Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. Political Participation
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2024.1412477

Legitimacy, Institutional Trust and Political Moral Laxity: Psychopolitical Impact of the Governance of the Legacy of 'Lima 2019' Games

Provisionally accepted
  • Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This paper analyzes the relationships between the perception of Legitimacy, Institutional Trust and Political Moral Laxity (PML) using "Proyecto Especial Legado" (LEGADO) as a case study. LEGADO is a public governance organization, created by the Government of Peru to manage the infrastructure and provide services derived from the organization of the Pan American and Parapan American Games “Lima 2019”. The results indicate a direct relationship between the perception of LEGADO's objective fulfillment (as an indicator of legitimacy) and the positive approval of this organization (as an indicator of institutional trust). Conversely, PML negatively affects approval for LEGADO. However, this relationship is mitigated when the perception of objective fulfillment is introduced as a mediating variable. Thus, although the effects are limited, a positive perception of objective fulfillment may help reduce the adverse effects of PML on trust in LEGADO. To conduct this research, a correlational study was performed using data collected from a questionnaire administered to 404 citizens in the Lima Metropolitan Area, which addressed issues of legitimacy, institutional trust, and PML in relation to the public governance of the games and their legacy (through LEGADO). In conclusion, the implications of governance legitimized by the fulfillment of institutional objectives in breaking the vicious cycle linking PML and institutional distrust are discussed.

    Keywords: Data curation, Formal analysis, investigation, methodology, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing. Rosa María Cueto: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing -review & editing. Rogger Anaya: Formal Analysis. Agustin Espinosa: Conceptualization

    Received: 10 Apr 2024; Accepted: 20 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Martí, Cueto and Espinosa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Agustin Espinosa, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.