ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional Plant Ecology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1567414

This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Nature-based Solutions for Land Degradation Neutrality and Deriving Co-BenefitsView all 7 articles

Effects of Simulated Warming and Litter Removal on Structure and Function of Semi-humid Alpine Grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Sichuan Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, and College of Grassland Resources, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, and College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Climate warming and human activities are modifying plant litter inputs in alpine grasslands, which is predicted to affect ecosystem structure and function. However, the effects of plant litter removal and warming as well as the combined impacts on the ecological functions of alpine grasslands are not well understood. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of experimental warming, litter removal, and their interaction on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) of alpine grasslands. Our results demonstrated a significant decrease in plant diversity (p < 0.05) and vegetation cover (p < 0.01) under experimental warming treatment, whereas the richness index (R) and belowground biomass (BGB) significantly increased under litter removal treatment (p < 0.05). The interaction effect of experimental warming and litter removal results in a neutralizing effect on the ecological functions in alpine grasslands. Meanwhile, the EMF tended to increase under all treatments of experimental warming, litter removal, and experimental warming-litter removal. However, there are differences in the response of aboveground and belowground multifunctionality to experimental warming and litter removal. The aboveground ecosystem multifunctionality (AEMF) showed a decreasing trend, while belowground ecosystem multifunctionality (BEMF) increased significantly (p < 0.01) under the experimental warming treatment. In contrast, AEMF and BEMF showed an increasing trend in litter removal treatment. In addition, the study found that litter removal could alleviate the negative effect of experimental warming on multiple ecological functions. These research findings can serve as a reference for maintaining ecosystem functions in alpine grasslands under climate change conditions and provide effective measures to enhance the capacity of grassland ecosystems to respond to climate change. The application of appropriate litter management measures and other nature-based solutions (NbS) to improve ecosystem functions, aiming to adopt sustainable approaches to address environmental challenges, holds significant importance for ecological conservation.

Keywords: Alpine grasslands, Experimental warming, Ecosystem multifunctionality, Litter removal, plant diversity

Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xue, Tian and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lihua Tian, Sichuan Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, and College of Grassland Resources, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more