ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 02 April 2025

Sec. Functional Plant Ecology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1566156

This article is part of the Research TopicEcophysiological Traits-Based Community Assembly and Maintenance of Ecosystem Functioning in Tropical RainforestsView all 10 articles

Distribution of different plant life forms on tropical islands: patterns and underlying mechanisms

Chengfeng YangChengfeng Yang1Jingyan ZhaoJingyan Zhao1Shengzhuo HuangShengzhuo Huang2Shurong ZhouShurong Zhou3Yikang Cheng*&#x;Yikang Cheng3*†
  • 1Key Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, China
  • 2Hainan Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Products from Li Folk Medicine, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China
  • 3School of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou, China

Introduction: Island biogeography theory posits that both island area and isolation significantly influence species distribution patterns and community structure. This study investigates the effects of island area and isolation on plant community structure, specifically focusing on the variation in species richness and abundance among different plant life forms (i.e., trees and shrubs) on tropical islands in the South China Sea.

Methods: We surveyed woody plants and collected soil samples from 20 tropical islands in the South China Sea, analyzing how island area, isolation, climate and soil factors influence plant communities across different life forms (trees vs. shrubs).

Results: The results indicate that species richness increases with island area and decreases with isolation, which aligns with the classic predictions of island biogeography. However, plant abundance exhibits a more complex pattern: tree abundance is positively correlated with island area and negatively correlated with isolation, while shrub abundance shows the opposite trend. Furthermore, the relative tree richness and abundance are predominant on larger, less isolated islands, whereas shrubs are more prevalent on smaller, more remote islands. These contrasting patterns suggest that different life forms adopt distinct ecological strategies within island ecosystems. The structural equation model (SEM) revealed that island area, isolation, and climatic factors directly affect the richness and abundance of trees but not shrubs. Additionally, the indirect effect of soil pH has proven to be a crucial environmental factor in shaping plant community structure.

Discussion: Overall, this study highlights the multifaceted roles of geographic, climatic, and soil factors in determining the composition of island plant communities across different life forms. The findings have important implications for island conservation, as they provide a deeper understanding of how plant communities respond to spatial and environmental factors, aiding in the management of biodiversity on tropical islands.

1 Introduction

Island biogeography theory plays a critical role in ecology, with its core principle being the positive correlation between area and species richness, as well as the negative correlation between isolation and species richness (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967). Island ecosystems, serve as “natural laboratories” for ecological research, providing unique conditions that enable scientists to investigate the mechanisms of species formation, extinction, and ecological adaptation, thereby enhancing our understanding of biodiversity maintenance and the dynamic processes of species distribution (Whittaker and Fernández-Palacios, 2007; Losos and Ricklefs, 2009; Whittaker et al., 2017). In the context of global change and increasing human disturbance, the significance of island studies have become even more pronounced (Fernández-Palacios et al., 2021; Manes et al., 2021).

Current research on island biogeography theory primarily focuses on the relationship between species richness and island area or isolation. However, community composition, including both species and functional diversity, is also highly sensitive to changes in island area, isolation, and environmental factors, which further influence ecosystem functions (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967; Warren et al., 2015; Spaak et al., 2017; Losos and Schluter, 2000; Schrader et al., 2020; Li X. et al., 2024). For instance, studies on plant abundance in contemporary ecological research are limited, yet abundance plays a crucial role in ecosystem functions, and its trends may not necessarily align with those of species richness (Ehrlén and Morris, 2015). A study on ecosystem services found that the abundance of common species is a major driver of ecosystem service functions, while species richness is not significantly correlated (Winfree et al., 2015). Additionally, a meta-analysis revealed that nitrogen enrichment reduced both plant species richness and abundance; however, the magnitude of the response varied due to differences in biodiversity indicators, environmental factors, and experimental contexts (Midolo et al., 2019).

Compared to mainland ecosystems, island ecosystems typically face more limited resources and harsher environmental conditions, which drive plants to develop unique and efficient adaptive strategies to cope with these challenges (Craine et al., 2012; Volaire, 2018). For example, in arid regions, short-lived plants fully exploit the periods each year when temperature and precipitation are moderately favorable for growth, completing their entire life cycle within this window and thus adopting a shortened life history strategy (Li et al., 2019; Tao et al., 2022). In island environments, the survival and reproduction of trees and shrubs necessitate more efficient resource utilization, which may, in turn, influence their distribution and diversity within the island ecosystem (Han et al., 2020). Trees are taller with larger root systems, enabling efficient resource capture and ecological stability. However, in relatively harsh island environments, their distribution is constrained by competition and growth conditions, making them more likely to concentrate in more favorable habitats (Shirima et al., 2016; Ziegler et al., 2024). In contrast, shrubs, with their shorter heights and dense branching structures, demonstrate greater adaptability and can achieve higher individual densities in competitive environments, thereby occupying more ecological niches and forming rich vegetation layers (Wilson, 1995; Götmark et al., 2016). Due to differing survival strategies and adaptations, plants with various life forms may respond differently to island area, isolation, and environmental factors (Xie et al., 2024). For instance, a study along an altitudinal gradient in the eastern Himalayas of Nepal found that plants of different life forms exhibited distinct relationships with various environmental factors (Bhattarai and Vetaas, 2003). Additionally, the relative abundance and density of different life forms within a community are crucial. The survival strategies and environmental responses of trees and shrubs differ, and their relative abundance and density can reveal their interrelationships and adaptation strategies within the ecosystem, the relative proportion of trees and shrubs reflects different successional stages of island vegetation and, to some extent, the stability of the island ecosystem (Morales et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2020). Some studies have shown that shrubs facilitate tree establishment in peat bogs, and once a certain number of trees are established, they further enhance shrub growth. The varying proportions of trees and shrubs within a community can have significant effects on its health and stability (Holmgren et al., 2015). Different relative proportions of trees and shrubs influence both species diversity and ecosystem function. Shrub dominance may aid soil restoration and expand habitat occupancy, while tree dominance enhances community stability and productivity (Lavorel and Garnier, 2002; Zizka et al., 2014). These ecological functions are vital for island ecosystem conservation, particularly through optimizing vegetation structure and fostering species interactions to improve ecosystem sustainability.

