Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci. , 20 February 2025

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1547359

Effects of elevated atmospheric ozone concentration on biomass and non-structural carbohydrates allocation of cherry radish

Li Li*Li Li1*Bingkai YangBingkai Yang1Jinling LiJinling Li2Xiaoke WangXiaoke Wang3Sami Ullah*Sami Ullah4*
  • 1Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • 2Forestry School, Guangxi Eco-engineering Vocational and Technical College, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 4School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences & Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Regional increases in atmospheric O3 have phytotoxicity due to its strong oxidizing properties. Cherry radish (Raphanus sativus L.), with its sensitivity to O3 and rapid growth cycle, serves as an excellent model for investigating the effects of elevated O3 on plant physiological responses. To determine the response of cherry radish to elevated O3 levels, we used nine open-top chambers with three O3 concentrations (Ambient-LO; 70 ppb O3 above ambient-MO; 140 ppb O3 above ambient−HO) in Beijing, China to examine the MDA, chlorophyll contents, biomass, soluble sugar, and starch contents in response to O3 exposure. The results showed that: 1) elevated O3 (EO3) did not affect leaf chlorophyll contents but increased carotenoid contents; (2). The total biomass, hypocotyl biomass and hypocotyl size were significantly decreased by 41% and 49%, 51% and 37%, 53% and 40% by MO and HO, respectively. The above-to-below-ground biomass ratio (A/B) increased by 49% and 61% under MO and HO treatments; (3). HO and MO significantly increased leaf fructose, sucrose, and glucose contents by 192% and 79%, 40% and 37%, 110% and 45%, respectively; (4). leaf soluble sugar biomass proportion increased by 75% and 99% under HO and MO mainly contributed by fructose biomass proportion increase; (5). radish plant allocated more soluble sugar, starch and NSC biomass proportion to leaf but not hypocotyl under EO3. In conclusion, radishes exposed to O3 allocate more nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) to the leaf at the expense of a great loss of hypocotyl biomass. This is possible mainly due to compensation of O3-induced damage via the sugar transport pathways, where transport is blocked so that the inefficient conversion of soluble sugars into starch can lead to reduced biomass accumulation and ultimately lower crop yields of radish. The role of radish fructose in protecting against or responding to O3 risks may be underestimated as it affects the overall sugar metabolism and transport within the plant.

1 Introductions

Tropospheric ozone (O3) is an oxidative, phytotoxic air pollutant that threatens crop production and agricultural security (Ramya et al., 2023). O3 forms in the lower atmosphere through complex photochemical reactions involving nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), both emitted by industrial activities, transportation, and natural sources. Globally, O3 concentrations have been increasing in some of the world’s metropolitan areas, with urban population exposure to O3 increasing at 89% of stations (+0.8% yr-1), such as Equatorial Africa, South Korea, India and China, due to lower O3 titration by NO (Sicard et al., 2023).

Mean annual O3 concentrations (maximum 8-hour day) in 74 major cities in China have been reported to increase by 28.8% from 2013 to 2019 (CAOPPBB, 2020) due to persistently high emissions of the primary precursors of O3 (volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides) (Li et al., 2021). The oxidizing nature of O3 is responsible for its phytotoxic effects on crops. O3 enters plants through stomata and stimulates the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Tiwari et al., 2018), which target membrane permeability via lipid peroxidation of the bilipid layer of membranes (Tripathi and Agrawal, 2013). Lipid peroxidation is commonly measured as malonaldehyde (MDA) content and has been correlated with the degree of membrane damage under O3 exposure, and is therefore often used as a biomarker of oxidative stress (Li et al., 2024).

