Djamila Bennabi
Emmanuel Haffen
Vincent Van Waes- 1Department of Clinical Psychiatry, INSERM, CHU de Besançon, Neurosciences, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, FondaMental Foundation, Creteil, France
- 2Laboratory of Integrative and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
Objectives: Vortioxetine has already shown its efficacy in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and its potential interest in the prevention of relapse. The aim of this study was to review the current status of knowledge regarding its cognitive effects.
Methods: We conducted a review of key data obtained from preclinical behavioral models and clinical trials in MDD focusing on vortioxetine-induced cognitive changes.
Results: In animals, acute and chronic administration of vortioxetine improves performance on objective measures that cover a broad range of cognitive domains. In human, vortioxetine appears to be a useful treatment option in MDD patients with cognitive dysfunction.
Conclusion: Vortioxetine constitutes a promising treatment for treatment of cognitive impairment in MDD, but its place in the therapeutic armamentarium still needs to be determined.
Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a widespread psychiatric illness, associated with reduced productivity, deterioration in quality of life, and important morbidity and mortality (1, 2). MDD is one of the main causes of global burden by disability-adjusted life-years and may become the leading cause of disease burden by 2030, according to WHO (3). Cognitive deficits are often present in the clinical presentation of MDD and constitute a substantial component of the personal, familial, and social burden of the disease (4, 5). These deficits cover fundamental cognitive domains, such as psychomotor speed, attention, learning and memory, executive functioning, and processing of emotionally valenced stimuli (6).
In the acute phase, cognitive problems represent a key mediator of health outcomes in subsets of patients. They are frequent residual manifestations, following remission of the current episode, and constitute good predictors of functional and social outcomes for depressed patients (7). This observation is of particular relevance if taken into consideration how psychosocial functioning impairments, notably decrements in work productivity, account disproportionately for the overall costs attributable to MDD (8, 9). Considering that one of the main objectives of treatment is achieving functional recovery, there is growing interest in therapeutic strategies targeting cognitive function.
Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with a multitarget profile that embraces several pharmacological actions: inhibition of the serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT) and direct modulation of receptor activity (i.e., partial agonism at 5-HT1B receptors, agonism at 5-HT1A, and antagonist properties at 5-HT1D, 5-HT3, and 5-HT7 receptors) (10). There is accreting mechanistic evidence that vortioxetine can also indirectly modulate dopaminergic, noradrenergic, histaminergic, cholinergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic systems. Its efficacy and safety in patients suffering from moderate to severe MDD are supported by positive short-term (6- to 12-week) randomized, placebo-controlled trials and one positive randomized, double-blind, 52-week relapse prevention trial (11). In pooled analyses of randomized trial data, higher rates of positive response and successful remission following treatment with vortioxetine were observed when compared with placebo, which supported its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (12). Moreover, vortioxetine is apparently well tolerated. Indeed, incidence of secondary effects on body weight, sleep, or sexual functioning seems to be low (10). Besides its efficacy in the acute and long-term treatment of MDD and its interest in the prevention of relapse, vortioxetine’s unique pharmacological profile makes it particularly interesting regarding therapeutic effects on cognitive impairment. The efficacy of vortioxetine in the management of MDD has been mainly linked to its action on synaptic serotonin levels via inhibition of SERT, but its cognition-enhancing properties are hypothesized to be also mediated by other mechanisms. The goal of this review is, therefore, to bring together and to summarize key data obtained from preclinical behavioral models and clinical trials in MDD focusing on vortioxetine-induced cognitive changes. Limitations and perspectives are then discussed.
Methods
Screening for studies on the cognitive effects of vortioxetine in preclinical and clinical settings was conducted on PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases. No limits were applied to publication year. Search for articles was based on the following keywords using Boolean operators: (1) for preclinical studies: “vortioxetine”, “rats,” “mice,” “depression,” “cognition”; (2) for clinical studies: “depression,” “cognition,” “vortioxetine.” Inclusion criteria for clinical studies were as follows: (a) publication in English, (b) inclusion of unipolar depressed patients, (c) controlled clinical trial or meta-analysis, and (d) measures of cognition as primary or secondary outcome. Our search criteria yielded 28 references. The reviewed studies are listed in Tables 1–3.
Animal Studies
Vortioxetine Decreases Depression-Related Behaviors in Rodents: an Effect Possibly Mediated by Direct Activity At 5-HT Receptors
In the rat, vortioxetine has a dose-dependent antidepressant-like effect in the forced swim test (FST) in an animal model of depression (Flinders Sensitive Line rats, minimal effective doses: 7.8 mg/kg subcutaneously [s.c.], administered 24, 6, and 1 h before the FST procedure) and anxiolytic-like effects in social interaction and conditioned fear tests (Sprague–Dawley rats, minimal effective doses: 2 [orally {p.o.}] and 3.9 [s.c.] mg/kg administered acutely, respectively) (40). Further microdialysis experiments carried out in the same study revealed that vortioxetine (2.5–10 mg/kg s.c.) increases extracellular 5-HT, dopamine, and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex as well as in the ventral hippocampus, especially for the highest dose tested. Subchronic administration of vortioxetine (5 mg/kg per day for 3 days; minipump implanted s.c.) also significantly increased extracellular 5-HT in the ventral hippocampus (40). Another study (chronic administration) in healthy middle-aged female mice indicated that both 1- and 3-month treatment with therapeutic doses of vortioxetine decreases the percentage of immobility in the FST (22). This is in accordance with data showing in healthy mice that acute and repeated dosing of vortioxetine produces more pronounced anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like activities than fluoxetine (41). This effect is associated with increased neurogenesis levels in the hippocampus (41), which are hypothesized to be one of the neurobiological mechanisms of action of antidepressant drugs (42).
Numerous studies have been conducted in various animal models of depression. For instance, it has been shown that chronic vortioxetine treatment reverses the increased time spent immobile in the FST observed in tryptophan depletion (43) or progesterone withdrawal (44) models. In line with these results, vortioxetine, fluoxetine, and S-ketamine induce in Flinders Sensitive Line rats an acute antidepressant-like activity (FST), but only S-ketamine has sustained effects (19). Unlike vortioxetine, the antidepressant-like responses of fluoxetine and S-ketamine are abolished by 5-HT depletion (44). Interestingly, using the SERT Met172 mouse model, which disrupts the high-affinity interactions of many antidepressants with SERT, Nackenoff and collaborators (45) showed that the antidepressant actions of vortioxetine may be SERT-independent. Indeed, vortioxetine was still able to enhance mobility in the tail suspension test and in the FST, to reduce consumption latency in the novelty-induced hypophagia test, and to promote proliferation and survival of subgranular-zone hippocampal stem cells, despite less interaction with SERT in these mice (45). Exposure to early stressful life events (in utero) is also an animal model of depression (46). It has been reported that single, chronic, and concomitant use of vortioxetine, dapoxetine, and fluoxetine has antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in prenatally stressed rats (47).