When exploring the relationship between species richness and island area, several mechanisms have been proposed, including the “passive sampling effect”, which suggests that island size may influence species numbers primarily through limitations on sample space rather than ecological factors (Connor and McCoy, 1979); the “habitat diversity effect”, which posits that species richness on islands is closely related to the diversity of habitat types and structures (Bracewell et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2024); and “ecological drift”, which implies that changes in species populations may result from random factors rather than selective pressures (Gilbert and Levine, 2017; Leibold and Chase, 2018). Numerous studies have demonstrated that these mechanisms play varying roles across different island systems (Li S. et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024). However, these mechanisms may overlook additional factors that could further explain island plant community composition, such as climatic conditions and habitat quality (e.g., soil nutrients, soil pH), which also influence island plant communities (Wu et al., 2022; Yuan et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024). A substantial body of evidence indicates that climate significantly affects plant growth, reproduction, and distribution (Cabral et al., 2014; Ramirez et al., 2020). Furthermore, soil properties, particularly soil nutrients and pH, exert distinct effects on plants, which vary across different ecosystems (Barker and Pilbeam, 2015; Barrow and Hartemink, 2023; Duan et al., 2023). By investigating the effects of island area, isolation, and climate, we can better understand how these factors influence island plant species richness and the abundance of various plant life forms. This occurs directly or indirectly through soil characteristics, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamic changes in island ecosystems and their responses to external pressures. This knowledge provides essential scientific insights for ecological conservation and resource management.

Due to the diverse adaptive strategies exhibited by different life forms, this study focuses on examining the varying responses of trees and shrubs to island area, isolation, and other environmental factors on the islands of the South China Sea. Specifically, the objectives of this study are to: 1) explore the relationships between plant species richness and the abundance of different life forms (trees and shrubs) in relation to island area and isolation; 2) assess how the relative abundance and relative density of trees and shrubs change with variations in island area and isolation; and 3) identify the key environmental and ecological factors that influence the richness, abundance, and relative distribution of trees and shrubs across different islands. Based on island biogeography theory, we hypothesize that larger and less isolated islands will have higher tree abundance, while smaller and more isolated islands will favor shrubs due to their superior adaptability and more efficient reproductive strategies. These insights will help clarify the mechanisms behind the composition of island plant communities and contribute to better understanding of the ecological dynamics at play in these unique environments.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study site and sampling method

As an important tropical marine ecosystem, the South China Sea is home to numerous islands, coral reefs, and shallows, exhibiting rich biodiversity and complex marine ecological environments. This region not only provides habitats and breeding grounds for a variety of marine organisms but also creates conditions conducive to the growth of diverse tropical and subtropical plant species. Despite the abundance of islands in this area, some are too small or lack sufficient vegetation to meet the criteria for plant surveys. Consequently, we selected 20 representative islands with woody vegetation that have experienced minimal disturbance for investigation from April 2023 to May 2024.

For each island, we established 20 m × 20 m permanent sampling plots, with the number of plots proportional to the logarithmic transformation of the island area (log10) (Supplementary Figure S1). Additionally, we took topography into account when selecting the specific locations of the plots, ensuring that the plot locations on the investigated islands covered all terrain types and different altitudes of the islands as much as possible. Additionally, we considered the vegetation conditions and habitat differences of the islands as supplementary information for plot selection. As a result, a total of 87 permanent plots were established across the 20 islands. To minimize the effects of spatial autocorrelation, we ensured that the distance between any two adjacent plots within each island exceeded 100 meters. For the smallest islands, while it was not entirely feasible to meet this standard, the distance between plots was maintained at over 40 meters.

On all selected islands, we conducted plant surveys and soil sampling within the established permanent plots. First, we utilized Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning technology, provided by Xunwei Positioning, to accurately locate the four corners of each plot. We marked these positions by inserting white rubber tubes into the soil and enclosing the 20 m × 20 m plot with red plastic string. Within the marked plots, we surveyed all woody plants with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 1 cm, recording species names through morphological identification and subsequently calibrated the Chinese and Latin names of the species based on the “Flora of China” (Flora of Chinese, 2019).

To collect soil samples, we established three evenly distributed 2 m × 2 m quadrats along the diagonal of each plot, ensuring that the quadrats covered different microhabitats within the plot. In each quadrat, we randomly collected four soil samples to a depth of 0-10 cm from various locations within the quadrat. The soil samples from each quadrat were then combined and thoroughly mixed to create a composite sample for each quadrat. In total, 261 composite soil samples were obtained across all islands, corresponding to 87 plots and three quadrats per plot. For each soil sample, large particles were removed using a 2 mm sieve, and the samples were and stored at 4°C for subsequent measurements of their physicochemical properties.

2.2 Data acquisition

We classified these plants into tree or shrub categories based on their life forms, referencing the “Flora of China” (Flora of Chinese, 2019). Subsequently, we utilized the “vegan” package in R to calculate the species richness and abundance of all species, as well as those of trees and shrubs, respectively. Additionally, we assessed the relative richness and relative abundance of trees and shrubs for each plot.

We measured five physicochemical properties of soil from the collected samples that could potentially influence plant communities, using the following specific methods: Soil pH was determined with a Metter- S210 SevenCompact pH analyzer, employing a soil-to-water ratio of 1:2.5. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content was assessed using the K2Cr2O7 oxidation-reduction titration technique. Total nitrogen (TN) levels in the soil were quantified utilizing the semi-micro Kjeldahl method. Total phosphorus (TP) concentrations were measured through colorimetric analysis with a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Finally, total potassium (TK) content was extracted using 1 M ammonium acetate and analyzed via inductively coupled plasma technology.

Climate data were obtained from WorldClim’s global climate and weather database (Fick and Hijmans, 2017), specifically the WorldClim 2.1 dataset for the period 1970-2000. This version was released in January 2020. Annual mean temperature and annual precipitation data were extracted from the bioclimatic variables bio1 and bio12 in the historical climate dataset. Wind speed data were sourced from a dataset with a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc minutes. We processed the downloaded TIFF files using the “terra” package in R to extract annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, and annual mean wind speed data for the 20 surveyed islands.