The chlorophyll content plays an important role in determining the photosynthetic yield of plants, while the reduction of chlorophyll content upon O3 treatment is well documented in the literature (Li et al., 2015; Choquette et al., 2020). O3 could also affect the chlorophyll ratio. Pellegrini (2014) observed a decrease in the ratio of total chlorophyll to carotenoids, implying an enhancement of photoprotective de-excitation pathways mediated by carotenoids of plants (Pellegrini, 2014). Exposure of crops to high O3 concentrations is a major threat to global food security as it would lead to significant yield losses by impairing photosynthesis (Bisbis et al., 2018; Ramya et al., 2023; Leung et al., 2022). Feng et al. (2019) reported that elevated tropospheric O3 concentrations in China reduced annual rice and wheat yields by 8% and 6%, respectively, in 2015. The cost of O3-induced losses in 2015 was ~$7.5 billion for rice and $11.1 billion for wheat. O3 has induced losses in major crops (Mills et al., 2011) such as wheat, rice (Feng et al., 2019) and common bean, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), pearl millet, finger millet (Sharps et al., 2021) and radish (Manning, 2023) due to impairment of photosynthesis. Apart from biomass reduction, O3 stress also leads to changes in photosynthate C allocation, with more biomass being used for O3 injury repairs rather than being converted to storage starch in different plant parts (Li et al., 2022).

Carbohydrates produced by photosynthesis in plants are mainly stored in the form of sugars and starches, which constitute nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs) for various metabolic activities (Bansal and Germino, 2009; Hoch, 2015). Soluble sugars including fructose, sucrose, and glucose, serve as a direct source of energy, while starch primarily functions as a rapid nutrient storage form (Li et al., 2022). It is reported that EO3 can increase soluble sugar and alter sugar distribution among organs for osmotic adjustment, scavenging of reactive oxygen species, and signaling, while starch decreases to produce soluble sugar to enhance photosynthetic activity and defense mechanisms in the leaves (Tiwari et al., 2018).

Photosynthetic partitioning changes under EO3, particularly concerning carbohydrate allocation between aboveground and belowground in many species, thereby affecting the balance between structural and nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) (Chen et al., 2018). Pools of NSCs in different plant organs can serve as buffers to counteract decreases in C assimilation in response to environmental stressors such as O3 exposure (Li et al., 2022) and the imbalance between C supply and demand across plant tissues (Du et al., 2020). The components of NSCs, starch and soluble sugars (sucrose, fructose, glucose), play different roles in modifying O3 stress (AbdElgawad et al., 2020), and their ratio may reflect the strategy for regulating a sustainable carbon balance between organs. Therefore, the concentration, accumulation, and proportional allocation of NSCs in different organs could reflect the status of carbon supply in the whole plant, providing insights into the strategy and ability of plants to grow and survive in the face of environmental perturbations. O3 could affect the allocation of non-structural carbohydrates, which has been reported in wheat (Sild et al., 2002) and soybean (Zheng et al., 2019), but we found it rare in root vegetables such as radish.

Cherry radish (Raphanus sativus L.) is a common root vegetable valued for its bright red color, crisp texture and fast growth. It’s widely used in salads and various culinary dishes for its refreshing taste and nutritional benefits. In China, the area under radish cultivation is up to 1.2 million square hectares, with an annual production of more than 40 million tons (Xing et al., 2024). Cherry radish has been studied for responses to root temperature and O3 (Kleier et al., 2001), cultivar-specific O3 sensitivity (Hassan et al., 2018), and gas exchange, growth, and nutrient status to CO2 and O3 (Barnes and Pfirrmann, 1992). In this study, we planted cheery radish in Changping, Beijing, China. The patterns of leaf MDA, pigments, biomass and NSC content and allocation were well-studied using open-top chambers (OTCs). We study how EO3 influences above and below-ground biomass and NSC allocation and how the relative components of NSC (soluble sugar and starch) of cherry radish are affected. Our hypotheses are: 1) EO3 concentrations will reduce biomass accumulation to reduce both above- and below-ground biomass due to chlorophyll reduction; 2) EO3 concentrations will increase sugar of above ground for resistance to O3 stress and decrease starch content of all plant parts for rapid nutrient supply.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental site and plant material