It is worth noting the critical role that affective biases apparently play in the onset and development of depression. Refsgaard and collaborators (48) used a recently developed affective bias test for rats to evaluate the modulation of affective biases by vortioxetine, sertraline, duloxetine, and the α2 adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan. Vortioxetine and idazoxan induced the largest effects, and at all tested doses, there were significant positive biases as outcome (48).
Altogether, these observations strongly suggest that vortioxetine has beneficial effects on depression-like behavior in rodents and that these latter may be mediated by direct activity at 5-HT receptors (19, 45). These effects could be related, for example, to desensitizing somatodendritic and activating postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors (40).
Vortioxetine Improves Cognition in Healthy Animals and in Animal Models of Depression
A growing body of evidence from preclinical studies suggests that vortioxetine may also enhance cognitive functions, besides its antidepressant and anxiolytic effects (Table 1). For instance, it has been shown that this compound improves acquisition and retention of contextual fear memory, object recognition memory, and visuospatial memory in rats and mice. Mørk and collaborators (13) reported in healthy male Sprague–Dawley rats an improvement in the novel object recognition (NOR) test and an increase in freezing time during the retention test in a contextual fear-conditioning paradigm. In two other studies, in female Long–Evans rats, acute administration of vortioxetine restored memory performance deficits induced by 5-HT depletion (14, 15). This is in line with data obtained by Li and collaborators (18). They found that healthy middle-aged female mice exhibited impaired visuospatial memory in the novel object placement (location) (OP) test. Chronic treatment with vortioxetine, but not fluoxetine, improved visuospatial memory in these animals and increased hippocampal expression of several neuroplasticity-related genes (transcription and translation factors, genes involved in synaptic plasticity, signal transduction, and neurotransmission). Hippocampal growth factor levels, in contrast, were affected neither by vortioxetine nor by fluoxetine in this experiment (18). Memory improvements were also reported in the OP test (visuospatial memory) in healthy middle-aged mice after chronic treatment with vortioxetine (22). Surprisingly, the effects on memory were significant following a 1-month treatment (OP) but absent after a 3-month treatment (NOR, recognition memory) (22). The reasons for the lack of effect after the 3-month treatment might be due to the fact that a different behavioral task was used to evaluate the effects of vortioxetine on memory (1-month treatment: visuospatial memory vs. 3-month treatment: recognition memory).
Table 1 Studies exploring the cognitive effects of vortioxetine in mice and rats.
Reversal learning, a form of cognitive flexibility, is impaired by chronic stress, a risk factor for depression, and the stress-induced impairment in reversal learning is sensitive to chronic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatments and is mimicked by 5-HT depletion. It has been shown that chronic dietary administration of vortioxetine can restore reversal learning in animals whose capacity was damaged due to exposure to chronic intermittent cold (16). In accordance with these data, vortioxetine also prevents the effect of stress on hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), rapidly increases hippocampal cell proliferation (faster than fluoxetine), and enhances recognition memory in male Sprague–Dawley OFA rats (17). du Jardin and collaborators (19) also investigated the acute and sustained effects of S-ketamine (15 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), or vortioxetine (10 mg/kg) on recognition memory in the NOR task. The investigators used Flinders Sensitive Line rats depleted or not of 5-HT. They found that vortioxetine, but not fluoxetine or S-ketamine, acutely ameliorated the memory deficits of Flinders Sensitive Line rats in the object recognition task irrespective of 5-HT tone (19). Hatherall and collaboratorss (21) have recently shown that chronic vortioxetine administration decreases the excessive expression of fear memory and the shift from active to maladaptive passive coping behavior induced by the chronic stress treatments: chronic plus acute prolonged stress and chronic unpredictable stress.
Furthermore, MDD figures as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease, since depressive symptoms significantly intensify the conversion of mild cognitive impairment into this dementia. Recently, Torrisi et al. (49) found that continuous treatment with either fluoxetine or vortioxetine might avoid cognitive deficits as well as depressive-like phenotype in a nontransgenic animal model of Alzheimer disease (induced by intracerebroventricular injection of amyloid-β (1–50)) with a key contribution of transforming growth factor β1.
Finally, Pehrson and collaborators (20) observed that acute administration of vortioxetine reverses scopolamine (an anticholinergic agent)–induced impairments regarding social and object recognition memory, without affecting scopolamine-induced impairments in attention. In this study, a modest and short-lived rise of hippocampal acetylcholine (ACh) levels was equally reported. Subchronic vortioxetine administration, on the other hand, neither reversed scopolamine-induced social recognition memory deficits, nor affected basal hippocampal ACh levels. In another study, the same team (23) demonstrated that either acute or subchronic vortioxetine administration attenuates phencyclidine (an N-methyl--aspartate [NMDA] receptor antagonist)–induced deficits in attentional set shifting performance and that both ondansetron (a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist) and escitalopram (a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor) can mimic this effect. Furthermore, subchronic vortioxetine reverses phencyclidine-induced object recognition and OP impairments in mice. More recently, Felice and collaborators (24) reported that vortioxetine improves context discrimination in mice. However, contrary to a previous hypothesis [cf. (17)], this improvement was observed through a neurogenesis-independent mechanism.
To sum up, in animal studies, vortioxetine appears to have beneficial effects on depression-related behavior and cognitive deficits that are distinct from those of SSRIs and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (15, 19, 41, 44, 45). Altogether, these preclinical data provide further evidence of the therapeutic potential of vortioxetine in the management of depression disorders including depression-induced cognitive impairments in humans. The results from these experiments also suggest that multiple mechanisms could be at the origin of the procognitive properties of vortioxetine. Indeed, it has been shown that vortioxetine exerts, in addition to direct effects on serotonin, indirect effects on multiple neurotransmitters such as noradrenergic, histaminergic, cholinergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic systems (demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo studies) (10, 51, 52). Furthermore, a growing number of studies also indicate that vortioxetine modulates molecular targets that are related to neuroplasticity (53). For example, Waller and collaborators (54) have shown that neuroplasticity pathways, and protein-interaction networks are modulated by vortioxetine in rodents. They also found that chronic vortioxetine treatment in rodents modulates gene expression of neurodevelopmental and plasticity markers (55). Another example is that vortioxetine promotes maturation of dendritic spines in vitro in hippocampal cultures (56). In this study, vortioxetine, ketamine, and duloxetine induced spine enlargement. Nonetheless, increased number of spines in contact with presynaptic terminals was only observed following treatment with vortioxetine. Other mechanisms have been suggested, such as the facilitating effects of vortioxetine on LTP and on neurogenesis levels in the hippocampus (17, 24, 50). Vortioxetine, but not fluoxetine, also increases hippocampal brain–derived neurotrophic factor levels in healthy rats (57), as well as in rats subjected to chronic unpredictable mild stress (an animal model of depression) (58).
