Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. Political Participation
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2024.1379789
This article is part of the Research Topic Power Relations in Society View all 5 articles

Shift in intelligence issue ownership: Conceptualizing CITINT – Intelligence conducted by citizens

Provisionally accepted
Iikka Pietilä Iikka Pietilä 1*Katleena Kortesuo Katleena Kortesuo 2Ulla Pohjanen Ulla Pohjanen 2Mikko Tuominen Mikko Tuominen 2
  • 1 Finnish Defence Forces, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
  • 2 Independent researcher, TBA, Finland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This paper elaborates on the conceptualization of CITINT i.e. the intelligence activities conducted by citizens and NGO's. This paper is a preliminary attempt to establish foundation and perspectives for future research, and to provide for initial conceptualization of CITINT. Moreover, this paper elucidates CITINT's implications in legislative perspective within Finnish context. A semisystematic limited literature review incorporating academic literature, governmental outlets, and news was executed to explore the contexts and definitions regarding CITINT. Interviews with a journalist, an active CITINT individual, and a detective superintended of Finnish national bureau of investigation were conducted to clarify and provide backrest for conceptualization. The key contributions of this paper are further elucidation of CITINT as a concept and its implications. Moreover, this paper discusses the shift in power relations from centralized issue ownership of intelligence activities towards a more fragmented scene in which individuals and non-governmental organizations (NGO's) have more relevance, possibilities, and weight. Within CITINT, this paper points out the differentiation between governmentally facilitated CITINT and the bottom up CITINT conducted by individuals and NGOs on their own terms and tools. One key contribution of this paper is connecting CITINT to societal participation through the CCSCM framework. Although the interviews comprise an empirical component, support contextualization, and provide tangible examples, this paper's focus is on the theoretical and conceptual aspects of CITINT. The paper concludes with a discussion on the outlook, and possibilities and challenges of CITINT, and provokes questions for further discussion on the matter.

    Keywords: CITINT, Intelligence, Civic intelligence, Citizen intelligence, Societal participation

    Received: 31 Jan 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Pietilä, Kortesuo, Pohjanen and Tuominen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Iikka Pietilä, Finnish Defence Forces, Helsinki, 00131, Uusimaa, Finland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.