AUTHOR=Toma Simina , Fiksenbaum Lisa , Omrin Danielle , Goldstein Benjamin I. TITLE=Elevated Familial Cardiovascular Burden Among Adolescents With Familial Bipolar Disorder JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry VOLUME=10 YEAR=2019 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00008 DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00008 ISSN=1664-0640 ABSTRACT=

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is one of the most heritable medical conditions, and certain phenotypic characteristics are especially familial in BD. BD is also strongly associated with elevated and premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Thus, far, little is known regarding the familiality of cardiovascular risk in BD. We therefore examined the extent of CVD-related conditions among relatives of: adolescents with BD with a family history of BD (familial BD), adolescents with BD without a family history of BD (non-familial BD) and healthy controls (HC).

Materials and Methods: The sample included 372 adolescents; 75 with familial BD, 96 with non-familial BD, and 201 HC. Parents of the adolescents completed the CARDIA Family Medical History interview regarding the adolescents' first- and second- degree adult relatives. We computed a “cardiovascular risk score” (CRS) for each relative, based on the sum of the presence of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, stroke, angina, and myocardial infarction (range 0–7). Primary analyses examined for group differences in mean overall CRS scores among first and second- degree relatives combined, controlling for age, sex, and race. Secondary analyses examined first- and second-degree relatives separately, controlling for age, sex, and race.

Results: There were significant between-group differences in CRS in first- and second- degree relatives combined, following the hypothesized ordering: CRS was highest among adolescents with familial BD (1.14 ± 0.78), intermediate among adolescents with non-familial BD (0.92 ± 0.79) and lowest in HC (0.76 ± 0.79; F = 6.23, df = 2, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.03). There was a significant pairwise difference between adolescents with familial BD and HC (p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.49). A similar pattern of between-group differences was identified when first-degree and second-degree relatives were examined separately.

Limitations: familial cardiovascular burden was determined based on parent interview, not evaluated directly.

Conclusions: Adolescents with BD with a family history of BD have elevated rates of CVD-related conditions among their relatives. This may be related to genetic overlap between BD and CVD-related conditions, shared environmental factors that contribute to both BD and CVD-related conditions, or a combination of these factors. More research is warranted to better understand the interaction between familial risk for BD and CVD, and to address this risk using family-wide preventive approaches.