The Moderating Effects of Personal Resources on Caregiver Burden in Carers of Alzheimer's Patients

Caring for persons with Alzheimer's disease can be an extremely difficult experience. To date, there has been a lack of research into the role of intermediary variables in the relationship between caregiver personality and psychosocial functioning. The growing numbers of dementia patients worldwide mean that more people are involved in their care, making research into this area a pressing concern. Both a caregiver's personality and personal resources play a key role in their capacity to cope with stressful situations. In order to determine how personal resources moderate the relationship between personality and burden of care, a total of 100 caregivers of Alzheimer's patients (78 women and 22 men) were asked to complete a set of questionnaires to assess personality, personal resources (sense of coherence, generalized self-efficacy, and perceived social support), as well as their levels of stress, depression, and commitment to care. Structural equation modeling and latent growth analysis suggest that personal resources explain the mechanisms underlying burden of care and moderate its relationship with personality. Our findings indicate that personal resources are a critical predictor of burden of care. Therefore, caregivers must be provided with appropriate support, taking into account their resources and personality profiles.

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive, degenerative disease of the nervous system with many negative consequences. It involves cognitive and functional impairment, gradual loss of memory, and behavioral and neuropsychiatric disturbances, which together lead to a significant decline in the ability to perform routine daily activities (1, 2). It is associated with significant suffering in both patients and their caregivers. Early onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms often results in early institutionalization (3), deterioration in quality of life (4), elevated caregiver stress (5), and significantly greater cost of care (6).

Excessive engagement in caregiving leads to poorer physical health (7), anxiety and depressive disorders (8, 9), sleep disorders and increased use of psychotropic drugs (10), poorer quality of life (11, 12), poorer immune response (13), and greater morbidity and mortality (14) in caregivers.

Provision of long-term care may result in significant caregiver burden, reflected in problems with mental, physical, social, economic, and emotional functioning (15). Objective burden refers to the strain manifested in the form of negative outcomes affecting health, social life, work, and the family system of carers. Subjective burden is linked to individual reactions and experiences, such as tension, anxiety, depression, or feelings of helplessness and loneliness (16, 17). The associated changes to one's life alongside the need to give up some, if not all, of one's previous activities, needs, and expectations in order to care for the patient may lead to a significant feeling of burden in caregivers (18). Interestingly, a greater sense of responsibility for the patient is associated with a reduced quality of care, leading to neglect, abuse, reluctance, and premature institutionalization (19, 20).

Personality and Caregiver Burden

Personality seems to play a central role in caregiver burden. Caregivers with less mature personality types, especially high neuroticism, have been shown to be at higher risk of experiencing severe caregiver burden (21–23). Therefore, it is necessary to study the relationship between personality and burden of care, as well as the mechanisms that potentially mediate it. To date, studies on caregivers of dementia patients have shown that it is necessary to take personality into account in care research, as it plays a significant role in caregiving. High levels of neuroticism have been reported to be associated with greater stress and depressive disorders (24–26), while high levels of extroversion and agreeableness have been linked with lower sense of burden (27–29). Openness to experiences and cognitive flexibility are linked with greater senses of cognitive, emotional, and physical well-being (29, 30) as well as lower mortality (31, 32). On the other hand, high levels of conscientiousness correlate with better cognitive functioning (33) and more pro-health behaviors (34). Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between personality and caregiver burden, taking into account the moderating effects of personal resources.

Sense of Coherence as a Moderating Variable

Due to the key role of caregivers in the provision of care, it seems of paramount importance to examine factors that may protect against caregiver burden. Previous studies have indicated that sense of coherence (SOC) plays a significant role in alleviating caregiver burden and preventing the development of depressive symptoms (35–40). Other findings suggest that a high SOC is associated with reduced caregiver burden and sense of isolation as well as better mental health (41, 42). The ability to find meaning, to understand one's experience, to positively re-evaluate one's situation, and the belief that one has can cope with the challenges of care are all critical factors that protect against depression (36, 43, 44) and reduce caregiver stress (37). In his concept of salutogenesis, Antonovsky points out that personality traits determine behavior in people with low SOC, while it seems to work the other way around in those with high SOC (45). Sense of coherence is therefore an important buffer against the negative influence of personality.

Social Support as a Moderating Variable

The exact relationships between personal resources and caregiver burden is poorly understood. Among personal resources, social support seems to play a particularly significant role in shaping the sense of burden and the development of depressive symptoms (46–48). However, little is known about the mediating role of social support in the relationship between personality and sense of burden. Kim et al. (49) indicate that previous studies provide no evidence that social support has a mediating role in the relationship between personality and mental health. Wang et al. (50) suggest that social support may act as a moderator in the relationship between factors related to the functioning of the patient and the feeling of burden in the caregiver. Social support alleviates the impact of cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms on caregiver's burden. Ong et al. (51) showed that both mental resilience and perceived social support contribute to a caregiver's sense of burden, and the relationship between mental resilience and the sense of being overburdened by the work of caring is may be affected by the level of perceived social support. In a study by Dias et al. (52), social support turned out to moderate mental resilience, with various types of support alleviating the physical and psychological effects of burden of care.

Self-Efficacy as a Moderating Variable

According to the theory of social learning, self-efficacy, expressed via an individual's conviction about their capacity to act, promotes better coping (53). Previous studies emphasize the significant role of self-efficacy in reducing levels of stress, depression (54), and the sense of burden (55–57). One study on caregivers of people with dementia demonstrated the moderating effect of caregiver self-efficacy on the relationship between the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia and subjective burden of care, as well as between social support and burden of care (58). Self-efficacy reduced the impact of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia on the subjective strain experienced by the carers. The relationship between social support and burden was influenced by the caregiver's level of self-efficacy. Therefore, enhancing the sense of self-efficacy should be an important element of interventions aimed at reducing caregiver burden.

