Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Biotechnology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547928

Rethinking Progress: Harmonizing the Discourse on Genetically Modified Crops

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
  • 2 Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Salale University, Fiche P.O. Box 245, Ethiopia, Fitche, Ethiopia
  • 3 Ethiopian Agricultural Research Institute, National Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, P.O. Box 249, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Genetically modified crops (GM crops) also known as biotech crops are crops that have been altered through genetic engineering techniques and under cultivation for approximately 28 years. By October 2024, over 30 nations have approved the cultivation of GM crops. The global area utilized for biotech crop production has reached 206.3 million hectares. Despite the substantial growth in the cultivation of these crops, debate continues between proponents and opponents of GM crops. In this article, critical concerns and common ground between the arguments of both sides were described. The main issues addressed include the naturalness of GM crops, religious perspectives, beneficial aspects, safety issues, socio-economic impacts and intellectual property rights. We argue that the classification GM crops as unnatural is a claim that lacks scientific reality.In a similar vein, comparing GM technology to the act of playing God is inappropriate. Moreover, the belief that GM crops do not contribute to yield improvements is inconsistent with empirical evidence. Additionally, the claim that foods produced from GM crops are unsafe for human consumption holds unseen concerns that is not on the ground. We have also highlighted the necessity of implementing intellectual property rights that support seed developers for a limited duration without violating farmers' rights. In conclusion, as a consumer has the right to know what they eat, labeling of GM food products fosters transparency and enhance consumer autonomy.

    Keywords: GM crops, Biotech crops, IPRs, Safety concerns, Terminator technology

    Received: 18 Dec 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Alemu, Hora, Safawo and Osena. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Abreham Bekele Alemu, Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, 27402, North Carolina, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more