others during the first episode of psychosis. J Clin Psychiatry. (2012) 73:e580–7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07036
34. Witt K, Van Dorn R, Fazel S. Risk factors for violence in psychosis: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 110 studies. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e55942. doi: 10.1371/annotation/f4abfc20-5a38-4dec-aa46-7d28018bbe38
35. Rund BR. A review of factors associated with severe violence in schizophrenia. Nord J Psychiatry. (2018) 72:1–11. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1497199
36. Rund BR. The association between schizophrenia and violence. Schizophr Res. (2018) 199:39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.043
37. Moulin V, Golay P, Palix J, Baumann PS, Gholamrezaee MM, Azzola A, et al. Impulsivity in early psychosis: A complex link with violent behaviour and a target for intervention. Eur Psychiatr. (2018) 49:30–6. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.12.003
38. Dellazizzo L, Potvin S, Beaudoin M, Luigi M, Dou BY, Giguère C-É, et al. Cannabis use and violence in patients with severe mental illnesses: a meta-analytical investigation. Psychiatry Res. (2019) 274:42–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.010
39. Dugré JR, Dellazizzo L, Giguère C-É, Potvin S, Dumais A. Persistency of cannabis use predicts violence following acute psychiatric discharge. Front Psychiatry. (2017) 8:176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00176
40. Lamsma J, Cahn W, Fazel S. Use of illicit substances and violent behaviour in psychotic disorders: two nationwide case-control studies and meta-analyses. Psychol Med. (2019) 50:2028–33. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002125
41. Ostrowsky PD, Michael K. Does marijuana use lead to aggression and violent behavior? J Drug Educ. (2011) 41:369–89. doi: 10.2190/DE.41.4.c
42. Budney AJ, Borodovsky JT. The potential impact of cannabis legalization on the development of cannabis use disorders. Prev Med. (2017) 104:31–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.034
43. Crocker CE, Tibbo PG. The interaction of gender and cannabis in early phase psychosis. Schizophr Res. (2018) 194:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.046
44. Fazel S, Smith EN, Chang Z, Geddes JR. Risk factors for interpersonal violence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Br J Psychiatry. (2018) 213:609–14. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.145
45. Koskinen J, Löhönen J, Koponen H, Isohanni M, Miettunen J. Rate of cannabis use disorders in clinical samples of patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. (2009) 36:1115–30. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp031
46. Schoeler T, Monk A, Sami MB, Klamerus E, Foglia E, Brown R, et al. Continued versus discontinued cannabis use in patients with psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. (2016) 3:215–25. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00363-6
47. Dumais A, Potvin S, Joyal C, Allaire J-F, Stip E, Lesage A, et al. Schizophrenia and serious violence: a clinical-profile analysis incorporating impulsivity and substance-use disorders. Schizophr Res. (2011) 130:234–7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.02.024
48. Rao H, Luty J, Trathen B. Characteristics of patients who are violent to staff and towards other people from a community mental health service in South East England. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. (2007) 14:753–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01182.x
49. Krakowski MI, De Sanctis P, Foxe JJ, Hoptman MJ, Nolan K, Kamiel S, et al. Disturbances in response inhibition and emotional processing as potential pathways to violence in schizophrenia: a high-density event-related potential study. Schizophr Bull. (2016) 42:963–74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw005
50. Harris AW, Large MM, Redoblado-Hodge A, Nielssen O, Anderson J, Brennan J. Clinical and cognitive associations with aggression in the first episode of psychosis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2010) 44:85–93. doi: 10.3109/00048670903270423
51. Rolin SA, Marino LA, Pope LG, Compton MT, Lee RJ, Rosenfeld B, et al. Recent violence and legal involvement among young adults with early psychosis enrolled in Coordinated Specialty Care. Early interv Psychiatry. (2018) 13:832–40. doi: 10.1111/eip.12675
52. Moulin V, Baumann P, Gholamrezaee M, Alameda L, Palix J, Gasser J, et al. Cannabis, a significant risk factor for violent behavior in the early phase psychosis. Subheading: two patterns of interaction of factors increase the risk of violent behavior: cannabis use disorder and impulsivity; cannabis use disorder, lack of insight and treatment adherence. Front Psychiatry. (2018) 9:294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00294
53. Cooper J, Jarrett M, Forrester A, di Forti M, Murray RM, Huddy V, et al. Substance use and at-risk mental state for psychosis in 2102 prisoners: the case for early detection and early intervention in prison. Early Interv Psychiatry. (2018) 12:400–9. doi: 10.1111/eip.12343