The experimental site was in Chang Ping district, a suburb of Beijing, China (40°12′N, 116°80′E). Beijing has a typical temperate and monsoonal climate with four clearly distinct seasons. The annual mean precipitation of the experimental site was 550.3 mm and the mean air temperature was 11.°C. The local soil in the experimental site is generally characterized as moist with moderate fertility (Tong et al., 2012), and therefore provided the required conditions to promote the growth of radish. The soil used in the pots contained an organic content of 16.4 g/kg, a total nitrogen content of 0.9 g/kg, an available phosphorus content of 102.1mg/kg, and a pH of 8.3. All plants were watered as needed and fertilized once with 4 g of specialized carbamide and potassium sulfate fertilizer (N14:P14: K14, Wuhan Greenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) prior to the experiment. A common radish variety planted in the fall (Raphanus sativus L. var. radculus Pers.) was selected, and 216 seeds were planted evenly into 36 pots (six seeds per pot) on August 27th. We used 5 kg soil in each pot (top diameter: 27.5 cm, base diameter: 18.5 cm, height: 21 cm), then 6 pots were randomly distributed to 1 of the 6 open-top chambers (OTCs).

This radish variety has a growing period of 30-45 days, is characterized by highly productive, drought-resistant, and low-temperature resistance, and is relatively common in autumn plantings in Beijing. The seedlings per pot were thinned to 4 and then moved to the ambient chambers to be accustomed to the environment until Sep. 15th.

2.2 OTCs

The OTCs were the same as in Li et al. (2022). The OTCs were made of an aluminum alloy frame covered with transparent plastic film with a 10-mm thickness (90% transparency). More details on OTC design, operation, O3 concentration control, and distribution control can also be found in Li et al. (2015) and Li et al. (2022). O3 concentrations were evenly distributed, both vertically and horizontally, within the OTCs. The Model 49i O3 analyzer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) was calibrated every month with a Model 49i-PS O3 analyzer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). A 10% variation in O3 concentrations around the target O3 concentrations was allowed in this experiment.

2.3 Experimental design and sampling

Three O3 treatments were randomly assigned to nine open-top chambers (OTCs). Due to the increasing O3 concentrations in Beijing (Wang et al., 2012; BMEPB, 2015; Li et al., 2020, 2021), the O3 concentrations in the present study were selected to match the levels in ambient air (low O3-LO), in addition to ambient air + 70 ppb O3 (medium O3-MO) and ambient air +140 ppb O3 (high O3-HO). O3 exposure started on September 15th and ended on October 10th. The duration was determined by the growth period of the radish. O3 was applied through fumigation from 8:30 to 17:30 (9 h) each day. The average ambient air (AA) O3 concentration in the experimental sites was 36.1 ppb, ranging from 22.4 ppb to 62.8 ppb throughout the day during the experimental periods (Figure 1). The average O3 concentrations of AA+70 and AA+140 were 119.7 ppb and 172.0 ppb (Figure 1), respectively, meaning that the O3 control could meet the target requirements. Due to the strong winds around October 7th, the O3 concentrations of HO treatments had a small fluctuation, but the mean value can still meet our target concentrations (Figure 1). The O3 was applied daily except for rainy days, for a total of 10 days of O3 exposure during the experimental period (Figure 1). The pots with the same treatments were interchanged to different positions of each chamber or different chambers with the same treatments every other day. Plants including green leaves were harvested at the end of the experiment for biomass, MDA, chlorophyll and NSC measurements.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. O3 exposure during the experiment LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

2.4 Measurements

Three mature green leaves were collected from three radishes per treatment at the end of the experiment for MDA and chlorophyll measurements after biomass measurements. Radish plants were separated as leaf and hypocotyl where the leaves were taken as aboveground biomass and the edible hypocotyl was taken as “blowground”. The rest attached root was not counted in this experiment because it was very tiny and took only around 3% of the total biomass.

Leaf was collected and stored in 4°C incubators with ice bags then transferred to the -80°C fridge. Leaf MDA contents were determined by microplate spectrometric assays as described by Wang et al. (2014). 50 mg of leaf tissue per plant was extracted with 4 ml 95% ethanol in the dark for 48 h at room temperature. The absorbance of leaf pigment extracts was measured at 646, 450 and 663 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV2101PC, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) for chlorophyll a (Chla), chlorophyll b (Chlb) and carotene (Car). Chlorophyll contents were calculated according to the specific absorption coefficients provided by Lichtenthaler (1987). The total chlorophyll content was taken as the sum of Chla, Chlb, and Car.

