AUTHOR=Lau Ho Ming , Smit Johannes H. , Fleming Theresa M. , Riper Heleen 

TITLE=Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry

VOLUME=7

YEAR=2017

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00209

DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00209

ISSN=1664-0640

ABSTRACT=<sec id="ST1"><title>Introduction</title><p>The development and use of serious games for mental health disorders are on the rise. Yet, little is known about the impact of these games on clinical mental health symptoms. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of serious games on symptoms of mental disorder.</p></sec><sec id="ST2"><title>Method</title><p>We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases, using mental health and serious games-related keywords. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and nine studies were included in the meta-analysis.</p></sec><sec id="ST3"><title>Results</title><p>All of the serious games were provided <italic>via</italic> personal computer, mostly on CD-ROM without the need for an internet connection. The studies targeted age groups ranging from 7 to 80 years old. The serious games focused on symptoms of depression (<italic>n</italic> = 2), post-traumatic stress disorder (<italic>n</italic> = 2), autism spectrum disorder (<italic>n</italic> = 2), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (<italic>n</italic> = 1), cognitive functioning (<italic>n</italic> = 2), and alcohol use disorder (<italic>n</italic> = 1). The studies used goal-oriented (<italic>n</italic> = 4) and cognitive training games (<italic>n</italic> = 6). A total of 674 participants were included in the meta-analysis (380 in experimental and 294 in control groups). A meta-analysis of 9 studies comprising 10 comparisons, using a random effects model, showed a moderate effect on improvement of symptoms [<italic>g</italic> = 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.28–0.83); <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001], favoring serious games over no intervention controls.</p></sec><sec id="ST4"><title>Discussion/conclusion</title><p>Though the number of comparisons in the meta-analysis was small, these findings suggest that serious gaming interventions may be effective for reducing disorder-related symptoms. More studies are needed in order to attain deeper knowledge of the efficacy for specific mental disorders and the longer term effects of this new type of treatment for mental disorders.</p></sec>