2.3 Statistic analysis

In this study, we employed linear regression to assess the effects of island area and isolation on plant community structure. We used logarithmically transformed island area and isolation as independent variables to analyze their linear relationships with species richness and abundance, including total species, trees, and shrubs, as well as the relative richness and relative abundance of different plant life forms.

We applied principal component analysis (PCA) to simplify the data structure of climate and soil nutrient variables. For climate, we used annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, and annual mean wind. For soil nutrients, we included total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), and soil organic carbon (SOC). The first principal component (PC1) from each PCA was retained as a composite predictor, as it explained the largest proportion of the variance-56.0% for climate variables and 54.7% for soil nutrients. In PCclimate, annual precipitation (-0.711) contributed the most, while in PCsoil, both nitrogen (-0.658) and soil organic carbon (-0.653) had the largest contributions. These first principal components were used as composite predictors for climate and soil variables in subsequent analyses (Supplementary Table S1).

We employed a piecewise structural equation model (SEM) to assess the direct effects of island area, isolation, and climate variables (PCclimate) on total plant richness and abundance, as well as the absolute and relative richness and abundance of each life form. Additionally, we examined the indirect effects mediated by soil nutrients (PCsoil) and soil pH. The psem function in the piecewiseSEM package (Lefcheck, 2016) was utilized for the SEM analysis. Specifically, this method performs confirmatory path analysis based on the results of directed separation tests (Shipley, 2009, 2013). Model fit was evaluated using goodness-of-fit statistics, and the best model was selected by comparing the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) values between the full model and simplified models (Grace, 2006). The model with the lowest AICc value was designated as the final model for the study (Shipley, 2013). Furthermore, the overall model fit was assessed using Fisher’s C statistic (Supplementary Table S2). If the p-value of Fisher’s C statistic exceeded 0.05 (i.e., the null hypothesis was accepted), the model was considered to have a good fit (Shipley, 2009). All statistical analyses were conducted using R 4.4.1.

3 Results

3.1 Response of richness of different life forms to island area and isolation

In terms of species richness, the richness of all species, trees, and shrubs exhibited similar trends in relation to island area and isolation. Specifically, with an increase in island area, the richness of all three groups significantly increased (P < 0.05) (Figures 1a-c). This phenomenon suggests that larger islands can provide more niches and resources, thereby supporting a greater number of species for survival and reproduction. Conversely, as isolation increased, the richness of all species, trees, and shrubs significantly decreased (P < 0.05) (Figures 1d-f). This trend may be related to the limitations on species dispersal abilities; more isolated islands often struggle to maintain high levels of species diversity. These results further emphasize the important influence of island area and isolation on plant community structure.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The effects of island area on the richness of all species (a), tree richness (b), and shrub richness (c); and the effects of island isolation on the richness of all species (d), tree richness (e), and shrub richness (f). Species richness refers to the taxonomic diversity within each plot, specifically the number of species present in a plot.

3.2 Response of abundance of different life forms to island area and isolation

In terms of species abundance, the relationships between the abundance of total species, trees, and shrubs with island area and isolation exhibited certain differences. Specifically, the abundance of total species did not show a significant relationship with either island area or isolation (P = 0.251, P = 0.731) (Figure 2a, d). However tree abundance increased significantly with island area, demonstrating a clear positive correlation (P < 0.001) (Figure 2b). Tree abundance, on the other hand, decreased with isolation (P = 0.013) (Figure 2e). In contrast, the trend for shrubs was opposite to that of trees. Shrub abundance showed a decreasing trend with island area (P = 0.119) (Figure 2c) but an increasing trend with isolation (P = 0.075) (Figure 2f), though the relationships were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that trees are more sensitive to the island area and isolation, possibly relying more on ecological spaces to maintain population stability. At the same time, the differing responses in abundance between trees and shrubs further reflect the diversity of adaptive strategies among different life forms in island environments.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The effects of island area on the abundance of all species (a), tree abundance (b), and shrub abundance (c); and the effects of island isolation on the abundance of all species (d), tree abundance (e), and shrub abundance (f). Plant abundance refers to the number of individuals present in each plot.

3.3 Response of relative richness and relative abundance of different life forms to island area and isolation

As island area increases, both relative richness and relative abundance of trees significantly increased, while the relative richness and relative abundance of shrubs significantly decreased (P < 0.001, P = 0.002) (Figure 3a, c). This indicates that large island area favors the spread and colonization of trees, while reducing the relative dominance of shrubs. Conversely, as isolation increases, both the relative richness and relative abundance of trees significantly decreased, while the relative richness and relative abundance of shrubs significantly increased (P < 0.001, P = 0.019 (Figure 3b, d). This suggests that on highly isolated islands, shrubs have a higher relative proportion within the community. In comparison, trees are more severely constrained in highly isolated environments, leading to a decrease in their proportion within the community. In summary, island area and isolation have significant effects on the relative proportions of trees and shrubs in a plant community. An increase in island area favors the richness and abundance of trees, whereas increased isolation promotes the relative proportion of shrubs in the community.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The effects of island area on the relative richness of trees and shrubs (a) and the relative abundance of trees and shrubs (c); and the effects of island isolation on the relative richness of trees and shrubs (b) and the relative abundance of trees and shrubs (d). Dark green represents trees, while light green represents shrubs.

3.4 Direct and indirect effects of island area, isolation, and climate on the absolute and relative plant richness and abundance