It is important to note that the studies described above have several limitations. For example, the behavioral effects reported are sometimes rather modest or appear only under particular conditions [e.g., social recognition is improved under acute dosing condition only (20)]. There is also a need for more systematic and comprehensive complementary studies testing the same behavioral parameters at short and long terms, under the same experimental conditions. Finally, a very high proportion of the studies cited in this section have been published by a small number of research teams, which are often from and/or sponsored by Lundbeck. Therefore, it would be useful to know if these data can be replicated and extended by independent studies.
Behavioral Effects of Vortioxetine: Involvement of the Tryptophan Metabolism?
There is a link between depression and the metabolism of tryptophan through kynurenine and serotonin pathways. Eskelund and collaborators (59) examined, in Sprague–Dawley and Flinders Sensitive Line rats, the effects of vortioxetine and other antidepressants (fluoxetine and ketamine) on various tryptophan metabolites in different brain regions and plasma. The effects of vortioxetine on tryptophan metabolites were also assessed in the cortical regions of lupus mice (MRL/MpJ-FasIpr), a murine model of increased depression-like behavior associated with inflammation. The investigators found that sustained vortioxetine and fluoxetine administration (at doses aimed to fully occupy serotonin transporters via food or drinking water for at least 14 days) decreased levels of the excitotoxin quinolinic acid independent of species. Ketamine, on the other hand, induced no significant effect.
Franklin and collaborators (60) studied the effects of vortioxetine and the SSRI paroxetine on pineal melatonin and monoamine synthesis in a subchronic tryptophan depletion model of depression based on a low tryptophan diet. Vortioxetine was administered via the diet (0.76 mg/kg of food weight) for 14 days. As results, tryptophan depletion-induced reductions of pineal melatonin and serotonin were reversed, while pineal noradrenaline was significantly increased (60). The authors suggested that the changes observed may be due to a strong 5-HT reuptake blocking action, along with possible additional effects on glutamate neurotransmission in the pineal gland via NMDA receptor modulation and with added impetus from increased noradrenaline output (60). In a subsequent study, the same team evaluated the effects of vortioxetine on potential biomarkers associated with tryptophan depletion including serum aldosterone, corticosterone, and interleukin 6 levels together with indirect indicators of glutamate neurotransmission. As in the previous study, vortioxetine was administered via the diet (10 mg/kg per day) for 14 days. Vortioxetine reversed tryptophan depletion-induced depressive-like behavior and reduced tryptophan depletion-induced increases of serum corticosterone, aldosterone, IL-6, and NMDA and α7-nicotinic ACh receptor expression in the amygdala and hippocampus, respectively (43). Since paroxetine, an SSRI, had almost no impact in this animal model of depression, the observations reported in the two studies mentioned above confirm the hypothesis that vortioxetine’s antidepressant activity may involve mechanisms beyond SERT inhibition (43, 60). While the effect of vortioxetine on tryptophan metabolism may be at the origin of its antidepressant effect, it is not clear yet whether this potential mechanism of action may be linked to its procognitive effects.
Human Studies
Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning: Clinical Data
The short-term effects of vortioxetine 5 to 20 mg/day on cognitive performance in adults with current MDD have been investigated in several cognitive domains, notably psychomotor speed and executive function [Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B, Simple Reaction Time], acquisition and memory [Rey Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)], attention and cognitive control (Stroop task), and with secondary subjective measures of cognitive function [Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ)] (Table 2).
Table 2 Randomized controls and open-label trials exploring the cognitive effects of vortioxetine in human.
In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, Katona et al. (25) randomized 453 elderly MDD patients to receive vortioxetine 5 mg/day, duloxetine 60 mg/day, or placebo. Vortioxetine separated from placebo in both the DSST and the RAVLT (standardized effect sizes 0.25 for DSST, 0.27 for RAVLT acquisition, and 0.24 for RAVLT delayed recall), indicating improvements in processing speed, verbal learning, and recall domains. Duloxetine failed to improve DSST scores, suggesting that vortioxetine exerts its beneficial effect on more cognitive domains. Moreover, a post hoc path analysis revealed that more than two-thirds of vortioxetine’s impact on cognition is attributable to direct treatment effect, not to improvement in severity of depressive symptoms, indirectly, as with duloxetine.
Concordant results were obtained in another double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a fixed dose of vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day) in younger MDD patients (26). In comparison to placebo, vortioxetine at both doses was significantly superior in terms of improvement of a weighted composite score of DSST, RAVLT acquisition, and RAVLT delay at 8 weeks, with mean treatment differences in the composite cognition score versus placebo of 0.36 (vortioxetine 10 mg/day, P < 0.0001) and 0.33 (vortioxetine 20 mg/day, P < 0.0001). Path analyses showed that this effect was largely a direct treatment effect at both doses (vortioxetine 10 mg: 64% and vortioxetine 20 mg: 48%) independent of improvements in overall depression severity. In secondary analyses evaluating objective cognitive measures as well as patient-reported outcomes, vortioxetine at both doses also showed superiority versus placebo, suggesting a favorable effect on memory, concentration, and planning/organization. It is important mentioning that the higher dose of vortioxetine resulted in a greater improvement of Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores. This dose–response effect was not observed for the cognitive performance scores, suggesting that vortioxetine exerts its procognitive and antidepressant actions via separate mechanisms. In a duloxetine-referenced trial, Mahableshwarkar et al. (27) explored the effects of flexible doses of vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day) on objective and subjective measures of cognitive functions and on functional capacity in patients with self-reported cognitive dysfunction. While both antidepressants significantly improved attention/concentration and planning/organization PDQ scores, only vortioxetine significantly improved DSST and TMT-B performance and the University of San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) scores, indicating restored executive function and functional capacity as well as faster cognitive processing. Path analysis has indicated that the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive performance is largely independent of the alleviation of depressive symptoms, while more than one-half of the duloxetine effect on cognitive deficits is attributable to improvements in depressive symptoms. Harrison et al. (61) studied which specific domains vortioxetine improves and demonstrated a procognitive effect in vortioxetine-treated patients at 8 weeks, even after correcting for a change in depression severity. In this study, vortioxetine at 10 and 20 mg/day separated from placebo for executive function, attention/speed of processing, and memory from the first week of treatment, indicating that vortioxetine may exert its positive effect on cognition early. It was stressed that this outcome does not inevitably reflect an enhancement of one specific domain, but mostly an improvement in a number of cognitive skills engaged by the DSST, as a result of changes in the other cognition variables. Interestingly, in a post hoc analysis of data from five RCTs, McIntyre et al. (29) reported that the positive effects of vortioxetine on both objective (DSST, TMT) and subjective (PDQ) measures of cognition were more prominent in patients with MDD who were active at work (especially in manager/administrator positions) than in the total population of those trials. This highlights the potential of vortioxetine to diminish cognitive dysfunction and enhance functional capacity, principally in working patients with MDD.