54. Dellazizzo L, Potvin S, Dou BY, Beaudoin M, Luigi M, Giguère C-É, et al. Association between the use of cannabis and physical violence in youths: a meta-analytical investigation. Am J Psychiatry. (2020) 177:619–26. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19101008
55. Carabellese F, Candelli C, Martinelli D, La Tegola D, Catanesi R. Cannabis use and violent behaviour: a psychiatric patients cohort study in Southern Italy. Riv Psichiatr. (2013) 48:43–50. doi: 10.1708/1228.13614
56. Beaudoin M, Potvin S, Dellazizzo L, Luigi M, Giguère C-É, Dumais A. Trajectories of dynamic risk factors as predictors of violence and criminality in patients discharged from mental health services: a longitudinal study using growth mixture modeling. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 10:301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00301
57. Beaudoin M, Potvin S, Giguère C-E, Discepola S-L, Dumais A. Persistent cannabis use as an independent risk factor for violent behaviors in patients with schizophrenia. NPJ Schizophr. (2020) 6:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41537-020-0104-x
58. Marino L, Scodes J, Richkin T, Alves-Bradford J-M, Nossel I, Wall M, et al. Persistent cannabis use among young adults with early psychosis receiving coordinated specialty care in the United States. Schizophr Res. (2020) 222:274–82. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.035
59. Rioux C, Castellanos-Ryan N, Parent S, Vitaro F, Tremblay RE, Séguin JR. Age of Cannabis use onset and adult drug abuse symptoms: a prospective study of common risk factors and indirect effects. Canad J Psychiatry. (2018) 63:457–64. doi: 10.1177/0706743718760289
60. Dharmawardene V, Menkes DB. Violence and self-harm in severe mental illness: inpatient study of associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol. Aust Psychiatry. (2017) 25:28–31. doi: 10.1177/1039856216671650
61. Schoeler T, Theobald D, Pingault J-B, Farrington DP, Jennings WG, Piquero AR, et al. Continuity of cannabis use and violent offending over the life course. Psychol Med. (2016) 46:1663–77. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715003001
62. Moulin V, Alameda L, Framorando D, Baumann P-S, Gholam M, Gasser J, et al. Early onset of cannabis use and violent behavior in psychosis. Eur Psychiatry. (2020) 63:e78. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.71
63. Dellazizzo L, Potvin S, Athanassiou M, Dumais A. Violence and cannabis use: a focused review of a forgotten aspect in the era of liberalizing cannabis. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 11:971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567887
64. Gibbs M, Winsper C, Marwaha S, Gilbert E, Broome M, Singh SP. Cannabis use and mania symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2015) 171:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.016
65. Norström T, Rossow I. Cannabis use and violence: Is there a link? Scand J Public Health. (2014) 42:358–63. doi: 10.1177/1403494814525003
66. Chabrol H, Saint-Martin C. Cannabis use and delinquent behaviors in high-school students. Addict Behav. (2009) 34:187–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.10.005
67. Monshouwer K, Van Dorsselaer S, Verdurmen J, Ter Bogt T, De Graaf R, Vollebergh W. Cannabis use and mental health in secondary school children: findings from a Dutch survey. Br J Psychiatry. (2006) 188:148–53. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.2.148
68. Hodgins S. Violent behaviour among people with schizophrenia: a framework for investigations of causes, and effective treatment, and prevention. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. (2008) 363:2505–18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0034
69. Moore TM, Stuart GL. A review of the literature on marijuana and interpersonal violence. Aggress Violent Behav. (2005) 10:171–92. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2003.10.002
70. Swartz M, Swanson J, Hiday VA, Borum R, Wagner HR, Burns BJ. Violence and severe mental illness: the effects of substance abuse and nonadherence to medication. Am J Psychiatry. (1998) 155:226–31. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.2.226
71. Kavanagh DJ, Waghorn G, Jenner L, Chant DC, Carr V, Evans M, et al. Demographic and clinical correlates of comorbid substance use disorders in psychosis: multivariate analyses from an epidemiological sample. Schizophr Res. (2004) 66:115–24. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00130-0
72. Miller R, Caponi JM, Sevy S, Robinson D. The insight–adherence–abstinence triad: an integrated treatment focus for cannabis-using first–episode schizophrenia patients. Bull Menninger Clin. (2005) 69:220–36. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2005.69.3.220
73. Adams SW, Yanos PT. Pathways to aggression and violence in psychosis without longstanding antisocial behavior: a review and proposed psychosocial model for integrative clinical interventions. Psychiatr Res. (2020) 293:113427. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113427
74. Kalk NJ, Robins JE, Ross KR, Pritchard M, Lynskey MT, Curtis VA, et al. Substance use in psychiatric crisis: relationship to violence. Psychol Med. (2020). doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003451. [Epub ahead of print].