The final structural equation model (SEM) revealed that the direct and indirect effects of island area, isolation and climate on the richness and abundance of different life forms varied. For all the species, island geographical characteristics and climate mainly exerted indirect effects on island plant richness and abundance through their influence on soil pH, rather than soil nutrients Island area, isolation, and climate factors also directly influenced species richness. Species abundance, on the other hand, was only directly influenced by climate factors, while island area and isolation had no direct effect on it (Figure 4a, b). For trees, the effects of island area, isolation, and climate on their richness followed a similar pattern to that of total species richness, but with different coefficients. Tree abundance, however, was directly influenced only by island area, isolation, and climate (Figure 4c, d). For shrubs, richness was mainly directly influenced by island isolation, while abundance was neither directly nor indirectly affected by affected by island geographical characteristics and climate (Figure 4e, f). Since the relative richness and relative abundance of trees and shrubs sum to 1, they exhibited a negative correlation. Therefore, the trends for trees were opposite to those of shrubs (Supplementary Figures S2a, b). For the relative richness of trees, island area, isolation, and climate factors influenced it via soil pH. The relative richness of trees also increased with island area. Island isolation did not have a direct effect on relative richness of trees (Figure 4g). For relative abundance, the impact of island area was more pronounced, while island isolation and climate factors only influenced it indirectly through soil pH and had no direct effects (Figure 4h).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The final results of the Structural Equation Model (SEM) reveal the direct effects of island area, isolation, and climate on total species richness (a), total species abundance (b), tree species richness (c), tree species abundance (d), shrub species richness (e), shrub species abundance (f), relative richness of trees (g), and relative abundance of trees (h), as well as their indirect effects mediated by environmental factors such as soil nutrients and pH, respectively. Plant species richness was estimated based on the number of species observed in the plots, while abundance was estimated based on the number of individuals recorded. PCclimate represents the climate factors after dimensionality reduction through Principal Component Analysis (PCA), PCsoil refers to the soil nutrient factors after dimensionality reduction, and pH represents soil acidity. Red and black arrows are the standardized path coefficient variables, representing significant positive and negative pathways respectively, with the thickness of the line proportional to the strength of the path coefficient. R2 is the marginal value that represents the proportion of variance explained for each fixed variable in the model. The symbols denote statistical significance (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ^P < 0.1).

4 Discussion

4.1 Effects of island area and isolation on plant richness and abundance

While traditional studies in island biogeography have mainly focused on the relationship between species richness and island area or isolation, our study further explores the differences in the responses of plant community abundance to island area and isolation, revealing significant ecological adaptations between trees and shrubs. Overall, plant species richness significantly increased with larger island areas, while it decreased markedly with greater isolation, a trend that aligns with the classic predictions of island biogeography (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967). This positive correlation between island area and species richness, as well as the negative correlation between isolation and species richness, was observed for the entire plant community and when categorized by life forms (Weigelt and Kreft, 2013; Portillo et al., 2019). These findings suggest that both island area and isolation play an important role in influencing plant species richness, and these patterns remain consistent regardless of the classification of different plant life forms (Kubota et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2024). However, the trends in plant abundance on these islands did not fully correspond with species richness. Notable differences in abundance trends were observed between trees and shrubs across various plant life forms. Specifically, the trend in tree abundance was consistent with that of its species richness; tree abundance significantly increased with island area but decreased significantly on highly isolated islands. This indicates that the growth and expansion of trees may depend on the ample resources and habitats available on larger islands, while high levels of isolation hinder seed dispersal and colonization, further limiting the increase in tree population density on isolated islands (Whittaker and Fernández-Palacios, 2007; Shirima et al., 2016; Nogales et al., 2024).

In contrast, the relationship between shrub abundance and island area and isolation exhibited an opposite trend. On islands with greater isolation, shrub abundance was higher, although this trend was close to being statistically significant. This phenomenon may be attributed to the relative reduction of tree abundance and the ecological strategy of shrubs, which makes their abundance insensitive to island area and isolation, as well as the formation of high-density monocultures. For instance, shrubs typically possess high vegetative reproduction capabilities and rapid growth rates; many shrubs on islands exhibit rhizomes and stolons, which enable them to occupy habitats with limited resources or restricted seed dispersal, thereby enhancing species persistence (Wilson, 1995; Götmark et al., 2016; Ottaviani et al., 2020). As observed in this study, islands such as Beishazhou Island and Zhongshazhou Island, which are characterized by higher isolation and smaller areas, displayed relatively low species richness. However, plant abundance was particularly high due to the dominance of a single species, i.e., Scaevola taccada. This suggests that while soil and climatic conditions on highly isolated islands may not be suitable for the growth of all plant types, larger islands may also suppress or inhibit the growth of certain plants through resource competition, with trees and shrubs showing different adaptive responses.

It is important to note that the differing patterns in species abundance and species richness suggest that the number of species and the abundance of individuals may be driven by distinct ecological mechanisms. Therefore, a comprehensive examination of these patterns should take into account various ecological processes from multiple perspectives within island ecosystems.

4.2 The regulation of the relative proportions of trees and shrubs by island area and isolation

This study revealed that island area and isolation significantly influence the relative richness and abundance of different plant life forms within the plant community. As island area increases, the relative richness and abundance of trees significantly increased, while the relative richness and abundance of shrubs significantly decline. This phenomenon aligns with the classical “area effect” in island biogeography, where larger islands provide more habitats and resources, thereby facilitating the expansion and survival of species (Connor and McCoy, 1979; Leibold and Chase, 2018; Li S. et al., 2024). For trees, larger islands not only offer more habitat but also maintain more stable environmental conditions, particularly in resource-rich environments where trees may dominate interspecific competition, driving their relative abundance and richness upward (Yan et al., 2023). In contrast, the relative richness and abundance of shrubs are lower on larger islands, which may be attributed to the expansion and competition of tree populations (Barnes and Archer, 1999). On larger islands, trees may dominate due to their spatial requirements for growth and their efficiency in resource utilization, which limits the expansion of shrubs (Grime, 2006). However, on smaller islands, the plant community may be more strongly influenced by edge effects, which favor the competition of shrubs in lower-quality habitats, resulting in a noticeable increase in their relative richness and abundance (Harper et al., 2005).

The increase in island isolation significantly reduced the relative richness and abundance of trees, while the relative richness and abundance of shrubs significantly increased. This is likely due to differences in dispersal mechanisms and colonization success rates. On smaller and more isolated islands, the difficulty of plant colonization increases. Shrubs, compared to trees, possess more flexible dispersal mechanisms and stronger reproductive and adaptive abilities to survive in harsh environments (Zizka et al., 2014; Ehmet et al., 2021). For instance, one of the most frequently occurring species in this survey, Scaevola taccada, has heteromorphic fruits—one type with softwood and fleshy pulp, and another with only pulp—that can be dispersed both by seawater and indirectly by birds, greatly enhancing the species’ dispersal efficiency (Emura et al., 2014). In cases where dispersal is challenging, shrubs may benefit relatively more from increased isolation, as their adaptive advantages are more pronounced in these environments (Gillespie et al., 2008). Shrub species, characterized by higher growth rates and the ability to rapidly respond to environmental changes while tolerating local resource limitations, may quickly occupy new habitats, form dominant communities, and potentially further restrict the territorial expansion of trees (Fukami, 2015). These findings suggest that classical theories in island biogeography still play a significant role in shaping plant communities. However, the distribution and dynamics of plant populations are not determined solely by the physical environment; their ecological strategies and interspecies competition also contribute to shaping these patterns.

