ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional and Applied Plant Genomics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1582154

This article is part of the Research TopicPlant Genotyping: From Traditional Markers to Modern Technologies, Volume IIView all 6 articles

Genome-wide identification and development of SSR molecular markers for genetic diversity studies in Ilex asprella

Provisionally accepted
Jingchun  LiJingchun Li1Changqian  QuanChangqian Quan1Rongchang  WeiRongchang Wei2Fan  WeiFan Wei1Qing  MaQing Ma3Yuquan  HuangYuquan Huang3Meihua  XuMeihua Xu1Danfeng  TangDanfeng Tang1*
  • 1Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants, Naning, China
  • 2Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
  • 3China Resources Sanjiu Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Huaibei, Anhui Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Ilex asprella is a common Chinese herb widely distributed in South China with high medicinal value, and its genetic diversity assessment is a prerequisite for the utilization of germplasm resources. Based on the published genome of I. asprella, this study conducted genome-wide SSR identification and development and performed genetic diversity analysis on 25 germplasm accessions. The results showed that a total of 137,443 SSR loci were detected across the whole genome of I. asprella. Six types of SSRs were obtained, and the dinucleotide and trinucleotide repeats were dominant, with dinucleotide repeat motifs accounting for 84.20% of the total markers and trinucleotide repeat motifs accounting for 12.22%. A total of 15 highly polymorphic primers were ultimately selected, including 13 dinucleotide primers and 2 trinucleotide primers. The allele distribution of SSR loci in the genome of Ilex asprella was uneven, and the heterozygosity of different loci varied; the fixation index (F) were all greater than 0, indicating that there was an excess of pure heterozygotes in this population; the genetic differentiation coefficient (Fst) was 0.192, and there existed a large amount of genetic differentiation; the mean value of gene flow (Nm) between different loci was 1.175, and there existed a certain degree of gene exchange in the population; the molecular analysis of variance (AMOVA) indicated that the variation of individuals was the main source of total variation. Genetic analysis revealed that the 25 samples can be divided into three populations. pop2 had the highest genetic diversity, followed by pop3, and pop1 had the lowest genetic diversity, suggesting that there were differences in the level of genetic diversity among the populations. Overall, we found that there was a large genetic differentiation in the Ilex asprella population, a high level of genetic diversity, gene exchange between different populations, and high inter-population gene mobility, which was of guiding significance for the subsequent selection and breeding of new varieties of Ilex asprella.

Keywords: Ilex asprella, SSR identification and development, Germplasm resource, Species identification, genetic diversity

Received: 24 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Quan, Wei, Wei, Ma, Huang, Xu and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Danfeng Tang, Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants, Naning, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more