Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Psychiatry, 11 September 2020
Sec. Public Mental Health
This article is part of the Research Topic Death and Mourning Processes in the Times of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) View all 47 articles

Silent Cries, Intensify the Pain of the Life That Is Ending: The COVID-19 Is Robbing Families of the Chance to Say a Final Goodbye

  • 1Departament of Internal Medicine, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil
  • 2Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Cariri, Ceara, Brazil

Introduction

The process of death and dying, despite being inherent to life, are phenomena that cause anxiety, fear, and anguish (1), with people’s reactions to this process closely correlated with their personal beliefs, social, philosophical aspects and their culture (2). During the pandemic of the new Coronavirus, COVID-19, started in Wuhan, China 668.073 deaths have already been caused in 216 countries (3). Thus, the discussion about the process of death and dying has become a daily occurrence from the news to the families but people cannot say goodbye, as well as performing their mourning rituals. This makes the process of accepting death/dying more complicated and increases the psychological suffering of those who have lost their relatives/friends. This paper aims to reflect the impact of the absence of standard rituals on the death/dying process in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Discussion

In prehistory, Neanderthals already practiced funeral rituals, being the first men to perform them through their beliefs in the idea that death was not characterized as the end, but as a transition from the world of the living to the spiritual kingdom. In ancient period, funerary rites were being improved and followed the advance of civilizations, quite prominent in ancient Egypt and the Chinese empire. They gained notoriety in the Iberian Peninsula when they were introduced by the Arabs in the 8th century (4). Therefore, there are archaeological records on funeral ritual practices since prehistory, suggesting that the concern with finitude was born concomitant with the conscience of the human being as an individual and of his life in collectivity, through ritualized care for death (5). In the 21st century, many victims of COVID-19 are dying in hospital isolation, without the presence of family or friends. The dead cannot be buried in their finest and favorite clothes. Instead, it is the grim anonymity of a hospital gown.

According to Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, in her Psychological Theory, when a person is faced with the imminence of finitude, they would experience five steps - denial, when they refuse the diagnosis; anger or revolt; negotiation or bargaining; depression, mourning process for the loss of life and, finally, acceptance of one’s finitude (6). However, rituals must be present for there to be a healthy mourning process and development. In all societies, in the event of someone’s death, the family and its social circle respond in a structured manner based on the meanings shared by the group (7). Thereby, there is no death without death rites. Rites are indispensable ways to express and solidify bonds, to encourage the sharing of emotions, to value certain situations, to ensure and reinforce social cohesion (8). Thus it is essential that family members and friends assist the death process to have the experience of elaborating the grief. In the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the high infectivity rate of the disease (9), this reality is being stolen from societies.

According to the literature, rituals go beyond action and are full of symbols. These symbols can have several meanings and make it possible to describe what we cannot express in words (5). Thus, they begin with agony and coincide with the initial phase of mourning. The segment takes place with the wake, funerals, condolences and public mourning (for prominent people), social (as in the case of the use of specific color of clothing) and psychological (the feeling of loss), extending with the cult of the dead or the visit to the cemetery, as it occurs on the day of the dead (10). Hence, in COVID-19 pandemic, the death is not a day worth living. It is a strange thing. Hospital morgues are flooded. Bodies and stories line up, coffins wrapped in pain and homesickness are led to cremation, leading to the creation of an emotional trauma.

Funeral rituals, therefore, mark the loss of a member to family members while affirming to society the value of the life of the deceased; provide the experience of mourning according to the values ​​and cultural prerogatives in which that community is immersed; they allow reflection on the paradigm of the coexistence of life and death; they redefine the meaning of life by pointing out a resizing of the lives of those who remained (11). In addition, they serve to contextualize the experience, allowing for role changes and the transition of the life cycle. They provide the family with support for the feeling of belonging to a culture capable of providing predictable responses at a time when the shock of loss leaves them numb and disjointed (5). The absence of these rites of passage also causes pain, enhances emotional traumas, which worries, because pain due to trauma can cause immediate and long-term physical consequences such as fibromyalgia and post-traumatic stress disorder. This profound disruption of organic and cognitive functions is even more common in victims of disasters (12) and pandemics.

According to Bromberg, in another perspective, funeral rituals have a therapeutic function, as (1) they help family members and friends to admit the loss of their loved ones; (2) creates a space for reflection on death as a process incorporated into life; (3) it makes it easier for family/friends to understand the grieving process and assimilate (13). In this perspective, it can be inferred that the possibility of performing funeral rites according to their customs/beliefs is a protective factor for the mental health and emotional traumas of the population that is suffering. Studies in psychology and Neurosciences demonstrate that memories loaded with emotion must be analyzed and reframed in order to overcome a traumatic phenomenon and avoid psychological distress and emotional trauma (14).

During the pandemic, several studies have shown an alarming increase in the rates of depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety (15), insomnia in addition to negative feelings such as fear, anguish, anger, stress, sadness and loneliness (16). In the psychological aspect, it is important to observe patients with their type of psychological suffering enter in silent crises and emotional traumas because this goes against all the cultural paradigms of modern society and all these feelings combined with loneliness intensify the pain of the life that is ending. This situation can also build and increase tension and it can be triggers in patients with pre-existing psychiatric diseases.