4.3 The driving mechanisms of island plant communities: the synergistic effects of geography, climate, and soil factors

Our results clearly indicate that the direct effects of island area and isolation are the most significant factors influencing plant communities on islands. The findings from the structural equation modeling (SEM) demonstrate that the direct effects of island area and isolation are highly significant, which is consistent with studies conducted on various islands. However, the impact of island area and isolation on species richness and abundance, as well as on different plant life forms, exhibits some variability (Schrader et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2022; Xie et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024). Specifically, species richness is more readily influenced by island area and isolation, while the responses of trees and shrubs to these two factors differ. The survival strategies of trees indicate a greater reliance on the favorable living conditions provided by larger island areas (Connor and McCoy, 1979). Furthermore, the influence of area and isolation on plant communities extends beyond direct effects to include indirect effects as well.

We also found that climatic factors, such as temperature, precipitation, and wind speed, directly influence the community structure of plants on islands, particularly affecting trees (Harter et al., 2015; Irl et al., 2020). Compared to mainland environments, oceanic islands, influenced by surrounding seas, may have more favorable conditions in terms of precipitation and temperature. However, the isolation and smaller size of islands made their plant communities more sensitive to changes in these climatic factors. Therefore, in the fragile island environment, climatic factors can still directly impact plant growth, survival, and distribution (Cabral et al., 2014; Ramirez et al., 2020). Interestingly, precipitation contributed the most in the PCclimate. However, trees and shrubs responded differently to precipitation. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that trees were directly influenced by the precipitation-dominant PCclimate, while shrubs were not. This is likely related to the more robust adaptive strategies of shrubs. As observed in our study, on islands dominated by shrubs (with higher relative abundance and relative dominance of shrubs), the leaf thickness of these shrub species was greater, and in some cases, even succulent-like (e.g., Scaevola taccada, Tournefortia argentea), further corroborating the distinct ecological strategies of trees and shrubs on islands (Aneja et al., 2025). Although wind speed had a lower contribution to the climate principal component than precipitation, it remains an important factor. In tropical islands, intermittent extreme wind events, such as tropical storms or typhoons, can significantly impact plant communities, leading to tree falls or vegetation loss (Uriarte et al., 2019; Bauman et al., 2022). These disturbances may disrupt existing community structures and provide opportunities for more adaptable plants, such as shrubs or herbaceous species, to expand, thereby altering the species composition of the community (Murphy and Metcalfe, 2016). We also found that the effects of these climatic factors are not only reflected at the physiological level of plants but also indirectly influence plant communities by altering the soil pH on islands. For instance, changes in precipitation and temperature can cause fluctuations in soil acidity, which in turn affect nutrient uptake and plant growth rates (Jesus et al., 2015; Pugnaire et al., 2019).

We also found that climatic factors, such as temperature, precipitation, and wind speed, directly affect the community structure of plants on islands (Harter et al., 2015; Irl et al., 2020). Islands are more fragile than mainland environments, and temperature and precipitation directly influence plant growth, survival, and distribution (Cabral et al., 2014; Ramirez et al., 2020). However, these effects are not only reflected at the physiological level of plants; they also indirectly influence plant communities by affecting soil conditions on the islands, including soil nutrients and pH (Jesus et al., 2015; Pugnaire et al., 2019). Wind speed, as a unique climatic factor on islands, also has a significant impact on plant communities. Strong winds can directly affect the growth and stability of tall plants, such as trees, and alter species dispersal patterns by spreading seeds and pollen (Kuparinen et al., 2009; Bullock et al., 2012). Particularly in tropical islands, intermittent extreme wind events, such as tropical storms or typhoons, can significantly impact plant communities, leading to tree falls or vegetation loss (Uriarte et al., 2019; Bauman et al., 2022). Such disturbances may disrupt existing community structures and create opportunities for highly adaptable plants, such as shrubs or herbaceous species, to expand, thereby altering the species composition of the community (Murphy and Metcalfe, 2016).

Our study confirmed the important role of soil pH in influencing island plant communities. This is supported by the results from structural equation modeling (SEM), which indicated that soil nutrients (such as nitrogen and organic carbon) did not have a significant direct impact on plant community structure. Instead, island area, isolation, and climatic factors affected community structure through their influence on soil pH. As a key environmental factor in island plant communities, soil pH profoundly affects plant growth and species diversity. It influences plant communities through various ecological mechanisms, not only by directly restricting plant growth but also by indirectly shaping community structure through alterations in interactions among plants, the environment, and other organisms. Soil pH affects the efficiency of nutrient absorption by plants, particularly the availability of essential elements (Kemmitt et al., 2006; Penn and Camberato, 2019; Barrow and Hartemink, 2023). Furthermore, soil pH influences the diversity and functional activity of rhizosphere microorganisms, which further impacts plant community composition through plant-microbe interactions (Husson, 2013; Duan et al., 2023). At the community level, in soils with extreme acidic or alkaline conditions, species with strong tolerance often dominate ecological niches, while pH-sensitive species may be excluded from the community (Barker and Pilbeam, 2015; Deinlein et al., 2014; Mann et al., 2023). This selective effect significantly alters the species composition of the community, particularly in isolated island environments, where regional variations in soil pH can increase the heterogeneity of plant communities across different islands, our study provides a new perspective for island ecology, emphasizing the critical role of soil as an ecological factor.