Biomass (separated as aboveground and belowground parts) was determined by drying up at 70°C to a constant weight prior to analysis. The biomass samples of all parts were then finely ground to powder with mortar and liquid nitrogen for NSC measurements. NSC contents (soluble sugar and starch contents) were determined as described by Li et al. (2022) with slight modifications. For soluble sugar components, we have measured fructose, sucrose, and glucose contents. Sucrose was determined by accurately aspirating 10ml of extract into a test tube, adding 2ml of 2mol/L KOH followed by boiling in water for 10 minutes, taking out and quickly cool down to room temperature (put in cold water), pour into a 50ml volumetric flask, and then finally set the volume with distilled water. Accurately aspirate 2ml of the dilution solution into a clean test tube, add 6ml of anthrone reagent, shake well, immediately place in a boiling water bath and heat for 5 minutes, remove and immediately cool rapidly in cold water with constant shaking. Read the absorbance value at 640nm and check the standard curve to get the amount of soluble sugar. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, and starch were determined by the anthrone-sulfuric acid method (Ma et al., 2021). Starch content (mg·g-1) was determined as described by Grantz and Yang (2000). NSC allocation proportions were calculated using the ratio of the products of target NSC components contents and target biomass to the whole plant NSC mass (Li et al., 2022).

2.5 Statistical analyses

The effects of O3 on all parameters were examined by one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc comparisons were conducted using the Duncan test. Prior to analysis, all data were checked for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and homogeneity of variance (Levene’s test). If the data were not normally distributed and/or their variance was not homogeneous, non-parametric tests were used. Results were considered significant when P<0.05. All analyses were performed using the SPSS statistics software (Version 17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Malondialdehyde

MDA contents were only influenced by high O3 (HO) treatments, which showed a 49% increase compared with the control. Medium O3 treatment (MO) did not show significant differences with the control treatment (LO) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The effects of elevated O3 on leaf MDA contents of radish Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

3.2 Chlorophyll contents

Chla, Chlb and Chla/Chlb were not affected by EO3 treatments while Car was increased by 26.1% and 26.2% by MO and HO, respectively (Figure 3). However, HO and MO decreased Ch(a+b)/Car by 23.3% and 23.7% compared with LO. (Figure 3E). No differences between MO and HO were detected (Figure 3).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The effects of elevated O3 on chlorophyll content (Chl a, A), chlorophyll b contents (Chl b, B) and carotenoids (Car, C), Chl a/Chl b (D), Chl (a+b)/Car (E) and total chlorophyll (total Chl, F) Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

3.3 Biomass

The results indicated that EO3 did not affect leaf biomass and total leaf area but significantly decreased hypocotyl biomass and hypocotyl size (P<0.05) (Figures 4A, B, D, E, F). The total biomass, hypocotyl biomass and hypocotyl size were significantly decreased by 41% and 49%, 51% and 37%, 53% and 40% by MO and HO, respectively. The above-to-below-ground biomass ratio (A/B) increased by 49% and 61% under MO and HO treatments (Figure 4C). Hypocotyl biomass, A/B, and the total biomass did not show differences between MO and HO (Figures 4B–D).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The effects of elevated O3 on leaf biomass (A), hypocotyl biomass (B), ratio of above-ground to below-ground biomass (A/B, C), total biomass (D), size of hypocotyl (E) and the total leaf area (F) Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

3.4 NSC contents

3.4.1 Leaf NSC contents

The results showed HO and MO significantly increased fructose, sucrose, glucose, soluble sugar and NSC contents by 192% and 79% (Figure 5A), 40% and 37% (Figure 5B), 110% and 45% (Figure 5C), 117% and 50% (Figure 5E), 87% and 46% (Figure 5F). The ratio of starch to soluble sugar significantly decreased 44% by HO (Figure 5G). HO and MO showed differences between fructose, glucose contents, soluble sugar, NSC and the ratio of starch to soluble sugar (Figure 5G). EO3 did not affect leaf starch contents (Figure 5D). The ratio of leaf fructose and sucrose to soluble sugar was not influenced by O3 treatments (Figures 5H, I).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Effects of elevated O3 on leaf fructose contents (A), sucrose contents (B), and glucose contents (C), starch contents (D), soluble sugar contents (E), NSC contents (F), starch to soluble sugar ratio (G), fructose to soluble sugar ratio (H) and sucrose to soluble sugar ratio (I) Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