In primary analyses of their RCT including paroxetine as an active reference, Baune et al. (39) evaluated the effects of vortioxetine on cognitive function in a sample of employed depressed patients. They observed no statistically significant effects on cognitive performance or functional capacity, as measured by DSST and UPSA-B, respectively, after 8 weeks of pharmacological treatment versus with placebo. However, they noted a similar reduction in depressive symptoms associated with an improvement in cognition following pharmacological treatments. Moreover, a tendency of numerical differences in favor of vortioxetine was perceived across seven secondary cognitive endpoints. More recently, Vieta et al. (31) observed improvements in DSST and UPSA-B performance in a small sample of patients with inadequate response to SSRI or SNRI (selective noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor) monotherapy treated with flexible doses of either vortioxetine or escitalopram. Although no statistically significant differences were reported, vortioxetine was superior to escitalopram in terms of improvement of the number of DSST correct symbols, with a mean difference between the treatments of 2.0 points in favor of vortioxetine. Further, a trend of numerical differences in favor of vortioxetine was seen across seven secondary cognitive endpoints.
In a randomized, double-blind study, Nierenberg et al. (35) assessed the efficacy of vortioxetine as an adjunctive treatment to SSRI and as a monotherapy versus continued SSRI in the treatment of residual cognitive symptoms in the remitted phase of MDD. One hundred fifty-one patients with MDD who achieved full or partial remission with SSRI, but reported residual cognitive symptoms, were randomized to receive 8 weeks of current SSRI + placebo, SSRI + vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day), or vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day) + placebo. From baseline to week 8, all treatment groups improved performance in objective measures of executive function, attention, processing speed, learning, and memory, with statistically nonsignificant treatment differences. These improvements had the tendency of being numerically larger when vortioxetine monotherapy was compared with SSRI monotherapy, as well as to display a better numerical performance regarding further improvement of depressive symptoms with vortioxetine as adjunctive treatment. Another study recently explored the effect of vortioxetine in a combination therapy. Yan et al. (36) reported that vortioxetine combined with cognitive behavior therapy leads to greater improvements in executive functions assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and attention function assessed with the Continuous Performance Test compared to vortioxetine alone. Moreover, the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the serum of patients treated with vortioxetine combined with CBT was higher than that in the group treated with vortioxetine alone.
Besides RCTs, three open-label trials examined the cognitive benefits of vortioxetine. Freeman et al. (32) reported an improvement in DSST scores and in the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire after treatment with a flexible dose of vortioxetine in the context of early postmenopausal and perimenopausal depression in 24 women (32). In an escitalopram-referenced trial, Levada and Troyan (62) specifically assessed the effects of vortioxetine on cognitive impairments and global, working, social, and family functioning in a cohort of 56 MDD patients. At week 8, both antidepressants exhibited procognitive effects. However, the effects of vortioxetine on short-term (working) memory and executive disturbances, attention, and processing speed were significantly higher. The impact of vortioxetine was also significantly superior on working, social, family, and total functioning. Finally, an open-label, real-world study was undertaken to examine the association between cognitive symptoms and workplace productivity in working patients with MDD treated with vortioxetine (37). Along the 52 weeks of treatment, significant improvements in cognitive symptoms, work productivity, and functional outcomes were reported. Interestingly, the enhancements in patient-rated cognitive symptoms could predict long-term improvements in functional outcomes, even following adjustment for reduction in depressive symptoms.
Several meta-analyses pooling available data regarding the cognitive effects of vortioxetine have yielded concordant results (Table 3). Focusing on the DSST in a meta-analysis of five RCTs, McIntyre et al. (28) found that fixed or flexible dosages of vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day) were more effective than placebo and duloxetine, with beneficial effects independent of the improvement of depressive symptoms as assessed by MADRS. The effect sizes derived from this meta-analysis were small in magnitude after adjustment for MADRS (standard mean difference with placebo was 0.24 and 0.19 with duloxetine, respectively). Rosenblat et al. (38) included 17 controlled trials in their meta-analysis, aiming to assess the pooled efficacy of antidepressants on several cognitive domains in MDD. Seven antidepressants were assessed in the context of a placebo-controlled trial, and apparently, vortioxetine had the largest pooled effect size on psychomotor speed, executive control, and cognitive control. Duloxetine, alternatively, displayed the greatest effect on delayed recall.
Table 3 Meta-analysis exploring the cognitive effects of vortioxetine in human.
Similarly, Baune et al. (39) reported that vortioxetine improves both objective and subjective measures of cognitive function, independently of its effect on depressive symptom severity. This network meta-analysis of 12 RCTs using the DSST showed that vortioxetine was the only antidepressant that improved cognitive dysfunction in the DSST versus placebo [standardized mean difference: 0.325 (95% confidence interval = 0.120–0.529, P = 0.009)]. Moreover, subjectively experienced cognitive function significantly improved in the vortioxetine treatment group, as measured by the PDQ; equally, each of the subdomain scores (i.e., planning/organization, attention/concentration, prospective and retrospective memory) displayed a significant enhancement.
Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning: Neuroimaging Data
Only one study aimed to evaluate the ability of vortioxetine to target directly the neural circuitry implicated in the cognitive deficits in depression and its capacity to mitigate those deficits (33). In this study with a double-blind design, Smith et al. (33) sought to determine the effect of treatment on functional magnetic resonance imaging responses during an N-back working memory task and on neuropsychological measures of executive function, speed and information processing, attention, and learning and memory. They reported that when compared to placebo, 14 days of treatment with 20 mg vortioxetine significantly reduced activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left hippocampus as well as across a network of temporal–parietal areas during the N-back task. Interestingly, these effects were dissociated from the mood effects of the drug. These neural changes were accompanied by improved subjective ratings of cognitive function as measured by the PDQ and improved performance in the TMT-A task. These authors suggest that vortioxetine may facilitate the ability to switch off the default-mode network and encourage more efficient recruitment of task-positive networks during working memory tasks. This could explain the direct and independent effect of vortioxetine on cognition, specifically on executive function and working memory.
Discussion
This review aimed to offer an overview of the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depression.
Preclinical studies offer a rationale to understand the molecular mechanisms of vortioxetine’s cognitive effects and provide a basis for the differentiation of vortioxetine from conventional antidepressants with respect to effects on cognitive functioning. Overall, in animal models, acute, subchronic, and chronic administration of vortioxetine exerts positive effects across a range of cognitive tasks (13–24). Vortioxetine achieved enhancements in acquisition and retention of contextual fear memory, object recognition memory, and visuospatial memory in rats and mice. Furthermore, pharmacological studies in some of the animal models indicate that the cognitive benefits of vortioxetine rely on its action on receptor activity, in particular 5-HT3 receptor antagonism (63).
GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, exerts inhibitory action on the glutamatergic excitatory neurotransmission system and key regulators of cognitive processing (64). The blockade of 5-HT3 receptor–expressing GABAergic interneurons by vortioxetine increases glutamate-dependent synaptic neurotransmission and enhances firing of pyramidal neurons (65, 66). Enhanced release of glutamate in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus enhances LTP (a cellular mechanism of learning and memory (67)) and promotes maturation of dendritic spines as shown in vitro in hippocampal cultures (56). Interestingly, in vivo studies of the rat prefrontal cortex showed that effects on modulation of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission occur at doses across the clinically relevant dose range (5–20 mg/day) (50, 66, 68).
The stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors further disinhibits pyramidal neurons, while partial agonism of 5-HT1B receptors by vortioxetine leads to greater glutamate and 5-HT release. Downstream, 5-HT modulates the release of several neurotransmitters including dopamine, noradrenaline, ACh, and histamine (69). This is significant from a cognitive perspective as ACh is involved in learning and memory, and histamine is implicated in attention, alertness, and memory (70, 71). The involvement of tryptophan metabolism and the modulation of LTP as well as the increase in neurogenesis levels and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in the hippocampus could also potentially explain vortioxetine’s unique procognitive action (60, 68). The distinctive serotoninergic properties of vortioxetine in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, in comparison to SSRIs that stimulate every 5-HT receptor, are likely an important feature of its cognitive activity (69). Of note, microdialysis studies in rats have shown that vortioxetine induces an approximately twofold higher rise in extracellular 5-HT concentration in comparison to an SSRI. In humans, PET studies using 5-HT transporter ligands to quantify the 5-HT transporter occupancy in the brain across different dose levels indicate that the mean 5-HT transporter occupancy is approximately 50% at 5 mg/day and 65% at 10 mg/day and increases to above 80% at 20 mg/day (34, 72). While the occupancy of 5‐HT transporter should be around 80% for a conventional SSRI/SNRI to be therapeutically useful, these studies suggest that vortioxetine may be efficacious at lower 5‐HT occupancy than necessary with SSRI/SNRIs (73). Taken together, the results of these studies offer a scientific basis for the differentiation of vortioxetine from SSRI and SNRI antidepressants with respect to effects on cognitive functioning and a rationale for continued studies to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of vortioxetine in greater detail.
In addition to its antidepressant effects, vortioxetine has demonstrated cognitive-enhancing properties in humans in seven short-term RCTs (6–12 weeks) (26–35), three meta-analyses (28, 30, 38), and one open-label trial (62), wherein cognitive function was the primary outcome of interest. At this timepoint, significant improvements have been reported in processing speed, verbal learning, and recall domains in young and elderly adults with recurrent, moderate to severe MDD. These improvements, independent of the alleviation of depressive symptoms, represent a direct effect of vortioxetine and have been reported at doses across the clinically relevant dose range (5–20 mg/day) without a dose–response effect (26), suggesting that vortioxetine exerts its procognitive and antidepressant actions via separate mechanisms. A more important procognitive effect was observed in the subpopulation that was working at study baseline, independently of the effects on depressive symptom relief. Across five placebo-controlled studies, vortioxetine recipients also showed a significant improvement in subjective measures of cognitive function and a significant and clinically meaningful effect in an objective measure of functional capacity (5, 27, 29–31). Given the significant relationship between functional impairment and cognitive dysfunction, these studies appear to add to the multiple evidence indicating that vortioxetine positively influences both symptomatic and functioning outcomes.
Meta-analyses comparing the effects of different classes of antidepressants, including SSRIs and SNRIs, indicate that conventional antidepressants may to a degree improve cognitive deficits associated with MDD, although the majority of supporting studies have limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of placebo controls, or an absence of prespecification of cognition as a primary endpoint (28, 30, 38). They also demonstrate that vortioxetine distinguishes itself from other antidepressants in terms of effects on cognitive function, probably in line with its specific action on brain substrates relevant to cognitive function. Vortioxetine had the greatest effects on DSST scores, but also on psychomotor speed, executive control, and cognitive control among all antidepressants evaluated for cognitive effects, except in Rosenblat and colleagues’ (38) meta-analysis in which duloxetine had the greatest effect on delayed recall. The different mechanisms of action of the two compounds could mediate these differential effects described. As discussed previously, the rapid and sustained increase of 5-HT neurotransmission produced by vortioxetine could not be attained with an SSRI, particularly in brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus, known to be clinically relevant for cognition. The results of these studies thus indicate that vortioxetine could be a useful option to treat cognitive dysfunction in depressed patients, as a first-line treatment, or for patients who reached full or partial remission with an SSRI but still report residual cognitive symptoms.
Although the effects of vortioxetine on cognition seem promising, several limitations need to be addressed. Methodological difficulties and a lack of long-term studies are confounding results across the field. These, together with variability in study design and in cognitive outcome measures, are limitations that must be overcome. Especially in meta-analyses, high variability is observed between the trials included in reporting of cognitive outcomes, patient numbers, timepoints of assessments, and outcomes, which limit the generalizability of the results and caution the interpretation. In three studies, results indicate numerical benefits with vortioxetine in cognitive performance, with statistically nonsignificant differences with the active comparator (35–39). Their small sample sizes and consequently lower statistical power may explain the inability to detect treatment differences. Only five studies included in this review used active comparators in assessing vortioxetine efficacy, and cognition was not systematically the primary endpoint (25, 32, 36, 37). Furthermore, one of the source trials only required patient-reported measures of cognition at baseline. Although it has been proposed that this reporting system may be more applicable to clinical practice, it will be important for future trials to investigate objectively measured deficits at inclusion for comparison (27). The phase of MDD, namely, subsyndromal, acute clinical, or postacute, also requires consideration. Surprisingly, only one RCT investigated the effects of the interventions on cognition in a remitted state of MDD (35). In addition, no study revealed whether the positive effect of vortioxetine on cognition represents a return to premorbid levels for these participants. The general paucity of such trials severely limits inferences about the causality of the effects of the interventions on depressive and cognitive symptoms. It should also be noted that a small number of studies attempted to assess the impact of long-term treatment with vortioxetine on cognition. Several trials focused on the DSST, a measure of information processing speed, executive function, and attention as a primary endpoint and on the RAVLT, which assesses learning and memory. As pointed out by Harrison et al. (61), it is noteworthy that usually individual cognitive tests are labeled as measures of specific domains, while in reality they index multiple cognitive skills. Interestingly, the data point out a lack of evidence on engagement of specific targets with particular cognitive domains. Vortioxetine seems in fact to enhance performance in diverse cognitive domains. Lastly, a small number of studies were from and/or sponsored by Lundbeck, which represents a significant limitation (36, 47, 48).