Aims of the Study

This study aimed to investigate (1) whether there is a relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and psychological and social burden in caregivers of Alzheimer's patients, (2) whether personal resources explain the mechanism underlying the development of caregiver burden, and (3) whether the indirect relationship between personality and caregiver burden is moderated by personal resources (sense of coherence, perceived social support, and generalized sense of self-efficacy). Based on the current literature, we hypothesize that: there is a relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and psychological and social burden in caregivers of Alzheimer's patients (hypothesis 1); personal resources explain the mechanism of caregiver burden (hypothesis 2); and personal resources moderate the strength of the relationship between personality and caregiver burden (hypothesis 3). All hypotheses and relations between variables are presented in Figure 1. Given the relative paucity of research concerning the unique effect of personal resources on the relationship between personality and caregiver burden, we believe that a better understanding of personal resources is crucial for the development of therapeutic strategies.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Theoretical model of the relationship between variables (based on literature and studies presented in the introduction).

Methods

Procedure and Study Design

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a sample of family caregivers recruited from local support centers and welfare institutions, as well as formal caregivers (employees of the aforementioned centers). We conducted home visits (in the case of informal caregivers) and institutional visits (for formal caregivers) that included established demographic interviews and questionnaire sets provided in the same order. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Institute of Psychology at University of Szczecin (KB 2/2017). All participants gave written informed consent. Participation in the study was voluntary, confidential, and the personal well-being of the respondents was of utmost importance. Significant inclusion criteria were: having been a carer for a minimum of 2 years and providing at least 8 h of care per week to a patient with Alzheimer's disease. Exclusion criteria were provision of care to a patient with a different type of dementia, death of the patient, and the caregiver being under 18 years old.

Participant Characteristics

The sample consisted of a total of 100 primary caregivers of Alzheimer's patients (the informal carers group consisted of 50 family members of patients with AD and the formal caregivers group consisted of 50 employees of help centers providing care for AD patients), including 78 women and 22 men, who provided care for M = 28.82 (SD = 6.39) hours a week, and whose mean age was M = 55.84 (SD = 13.36) and total duration of care was M = 5.18 years (SD = 4.25). Most respondents (58%) devoted >32 h a week to caring for AD patients, 28% spent 17-32 h, and 14% spent 8-16 h caring. A total of 37 of the AD patients being cared for were in the first stage of the disease, 44 were in the second stage, and 19 were in the third stage of the disease. We defined the stages of AD based on (59). The primary carers were children (46%), spouses/partners (34%), or other relatives (12%), friends (6%), and siblings (2%) of the patients.

Psychological Assessment

To meet our research aims, we selected the relatively more significant personal resources and factors related to caregiver burden: sense of coherence, perceived social support, and generalized sense of self-efficacy. To assess the personality traits of the caregivers, we used the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) (60). This is a 240-item questionnaire, with each statement rated on a 5-point scale. The scores are presented on six scales: agreeableness, conscientiousness, extroversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience. The Polish version of the NEO-PI-R has high reliability (Cronbach's alpha equals from 0.81 to 0.86 for each scale). Sense of coherence was examined using Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-29) (61). This 29-item questionnaire (each statement rated on a seven-point scale) measures general sense of coherence and its three domains: comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. The Polish version of the SOC-29 has high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ratio in the entire sample between 0.78 and 0.95). The social support of carers was examined using the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU K-22; 22 items, with each statement rated on a five-point scale) (62), which quantifies the general level of perceived social support as well as its three dimensions: emotional support, practical support, and social integration. The Polish version of the F-SozU K-22 has high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ratio in entire sample 0.91). Generalized self-efficacy was measured using the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) (63). This is a 10-items questionnaire (each statement rated on a four-point scale) and the Polish version has high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ratio in entire sample 0.85). The level of caregiver burden was estimated based on involvement in care, sense of stress, and depression. For this purpose, we used the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ) (64) to determine the general level of burden and its four domains (tension, supervision, worrying, urging). This is a 29-item questionnaire, with each statement rated on a five-point scale. The Polish version of the Depression Assessment Questionnaire (DAQ; 75-items questionnaire; each statement rated on a four-point scale) (65) was used to assess depression and the four aspects thereof: cognitive deficits and energy loss; thoughts about death, pessimism, and alienation; guilt and anxiety; psychosomatic symptoms and loss of interests; and an additional fifth scale for assessing self-regulation to measure resources that protect against depression. Most of the DAQ scales have high or very high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ratios range from 0.70 to 0.97). The Sense of Stress Questionnaire (SSQ; 29-item questionnaire, with each statement rated on a seven-point scale) (66) was used to determine general levels of stress as well as emotional tension, external stress, and social integration. The Polish version of the SSQ has high reliability (Cronbach's alpha equal to 0.78).

Statistical Analysis

Pearson r correlation coefficient was used to establish the relationships between the investigated variables (testing the first hypothesis). Correlation analysis was performed with the GNU PSPP-0.10.1-gbe241b program. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in the WarpPLS 6.0 0 program (67) was used to examine the relationships between personal resources and caregiver burden. Finally, Full Latent Growth Analysis (68) was used to investigate the moderating effects of personal resources. To test the second hypothesis, partial least squares structural equation modeling was performed with WarpPLS 6.0 (67). The analysis revealed that the model was free of average and full collinearity (AVIF = 1.26, AFVIF = 1.59) and had very good predictive power (GoF = 0.53). Moreover, to test the third hypothesis, we performed Full Latent Growth Analysis (69). Sometimes the inclusion of moderating variables and corresponding indicators in PLS-SEM may lead to problems, such as increased levels of collinearity and the emergence of Simpson's Paradox (67); these problems may be avoided if Full Latent Growth Analysis is applied. This method is used to estimate the effects of a latent variable or indicators on all paths in the model (all at once) without the need to include any new paths or variables. Full Latent Growth Analysis should be viewed as a comprehensive statistical analysis of moderating effects, where the moderating variable is latent in the sense that it does not “disturb” the model in any way. The form of this analysis is conceptually similar to Multi Group Analysis (70). The model that was verified in subsequent stages took into account single consecutive moderating variables. PLS-SEM was used because there is a tiny sample size and the amount of latent and visible variables is large in comparison to the number of observations. A PLS-SEM model is a path model in which some variables may be effects of others, while still being causes for variables later in the hypothesized causal sequence. It is a good alternative to covariance-based structural models, so it is a method that can be viewed as a comprehensive analysis of moderating effects in which the moderating variable is latent (68).