3.4.2 Hypocotyl NSC contents

The results indicated that EO3 did not affect fructose contents, sucrose contents, glucose contents, starch contents, soluble sugar contents, NSC contents and the ratio of starch to soluble sugar (Figure 6). The ratio of hypocotyl fructose and sucrose to soluble sugar was not influenced by O3 treatments (Figures 6H, I).

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Effects of elevated O3 on hypocotyl fructose contents(A), sucrose contents (B), and glucose contents (C), starch contents (D), soluble sugar contents (E), NSC contents (F), starch to soluble sugar ratio (G), fructose to soluble sugar ratio (H) and sucrose to soluble sugar ratio (I) Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

3.5 NSC allocation proportions

3.5.1 Soluble sugar, starch, and NSC allocation proportions

The results indicated that the HO and MO significantly increased the allocation and proportion to leaf soluble sugar by 75% and 99% (Figure 7A), to leaf starch by 74% and 99% (Figure 7B) and to NSC by 76% and 115% (Figure 7C) while reduced the allocation proportion to hypocotyl soluble sugar by 57% and 43% (Figure 7A), starch by 25% and 19% (Figure 7B), NSC by 47% and 31%, respectively (Figure 7C).

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. The proportion of soluble sugar (A), starch (B), and NSC (C) between leaf and hypocotyl under three O3 concentration treatments. Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters inside bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

3.5.2 Leaf and hypocotyl soluble sugar allocation proportions

Although EO3 significantly increases the leaf fructose, sucrose, glucose contents and soluble sugar proportion (Figures 6, 7), the enhancement of leaf soluble sugar of leaf proportion of radish plant is mainly due to the increased fructose proportion (Figure 8A). The results indicated that HO and MO increased the fructose proportion by 36% and 19% (Figure 8A) while the sucrose and glucose were not affected by EO3. The proportions of hypocotyl were not affected by treatments (Figure 8B).

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Effects of elevated O3 on soluble sugar components proportion of leaf (A) and hypocotyl (B) Values are represented as mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters inside bars indicate significant multiple comparisons between treatments when P<0.05. LO means low O3 treatments; MO means medium O3 treatments; HO means high O3 treatments.

4 Discussion

4.1 MDA and chlorophyll contents

Lipid peroxidation is generally measured as malonaldehyde (MDA) content and has been correlated with the degree of membrane damage under O3 exposure (Li et al., 2024). We found that leaf MDA contents increased significantly by 46% only under HO (≈160ppb) after 20 days of fumigation, but not under MO (Figure 1), implying that EO3 could lead to a decrease in membrane stability and an increase in membrane damage in cherry radish leaves. It has been reported that MDA levels increase when reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals, attack the unsaturated lipids present in cell membranes under oxidative stress such as O3 (Chaudhary and Rathore, 2021). Our result also suggests that the cherry radish cultivar selected in this experiment may have a higher O3 tolerance capacity, as Tiwari and Agrawal (2011) found that the MDA content of radish (Raphnus sativus L cv Pusa Reshmi) leaves increased significantly after 60 days when grown even at a mean O3 concentration of 40.8 ppb (8h).