5 Conclusion

Although many traditional studies in island biogeography focus on the relationship between species diversity and island area or isolation, fewer investigations have refined the analysis of island plants based on different life forms. Most studies tend to address species richness without exploring other comprehensive indicators, such as plant community abundance, relative richness, and relative abundance. Our study represents a significant advancement in this area, revealing the distinct relationships between plant richness and abundance and island area and isolation. The observed trends in species richness align with traditional island biogeography theory, while plant abundance exhibits a more complex pattern, highlighting differential responses among various plant life forms. Specifically, trees are more sensitive to spatial limitations and their growth and dispersal are more dependent on the resources and habitat space provided by larger islands, whereas shrubs exhibit stronger dispersal abilities and faster reproductive mechanisms, showing greater adaptability in resource-limited and highly isolated environments. In addition, relative richness and relative abundance also show significant differences under variations in island area and isolation. On larger islands, the relative richness and relative abundance of trees significantly increase, while shrubs show a contrasting decline. These results indicate that increasing island area favors the expansion of trees, while higher island isolation promotes the dominance of shrubs within communities, revealing the distinct responses of different plant life forms to their ecological strategies in island environments. Structural equation modeling (SEM) further indicates that island area and isolation indirectly affect plant community richness and abundance by influencing soil pH, highlighting the mediating role of soil pH as a key environmental factor. This emphasizes the critical role of soil factors in shaping the structure of island plant communities. The direct effects of island geography and climate on plant communities are not limited to the physical environment but also act indirectly through their influence on the soil, affecting plant community composition and function. This finding provides new perspectives for the conservation and management of island plant communities. Island area and isolation directly influence the composition of plant communities, and different plant life forms respond differently to these factors. Therefore, island conservation strategies should be tailored to the needs of different plant communities, taking into account the size and isolation of the islands. Additionally, future research should focus on how island plant communities respond to climate change, particularly the regulation of key soil factors such as soil pH, to further optimize the management of island ecosystems and promote plant community diversity. Long-term monitoring and comparative studies across islands will help to better understand the complex relationships between island geography, soil properties, and plant community composition, providing a more scientific basis for island conservation.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

CY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. JZ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SH: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (Grant no. ZDYF2022SHFZ320).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Lan Liu, Lingbing Wu, and Nianxun Xi from Hainan University for their guidance in experimental design and implementation. We also appreciate Haifeng Ding, Bo Zhang, and Yu Nie for their assistance and valuable suggestions during data analysis. Our thanks go to Hao Qin, Renfu Liao, Shuxin Liu, Zhen Zhang, and Run Zhang for their help in fieldwork.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1566156/full#supplementary-material

References

Aneja, P., Sanyal, R., Ranjan, A. (2025). Leaf growth in third dimension: a perspective of leaf thickness from genetic regulation to ecophysiology. New Phytol. 245, 989–999. doi: 10.1111/nph.v245.3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barker, A. V., Pilbeam, D. J. (Eds.) (2015). Handbook of plant nutrition (CRC press).

Google Scholar

Barnes, P. W., Archer, S. (1999). Tree-shrub interactions in a subtropical savanna parkland: competition or facilitation? J. Vegetation. Sci. 10, 525–536. doi: 10.2307/3237187

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrow, N. J., Hartemink, A. E. (2023). The effects of pH on nutrient availability depend on both soils and plants. Plant Soil 487, 21–37. doi: 10.1007/s11104-023-05960-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bauman, D., Fortunel, C., Delhaye, G., Malhi, Y., Cernusak, L. A., Bentley, L. P., et al. (2022). Tropical tree mortality has increased with rising atmospheric water stress. Nature 608, 528–533. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04737-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhattarai, K. R., Vetaas, O. R. (2003). Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 327–340. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00044.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bracewell, S. A., Clark, G. F., Johnston, E. L. (2018). Habitat complexity effects on diversity and abundance differ with latitude: an experimental study over 20 degrees. Ecology 99, 1964–1974. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2018.99.issue-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bullock, J. M., White, S. M., Prudhomme, C., Tansey, C., Perea, R., Hooftman, D. A. (2012). Modelling spread of British wind-dispersed plants under future wind speeds in a changing climate. J. Ecol. 100, 104–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01910.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabral, J. S., Weigelt, P., Kissling, W. D., Kreft, H. (2014). Biogeographic, climatic and spatial drivers differentially affect α-, β-and γ-diversities on oceanic archipelagos. Proc. R. Soc. B.: Biol. Sci. 281, 20133246. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Connor, E. F., McCoy, E. D. (1979). The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am. Nat. 113, 791–833. doi: 10.1086/283438

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Craine, J. M., Engelbrecht, B. M., Lusk, C. H., McDowell, N. G., Poorter, H. (2012). Resource limitation, tolerance, and the future of ecological plant classification. Front. Plant Sci. 3, 246. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deinlein, U., Stephan, A. B., Horie, T., Luo, W., Xu, G., Schroeder, J. I. (2014). Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, C., Li, X., Li, C., Yang, P., Chai, Y., Xu, W. (2023). Positive effects of fungal β diversity on soil multifunctionality mediated by pH in the natural restoration succession stages of alpine meadow patches. Ecol. Indic. 148, 110122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110122

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ehmet, N., Wang, Y. P., Zhao, X., Sun, K., Hou, Q. Z. (2021). Adaptive response of reproductive characteristics of Trifolium repens on time scale. Flora 285, 151923. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2021.151923

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ehrlén, J., Morris, W. F. (2015). Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 18, 303–314. doi: 10.1111/ele.2015.18.issue-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Emura, N., Denda, T., Sakai, M., Ueda, K. (2014). Dimorphism of the seed-dispersing organ in a pantropical coastal plant, Scaevola taccada: heterogeneous population structures across islands. Ecol. Res. 29, 733–740. doi: 10.1007/s11284-014-1164-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Palacios, J. M., Kreft, H., Irl, S. D., Norder, S., Ah-Peng, C., Borges, P. A., et al. (2021). Scientists’ warning–The outstanding biodiversity of islands is in peril. Global Ecol. Conserv. 31, e01847. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01847

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fick, S. E., Hijmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.2017.37.issue-12

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Flora of Chinese (2019). Available online at: https://www.iplant.cn/foc (Accessed September 15, 2024).

Google Scholar

Fukami, T. (2015). Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160340

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert, B., Levine, J. M. (2017). Ecological drift and the distribution of species diversity. Proc. R. Soc. B.: Biol. Sci. 284, 20170507. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0507

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillespie, R. G., Claridge, E. M., Roderick, G. K. (2008). Biodiversity dynamics in isolated island communities: interaction between natural and human-mediated processes. Mol. Ecol. 17, 45–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03466.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Götmark, F., Götmark, E., Jensen, A. M. (2016). Why be a shrub? A basic model and hypotheses for the adaptive values of a common growth form. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1095. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01095

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grace, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling and natural systems. (Boca Raton, FL, USA: Cambridge University Press).