Results

Personality and Psychological and Social Burden

Statistics for all investigated variables are presented in Table 1 (mean scores of all variables), Table 2 (correlations between variables). There is a positive relationship between neuroticism and all dimensions of burden. High levels of neuroticism in caregivers are associated with greater involvement in care, more severe depressive symptoms, and greater stress. In turn, carers who report high levels of extroversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness reveal fewer depressive symptoms and less perceived stress. Our results thus confirm that there is a relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and sense of mental and social burden in the caregivers of AD patients (hypothesis 1). In particular, carers manifesting high levels of neuroticism are at greater risk of feeling overburdened with care.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Mean scores of all variables in the studied group (n = 100).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Correlations between personality dimensions and caregiver burden.

The Effect of Personal Resources on the Variance of Perceived Burden of Care

Hypothesis 2 suggested that personal resources explain the mechanism underlying perceived burden of care. The tested model is presented in Figure 1. The goodness of fit statistics are presented in Table 3.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Goodness of fit statistics.

The statistics for all variables are presented in Table 4. The analysis of path coefficients for the model showed that a rise in sense of coherence was linked with reduced depression, sense of stress, and involvement in care. As Table 4 shows, elevated perceived social support is associated with reduced sense of stress, while increased generalized self-efficacy is associated with greater involvement in care. Our analysis shows that the largest portion of the explained variance was observed when measuring the general sense of stress, as presented in Table 5. The results allowed for a partial confirmation that personal resources explain the mechanism underlying caregiver burden (hypothesis 2). And so, as personal resources increase, the sense of burden of care tends to drop.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Path coefficients in the tested model.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Explained variance of the tested dimensions of caregiver burden.

Testing for Moderating Effects

Hypothesis 3 suggested that personal resources moderate the relationship between personality and perceived burden of care. The results suggest that personal resources moderate the strength of the relationship between personality and perceived burden of care, which is in line with Hypothesis 3.

The Moderating Effect of General Sense of Coherence

Our analysis showed that an increase in levels of general SOC entailed a greater effect of neuroticism on guilt and anxious tension alongside a lesser effect of neuroticism on psychosomatic symptoms and loss of interests, interpersonal tension, supervision, and urging. Further analysis showed that in response to an increase in general SOC, the impact of extroversion on guilt and anxious tension tended to drop, while its effect on the level of psychosomatic symptoms and loss of interest, interpersonal tension, supervision, and urging increased. Furthermore, an increase in general SOC increased the impact of openness to experience on psychosomatic symptoms, loss of interests, interpersonal tension, worrying, supervision, urging, emotional tension, external stress, and intrapsychic stress. General SOC did not moderate any relationship between agreeability and individual stress measures. In turn, an increase in general SOC led to an increase in the effect of conscientiousness on cognitive deficits and energy loss as well as thinking about death, pessimism, and alienation. All results are presented in Table 6.

TABLE 6

Table 6. The moderating effect of sense of coherence on the relationship between personality and burden of care.

The Moderating Effect of Perceived Social Support

Our analysis showed that with increased perceived social support, the influence of neuroticism on thinking about death, pessimism, and alienation, guilt, and anxious tension tended to rise, while its impact on psychosomatic symptoms and loss of interests, interpersonal tension, worrying, supervision and urging was likely to drop. Further analysis showed that as general perceived social support increased, so did the impact of extroversion on psychosomatic symptoms and loss of interests, interpersonal tension, supervision, and urging, while its effect on guilt and anxious tension decreased. A rise in general perceived social support also entailed an increase in the impact of openness to experience on psychosomatic symptoms and loss of interests, interpersonal tension, worrying, supervision, urging, and external and intrapsychic stress. We did not observe a moderating effect of general perceived social support on the relationship between agreeableness and caregiver burden measures. Further analysis showed that as general perceived social support increased, so did the effect of conscientiousness on thinking about death, pessimism, and alienation, worrying, and urging, while its influence on emotional stress tended to drop. All results are shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7

Table 7. The moderating effect of perceived social support on the relationship between personality and burden of care.

The Moderating Effect of Generalized Self-Efficacy

Our analysis showed that the effect of neuroticism on cognitive deficits, energy loss, thinking about death, pessimism, and alienation, as well as the effect of extroversion on supervision were likely to increase with increased self-efficacy. No moderating effect of generalized self-efficacy was found on the relationship between openness to experience and caregiver burden measures. We did, however, observe that as self-efficacy scores increased, the impact of agreeableness on thinking about death, pessimism, and alienation, guilt and anxious tension, and supervision was likely to drop. Further analysis also demonstrated that a rise in generalized self-efficacy led to a decrease in the effect of conscientiousness on interpersonal tension and supervision and an increase in its impact on cognitive deficits and energy loss. The results are presented in Table 8.

TABLE 8

Table 8. The moderating effect of generalized self-efficacy on the relationship between personality and burden of care.

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the relationship between personality and caregiver burden in the carers of people with Alzheimer's disease, taking into account the variables moderating said relationship.

Relationship Between Personality and Psychological and Social Burden

The results partially confirmed the first hypothesis. Our results showed that highly neurotic caregivers report a greater burden of care. In turn, carers who are more extroverted, open to experience, agreeable, and conscientious experience less stress and fewer depressive symptoms. Largely in line with our findings, previous studies also indicate that personality is significantly associated with stress levels. A particularly high level of neuroticism among caregivers is associated with the use of maladaptive strategies to cope with the demands of care (21, 22) and a greater need to control the care recipient (23). There are also links between neuroticism and depression (71, 72), increased sense of stress (73), greater sensitivity to care-related stressors (74), and fewer pro-health behaviors (71) in the population of carers.