75. Dan Glauser ES, Framorando D, Solida-Tozzi A, Golay P, Gholam M, Alameda L, et al. Evolution of impulsivity levels in relation to early cannabis use in violent patients in the early phase of psychosis. Psychol Med. (2022). doi: 10.1017/S0033291721005316. [Epub ahead of print].
76. Dervaux A, Goldberger C, Gourion D, Bourdel M-C, Laqueille X, Lôo H, et al. Impulsivity and sensation seeking in cannabis abusing patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2010) 123:278–80. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.029
77. Alford M, O'Rourke S, Doyle P, Todd L. Examining the factors associated with impulsivity in forensic populations: a systematic review. Aggr Violent Behav. (2020) 54:101409. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2020.101409
78. Ouzir M. Impulsivity in schizophrenia: a comprehensive update. Aggress Violent Behav. (2013) 18:247–54. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.014
79. Abdel-Baki A, Turgeon N, Chalfoun C, Nguyen A. Psychose et impulsivité: un mauvais mariage. Psychiatrie et violence. (2013) 12. doi: 10.7202/1025225ar
80. Kaladjian A, Jeanningros R, Azorin J-M, Anton J-L, Mazzola-Pomietto P. Impulsivity and neural correlates of response inhibition in schizophrenia. Psychol Med. (2011) 41:291–9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000796
81. Volavka J, Citrome L. Heterogeneity of violence in schizophrenia and implications for long-term treatment. Int J Clin Pract. (2008) 62:1237–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01797.x
83. Hoptman MJ, Volavka J, Weiss EM, Czobor P, Szeszko PR, Gerig G, et al. Quantitative MRI measures of orbitofrontal cortex in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Psychiatry Res. (2005) 140:133–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2005.07.004
84. Faay MD, van Os J, van Amelsvoort T, Bartels-Velthuis AA, Bruggeman R, Cahn W, et al. Aggressive behavior, hostility, and associated care needs in patients with psychotic disorders: a 6-year follow-up study. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 10:934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00934
85. Micciolo R, Bianconi G, Canal L, Clerici M, Ferla MT, Giugni C, et al. Young age and the risk of violent behaviour in people with severe mental disorders: prospective, multicentre study. BJPsych Open. (2022) 8:E1. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1047
86. Faay MD, van Baal GCM, Arango C, Díaz-Caneja CM, Berger G, Leucht S, et al. Hostility and aggressive behaviour in first episode psychosis: Results from the OPTiMiSE trial. Schizophr Res. (2020) 223:271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.08.021
87. Krakowski MI, Czobor P. Depression and impulsivity as pathways to violence: implications for antiaggressive treatment. Schizophr Bull. (2013) 40:886–94. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt117
88. Wang EW, Diamond PM. Empirically identifying factors related to violence risk in corrections. Behav Sci Law. (1999) 17:377–89. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<377::AID-BSL351>3.0.CO;2-M
89. Ramírez JM, Andreu J. Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity) Some comments from a research project. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2006) 30:276–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.015
90. Bjørkly S. A systematic review of the relationship between impulsivity and violence in persons with psychosis: evidence or spin cycle? Aggress Violent Behav. (2013) 18:753–60. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2013.08.001
91. Vergés A, Littlefield AK, Arriaza T, Alvarado ME. Impulsivity facets and substance use initiation: a comparison of two models of impulsivity. Addict Behav. (2019) 88:61–6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.018
92. VanderVeen JD, Hershberger AR, Cyders MA. UPPS-P model impulsivity and marijuana use behaviors in adolescents: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2016) 168:181–90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.016
93. Hogarth L. The role of impulsivity in the aetiology of drug dependence: reward sensitivity versus automaticity. Psychopharmacology. (2011) 215:567–80. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2172-0
94. De Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. (2009) 14:22–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x
95. Liraud F, Verdoux H. Which temperamental characteristics are associated with substance use in subjects with psychotic and mood disorders? Psychiatry Res. (2000) 93:63–72. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(99)00120-1
96. Dervaux A, Baylé FJ, Laqueille X, Bourdel M-C, Le Borgne M-H, Olié J-P, et al. Is substance abuse in schizophrenia related to impulsivity, sensation seeking, or anhedonia? Am J Psychiatry. (2001) 158:492–4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.492