Google Scholar

Grime, J. P. (2006). Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties (Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons).

Google Scholar

Han, Z. Q., Liu, T., Wang, T., Liu, H. F., Hao, X. R., Ouyang, Y. N., et al. (2020). Quantification of water resource utilization efficiency as the main driver of plant diversity in the water-limited ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 429, 108974. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108974

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Harper, K. A., Macdonald, S. E., Burton, P. J., Chen, J., Brosofske, K. D., Saunders, S. C., et al. (2005). Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 19, 768–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Harter, D. E., Irl, S. D., Seo, B., Steinbauer, M. J., Gillespie, R., Triantis, K. A., et al. (2015). Impacts of global climate change on the floras of oceanic islands–Projections, implications and current knowledge. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17, 160–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.01.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmgren, M., Lin, C. Y., Murillo, J. E., Nieuwenhuis, A., Penninkhof, J., Sanders, N., et al. (2015). Positive shrub–tree interactions facilitate woody encroachment in boreal peatlands. J. Ecol. 103, 58–66. doi: 10.1111/jec.2015.103.issue-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Husson, O. (2013). Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil 362, 389–417. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1429-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Irl, S. D., Obermeier, A., Beierkuhnlein, C., Steinbauer, M. J. (2020). Climate controls plant life-form patterns on a high-elevation oceanic island. J. Biogeogr. 47, 2261–2273. doi: 10.1111/jbi.v47.10

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jesus, J. M., Danko, A. S., Fiúza, A., Borges, M. T. (2015). Phytoremediation of salt-affected soils: a review of processes, applicability, and the impact of climate change. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 22, 6511–6525. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4205-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kemmitt, S. J., Wright, D., Goulding, K. W., Jones, D. L. (2006). pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 898–911. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kubota, Y., Shiono, T., Kusumoto, B. (2015). Role of climate and geohistorical factors in driving plant richness patterns and endemicity on the east Asian continental islands. Ecography 38, 639–648. doi: 10.1111/ecog.2015.v38.i6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuparinen, A., Katul, G., Nathan, R., Schurr, F. M. (2009). Increases in air temperature can promote wind-driven dispersal and spread of plants. Proc. R. Soc. B.: Biol. Sci. 276, 3081–3087. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0693

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lavorel, S., Garnier, E. (2002). Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16, 545–556. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, M. K., Lee, H. S., Lee, H. I., Lee, S. W., Lee, Y. J., Lee, C. B. (2022). Relative importance of landscape and climate factors to the species diversity of plant growth forms along an East Asian Archipelago. Forests 13, 218. doi: 10.3390/f13020218

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lefcheck, J. S. (2016). piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579. doi: 10.1111/mee3.2016.7.issue-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leibold, M. A., Chase, J. M. (2018). Metacommunity ecology Vol. 59 (Princeton University Press).

Google Scholar

Li, X., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Cheng, X., Zhang, Q., Zhang, K. (2024). Plant species composition and key-species abundance drive ecosystem multifunctionality. J. Appl. Ecol. 61 (9), 2100–2110. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14717

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Tu, T., Li, S., Yang, X., Zheng, Y., Guo, L. D., et al. (2024). Different mechanisms underlie similar species-area relationships in two tropical archipelagoes. Plant Diversity 46, 238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2023.08.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhang, X. N., Lv, G. H. (2019). Phylogeography of Ixiolirion songaricum, a spring ephemeral species endemic to Northwest China. Plant Syst. Evol. 305, 205–221. doi: 10.1007/s00606-018-1563-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Losos, J. B., Ricklefs, R. E. (2009). Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature 457, 830–836. doi: 10.1038/nature07893

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Losos, J. B., Schluter, D. (2000). Analysis of an evolutionary species–area relationship. Nature 408, 847–850. doi: 10.1038/35048558

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H., Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography Vol. 1 (Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton university press).

Google Scholar

Manes, S., Costello, M. J., Beckett, H., Debnath, A., Devenish-Nelson, E., Grey, K. A., et al. (2021). Endemism increases species’ climate change risk in areas of global biodiversity importance. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109070. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109070

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mann, A., Lata, C., Kumar, N., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Sheoran, P. (2023). Halophytes as new model plant species for salt tolerance strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1137211. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1137211

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Midolo, G., Alkemade, R., Schipper, A. M., Benítez-López, A., Perring, M. P., De Vries, W. (2019). Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant species richness and abundance: A global meta-analysis. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 398–413. doi: 10.1111/geb.12856

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Morales, A. I. G. C., Mendoza, J. M. O., Gozalbo, M. E., Martínez, J. J. C. (2012). Arboreal and prostrate conifers coexisting in Mediterranean high mountains differ in their climatic responses. Dendrochronologia 30, 279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2012.02.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy, H. T., Metcalfe, D. J. (2016). The perfect storm: Weed invasion and intense storms in tropical forests. Austral Ecol. 41, 864–874. doi: 10.1111/aec.2016.41.issue-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nogales, M., McConkey, K. R., Carlo, T. A., Wotton, D. M., Bellingham, P. J., Traveset, A., et al. (2024). A review on the state of the art in frugivory and seed dispersal on islands and the implications of global change. Bot. Rev. 90 (2), 160–185. doi: 10.1007/s12229-023-09296-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ottaviani, G., Keppel, G., Götzenberger, L., Harrison, S., Opedal, Ø. H., Conti, L., et al. (2020). Linking plant functional ecology to island biogeography. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 329–339. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Penn, C. J., Camberato, J. J. (2019). A critical review on soil chemical processes that control how soil pH affects phosphorus availability to plants. Agriculture 9, 120. doi: 10.3390/agriculture9060120