In turn, high levels of extroversion in carers are associated with fewer negative emotions, less severe depressive symptoms (49, 75), and better physical and mental health (73). Highly extroverted caregivers are more involved in interpersonal relationships, more optimistic and cordial toward others, and generally more active, which means that they are likely to find more benefits in caring for others (74) and be less sensitive to care-related stressors (76).

Caregiver agreeableness is associated with greater readiness to help, kindness, and trust, thus fostering relationships with care recipients (77), allowing them more freedom in functioning (23), reducing caregiver stress (78), and helping them maintain better mental health (28, 29).

Similarly, high levels of conscientiousness, associated with greater purposefulness and determination, meticulousness, reliability, and sense of duty, are conducive to maintaining better relationships with recipients of care (77), more positive perceptions of the care situation (74, 77), fewer depressive symptoms, more pro-health behaviors (34), better cognitive functioning (33), and lower mortality (28, 31, 32).

Caregiver openness to experience is linked to greater curiosity and cognitive flexibility. Evidence suggests that it is also associated with caregiving-related growth (77), higher levels of emotional, cognitive, and physical well-being (29, 30), and lower mortality (31, 32).

Our results are consistent with research to date, suggesting that caregivers with less mature personality types are more vulnerable to experiencing greater burden of care (23). Numerous authors indicate that neuroticism is associated with greater stress and depressive symptoms (24–26, 72). In turn, other personality traits are associated with better mental and physical health in caregivers (78). It therefore seems reasonable to include personality in conceptual models and research pertaining to care.

Relationship Between Personal Resources and Perceived Burden of Care

A partial confirmation of the second hypothesis was possible, our findings suggest that caregivers with greater sense of coherence exhibit less burden due to provision of care. It is therefore consistent with previous reports indicating that high levels of SOC lead to reduced experience of stress (37, 44), lower burden of care (41, 42) and less severe depressive symptoms (36, 43, 44, 79). As a meta-resource, SOC seems to have a significant effect on stress. Enhancing caregivers' capacity to comprehend their situation, their ability to find meaning in their experience, and the belief that they can manage all the potential adversities ahead can help them develop adequate coping strategies and reduce the level of burden resulting from provision of care (80).

We also found perceived social support to be associated with reduced stress in caregivers, which is consistent with other studies (81, 82). Previous reports also indicate that a high level of perceived social support may lead to reduced level of burden (83), reduced depressive symptoms (84), and alleviation of negative effects of care (17, 85, 86).

Carers with high levels of generalized self-efficacy were reported to manifest greater commitment to caregiving. The available evidence suggests that a high generalized sense of self-efficacy may result in reduced stress and fewer depressive symptoms experienced by caregivers (54) and lower burden of care (55–57, 87). Such results may highlight another aspect of self-efficacy: feeling that one is able to deal with stressors and having confidence in one's competence. Based on the belief that they have the capacity to cope with the demands of care, caregivers can become more involved in caring activities and take more control over the functioning of their patients.

Moderating Effects of the Relationship Between Personality and Burden of Care

The third hypothesis was confirmed in a complex way. The nature of the relationship between personality and burden of care can be explained by in-depth analyses with sense of coherence as a moderator. In our research, we found that SOC moderated the relationship between caregiver personality and burden of care. We found that increased SOC was linked with stronger relationships between neuroticism and guilt and anxious tension as well as weaker relationships between neuroticism and psychosomatic symptoms and certain aspects of commitment to care—interpersonal tension, supervision, and urge. Given that, as a trait, neuroticism is associated with experiencing negative emotions, anxiety, and fear, highly neurotic caregivers who have the capacity to positively re-evaluate their situation and find meaning in their experience, to understand the challenges ahead, and are sure of their ability to cope with the tasks involved in caring may still be prone to the presence of increased, unfounded anxiety, emotional problems, and self-blame. On the other hand, they are less vulnerable to developing psychosomatic symptoms (i.e., problems with sleep or concentration), experience less tension in their relationships with care recipients, are less likely to control their functioning, and more likely to foster their independence. According to the theory of salutogenesis (45), the availability of resources is not the only condition for successful coping. A possible explanation of our results may be that neuroticism manifested as a general tendency to feel negative emotions may hinder adaptation and coping. Other reports suggest that neuroticism may be associated with lower SOC (88, 89). It can therefore be assumed that high levels of SOC among highly neurotic caregivers constitute only a partial protection against depressive symptoms. On the other hand, they may serve as an important protective factor against over-involvement in care.

The results of our research also demonstrated that an increase in SOC led to weaker relationships between extroversion and guilt and anxious tension and stronger relationships between extroversion and decreased psychosomatic symptoms, tension in relationships with care recipients, supervision, and urging. We also observed that with increased SOC, openness to experience was more associated with a decrease in psychosomatic symptoms, supervision, and all investigated types of stress. In addition, it was more closely linked with increased tension in relations with care recipients and worrying. Furthermore, we found that an increase in SOC was linked to a greater association between conscientiousness and decreased cognitive deficits and thinking about death. Our results are consistent with previous reports, highlighting the key role of SOC in reducing the sense of burden (41, 42), depressive symptoms (36, 43, 44, 79), and the severity of stress (37, 44). The analysis of personality traits leads to very diverse conclusions, especially in relation to involvement in care. High levels of openness to experience are associated with an increase in tension in relations with the care recipient and an increase in concerns about the patient and their future. This may be due to more frequent positive and negative feelings experienced by more open caregivers and their greater cognitive curiosity, which may be additionally reinforced by a high sense of comprehensibility, meaningfulness, and their self-perceived capacity to cope. The role of openness to experience seems to be somewhat overlooked in research. It is worth emphasizing, however, that the sense of coherence plays an important intermediary role in shaping the sense of caregiver burden. Previous studies indicate that sense of coherence plays a significant role in the perception of mental health (90) and the development of psychosomatic disorders (91).