97. Le Moal M, Koob GF. Drug addiction: pathways to the disease and pathophysiological perspectives. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2007) 17:377–93. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.10.006
98. Chanut F. Impulsivité et troubles liés à une substance: un mélange explosif! Psychiatrie et violence. (2013) 12. doi: 10.7202/1025227ar
99. Tiihonen J, Swartz MS. Pharmacological intervention for preventing violence among the mentally ill with secondary alcohol-and drug-use disorders. In: Hodgins S, editor. Violence Among the Mentally III. Dordrecht: Springer (2000). p. 171–91. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4130-7_10
100. Gonzalez R, Schuster RM, Mermelstein RJ, Vassileva J, Martin EM, Diviak KR. Performance of young adult cannabis users on neurocognitive measures of impulsive behavior and their relationship to symptoms of cannabis use disorders. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2012) 34:962–76. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.703642
101. Allen TJ, Moeller FG, Rhoades HM, Cherek DR. Impulsivity and history of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. (1998) 50:137–45. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00023-4
102. Gut-Fayand A, Dervaux A, Olié J-P, Lôo H, Poirier M-F, Krebs M-O. Substance abuse and suicidality in schizophrenia: a common risk factor linked to impulsivity. Psychiatry Res. (2001) 102:65–72. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00250-5
103. Green AI, Tohen MF, Hamer RM, Strakowski SM, Lieberman JA, Glick I, et al. First episode schizophrenia-related psychosis and substance use disorders: acute response to olanzapine and haloperidol. Schizophr Res. (2004) 66:125–35. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.08.001
104. Kozak K, Lucatch AM, Lowe DJ, Balodis IM, MacKillop J, George TP. The neurobiology of impulsivity and substance use disorders: implications for treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2019) 1451:71–91. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13977
105. Blum K, Braverman ER, Holder JM, Lubar JF, Monastra VJ, Miller D, et al. The reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive and compulsive behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs. (2000) 32:1–112. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10736099
106. Leeman RF, Potenza MN. Similarities and differences between pathological gambling and substance use disorders: a focus on impulsivity and compulsivity. Psychopharmacology. (2012) 219:469–90. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2550-7
107. Sofuoglu M, Sewell RA. Norepinephrine and stimulant addiction. Addict Biol. (2009) 14:119–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00138.x
108. Bidwell LC, Metrik J, McGeary J, Palmer RH, Francazio S, Knopik VS. Impulsivity, variation in the cannabinoid receptor (CNR1) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) genes, and marijuana-related problems. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. (2013) 74:867–78. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.867
109. Sanchez-Roige S, Fontanillas P, Elson SL, Gray JC, de Wit H, MacKillop J, et al. Genome-wide association studies of impulsive personality traits (BIS-11 and UPPS-P) and drug experimentation in up to 22,861 adult research participants identify loci in the CACNA1I and CADM2 genes. J Neurosci. (2019) 39:2562–72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2662-18.2019
110. Gruber SA, Silveri MM, Dahlgren MK, Yurgelun-Todd D. Why so impulsive? White matter alterations are associated with impulsivity in chronic marijuana smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. (2011) 19:231. doi: 10.1037/a0023034
111. Gruber SA, Dahlgren MK, Sagar KA, Gönenç A, Lukas SE. Worth the wait: effects of age of onset of marijuana use on white matter and impulsivity. Psychopharmacology. (2014) 231:1455–65. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3326-z
112. Battistella G, Fornari E, Annoni J-M, Chtioui H, Dao K, Fabritius M, et al. Long-term effects of cannabis on brain structure. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2014) 39:2041. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.67
113. Lopez-Larson MP, Bogorodzki P, Rogowska J, McGlade E, King JB, Terry J, et al. Altered prefrontal and insular cortical thickness in adolescent marijuana users. Behav Brain Res. (2011) 220:164–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.02.001
114. Matochik JA, Eldreth DA, Cadet J-L, Bolla KI. Altered brain tissue composition in heavy marijuana users. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2005) 77:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.06.011