Chlorophyll is the primary pigment involved in capturing light energy for photosynthesis (Croce and van Amerongen, 2020). Although O3-induced oxidative stress has been reported to damage chlorophyll molecules and disrupt photosynthesis (Li et al., 2015), we found that chlorophyll content remains unchanged in mature leaves (Figure 3). The damage caused by EO3 depends on both plant development stage, O3 dose, intensity and duration of O3 fumigation (Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007; Li et al., 2022). The fact that the chlorophyll content of mature radish leaves remains unchanged may be due to effective protective mechanisms and the strategy to maintain photosynthetic efficiency at this stage of radish growth (Pell et al., 1997), as indicated by the unchanged leaf biomass (Figure 4), which may involve repair mechanisms for damaged chlorophyll (Castagna and Ranieri, 2009). Regulating chlorophyll levels to ensure continued photosynthesis despite stress is critical, as a reduction in chlorophyll content would reduce the plant’s ability to capture light energy, further affecting growth and survival, and thus leading to reduced biomass accumulation. Sakalauskaitė et al. (2008) also reported that EO3 did not have a significant negative effect on photosynthetic pigment synthesis in radishes. The unchanged chlorophyll results indicated that the acute O3 exposure in this experiment was still within a range where the defense mechanisms of radish could cope and chlorophyll levels could remain stable.

The results showed that carotenoids were increased by both HO and MO (Figure 3). The explanation is that leaf carotenoids, a class of pigmented compounds synthesized by plants play a crucial role in photoprotection by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and absorbing excess light energy, especially under stress conditions (Pellegrini et al., 2015) or by their involvement in non-photochemical quenching of Chl fluorescence (Casper-Lindley and Björkman, 1998). EO3 induces plants to enhance their antioxidant defense, including the synthesis of carotenoids (Singh et al., 2023). The ratio of total chlorophyll to carotenoids decreases at the end of fumigation (Figure 3), which is considered an early stress indicator (Tiwari et al., 2018), suggesting that plants need to invest in the enhancement of carotenoid-mediated photoprotective quenching pathways (Pellegrini, 2014; Tiwari et al., 2018). Although we have not found similar research on radish, this result of increased Chl/Car ratio is consistent with the findings of Pellegrini et al. (2011) in Salvia officinalis, which confirmed that O3-treated leaves increased the need for carotenoid-mediated photoprotection.

4.2 Biomass and NSCs

NSC accumulation in source tissues (leaves) and their transport to sink tissues (underground parts, fruits) regulates overall crop productivity and quality (Xu et al., 2024). During stress conditions, such as nutrient deficiency or environmental stress (e.g., elevated O3), NSC allocation can shift from growth to maintenance, reducing biomass production and yield (Li et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2024). Radish exposed to EO3 showed lower A/B rates, meaning that the O3-induced reduction in hypocotyl biomass was greater than the reduction in shoot growth (above ground) (Figure 4), which was in contradiction to our first hypothesis. The possible reasons why leaf biomass remains relatively unaffected while hypocotyl growth is inhibited are compensatory responses. Leaves are crucial for photosynthesis, the main energy source of the plant. As an annual crucifer, radish under EO3 may prioritize resource allocation to maintain critical functions (photosynthesis, reproduction) according to the optimal allocation hypothesis (Kozłowski, 1992). As a compensatory response, the inhibited belowground biomass of radish implies a reallocation of carbon resources away from hypocotyl growth processes towards leaf photosynthesis, defense mechanisms, or reproduction generation, as reported in potatoes (Asensi-Fabado et al., 2010). Therefore, plants may divert resources to leaf protection at the expense of reduced hypocotyl growth, biomass, and NSC partitioning.