The nature of the relationship between caregiver personality and burden of care is also explained by the moderating effect of perceived social support. We found increased perceived social support to be linked to neuroticism having a stronger relationship with decreased thinking about death and increased guilt and anxious tension. At the same time, it had a weaker relationship with increased psychosomatic symptoms, tension in relations with the patient, worrying, supervision, and urging. On the other hand, increased perceived social support resulted in extroversion having a stronger relationship with decreased psychosomatic symptoms and tension in relations with the patient, as well as increased supervision, and its having a weaker relationship with decreased guilt. Perceived social support also moderated the relationship between openness to experience and conscientiousness and the investigated dimensions of caregiver burden. Openness to experience was more associated with a decrease in psychosomatic symptoms and supervision, as well as an increase in tension in relationships with the patient, worrying, urging, and external and intrapsychic stress. Conscientiousness, on the other hand, was more closely related to decreased thinking about death and increased worrying and urging. At the same time, it was less associated with decreased emotional tension. Previous studies indicate a significant role of social support in reducing care-related stress (81, 82, 92, 93), burden of care (15, 46–48), and depression (84). Researchers particularly emphasize the key role of family support in alleviating the negative effects of stress (17, 85, 86, 94). Ong et al. (51) describe the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between mental resilience and burden. In turn, Kim et al. (49) point out that there is insufficient evidence that support plays a mediating role between personality and mental health. Our findings suggest that the potential moderating role of social support remains somewhat unclear. Increasing tension in the relationship between the caregiver and the care recipient may lead to greater involvement in care. On the other hand, making efforts to maintain a high level of support (greater social activity, fostering interpersonal relationships) may increase the tension due to the patient's greater expectations concerning the amount of time and attention they should receive.

The nature of the relationship between caregiver personality and burden of care is also explained by the analyses of the moderating effect of generalized sense of self-efficacy. Our research showed that with increased generalized sense of self-efficacy, neuroticism had a stronger relationship with increased cognitive deficits and decreased thinking about death. We also found extroversion to have a stronger relationship with increased supervision, while agreeableness had a weaker relationship with decreased thinking about death, guilt, and supervision. Along with the increase in self-efficacy, conscientiousness was less related to the increase in tension in relations with the patient and supervision, and more related to decreased cognitive deficits. Studies to date indicate a significant role of self-efficacy in reducing sense of burden (55–57, 87) as well as levels of stress and vulnerability to depression (54). Interestingly, our findings suggest the opposite relationship. Self-efficacy, associated with a high level of confidence in one's own competence and self-perceived capacity to cope, may lead to greater involvement in care. A high sense of self-efficacy may be linked to the need to take more control over the patient's functioning. According to Bandura's socio-cognitive theory (53), taking action may be accompanied by the belief that said action is worth the effort.

Thus, personal resources play an important role in moderating the relationship between personality and burden of care. However, their moderating effects in the studied sample are rather diverse. Our research indicates that personality has both a direct and indirect effect on caregiver burden, in the latter case involving personal resources. Hence, to improve caregivers' functioning and reduce their perceived burden of care, it is essential to take into account their personality traits and the repertoire of personal resources they have at their disposal.

Limitations, Strengths, and Future Directions

This study had several strengths and limitations. First of all, a major limitation is its relatively small sample size. Further research could include larger groups. Nevertheless, this research provokes reflection on the factors that could play a significant role in improving the psychosocial functioning of caregivers. Studies to date tend to focus mainly on the negative consequences of providing care, therefore it seems all the more necessary for further research to shed light on the role of resources in reducing the sense of burden. In the future, this aspect of caregivers' functioning should be addressed using a larger group of respondents. Another important limitation is the relatively small number of male carers. Previous studies show that it is women rather than men who tend to provide care and are mainly responsible for ill persons (95–97). It therefore seems crucial to investigate the situation of men who undertake caregiving roles. In addition, in this study we have focused on caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease. Further research could consider patients with other types of dementia, such as frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia, and Lewy body dementia.

Despite these limitations, the study also had several strengths. First of all, to the best of our knowledge, this study is one of the few that have considered the role of personality components in the development of caregiver burden. One of its major strengths is therefore its approach toward personal resources as important determinants of the relationship between caregiver personality and burden, thus helping to identify factors that can transform or prevent negative consequences of care.

Our findings shed further light on the factors that may be construed as critical in shaping perceived burden of care. The results of this study could prove useful for both psychological practice and psychoeducation. Furthermore, this study suggests that the caregiver's personality and personal resources should be considered when developing assistance programs. Proper assessment of a caregiver's personality and personal resources could help identify the most significant contributors to subjective feeling of burden.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that carers with less mature personality types are more likely to be burdened with care, thus confirming the key role of personality components in caregiver burden. In addition, personal resources are an important predictor of burden of care. The nature of the relationship between personality and perceived burden depends on levels of personal resources. Therefore, it seems crucial to properly support caregivers and strengthen their resources. This may have implications for future research. Proper assessment of resources and personality should be an important goal for all psychotherapeutic activities. Identification of the factors that make one vulnerable to increased burden can help in the selection of the most suitable strategies for coping with the demands of care. Therefore, to protect the caregiver against depression and reduce their stress and burden, it seems of utmost importance to undertake all the necessary measures to rebuild or recover any resources that might have been lost or depleted. Such actions can also protect against premature institutionalization of patients. Individual caregiver personality profiles and assessment of personal resources could improve the provision of effective aid to carers.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Institute of Psychology at University of Szczecin (KB 2/2017). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AS was the coordinator of the project, was involved in the study design, took part in recruitment of the participants, conducted research, managed the literature searches and analyses, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MB was involved in the study design, was a supervisor, and corrected the manuscript. ET was involved in the study design, took part in recruitment of the participants, managed the literature searches and analyses, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Lyketsos CG, Steinberg M, Tschantz J, Norton MC, Steffens DC, Breitner JC. Mental and behavioral disturbances in dementia: findings from the Cache County study on memory in aging. Am J Psychiatry. (2000) 157:708–14. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Grossberg GT, Kamat S. Alzheimer's: The Latest Assessment and Treatment Strategies. Sudbury, ON: Jones & Bartlett Learning (2010).

