ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional Plant Ecology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547431

This article is part of the Research TopicInteractive Effects of Climate Change and Human Activities on Plant Productivity in Grassland and Cropland EcosystemsView all 7 articles

The variations of wheat-maize production, soil organic carbon, and carbon footprints: insights from a 20-year on-farm observational experiment in the North China Plain

Provisionally accepted
Ning  WangNing Wang1Zhipin  AiZhipin Ai1Qiuying  ZhangQiuying Zhang2*Peifang  LengPeifang Leng1Yunfeng  QiaoYunfeng Qiao1Zhao  LiZhao Li1Chao  TianChao Tian1Shi  XinjieShi Xinjie3Hefa  ChengHefa Cheng4Gang  ChenGang Chen5Fadong  LiFadong Li1*
  • 1Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
  • 2Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 3Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
  • 4Peking University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 5Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Climate change is a substantial threat to the global food supply, especially for the North China Plain (NCP), a critical agricultural region in China that exhibits high sensitivity and vulnerability to climate change. Under climate change, many uncertainties remain regarding crop yields, soil organic carbon (SOC), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A 20−year on−farm observational study (2003-2022) of a winter wheat−summer maize rotation system was conducted to comprehensively quantify the continuous variations in crop productivity, SOC storage, GHG emissions, and carbon footprints (CFs) in the NCP. Results indicated a warming trend of 0.08°C per year and an annual increase of 57 hours in sunshine duration over the study period. Both wheat and maize yields showed sustained improvements, with annual rates of 70 kg ha–1 and 184 kg ha–1, respectively. Wheat yields were primarily influenced by cumulative sunshine hours in November and soil total potassium (K) content, whereas maize yields were significantly affected by wheat-season agricultural inputs (water, N, P, K fertilizers) and initial soil properties (pH, N, P, K). Although wheat production generated higher GHG emissions than maize (7,307.5 vs 2,998.7 kg CO2-eq ha−1), the wheat season transitioned into a net carbon sink (CF < 0) due to SOC accumulation (0.58 g kg–1 year–1). Conversely, SOC depletion (-0.72 g kg–1 year–1) during the maize season resulted in a carbon source status (CF > 0). This divergence likely stems from contrasting straw management practices: wheat straw incorporation at 20 cm depth versus maize straw surface mulching. Our findings demonstrate significant improvements in crop yields, SOC sequestration, and net ecosystem economic budget over two decades. However, the decelerating trends in yield gains and SOC accumulation rates warrant strategic attention to sustain long-term agricultural resilience.

Keywords: Climate Change, Agricultural practice, Carbon Sequestration, Greenhouse gas emissions, Long-term field experiment

Received: 18 Dec 2024; Accepted: 02 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Ai, Zhang, Leng, Qiao, Li, Tian, Xinjie, Cheng, Chen and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qiuying Zhang, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Fadong Li, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more