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Portillo, J. T. D. M., Ouchi-Melo, L. S., Crivellari, L. B., de Oliveira, T. A. L., Sawaya, R. J., Duarte, L. D. S. (2019). Area and distance from mainland affect in different ways richness and phylogenetic diversity of snakes in Atlantic Forest coastal islands. Ecol. Evol. 9, 3909–3917. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2019.9.issue-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pugnaire, F. I., Morillo, J. A., Peñuelas, J., Reich, P. B., Bardgett, R. D., Gaxiola, A., et al. (2019). Climate change effects on plant-soil feedbacks and consequences for biodiversity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaz1834. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramirez, A. R., De Guzman, M. E., Dawson, T. E., Ackerly, D. D. (2020). Plant hydraulic traits reveal islands as refugia from worsening drought. Conserv. Physiol. 8, coz115. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coz115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schrader, J., König, C., Triantis, K. A., Trigas, P., Kreft, H., Weigelt, P. (2020). Species–area relationships on small islands differ among plant growth forms. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 814–829. doi: 10.1111/geb.13056

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shipley, B. (2009). Confirmatory path analysis in a generalized multilevel context. Ecology 90, 363–368. doi: 10.1890/08-1034.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shipley, B. (2013). The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using ad-separation test. Ecology 94, 560–564. doi: 10.1890/12-0976.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirima, D. D., Totland, Ø., Moe, S. R. (2016). The relative importance of vertical soil nutrient heterogeneity, and mean and depth-specific soil nutrient availabilities for tree species richness in tropical forests and woodlands. Oecologia 182, 877–888. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3696-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Spaak, J. W., Baert, J. M., Baird, D. J., Eisenhauer, N., Maltby, L., Pomati, F., et al. (2017). Shifts of community composition and population density substantially affect ecosystem function despite invariant richness. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1315–1324. doi: 10.1111/ele.2017.20.issue-10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tao, Y., Qiu, D., Gong, Y. M., Liu, H. L., Zhang, J., Yin, B. F., et al. (2022). Leaf-root-soil N: P stoichiometry of ephemeral plants in a temperate desert in Central Asia. J. Plant Res. 135, 55–67. doi: 10.1007/s10265-021-01355-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Uriarte, M., Thompson, J., Zimmerman, J. K. (2019). Hurricane María tripled stem breaks and doubled tree mortality relative to other major storms. Nat. Commun. 10, 1362. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09319-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Volaire, F. (2018). A unified framework of plant adaptive strategies to drought: crossing scales and disciplines. Global Change Biol. 24, 2929–2938. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2018.24.issue-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Warren, B. H., Simberloff, D., Ricklefs, R. E., Aguilée, R., Condamine, F. L., Gravel, D., et al. (2015). Islands as model systems in ecology and evolution: Prospects fifty years after MacArthur-Wilson. Ecol. Lett. 18, 200–217. doi: 10.1111/ele.2015.18.issue-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Weigelt, P., Kreft, H. (2013). Quantifying island isolation–insights from global patterns of insular plant species richness. Ecography 36, 417–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07669.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Whittaker, R. J., Fernández-Palacios, J. M. (2007). Island biogeography: ecology, evolution, and conservation (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).

Google Scholar

Whittaker, R. J., Fernández-Palacios, J. M., Matthews, T. J., Borregaard, M. K., Triantis, K. A. (2017). Island biogeography: taking the long view of nature’s laboratories. Science 357, eaam8326. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8326

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilson, B. F. (1995). “Shrub stems: form and function,” in Plant stems (Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press), 91–102.

Google Scholar

Winfree, R., Fox, J. W., Williams, N. M., Reilly, J. R., Cariveau, D. P. (2015). Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecol. Lett. 18, 626–635. doi: 10.1111/ele.2015.18.issue-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, L., Ren, Y., Wan, J. Z., Wang, M., Wang, Z., Fu, F., et al. (2022). Effects of precipitation change and nitrogen and phosphorus additions on traits and abundance of potentilla anserina in an alpine meadow. Atmosphere 13, 1820. doi: 10.3390/atmos13111820

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, Y., Huang, H., Xie, X., Ou, J., Chen, Z., Lu, X., et al. (2024). Landscape, human disturbance, and climate factors drive the species richness of alien invasive plants on subtropical islands. Plants 13, 2437. doi: 10.3390/plants13172437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Y., Jarvie, S., Zhang, Q., Han, P., Liu, Q., Zhang, S., et al. (2023). Habitat heterogeneity determines species richness on small habitat islands in a fragmented landscape. J. Biogeogr. 50, 976–986. doi: 10.1111/jbi.14594

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Cooper, D. J., Li, Z., Song, W., Zhang, Y., Zhao, B., et al. (2020). Differences in tree and shrub growth responses to climate change in a boreal forest in China. Dendrochronologia 63, 125744. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125744

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, G., Levi, E. E., Davidson, T. A., Lauridsen, T. L., Søndergaard, M., Yang, Z., et al. (2024). Warming alters the network of physiological traits and their contribution to plant abundance. Sci. Total. Environ. 939, 173573. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173573

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, S., Qin, H., Liao, R., Cheng, Y. (2024). Habitat quality drives the species–area relationship of plants and soil microbes in an ocean archipelago. Oikos 2024 (11), e10660. doi: 10.1111/oik.v2024.i11

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ziegler, C., Cochard, H., Stahl, C., Foltzer, L., Gérard, B., Goret, J. Y., et al. (2024). Residual water losses mediate the trade-off between growth and drought survival across saplings of 12 tropical rainforest tree species with contrasting hydraulic strategies. J. Exp. Bot. 75 (13), 4128–4147. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zizka, A., Govender, N., Higgins, S. I. (2014). How to tell a shrub from a tree: A life-history perspective from a South African savanna. Austral Ecol. 39, 767–778. doi: 10.1111/aec.2014.39.issue-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ecological strategies, plants life forms, island area, island biogeography, island isolation, species abundance, species richness

Citation: Yang C, Zhao J, Huang S, Zhou S and Cheng Y (2025) Distribution of different plant life forms on tropical islands: patterns and underlying mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1566156. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1566156

Received: 24 January 2025; Accepted: 17 March 2025;
Published: 02 April 2025.

Edited by:

Robert John, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India

Reviewed by:

Xiao Xu, Yunnan University, China
Tianyun Li, Lanzhou University, China

Copyright © 2025 Yang, Zhao, Huang, Zhou and Cheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yikang Cheng, eWtjaGVuZ0BoYWluYW51LmVkdS5jbg==

ORCID: Yikang Cheng, orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-3904

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more