3. Lyketsos CG, Carrillo MC, Ryan JM, Khachaturian AS, Trzepacz P, Amatniek J, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. (2011) 7:532–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. González-Salvador T, Lyketsos CG, Baker A, Hovanec L, Roques C, Brandt J, et al. Quality of life in dementia patients in long-term care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2000) 15:181–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(200002)15:2<181::AID-GPS96>3.0.CO;2-I

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. González-Salvador MT, Arango C, Lyketsos CG, Barba AC. The stress and psychological morbidity of the Alzheimer patient caregiver. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (1999) 14:701–10. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199909)14:9<701::AID-GPS5>3.0.CO;2-#

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Murman DL, Chen Q, Powell MC, Kuo SB, Bradley CJ, Colenda CC. The incremental direct costs associated with behavioral symptoms in AD. Neurology. (2002) 59:1721–9. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000036904.73393.E4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. González EW, Polansky M, Lippa CF, Walker D, Feng D. Family caregivers at risk: who are they? Issues Ment Health Nurs. (2011) 32:528–36. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2011.573123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Coon D, Evans B. Empirically based treatments for family caregiver distress: what works and where do we go from here? Geriatr Nurs. (2009) 30:426–36. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2009.09.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Black SE, Gauthier S, Dalziel W, Keren R, Correia J, Hew H, et al. Canadian Alzheimer's disease caregiver survey: baby–boomer caregivers and burden of care. J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2009) 25:807–13. doi: 10.1002/gps.2421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lopez J, Lopez–Arrieta J, Crespo M. Factors associated with the positive impact of caring for eldery and dependent relatives. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2005) 41:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Belle SH, Burgio L, Burns R, Coon D, Czaja SJ, Gallagher-Thompson D, et al. Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. (2006) 145:727–38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Costa S, Ferreira J, Leite Â, Pereira M. Traumatic stress as a mediator of quality of life and burden in informal caregivers of amputees due to diabetic foot: a longitudinal study. Health Psychol Rep. (2021) 9:338–48. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2020.101495

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Schulz R, Martire LM. Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2004) 12:240–9. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200405000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Beach SR, Schulz R, Williamson GM, Miller LS, Weiner MF, Lance CE. Risk factors for potentially harmful informal caregiver behavior. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2005) 53:255–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53111.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist. (1990) 30:583–94. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.5.583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Etters L, Goodall D, Harrison B. Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. (2008) 20:423–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00342.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Llanque S, Savage L, Rosenburg N, Caserta M. Concept analysis: Alzheimer's caregiver stress. Nurs Forum. (2016) 51:21–31. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ballard C, Lowery K, Powell I, O'brien J, James I. Impact of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia on caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. (2000) 12:93–105. doi: 10.1017/S1041610200006840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Williamson GM, Shaffer DR. The family relationships in later life project. relationship quality and potentially harmful behaviors by spousal caregivers: how we were then, how we are now? Psychol Aging. (2001) 16:217–26. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.217

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mittelman MS, Roth DL, Clay OJ, Haley WE. Preserving health of Alzheimer caregivers: impact of a spouse caregiver intervention. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2007) 15:780–9. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31805d858a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chappell NL, Dujela N. Caregivers–who copes how? Int J Aging Hum Dev. (2009) 69:221–44. doi: 10.2190/AG.69.3.d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Vugt ME, Stevens F, Aalten P, Lousberg R, Jaspers N, Winkens I, et al. Behavioural disturbances in dementia and quality of the marital relationship. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2003) 18:149–54. doi: 10.1002/gps.807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Covinsky KE, Newcomer R, Fox P, Wood J, Sands L, Dane K, et al. Patient and caregiver characteristics associated with depression in caregivers of patients with dementia. J Gen Intern Med. (2003) 18:1006–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30103.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Campbell P, Wright J, Oyebode J, Job D, Crome P, Bentham P, et al. Determinants of burden in those who care for someone with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2008) 23:1078–85. doi: 10.1002/gps.2071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Helmes E, Green B, Almeida O. Individual differences in the experience of burden in caring for relatives with dementia: role of personality and mastery. Australas J Ageing. (2005) 24:202–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2005.00120.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shurgot GR, Knight BG. Influence of neuroticism, ethnicity, familism, and social support on perceived burden in dementia caregivers: pilot test of transactional stress and social support model. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2005) 60:331–4. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.6.P331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Melo G, Maroco J, de Mendonça A. Influence of personality on caregiver's burden, depression and distress related to the BPSD. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2011) 26:1275–82. doi: 10.1002/gps.2677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Löckenhoff CE, Sutin AR, Ferrucci L, Costa PT Jr. Personality traits and subjective health in the later years: the association between NEO-PI-R and SF-36 in advanced age is influenced by health status. J Res Pers. (2008) 42:1334–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.05.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Steel P, Schmidt J, Shultz J. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. (2008) 134:138–61. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Duberstein PR, Sörensen S, Lyness JM, King DA, Conwell Y, Seidlitz L, et al. Personality is associated with perceived health and functional status in older primary care patients. Psychol Aging. (2003) 18:25–37. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.25