115. Yücel M, Solowij N, Respondek C, Whittle S, Fornito A, Pantelis C, et al. Regional brain abnormalities associated with long-term heavy cannabis use. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2008) 65:694–701. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.6.694
116. Filbey FM, Aslan S, Calhoun VD, Spence JS, Damaraju E, Caprihan A, et al. Long-term effects of marijuana use on the brain. Proc Nat Acad Sci. (2014) 111:16913–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415297111
117. Habets P, Marcelis M, Gronenschild E, Drukker M, van Os J. Reduced cortical thickness as an outcome of differential sensitivity to environmental risks in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. (2011) 69:487–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.010
118. James A, Hough M, James S, Winmill L, Burge L, Nijhawan S, et al. Greater white and grey matter changes associated with early cannabis use in adolescent-onset schizophrenia (AOS). Schizophr Res. (2011) 128:91–7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.02.014
119. Rais M, Van Haren NE, Cahn W, Schnack HG, Lepage C, Collins L, et al. Cannabis use and progressive cortical thickness loss in areas rich in CB1 receptors during the first five years of schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2010) 20:855–65. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.08.008
120. Rais M, Cahn W, Van Haren N, Schnack H, Caspers E, Hulshoff Pol H, et al. Excessive brain volume loss over time in cannabis-using first-episode schizophrenia patients. Am J Psychiatry. (2008) 165:490–6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071110
121. Solowij N, Yücel M, Respondek C, Whittle S, Lindsay E, Pantelis C, et al. Cerebellar white-matter changes in cannabis users with and without schizophrenia. Psychol Med. (2011) 41:2349–59. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100050X
122. Szeszko PR, Robinson DG, Sevy S, Kumra S, Rupp CI, Betensky JD, et al. Anterior cingulate grey-matter deficits and cannabis use in first-episode schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. (2007) 190:230–6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024521
123. Rapp C, Bugra H, Riecher-Rossler A, Tamagni C, Borgwardt S. Effects of cannabis use on human brain structure in psychosis: a systematic review combining in vivo structural neuroimaging and post mortem studies. Curr Pharm Des. (2012) 18:5070–80. doi: 10.2174/138161212802884861
124. Welch KA, McIntosh AM, Job DE, Whalley HC, Moorhead TW, Hall J, et al. The impact of substance use on brain structure in people at high risk of developing schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. (2010) 37:1066–76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq013
125. Welch KA, Stanfield AC, McIntosh AM, Whalley HC, Job DE, Moorhead TW, et al. Impact of cannabis use on thalamic volume in people at familial high risk of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. (2011) 199:386–90. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.090175
126. Matsuo K, Nicoletti M, Nemoto K, Hatch JP, Peluso MA, Nery FG, et al. A voxel-based morphometry study of frontal gray matter correlates of impulsivity. Hum Brain Mapp. (2009) 30:1188–95. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20588
127. Korponay C, Pujara M, Deming P, Philippi C, Decety J, Kosson DS, et al. Impulsive-antisocial psychopathic traits linked to increased volume and functional connectivity within prefrontal cortex. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2017) 12:1169–78. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx042
128. Schilling C, Kühn S, Romanowski A, Schubert F, Kathmann N, Gallinat J. Cortical thickness correlates with impulsiveness in healthy adults. Neuroimage. (2012) 59:824–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.058
129. Hoptman MJ, Antonius D, Mauro CJ, Parker EM, Javitt DC. Cortical thinning, functional connectivity, and mood-related impulsivity in schizophrenia: relationship to aggressive attitudes and behavior. Am J Psychiatry. (2014) 171:939–48. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111553
130. Kumari V, Barkataki I, Goswami S, Flora S, Das M, Taylor P. Dysfunctional, but not functional, impulsivity is associated with a history of seriously violent behaviour and reduced orbitofrontal and hippocampal volumes in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. (2009) 173:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.09.003
131. Gruber SA, Dahlgren MK, Sagar KA, Gönenc A, Killgore WD. Age of onset of marijuana use impacts inhibitory processing. Neurosci Lett. (2012) 511:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.039
132. Monti PM, Miranda Jr R, Nixon K, Sher KJ, Swartzwelder HS, Tapert SF, et al. Adolescence: booze, brains, and behavior. Alcoholism. (2005) 29:207–20. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000153551.11000.F3