Future research could explore the efficacy of vortioxetine to mitigate cognitive dysfunction in MDD in combination with treatment specifically designed to target cognitive performance. Indeed, a combination of pharmacological interventions and psychological approaches may be the most effective treatment both in terms of acute response and relapse prevention in MDD, but also in targeting cognitive dysfunction. For example, combining vortioxetine with cognitive behavioral therapy could be a direction to explore to enhance cognitive functioning in MDD. An additional opportunity worth exploring would be to combine vortioxetine with brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation or with other psychotropic agents with known beneficial effects in the domain of cognition (e.g., psychostimulants). Of interest, in line with recent findings suggesting that the targeting of inflammatory signaling pathways is an interesting strategy to improve the responsiveness of unipolar depressive patients, an RCT conducted by Fourrier and colleagues (74) will explore the effects of vortioxetine as an add-on strategy with 400 mg celecoxib, an anti-inflammatory COX-2 inhibitor, on cognitive function and inflammatory markers. Finally, more work is needed to better specify the cognitive effects of vortioxetine and possibly identify patient subgroups to whom treatment would be most beneficial. Additionally, long-term studies are also required toward a better understanding on the effects of cognitive dysfunction treatment on long-term outcomes of MDD, such as functional recovery and development of dementia or other cognitive disorders. Interestingly, a recent RCT investigated the efficacy of vortioxetine on cognitive functions in Alzheimer disease patients with depressive symptoms and reported significant improvement in most of the cognitive tests applied (75).
It would also be useful to integrate extensive examination of distinct cognitive functions such as the processing of information with emotional valence in human studies, as positive effects of vortioxetine have been reported in the affective bias test in rat (48). This is of particular importance as numerous studies emphasize the importance of negative biases in information processing in the etiology and maintenance of depressive disorders (76). Finally, it would be particularly interesting to evaluate vortioxetine’s effect on neural circuit/subcircuit connectivity to understand its mechanisms of action in greater detail.
Despite research advances recognizing cognition as an important target, treatment advances are still unsatisfactory due to methodological difficulties across the field. Vortioxetine constitutes a promising therapeutic alternative in the presence of cognitive dysfunction, and its impact on functional capacity and its good safety/tolerability profile argue in favor of its use. Furthermore, the superior effect observed in working patients suggests additional advantages in terms of psychosocial functioning, as compared with more sedating antidepressant drugs. The actual mechanism responsible for its action still remains to be fully elucidated.
Author Contributions
DB and VVW conducted the literature search. DB, EH, and VVW contributed substantially to writing of the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and to final approval of the version to be submitted.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Kessler RC, Zhao S, Blazer DG, Swartz M. Prevalence, correlates, and course of minor depression and major depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. J Affect Disord (1997) 45(1–2):19–30. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00056-6
2. Kessler RC, Borges G, Walters EE. PRevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1999) 56(7):617–26. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.617
3. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Lond Engl (2012) 380(9859):2197–223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61690-0
4. Jaeger J, Berns S, Uzelac S, Davis-Conway S. Neurocognitive deficits and disability in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res (2006) 145(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.11.011
5. McIntyre RS, Cha DS, Soczynska JK, Woldeyohannes HO, Gallaugher LA, Kudlow P, et al. Cognitive deficits and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: determinants, substrates, and treatment interventions. Depress Anxiety (2013) 30(6):515–27. doi: 10.1002/da.22063
6. Fossati P. Is major depression a cognitive disorder? Rev Neurol (Paris) (2018) 174(4):212–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.01.365
7. Hasselbalch BJ, Knorr U, Kessing LV. Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. J Affect Disord (2011) 134(1–3):20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.011
8. Bortolato B, Miskowiak KW, Köhler CA, Maes M, Fernandes BS, Berk M, et al. Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? BMC Med [Internet]. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0560-3 22 janv 2016 [cité 12 mai 2018];14. Disponible sur: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724131/.
9. Ekman M, Granström O, Omérov S, Jacob J, Landén M. The societal cost of depression: evidence from 10,000 Swedish patients in psychiatric care. J Affect Disord (2013) 150(3):790–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.003
10. Sowa-Kućma M, Pańczyszyn-Trzewik P, Misztak P, Jaeschke RR, Sendek K, Styczeń K, et al. Vortioxetine: A review of the pharmacology and clinical profile of the novel antidepressant. Pharmacol Rep PR (2017) 69(4):595–601. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.01.030
11. Koesters M, Ostuzzi G, Guaiana G, Breilmann J, Barbui C. Vortioxetine for depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2017) 7:CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2
12. Zhang J, Mathis MV, Sellers JW, Kordzakhia G, Jackson AJ, Dow A, et al. The US Food and Drug Administration’s perspective on the new antidepressant vortioxetine. J Clin Psychiatry (2015) 76(1):8–14. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14r09164
13. Mørk A, Montezinho LP, Miller S, Trippodi-Murphy C, Plath N, Li Y, et al. Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), a novel multimodal antidepressant, enhances memory in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (2013) 105:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.01.019
14. du Jardin KG, Jensen JB, Sanchez C, Pehrson AL. Vortioxetine dose-dependently reverses 5-HT depletion-induced deficits in spatial working and object recognition memory: a potential role for 5-HT1A receptor agonism and 5-HT3 receptor antagonism. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol (2014) 24(1):160–71. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.07.001
15. Jensen JB, du Jardin KG, Song D, Budac D, Smagin G, Sanchez C, et al. Vortioxetine, but not escitalopram or duloxetine, reverses memory impairment induced by central 5-HT depletion in rats: evidence for direct 5-HT receptor modulation. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol (2014) 24(1):148–59. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.10.011
16. Wallace A, Pehrson AL, Sánchez C, Morilak DA. Vortioxetine restores reversal learning impaired by 5-HT depletion or chronic intermittent cold stress in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2014) 17(10):1695–706. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000571
17. Bétry C, Etiévant A, Pehrson A, Sánchez C, Haddjeri N. Effect of the multimodal acting antidepressant vortioxetine on rat hippocampal plasticity and recognition memory. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2015) 58:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.12.002
18. Li Y, Abdourahman A, Tamm JA, Pehrson AL, Sánchez C, Gulinello M. Reversal of age-associated cognitive deficits is accompanied by increased plasticity-related gene expression after chronic antidepressant administration in middle-aged mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (2015) 135:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.05.013
19. du Jardin KG, Liebenberg N, Müller HK, Elfving B, Sanchez C, Wegener G. Differential interaction with the serotonin system by S-ketamine, vortioxetine, and fluoxetine in a genetic rat model of depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2016) 233(14):2813–25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4327-5
20. Pehrson AL, Hillhouse TM, Haddjeri N, Rovera R, Porter JH, Mørk A, et al. Task- and treatment length-dependent effects of vortioxetine on scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction and hippocampal extracellular acetylcholine in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2016) 358(3):472–82. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.233924
21. Hatherall L, Sánchez C, Morilak DA. Chronic vortioxetine treatment reduces exaggerated expression of conditioned fear memory and restores active coping behavior in chronically stressed rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2017) 20(4):316–23.