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Iwasa H, Masui Y, Gondo Y, Inagaki H, Kawaai C, Suzuki T. Personality and all-cause mortality among older adults dwelling in a Japanese community: a five-year population-based prospective cohort study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2008) 16:399–405. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181662ac9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Taylor MD, Whiteman MC, Fowkes GR, Lee AJ, Allerhand M, Deary IJ. Five factor model personality traits and all-cause mortality in the Edinburgh artery study cohort. Psychosom Med. (2009) 71:631–41. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181a65298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wilson RS, Schneider JA, Arnold SE, Bienias JL, Bennett DA. Conscientiousness and the incidence of Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2007) 64:1204–12. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bogg T, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol Bull. (2004) 130:887–919. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Caap-Ahlgren M, Dehlin O. Factors of importance to the caregiver burden experienced by family caregivers of Parkinson's disease patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2002) 14:371–7. doi: 10.1007/BF03324464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Chumbler NR, Rittman M, Van Puymbroeck M, Vogel WB, Qnin H. The sense of coherence, burden, and depressive symptoms in informal caregivers during the first month after stroke. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2004) 19:944–53. doi: 10.1002/gps.1187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Del-Pino-Casado R, Espinosa-Medina A, López-Martínez C, Orgeta V. Sense of coherence, burden and mental health in caregiving: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2019) 242:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Matsushita M, Ishikawa T, Koyama A, Hasegawa N, Ichimi N, Yano H, et al. Is sense of coherence helpful in coping with caregiver burden for dementia? Psychogeriatrics. (2014) 14:87–92. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Orgeta V, Sterzo EL. Sense of coherence, burden, and affective symptoms in family carers of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. (2013) 25:973–80. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Stensletten K, Bruvik F, Espehaug B, Drageset J. Burden of care, social support, and sense of coherence in elderly caregivers living with individuals with symptoms of dementia. Dementia. (2016) 15:1422–35. doi: 10.1177/1471301214563319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Andrén S, Elmståhl S. The relationship between caregiver burden, caregivers' perceived health and their sense of coherence in caring for elders with dementia. J Clin Nurs. (2008) 17:790–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02066.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Välimäki TH, Vehvilainen-Julkunen KM, Pietilä AM, Pirttilä TA. Caregiver depression is associated with a low sense of coherence and health–related quality of life. Aging Ment Health. (2009) 13:799–807. doi: 10.1080/13607860903046487

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Tang ST, Li C-Y. The important role of sense of coherence in relation to depressive symptoms for Taiwanese family caregivers of cancer patients at the end of life. J Psychosom Res. (2008) 64:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.08.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Mausbach BT, Aschbacher K, Patterson TL, Ancoli-Israel S, von Känel R, Mills PJ, et al. Avoidant coping partially mediates the relationship between patient problem behaviors and depressive symptoms in spousal Alzheimer caregivers. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2006) 1:299–306. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000192492.88920.08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manager Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (1987).

46. Chen HM, Huang MF, Yeh YC, Huang WH, Chen CS. Effectiveness of coping strategies intervention on caregiver burden among caregivers of elderly patients with dementia. Psychogeriatrics. (2015) 15:20–5. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ozbay F, Johnson DC, Dimoulas E, Morgan CA III, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Psychiatry. (2007) 4:35–40.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

48. Shieh SC, Tung HS, Liang SY. Social support as influencing primary family caregiver burden in Taiwanese patients with colorectal cancer. J Nurs Scholarsh. (2012) 44:223–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01453.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kim Y, Duberstein PR, Sörensen S, Larson MR. Levels of depressive symptoms in spouses of people with lung cancer: Effects of personality, social support, and caregiving burden. Psychosomatic. (2005) 46:123–30. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.46.2.123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wang Z, Ma C, Han H, He R, Zhou L, Liang R, et al. Caregiver burden in Alzheimer's disease: moderation effects of social support and mediation effects of positive aspects of caregiving. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2018) 33:1198–206. doi: 10.1002/gps.4910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ong HL, Vaingankar JA, Abdin E, Sambasivam R, Fauziana R, Tan ME, et al. Resilience and burden in caregivers of older adults: moderating and mediating effects of perceived social support. BMC Psychiatry. (2018) 18:e27. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1616-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Dias R, Santos RL, Sousa MF, Nogueira ML, Torres B, Belfort T, et al. Resilience of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review of biological and psychosocial determinants. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. (2015) 37:12–9. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2014-0032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Pajares F, Urdan T. Guide for Constructing Self–Efficacy Scales. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing (2006).

54. Steffen AM, McKibbin C, Zeiss AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Bandura A. The revised scale for caregiving self–efficacy: reliability and validity studies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2002) 57:74–86. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.P74

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Gallagher D, Mhaolain AN, Crosby L, Ryan D, Lacey L, Coen RF, et al. Self-efficacy for managing dementia may protect against burden and depression in Alzheimer's caregivers. Aging Ment Health. (2011) 15:663–70. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.562179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Montoro-Rodriguez J, Gallagher-Thompson D. The role of resources and appraisals in predicting burden among latina and non-hispanic white female caregivers: a test of an expanded socio-cultural model of stress and coping. Aging Ment Health. (2009) 13:648–58. doi: 10.1080/13607860802534658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Romero-Moreno R, Losada A, Mausbach BT, Marquez-Gonzalez M, Patterson TL, Lopez J. Analysis of moderating effect of self–efficacy Romains in different points of the dementia caregiving process. Aging Ment Health. (2011) 15:221–31. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2010.505231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Zhang S, Guo QH, Helen E, Yates P, Li C. Self–efficacy moderation and mediation roles on BPSD and social support influences on subjective caregiver burden in Chinese spouse caregivers of dementia patients. Int Psychogeriatr. (2014) 26:1465–73. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000994

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Cummings JL, Mega MS. Neuropsychiatry and Behavioural Neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc (2003).

60. Siuta J. NEO Personality Inventory. Polish Version. Warsaw: Psychological Test Laboratory PTP (2006).

61. Koniarek J, Dudek B, Makowska Z. Questionnaire of life orientation: adaption of the sense of coherence questionnaire by A. Antonovsky. Prz Psychol. (1993) 36:491–502.

62. Juczyński Z. The role of perceived social support for the well-being of the individual - on the example of the Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU K-14). Psychol J. (2019) 25:195–202.