133. Chambers CD, Garavan H, Bellgrove MA. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2009) 33:631–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016
134. Dalley JW, Mar AC, Economidou D, Robbins TW. Neurobehavioral mechanisms of impulsivity: fronto-striatal systems and functional neurochemistry. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2008) 90:250–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.12.021
135. Jentsch JD, Taylor JR. Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology. (1999) 146:373–90. doi: 10.1007/PL00005483
136. Morein-Zamir S, Robbins TW. Fronto-striatal circuits in response-inhibition: Relevance to addiction. Brain Res. (2015) 1628:117–29. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.012
137. van den Heuvel OA, van der Werf YD, Verhoef KM, de Wit S, Berendse HW, Wolters EC, et al. Frontal–striatal abnormalities underlying behaviours in the compulsive–impulsive spectrum. J Neurol Sci. (2010) 289:55–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.043
138. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci Methods. (2006) 26:2424–33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006
139. Hu Y, Salmeron BJ, Gu H, Stein EA, Yang Y. Impaired functional connectivity within and between frontostriatal circuits and its association with compulsive drug use and trait impulsivity in cocaine addiction. JAMA Psychiatry. (2015) 72:584–92. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1
140. Courtney KE, Ghahremani DG, Ray LA. Fronto-striatal functional connectivity during response inhibition in alcohol dependence. Addict Biol. (2013) 18:593–604. doi: 10.1111/adb.12013
141. Wang W, Worhunsky PD, Zhang S, Le TM, Potenza MN, Li C-SR. Response inhibition and fronto-striatal-thalamic circuit dysfunction in cocaine addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2018) 192:137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.037
142. Athanassiou M, Dumais A, Gnanhoue G, Abdel-Baki A, Jutras-Aswad D, Potvin S, et al. Systematic review of longitudinal studies investigating the impact of cannabis use in patients with psychotic disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. (2021) 21:779–91. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1942845
143. Swanson JW, Van Dorn RA, Swartz MS, Smith A, Elbogen EB, Monahan J. Alternative pathways to violence in persons with schizophrenia: the role of childhood antisocial behavior problems. Law Hum Behav. (2008) 32:228. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9095-7
144. Volavka J, Citrome L. Pathways to aggression in schizophrenia affect results of treatment. Schizophr Bull. (2011) 37:921–9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr041
145. Krakowski M, Tural U, Czobor P. The importance of conduct disorder in the treatment of violence in schizophrenia: efficacy of clozapine compared with olanzapine and haloperidol. Am J Psychiatry. (2021) 178:266–74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20010052
146. Rolin SA, Scodes J, Dambreville R, Nossel IR, Bello I, Wall MM, et al. Feasibility and utility of different approaches to violence risk assessment for young adults receiving treatment for early psychosis. Commun Ment Health J. (2022). doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00922-6. [Epub ahead of print].
147. Rolin SA, Bareis N, Bradford J-M, Rotter M, Rosenfeld B, Pauselli L, et al. Violence risk assessment for young adults receiving treatment for early psychosis. Int J Law Psychiatry. (2021) 76:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101701
148. Hodgins S, Klein S. New clinically relevant findings about violence by people with schizophrenia. Canad J Psychiatry. (2017) 62:86–93. doi: 10.1177/0706743716648300
149. Eagle K, Ma T, Sinclair B. Integrated substance use rehabilitation in a secure forensic facility. J Forensic Pract. (2019) 21:50–60. doi: 10.1108/JFP-09-2018-0037
Keywords: cannabis use, impulsivity, violent behavior, psychosis, prevention
Citation: Moulin V, Framorando D, Gasser J and Dan-Glauser E (2022) The Link Between Cannabis Use and Violent Behavior in the Early Phase of Psychosis: The Potential Role of Impulsivity. Front. Psychiatry 13:746287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.746287
Received: 23 July 2021; Accepted: 22 February 2022;
Published: 22 March 2022.
Edited by:
Brian Littlechild, University of Hertfordshire, United KingdomReviewed by:
Wayne Denis Hall, The University of Queensland, AustraliaMarije E. Keulen-de Vos, Forensic Psychiatric Center de Rooyse Wissel, Netherlands
Copyright © 2022 Moulin, Framorando, Gasser and Dan-Glauser. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Valerie Moulin, moulinvperso@gmail.com