In addition, it must be considered that the process of facing death has profound correlations with the historical moment, with the social, economic and cultural prerogatives in which one is immersed. In the Middle Ages until the mid-eighteenth century, for example, death was part of people’s daily lives, existing a close relationship between the living and the dead. The image that we had of death was shown through two main characteristics: family simplicity and its publicity, and dying in public persisted until the end of the 19th century (17). Until the end of the 18th century, death was a public and well-organized ceremony, the moment before death was familiar, and the presence of relatives and friends in the patient’s room was essential. Only in the 19th century death in the West started to separate the dead from the survivors, relating to pain and emotions shown by crying, screaming and pleading. In the 19th and 20th centuries, the rites were heavily governed by the influence of the Catholic religion (4). Therefore, rituals such as the concept of death have been reinvented over time, thinking about them reflecting their effects on people’s mental health is to think and reflect to what extent the social context influences the mental health of a population. In fact, with the technological advancement and longevity of human beings, facing premature and abrupt death seems to oppose the very “sense of normality”, while challenging those who lost their loved ones to reinvent themselves in a short period of time and, in parallel, fear for their deaths, those of other loved ones and of the very society in which they are immersed, that is, of their own concept of normal.

Thus, with scientific-technological advances in medical knowledge, society became a consumer of health care. However, death and the anguish/fear of death are still a continuum in people’s lives. Rituals emerge as a therapeutic tool for emotional traumas in death context, an aid to understand and elaborate the strangeness of the moment, but also reconciling the living with the process of dying. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the inability to perform these rites reinforces the painful nature of death, arouses the feeling of loss in family members, friends, spouses, amplifies and causes emotional trauma and confronts society with its own fragility, both because of the speed with which it is installed and because of the novelty in ways of conducting the death process. There is a need for a deep reflection on the psychological, anthropological, sociological, and medical point of view of the death-dying process in the context of the new SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic, seeking to reconfigure the symbolisms, signifiers and meanings that this process took from 2020 and how the absence of this process impacts people’s mental health. After all, the COVID-19 is robbing families of the chance to say a final goodbye.

Author Contributions

MLRN, JGJ, and MMM reviewed the study protocol, read, and screened articles for inclusion. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Scientific Writing Lab, Medicine School – Universidade Federal of Cariri (UFCA) and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

References

1. Silva RS, Campos AER, Pereira Á. Cuidando do paciente no processo de morte na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Rev Esc Enferm USP (2011) 45(3):738–44. doi: 10.1590/S0080-62342011000300027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Peters L, Cant R, Payne S, O’Connor M, McDermott F, Hood K, et al. How death anxiety impacts nurses’ caring for patients at the end of life: a review of literature. Open Nurs J (2013) 7:14–21. doi: 10.2174/1874434601307010014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. World Health Organization – WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. (2020). Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. [Accessed April 30, 2020].

Google Scholar

4. Tomasi JM. Cortejos fúnebres e velórios: os ritos fúnebres católicos na cidade de Florianópolis (SC) na contemporaneidade. RBHR (2013) 17:215–30.

Google Scholar

5. Souza CP, Souza AM. Rituais Fúnebres no Processo do Luto: Significados e Funções. Psic: Teor e Pesq (2019) 35:e35412. doi: 10.1590/0102.3772e35412

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Gonçalves Júnior J, Lóssio Neto CC, Cruz LS, Santos MSV, Novais MSMC, Rollim Neto ML. Oncologia Pediátrica – Interfaces Teóricas. 1st Ed. CRV Editor: Curitiba (2016).

Google Scholar

7. Meneses RA, Gomes EC. “Seu funeral, sua escolha”: rituais fúnebres na contemporaneidade. Rev Antropol (2011) 54(1):88–132. doi: 10.2307/41825781

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gonçalves AC. Rituais tradicionais de solidariedade. Religião e tensões entre finitude e infinitude. In: Ramos LAO, Ribeiro JM, Polônia A, editors. Estudos em homenagem a João Francisco Marques, vol. 2. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Univ. do Porto (2001).

Google Scholar

9. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med (2020) 382:1199–207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Bayard JP. Sentido oculto dos ritos mortuários: Morrer é morrer. Paulus: São Paulo (1996).

Google Scholar

11. Imber-Black E. Os rituais e o processo de elaboração. In: Walsh F, McGoldrick M, editors. Morte na família: Sobrevivendo às perdas. Porto Alegre: Artmed (1998). p. 229–45.

Google Scholar

12. Walter S, Leibner N, Jerg-Bretzek L, Hrabal V, Traue HC. Pain and emotional processing in psychological trauma. Psychiatr Danub (2010) 22(3):465–70.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Bromberg MH. A Psicoterapia em situações de perdas e luto. Livro Pleno: Campinas (2000).

Google Scholar

14. Peres JPF, Mercante JPP, Nasello AG. Promovendo resiliência em vítimas de trauma psicológico. Rev Psiquiatr RS (2005) 27(2):131–8. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81082005000200003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xiang Y-T, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatr (2020) 7:228–9. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Torales J, O´Higgins M, Castadelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry (2020). doi: 10.1177/0020764020915212

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Rezende AAM, Santos GF, Caldeira VP, Magalhães ZF. Ritos de Morte na Lembrança dos Velhos. Rev Bras Enferm (1995) 48(1):7–16. doi: 10.1590/S0034-71671995000100002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: coronavirus infection, mental health, death, pain, public health

Citation: Gonçalves Júnior J, Moreira MM and Rolim Neto ML (2020) Silent Cries, Intensify the Pain of the Life That Is Ending: The COVID-19 Is Robbing Families of the Chance to Say a Final Goodbye. Front. Psychiatry 11:570773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.570773

Received: 09 June 2020; Accepted: 28 August 2020;
Published: 11 September 2020.

Edited by:

Efosa Kenneth Oghagbon, Benue State University, Nigeria

Reviewed by:

Aikaterini Arvaniti, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

Copyright © 2020 Gonçalves Júnior, Moreira and Rolim Neto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jucier Gonçalves Júnior, anVjaWVyZ2p1bmlvckBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.