22. Li Y, Sanchez C, Gulinello M. Distinct antidepressant-like and cognitive effects of antidepressants with different mechanisms of action in middle-aged female mice. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2017) 20(6):510–5. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx004
23. Pehrson AL, Pedersen CS, Tølbøl KS, Sanchez C. Vortioxetine treatment reverses subchronic PCP treatment-induced cognitive impairments: a potential role for serotonin receptor-mediated regulation of GABA neurotransmission. Front Pharmacol. (2018) 9:162. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00162
24. Felice D, Guilloux J-P, Pehrson A, Li Y, Mendez-David I, Gardier AM, et al. Vortioxetine improves context discrimination in mice through a neurogenesis independent mechanism. Front Pharmacol (2018) 9:204. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00204
25. Katona C, Hansen T, Olsen CK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study comparing the efficacy and safety of Lu AA21004 in elderly patients with major depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol (2012) 27(4):215–23. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283542457
26. McIntyre RS, Lophaven S, Olsen CK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2014) 17(10):1557–67. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000546
27. Mahableshwarkar AR, Jacobsen PL, Chen Y, Serenko M, Trivedi MH. A randomized, double-blind, duloxetine-referenced study comparing efficacy and tolerability of 2 fixed doses of vortioxetine in the acute treatment of adults with MDD. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2015) 232(12):2061–70. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3839-0
28. McIntyre RS, Harrison J, Loft H, Jacobson W, Olsen CK. The Effects of vortioxetine on cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2016) 24. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw055
29. McIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of vortioxetine on cognitive functioning in working patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry (2017) 78(1):115–21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744
30. Baune BT, Brignone M, Larsen KG. A network meta-analysis comparing effects of various antidepressant classes on the digit symbol substitution test (DSST) as a measure of cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2018) 21(2):97–107. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx070
31. Vieta E, Sluth LB, Olsen CK. The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive dysfunction in patients with inadequate response to current antidepressants in major depressive disorder: a short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study versus escitalopram. J Affect Disord (2018) 227:803–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.053
32. Freeman MP, Cheng LJ, Moustafa D, Davies A, Sosinsky AZ, Wang B, et al. Vortioxetine for major depressive disorder, vasomotor, and cognitive symptoms associated with the menopausal transition. Ann Clin Psychiatry Off J Am Acad Clin Psychiatr (2017) 29(4):249–57.
33. Smith J, Browning M, Conen S, Smallman R, Buchbjerg J, Larsen KG, et al. Vortioxetine reduces BOLD signal during performance of the N-back working memory task: a randomised neuroimaging trial in remitted depressed patients and healthy controls. Mol Psychiatry (2018) 23(5):1127–33. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.104
34. Areberg J, Luntang-Jensen M, Søgaard B, Nilausen DØ. Occupancy of the serotonin transporter after administration of Lu AA21004 and its relation to plasma concentration in healthy subjects. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol (2012) 110(4):401–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00810.x
35. Nierenberg AA, Loft H, Olsen CK. Treatment effects on residual cognitive symptoms among partially or fully remitted patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blinded, exploratory study with vortioxetine. J Affect Disord (2019) 250:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.006
36. Yan G, Zhang M, Liu Y, Yin M. Efficacy of vortioxetine combined cognitive behaviour intervention therapy on brain-derived neurotrophic factor level on depressive patients. Psychogeriatr Off J Jpn Psychogeriatr Soc (2019) doi: 10.1111/psyg.12426
37. Chokka P, Bougie J, Proulx J, Tvistholm AH, Ettrup A. Long-term functioning outcomes are predicted by cognitive symptoms in working patients with major depressive disorder treated with vortioxetine: results from the AtWoRC study. CNS Spectr (2019), 1–12. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919000786
38. Rosenblat JD, Kakar R, McIntyre RS. The Cognitive Effects of Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2015) doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv082
39. Baune BT, Sluth LB, Olsen CK. The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive performance in working patients with major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study. J Affect Disord (2018) 229:421–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.056
40. Mørk A, Pehrson A, Brennum LT, Nielsen SM, Zhong H, Lassen AB, et al. Pharmacological effects of Lu AA21004: a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. mars (2012) 340(3):666–75. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.189068
41. Guilloux J-P, Mendez-David I, Pehrson A, Guiard BP, Repérant C, Orvoën S, et al. Antidepressant and anxiolytic potential of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) assessed by behavioural and neurogenesis outcomes in mice. Neuropharmacology (2013) 73:147–59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.014
42. Park S-C. Neurogenesis and antidepressant action. Cell Tissue Res. (2019) 377(1):95–106. doi: 10.1007/s00441-019-03043-5
43. Hlavacova N, Li Y, Pehrson A, Sanchez C, Bermudez I, Csanova A, et al. Effects of vortioxetine on biomarkers associated with glutamatergic activity in an SSRI insensitive model of depression in female rats. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2018) 82:332–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.07.008
44. Li Y, Raaby KF, Sánchez C, Gulinello M. Serotonergic receptor mechanisms underlying antidepressant-like action in the progesterone withdrawal model of hormonally induced depression in rats. Behav Brain Res (2013) 256:520–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.002
45. Nackenoff AG, Simmler LD, Baganz NL, Pehrson AL, Sánchez C, Blakely RD. Serotonin Transporter-Independent Actions of the Antidepressant Vortioxetine As Revealed Using the SERT Met172 Mouse. ACS Chem Neurosci (2017) 8(5):1092–100. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00038
46. Maccari S, Polese D, Reynaert M-L, Amici T, Morley-Fletcher S, Fagioli F. Early-life experiences and the development of adult diseases with a focus on mental illness: The Human Birth Theory. Neuroscience (2017) 342:232–51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.042
47. Ratajczak PK, Kus K, Zaprutko T, Szczepański M, Nowakowska E. Antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy of single, chronic and concomitant use of vortioxetine, dapoxetine and fluoxetine in prenatally stressed rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Warsz) (2019) 79(1):13–24. doi: 10.21307/ane-2019-002
48. Refsgaard LK, Haubro K, Pickering DS, Stuart SA, Robinson ESJ, Andreasen JT. Effects of sertraline, duloxetine, vortioxetine, and idazoxan in the rat affective bias test. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2016) 233(21–22):3763–70. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4407-6
49. Torrisi SA, Geraci F, Tropea MR, Grasso M, Caruso G, Fidilio A, et al. Fluoxetine and Vortioxetine Reverse Depressive-Like Phenotype and Memory Deficits Induced by Aβ1-42 Oligomers in Mice: A Key Role of Transforming Growth Factor-β1. Front Pharmacol (2019) 10:693. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00693