63. Juczyński J. Generalized self-efficacy - theory and measurement. Act Univ Lodz Fol Psychol. (2000) 4:11–24.

64. Ciałkowska M, Hadryś T, Kiejna A. Involvement evaluation questionnaire - description and application. Psychiatr Pol. (2009) 43:435–44.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

65. Łojek E, Stańczak J, Wójcik A. Questionnaire for Measuring Depression. Warsaw: Psychological Test Laboratory PTP (2015).

66. Plopa M, Makarowski R. Sense of Stress Questionnaire. Warsaw: Vizja Press & IT (2010).

67. Kock N. Using WarpPLS in E–collaboration studies: an overview of five main analysis steps. Int J e. (2010) 6:1–12. doi: 10.4018/jec.2010100101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Kock N. Advanced mediating effects tests, multi–group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS–based SEM. Int J e. (2014) 10:1–13. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2014010101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Kock N. Full latent growth and its use in PLS-SEM: testing moderating relationships. Data Anal Perspect J. (2020) 1:1–5.

70. Sarstedt M, Schwaiger M, Taylor CR. Advances in International Marketing. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. (2011).

71. Gallant MP, Connell CM. Neuroticism and depressive symptoms among spouse caregivers: do health behaviors mediate this relationship? Psychol Aging. (2003) 18:587–92. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Jang Y, Clay OJ, Roth DL, Haley WE, Mittelman MS. Neuroticism and longitudinal change in caregiver depression: impact of a spouse–caregiver intervention program. Gerontologist. (2004) 44:311–7. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.3.311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Renzetti C, Iacono S, Pinelli M, Marri L, Modugno M, Neri M. Living with dementia: is distress influenced by carer personality? Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl. (2001) 7:333–40. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4943(01)00157-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Koerner SS, Kenyon DB, Shirai Y. Caregiving for elder relatives: which caregivers experience personal benefits/gains? Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2009) 48:238–45. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.01.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Jylha P, Isometsa E. The relationship of neuroticism and extraversion to symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general population. Depress Anxiety. (2006) 23:281–9. doi: 10.1002/da.20167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Koerner SS, Kenyon DB. Understanding “good days” and “bad days”: emotional and physical reactivity among caregivers for elder relatives. Fam Relat. (2007) 56:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00435.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Hollis-Sawyer LA. Mother–daughter eldercare and changing relationships: a path–analytic investigation of factors underlying positive, adaptive relationships. J Adult Dev. (2003) 10:41–52. doi: 10.1023/A:1020738804030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Löckenhoff CE, Duberstein PR, Friedman B, Costa PT Jr. Five–factor personality traits and subjective health among caregivers: the role of caregiver strain and self-efficacy. Psychol Aging. (2011) 26:592–604. doi: 10.1037/a0022209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Del-Pino-Casado R, Frías-Osuna A, Palomino-Moral PA, Ruzafa-Martínez M, Ramos-Morcillo AJ. Social support and subjective burden in caregivers of adults and older adults: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0189874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Childers KM. Sense of coherence and caregivers of persons with dementia. Behav Sci. (2019) 9:1–25. doi: 10.3390/bs9020014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. (2014) 311:1052–60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. Social Epidemiology. Second Editions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2014).

83. Krause N, Borawski E. Clarifying the functions of social support in later life. Res Aging. (1994) 16:251–79. doi: 10.1177/0164027594163002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Miller B, Townsend A, Carpenter E, Montgomery RV, Stull D, Young RF. Social support and caregiver distress: a replication analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2001) 56:249–56. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.4.S249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Lai D, Thomson C. The impact of perceived adequacy of social support on caregiving burden of family caregivers. Fam Soc. (2011) 92:99–106. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.4063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Parrish MM, Adams S. Caregiver comorbidity and the ability to manage stress. J Gerontol Soc Work. (2003) 42:41–58. doi: 10.1300/J083v42n01_04

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Khan F, Pallant J, Brand C. Caregiver strain and factors associated with caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life in a community cohort with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. (2007) 29:1241–50. doi: 10.1080/01443610600964141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Hochwälder J. The contribution of the Big Five personality factors to sense of coherence. Pers Individ Differ. (2012) 53:591–6. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Kase T, Ueno Y, Oishi K. The overlap of sense of coherence and the big five personality traits: a confirmatory study. Health Psychol Open. (2018) 5:1–4. doi: 10.1177/2055102918810654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Eriksson M, Lindström B. Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2006) 60:376–81. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.041616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Söderfeldt M, Söderfeldt B, Ohlson CG, Theorell T, Jones I. The impact of sense of coherence and high–demand/low–control job environment on self–reported health, burnout and psychophysiological stress indicators. Work Stress. (2000) 14:1–15. doi: 10.1080/026783700417195

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Aoun SM, Bentley B, Funk L, Toye C, Grande G, Stajduhar KJ. A 10-year literature review of family caregiving for motor neurone disease: moving from caregiver burden studies to palliative care interventions. Palliat Med. (2013) 27:437–46. doi: 10.1177/0269216312455729

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Chiou CJ, Chang HY, Chen IP, Wang HH. Social support and caregiving circumstances as predictors of caregiver burden in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2009) 48:419–24. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Chang BL, Brecht M, Carter PA. Predictors of social support and caregiver outcomes. Women Health. (2001) 33:39–61. doi: 10.1300/J013v33n01_04

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. González FE, Palma SF. Functional social support in family caregivers of elderly adults with severe dependence. Invest Educ Enferm. (2016) 34:68–73. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v34n1a08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Kaufman AV, Kosberg JI, Leeper JD, Tang M. Social support, caregiver burden, and life satisfaction in a sample of rural African American and White caregivers of older persons with dementia. J Gerontol Soc Work. (2010) 53:251–69. doi: 10.1080/01634370903478989

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Oshodi YO, Adeyemi JD, Aina OF, Suleiman TF, Erinfolami AR, Umeh C. Burden and psychological effects: caregiver experiences in a psychiatric outpatient unit in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr J Psychiatry. (2012) 15:99–105. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.v15i2.13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar