Hebin Wang1†
Xingxing Li- 1Department of Psychiatry, Ningbo Kangning Hospital, Ningbo, China
- 2Department of Psychiatry, Yongkang Third Hospital, Jinhua, China
A Commentary on
Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Impulse Inhibition in Abstinent Patients With Methamphetamine Addiction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
by Yuan, J., Liu, W., Liang, Q., Cao, X., Lucas, M.V., and Yuan, T.F. (2020). JAMA Netw Open 3, e200910. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0910
Drug addiction and relapse are characterized by compulsive drug seeking behavior and high impulsivity throughout different stages of addiction (e.g., formation and relapse) (1). Methamphetamine (MA) dependents exhibited high impulsivity, which act as important risk of relapse (2). Neuroimaging studies reported dopaminergic transmission and cortical-striatal circuitry mechanisms underlying the changes (3). It is conceivable that targeting these aberrant circuits might facilitate the behavioral control and reduce behavioral impulsivity in MA dependents (4) and, finally, prevent the patients from relapse. A recent study published on JAMA Netw Open proved the clinical potential of brain stimulation approach for impulsivity control in MA patients (5).
The authors firstly developed a two-choice oddball task that allows for quantification of behavioral impulsivity with improved sensitivity, in compared to the classical Go/Nogo task (6). The task contains both standard (frequently) and deviant (infrequently) trials; the subject needs to habituate for standard trial responses and response for deviant trial by press the button for inhibition. The behavioral results therefore provided both accuracy responses and reaction time (RT) differences between the two conditions. The authors found that the MA dependents reported lower accuracy and shortened response time, both of which reflecting the increased impulsivity associated with MA dependence.
Considering the importance of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in behavioral inhibition and risk decision making processes (7), the authors therefore designed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of 1 Hz non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on impulsivity of MA dependents, which is found to be effective in reducing impulsivity in other types of patients (8). Single session 1-Hz treatment at left PFC successfully improved accuracy and slowed down the response time, while repeated treatment with 10 sessions demonstrated lasting effects for at least 30 days. These findings suggest that 1 Hz rTMS could reduce behavioral impulsivity and improve the cautious decision making.
The study for the first time reported the effects of rTMS intervention on impulsivity of MA dependence. It is possible that this finding might be generalize to other substances of abuse as well and warrants future large trials investigating the effects of chronic rTMS on impulsive drug seeking behaviors and relapse. Recent studies emphasized the potency of rTMS treatment on drug intake behavior, improve sleep quality and cognition, and efficiency to reduced cue reactivity or craving in a variety of drug dependents (9–17). It should be noted that most of these results focused on high-frequency (e.g., 10 Hz) rTMS stimulation at left PFC region (18).
Previous studies reported that, for MA addicts, the craving rate decreased after high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS at left PFC, and the rate increased after low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS at the same cortex (19, 20). There is a theory that the excitation of unilateral cortical regions leads to suppression of the contralateral side, so the high-frequency stimulation on the left can achieve the same therapeutic effect in the right position by low frequency (21). It is consistent with the results observed by Yuan et al. that no matter high-frequency rTMS at left PFC or low-frequency rTMS at right PFC effectively reduced craving rate for MA abusers (22). Whether the patient requires two different and separate treatment protocols for drug seeking and impulsivity is yet to be understood.
The study is limited by a short period of treatment and follow-up time window. It is still necessary to understand the lasting effects of rTMS on impulsivity improvement; it is also important to examine if rTMS also improves risk decision making, which partly relies on behavioral inhibition ability. In addition, it will be interesting to understand if targeting motor cortical areas (e.g., SMA, M1) would also modulate the motor impulsivity and provide a full picture of impulsivity treatment in substances of abuse.
Taken together, the recent study by Yuan et al. opened novel possibility of impulsive behavior intervention for drug dependence and potentially imply on relapse behavior. Neuroimaging studies are required to elucidate the underlying neuroplasticity and circuitry changes following rTMS treatment.
Author Contributions
HW, CY, and XL contributed equally to this work. HW and CY drafted the manuscript. XL revised the manuscript. WL and FH provided funds. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The study was supported by the Medical Science and Technology Project in Ningbo (2017A54 and 2018A31), Science and Technology Project in Yongkang (201634), and Ningbo Municipal Innovation Team of Life Science and Health (2015C110026).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Qi Zhou, Wenhao Zhuang, and Xiaoli Liu for help during manuscript writing.