50. Dale E, Zhang H, Leiser SC, Xiao Y, Lu D, Yang CR, et al. Vortioxetine disinhibits pyramidal cell function and enhances synaptic plasticity in the rat hippocampus. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl (2014) 28(10):891–902. doi: 10.1177/0269881114543719
51. Pehrson AL, Cremers T, Bétry C, van der Hart MGC, Jørgensen L, Madsen M, et al. Lu AA21004, a novel multimodal antidepressant, produces regionally selective increases of multiple neurotransmitters–a rat microdialysis and electrophysiology study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol (2013) 23(2):133–45. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.04.006
52. Kugathasan P, Waller J, Westrich L, Abdourahman A, Tamm JA, Pehrson AL, et al. In vivo and in vitro effects of vortioxetine on molecules associated with neuroplasticity. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl (2017) 31(3):365–76. doi: 10.1177/0269881116667710
53. du Jardin KG, Müller HK, Sanchez C, Wegener G, Elfving B. A single dose of vortioxetine, but not ketamine or fluoxetine, increases plasticity-related gene expression in the rat frontal cortex. Eur J Pharmacol (2016) 786:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.05.029
54. Waller JA, Nygaard SH, Li Y, du Jardin KG, Tamm JA, Abdourahman A, et al. Neuroplasticity pathways and protein-interaction networks are modulated by vortioxetine in rodents. BMC Neurosci (2017) 18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0376-x
55. Waller JA, Tamm JA, Abdourahman A, Pehrson AL, Li Y, Cajina M, et al. Chronic vortioxetine treatment in rodents modulates gene expression of neurodevelopmental and plasticity markers. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol (2017) 27(2):192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.11.014
56. Waller JA, Chen F, Sánchez C. Vortioxetine promotes maturation of dendritic spines in vitro: A comparative study in hippocampal cultures. Neuropharmacology (2016) 103:143–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.12.012
57. Chen F, Danladi J, Ardalan M, Elfving B, Müller HK, Wegener G, et al. A Critical Role of Mitochondria in BDNF-Associated Synaptic Plasticity After One-Week Vortioxetine Treatment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2018) 21(6):603–15. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy022
58. Lu Y, Ho CS, McIntyre RS, Wang W, Ho RC. Effects of vortioxetine and fluoxetine on the level of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factors (BDNF) in the hippocampus of chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depressive rats. Brain Res Bull (2018) 142:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.06.007
59. Eskelund A, Li Y, Budac DP, Müller HK, Gulinello M, Sanchez C, et al. Drugs with antidepressant properties affect tryptophan metabolites differently in rodent models with depression-like behavior. J Neurochem (2017) 142(1):118–31. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14043
60. Franklin M, Hlavacova N, Li Y, Bermudez I, Csanova A, Sanchez C, et al. Reprint of: Contrasting effects of vortioxetine and paroxetine on pineal gland biochemistry in a tryptophan-depletion model of depression in female rats. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2018) 82:339–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.010
61. Harrison JE0, Lophaven S, Olsen CK. Which Cognitive Domains are Improved by Treatment with Vortioxetine? Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2016) doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw054
62. Levada OA, Troyan AS. Cognitive-functional relationships in major depressive disorder: crucial data from a Ukrainian open-label study of vortioxetine versus escitalopram. J Affect Disord (2019) 250:114–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.040
63. Sanchez C, Asin KE, Artigas F. Vortioxetine, a novel antidepressant with multimodal activity: review of preclinical and clinical data. Pharmacol Ther (2015) 145:43–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.07.001
64. Ciranna L. Serotonin as a Modulator of Glutamate- and GABA-Mediated Neurotransmission: Implications in Physiological Functions and in Pathology. (2006)
65. Pehrson AL, Sanchez C. Serotonergic modulation of glutamate neurotransmission as a strategy for treating depression and cognitive dysfunction. CNS Spectr (2014) 19(2):121–33. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000540
66. Riga M, Celada P, Sánchez C, Artigas F. Role of 5-HT3 receptors in the mechanism of action of the investigational antidepressant vortioxetine. (2013) doi: 10.1016/S0924-977X(13)70621-7
67. Malinow R, Mainen ZF, Hayashi Y. LTP mechanisms: from silence to four-lane traffic. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2000) 10(3):352–7. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00099-4
68. Dale E, Grunnet M, Pehrson AL, Frederiksen K, Larsen PH, Nielsen J, et al. The multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine may facilitate pyramidal cell firing by inhibition of 5-HT3 receptor expressing interneurons: An in vitro study in rat hippocampus slices. Brain Res (2018) 1689:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.025
69. Stahl SM. Modes and nodes explain the mechanism of action of vortioxetine, a multimodal agent (MMA): actions at serotonin receptors may enhance downstream release of four pro-cognitive neurotransmitters. CNS Spectr (2015) 20(6):515–9. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000358
70. Fink KB, Göthert M. 5-HT Receptor Regulation of Neurotransmitter Release. Pharmacol Rev (2007) 59(4):360–417. doi: 10.1124/pr.59.07103
71. Haas H, Panula P. The role of histamine and the tuberomamillary nucleus in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci (2003) 4(2):121–30. doi: 10.1038/nrn1034
72. Stenkrona P, Halldin C, Lundberg J. 5-HTT and 5-HT(1A) receptor occupancy of the novel substance vortioxetine). A PET study in control subjects. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol (2013) 23(10):1190–8. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.01.002
73. Meyer JH, Wilson AA, Sagrati S, Hussey D, Carella A, Potter WZ, et al. Serotonin transporter occupancy of five selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors at different doses: an [11C]DASB positron emission tomography study. Am J Psychiatry (2004) 161(5):826–35. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.826
74. Fourrier C, Sampson E, Mills NT, Baune BT. Anti-inflammatory treatment of depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of vortioxetine augmented with celecoxib or placebo. Trials (2018) 19(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2829-7
75. Cumbo E, Cumbo S, Torregrossa S, Migliore D. Treatment Effects of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functions in Mild Alzheimer’s Disease Patients with Depressive Symptoms: A 12 Month, Open-Label, Observational Study. J Prev Alzheimers Dis (2019) 6(3):192–7.
Keywords: major depressive disorder, vortioxetine, cognition, humans, animals
Citation: Bennabi D, Haffen E and Van Waes V (2019) Vortioxetine for Cognitive Enhancement in Major Depression: From Animal Models to Clinical Research. Front. Psychiatry 10:771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00771
Received: 30 March 2019; Accepted: 25 September 2019;
Published: 06 November 2019.
Edited by:
Colin T. Dourish, P1vital Limited, United KingdomReviewed by:
Paul Moser, Independent Researcher, Toulouse, FranceJohn Edward Harrison, King’s College London, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2019 Bennabi, Haffen and Van Waes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bennabi Djamila, ZGJlbm5hYmlAY2h1LWJlc2FuY29uLmZy