
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Psychiatry , 25 February 2020
Sec. Forensic Psychiatry
Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00128
This article is part of the Research Topic Therapeutic Process and Well-Being in Forensic Psychiatry and Prison View all 24 articles
This article is a correction to:
The Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire: Development, Validation, and Revision
A Corrigendum on
The Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire: Development, Validation, and Revision
by Tomlin, J., Völlm, B., Furtado, V., Egan, V., and Bartlett, P. (2019). Front. Psychiatry 10:805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00805
In the original article, there was an error. The Forensic Inpatient Quality of Life Questionnaire - Short Version (FQL-SV) was incorrectly called the Forensic Quality of Life Profile - Short Version (FQL-SV).
A correction has been made to the Instruments section, subsection Forensic Quality of Life Profile-Short Version (FQL-SV), Paragraph 1:
“Forensic Inpatient Quality of Life Questionnaire - Short Version (FQL-SV)
Patient quality of life was measured with the short version of the Forensic Inpatient Quality of Life Questionnaire - Short Version (FQL-SV; 45, 46). This scale was developed in The Netherlands and translated into English by its authors. The FQL-SV is comprised of 20 items. It asks patients about a range of topics including leave, safety, food, personal hygiene, sexuality, and relationships with other residents.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: forensic, mental health, restrictive, autonomy, FRQ, forensic restrictiveness questionnaire, psychometric
Citation: Tomlin J, Völlm B, Furtado V, Egan V and Bartlett P (2020) Corrigendum: The Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire: Development, Validation, and Revision. Front. Psychiatry 11:128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00128
Received: 06 January 2020; Accepted: 13 February 2020;
Published: 25 February 2020.
Edited and reviewed by: Alexander Ian Frederic Simpson, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Canada
Copyright © 2020 Tomlin, Völlm, Furtado, Egan and Bartlett. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jack Tomlin, amFjay50b21saW5AbWVkLnVuaS1yb3N0b2NrLmRl
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.