AUTHOR=Fuhr Kristina , Werle Dustin 

TITLE=Mental Training for Better Achievement: Effects of Verbal Suggestions and Evaluation (of Effectiveness) on Cognitive Performance

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2018

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00510

DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00510

ISSN=1664-0640

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objective:</bold> There is only some literature regarding the influence of verbal suggestions on cognitive performance in healthy volunteers. For example, the performance in a knowledge test was enhanced when participants were told that they had subliminally received the correct answer. However, enhancing cognitive performance only via verbal suggestions without prior conditioning phases has not yet been examined. The goal of our study was therefore to investigate the effects of a mental training based on verbal suggestions compared to a control training on cognitive performance in a student population using a balanced-placebo-design.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> In total, 103 participants were randomly assigned either to listening to a 20 min audio-taped mental training or to a 20 min philosophy lecture (control training) via headphones. Participants were individually tested before and after the training concerning their cognitive performance. Information about the type of training were varied in both intervention conditions (“You are part of our experimental condition and you will receive an effective mental training” or “You are part of our control group and you will receive the control condition”). At the end of the assessment, participants were asked what kind of training they believed they had received and how effective they would rate the received training.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Overall, the cognitive performance improved in all participants, <italic>F</italic><sub>(1, 99)</sub> = 490.01, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no interaction of the type of training and type of instruction on the cognitive performance. Participants who rated the received training as being effective at the end of the experiment (regardless if it was the mental or the control training), have before experienced a greater improvement in their cognitive performance [<italic>F</italic><sub>(2,100)</sub> = 7.26, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001] and showed higher scores in the ability to absorb [<italic>F</italic><sub>(2, 99)</sub> = 3.75, <italic>p</italic> = 0.027].</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The subjects' own experiences in the task might have influenced the rating of the training rather than the actual training or the information they receive regarding the type of training. This finding underlines the relevance of enhancing the subjective beliefs and self-efficacy in situations where cognitive attention processes are important and of individually tailoring mental trainings.</p>