ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional Plant Ecology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1568951

Seed biology and regeneration niche of the threatened cold desert perennial Ivesia webberi A. Gray

Provisionally accepted
Israel  T BorokiniIsrael T Borokini1,2*Michael  D FranceMichael D France1Daniel  HarmonDaniel Harmon3Kevin  T ShoemakerKevin T Shoemaker4Peter  J WeisbergPeter J Weisberg4Mary  M PeacockMary M Peacock5
  • 1Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, United States
  • 2Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, United States
  • 3Great Basin Rangelands Research, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Reno, Nevada, United States
  • 4Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
  • 5Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Understanding the regeneration niche is of critical importance for the conservation of rare plants, yet species-specific information is often lacking for key components of the plant life cycle such as seed dormancy and germination. We conducted a detailed study of the regeneration niche for Ivesia webberi, a U.S. federally threatened forb that is endemic to the Great Basin Desert. Using seeds collected from 11 populations across a span of years, we investigated seed storage behavior, embryo morphology, and interannual and interpopulation seed viability, while testing the efficacy of alternative nondestructive methods to assess seed viability. We also studied the effects of various pre-incubation and incubation treatments on germination rates, speed, and synchrony. An examination of x-ray images showed that I. webberi have non-endospermic seeds with spatulate embryos. We observed a significant reduction in seed viability over three years, suggesting a recalcitrant storage behavior. Seed viability exhibited significant interannual, but not interpopulation, variation across 11 I. webberi populations. Both the x-ray and multispectral imaging are promising nondestructive methods that can replace the widely used, but destructive, tetrazolium test. Across all 68 germination treatments, seed germination was higher, faster, and more synchronized under warmer cold-stratified incubation temperatures. Seed germination was significantly increased by preincubation chilling and reduced by pre-incubation heat treatments, while pre-incubation and incubation light exposures had no effect. Both the seed embryo morphology and germination experiments suggest physiological dormancy in I. webberi. Results suggest that warmer and shorter winters, such as are consistent with predicted climate change, could increase germination. but also lead to shifts in regeneration phenology that increase vulnerability of seedlings to frost.

Keywords: Ivesia webberi, Seed viability, Germination rate, Multispectral imaging, cold stratification, physiological dormancy

Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Borokini, France, Harmon, Shoemaker, Weisberg and Peacock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Israel T Borokini, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more