AUTHOR=Kavanagh Bianca E. , O’Donohue Josephine S. , Ashton Melanie M. , Lotfaliany Mojtaba , McCallum Maddy , Wrobel Anna L. , Croce Sarah , Berk Michael , Saunders Lucy , Lai Jerry , Berk Lesley TITLE=Coping with COVID-19: Exploring coping strategies, distress, and post-traumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry VOLUME=13 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1025767 DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1025767 ISSN=1664-0640 ABSTRACT=Objective

This study aimed to explore coping strategies, distress, and post-traumatic growth among Australians with and without a history of a mental health diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and methods

Australians (N = 381) completed an online survey between 4-August 2020 and 25-October-2020. Coping strategies, distress, and post-traumatic growth were ascertained via the Brief COPE, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI), respectively. Linear regression was conducted to examine the relationship between the Brief COPE, DASS-21, and PTGI, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Models were conducted separately for those with/without a history of a mental health diagnosis.

Results

Higher distress was found among those with a history of a mental health diagnosis. Significant differences in the types of coping strategies associated with distress and post-traumatic growth were identified between the groups, however, behavioral disengagement and self-blame consistently predicted depression, anxiety, and stress. For those with a history of a mental health diagnosis, positive reframing decreased anxiety. Self-distraction was associated with post-traumatic growth across both groups.

Conclusion

There are important differences in the way people with and without a history of a mental health diagnosis cope with the COVID-19 pandemic.