References
1. Jentsch JD, Ashenhurst JR, Cervantes MC, Groman SM, James AS, Pennington ZT. Dissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2014) 1327:1–26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12388
2. Jones HW, Dean AC, Price KA, London ED. Increased self-reported impulsivity in methamphetamine users maintaining drug abstinence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse (2016) 42:500–6. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1192639
3. Lee B, London ED, Poldrack RA, Farahi J, Nacca A, Monterosso JR, et al. Striatal dopamine d2/d3 receptor availability is reduced in methamphetamine dependence and is linked to impulsivity. J Neurosci (2009) 29:14734–40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3765-09.2009
4. Adinoff B, Rilling LM, Williams MJ, Schreffler E, Schepis TS, Rosvall T, et al. Impulsivity, neural deficits, and the addictions: the “oops” factor in relapse. J Addict Dis (2007) 26(Suppl 1):25–39. doi: 10.1300/J069v26S01_04
5. Yuan J, Liu W, Liang Q, Cao X, Lucas MV, Yuan TF. Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Impulse Inhibition in Abstinent Patients With Methamphetamine Addiction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open (2020) 3:e200910. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0910
6. Yuan J, He Y, Qinglin Z, Chen A, Li H. Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two-choice oddball task. Psychophysiology (2008) 45:986–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00693.x
7. Sabrini S, Wang GY, Lin JC, Ian JK, Curley LE. Methamphetamine use and cognitive function: A systematic review of neuroimaging research. Drug Alcohol Depend (2019) 194:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.041
8. Sokhadze EM, El-Baz A, Baruth J, Mathai G, Sears L, Casanova MF. Effects of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Gamma Frequency Oscillations and Event-Related Potentials During Processing of Illusory Figures in Autism. J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 39:619–34. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0662-7
9. Shen Y, Cao X, Tan T, Shan C, Wang Y, Pan J, et al. 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces Heroin cue craving in long-term addicts. Biol Psychiatry (2016) 80(3):e13–4. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.02.006
10. Li X, Hartwell KJ, Owens M, Lematty T, Borckardt JJ, Hanlon CA, et al. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Nicotine Cue Craving. Biol Psychiatry (2013) 73:714–20. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.003
11. Bolloni C, Panella R, Pedetti M, Frascella AG, Gambelunghe C, Piccoli T, et al. Bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Cocaine Intake: A Pilot Study. Front Psychiatry (2016) 7:133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00133
12. Liu T, Li Y, Shen Y, Liu X, Yuan TF. Gender does not matter: Add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2019) 92:70–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.018
13. Liang Y, Wang L, Yuan TF. Targeting Withdrawal Symptoms in Men Addicted to Methamphetamine With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry (2018) 75:1199–201. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2383
14. Ernestina Politi MD, Eugenia Fauci MD, Santoro A, Enrico Smeraldi MD. Daily Sessions of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Left Prefrontal Cortex Gradually Reduce Cocaine Craving. Am J Addict (2008) 17:345–6. doi: 10.1080/10550490802139283
15. Camprodon JA, Martínez-Raga J, Alonso-Alonso M, Shih MC, Pascual-Leone A. One session of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the right prefrontal cortex transiently reduces cocaine craving. Drug Alcohol Depend (2007) 86:91–4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.002
16. Madeo G, Terraneo A, Cardullo S, Gomez Perez LJ, Cellini N, Sarlo M, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Large Cohort of Patients With Cocaine-Use Disorder: An Observational Study. Front Psychiatry (2020) 11:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00158
17. Lin J, Liu X, Li H, Yu L, Shen M, Lou Y, et al. Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on sleeping quality and mood status in drug dependent male inpatients during abstinence. Sleep Med (2019) 58:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.01.052
18. Ekhtiari H, Tavakoli H, Addolorato G, Baeken C, Bonci A, Campanella S, et al. Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2019) 104:118–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.007
19. Li X, Malcolm RJ, Huebner K, Hanlon CA, Taylor JJ, Brady KT, et al. Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transiently increases cue-induced craving for methamphetamine: a preliminary study. Drug Alcohol Depend (2013) 133:641–6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.08.012
20. Su H, Zhong N, Gan H, Wang J, Han H, Chen T, et al. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for methamphetamine use disorders: A randomised clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend (2017) 175:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.037
21. Kirton A, Chen R, Friefeld S, Gunraj C, Pontigon AM, Deveber G. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol (2008) 7:507–13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70096-6
Keywords: transcranial magnetic stimulation, low-frequency, methamphetamine, commentary, prefrontal cortex (PFC)
Citation: Wang H, Li X, Yu C, Hu F and Liu W (2020) Commentary: Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Impulse Inhibition Methamphetamine in Abstinent Methamphetamine Patients. Front. Psychiatry 11:561246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.561246
Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 02 September 2020;
Published: 25 September 2020.
Edited by:
Jianhua Chen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaReviewed by:
Yingying Tang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaCopyright © 2020 Wang, Li, Yu, Hu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fangzhen Hu, 947112771@qq.com; Wenbang Liu, liuwenbangkn@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work