O3 stress causes significant changes in the metabolite contents of plants (Gandin et al., 2021). Consistent with the biomass results, leaf soluble sugar content increased under EO3, and the proportions of leaf soluble sugar and starch also increased (Figures 4, 5, 7), but hypocotyl starch content was not affected by EO3 treatments, which is partially different from the second hypothesis. The possible reasons are: 1. EO3 directly damages chloroplasts and reduces photosynthetic rates (Li et al., 2022), so the increase in soluble sugars reflects an attempt to maintain energy flux, repair injury, and adjust carbohydrate metabolism through the O3-induced source-sink imbalance; 2. hypocotyl starch content was not affected by EO3, which may be due to phloem transport with consequent inhibition of translocation to belowground parts, as reported by Grantz and Young (2000). This inhibition may lead to the accumulation of photosynthates such as fructose in leaves instead of being transported to other parts of the plant (below ground) or used for growth and development (Li et al., 2018); 3. Changes in sugar metabolism can activate defense mechanisms. Soluble sugars, such as glucose and fructose, can act as signaling molecules that induce the expression of defense-related genes (Papazian and Blande, 2020). EO3 could affect plant metabolism, including the production and accumulation of certain sugars of non-structural carbohydrates such as fructose, as our results show (Figure 8). Fructose, as a means of maintaining cellular homeostasis, has been reported to protect cellular structures from oxidative damage and to maintain osmotic balance (Sanità di Toppi and Gabbrielli, 2021); 4. Increased levels of soluble sugars could also increase respiratory activity, as these sugars serve as primary substrates with the necessary energy for cellular respiration (Rashid et al., 2020); 5. Sugars, including fructose, act as signaling molecules in plants, regulating gene expression related to stress responses. EO3 could trigger an increase in sugar signaling to initiate protective mechanisms, leading to an accumulation of these soluble sugars (Koch, 2019). However, changes in sugar composition, with increased levels of soluble sugars, particularly fructose, will attract more insects to feed, which may increase the risk of yield loss (Xia et al., 2021). Furthermore, the harvest time in this experiment of this radish is in the reproductive phase (50 days), and the increase in sugar levels may indicate that more energy is being allocated to the leaf for regeneration early on, as EO3 can also induce leaf senescence (van Doorn, 2008). Sugar accumulates in leaves and leads to carbon imbalance, which induces sugar phosphorylation and down-regulates of the photosynthesis (Piccolo et al., 2020). Fructose and glucose showed the highest increase among the soluble sugar components (Figure 8). This is because sucrose, as a photosynthetic end product, must be hydrolyzed to glucose and fructose by invertase or catalyzed to fructose by sucrose synthase before it can be used (Ruan, 2014). Glucose and fructose are then used for growth as well as stored and transported, as facilitated by sugar transporters (Ruan, 2014). The decrease in the ratio of leaf starch to soluble sugars (Figure 5) is part of a complex cascade of effects triggered by O3 stress, including disrupting the balance of carbon allocation within the plant which may lead to altered source-sink relationships (Gupta et al., 2015). Starch-to-soluble sugar ratio under EO3 is indicative of complex adjustments in plant metabolism aimed at coping with environmental stress, which may reflect or determine plant health and productivity (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012). A lower starch-to-soluble sugar ratio (Figure 5) could be a plant strategy to cope with O3-induced oxidative stress because soluble sugars, such as glucose and fructose, can act as antioxidants and mitigate cell damage (Polle et al., 2023). However, a lower ratio of starch to soluble sugars in the leaf results in less transfer of photosynthate production to the other organs, as the leaf acts as a source of photosynthates (such as starch and sugars) that are transported to other parts of the plant (sinks), such as fruits, seeds or roots (hypocotyl), where they are used or stored. The inefficient conversion of soluble sugars into starch can lead to reduced biomass accumulation and ultimately lower crop yields (Melash et al., 2023).

The proportion of more starch and more soluble sugars from hypocotyl to leaf (Figure 7) reflects that O3 could cause shifts in the partitioning of assimilates from storage compounds (i.e. starch) to compounds (i.e. soluble sugars) involved in the O3 injury repair response (Li et al., 2022). Under stress, plants often reallocate resources to prioritize survival and defense over growth. This is a ‘trade-off’ between promoting some metabolic functions at the expense of reducing growth to develop the production of defense metabolites (Matyssek and Sandermann, 2003; Grantz et al., 2006). This can further affect the energy balance of the plant and may lead to a situation where more energy is consumed by respiration than is produced by photosynthesis (Feng et al., 2008), negatively affecting plant fitness. The higher proportion of fructose in leaves under EO3 (Figure 8) means that EO3-induced starch hydrolysis into simpler sugars, particularly fructose, by the oxidative stress to provide energy for repair mechanisms or to act as antioxidants (Thalmann and Santelia, 2017). Cherry radish is a very common green vegetable that is easily threatened by EO3. However, very few studies have investigated the adverse effects of O3 pollution on radish through the accumulation and variation of non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) allocation and its implication for production. Our study provides quantitative insights into the effects of O3 on MDA, chlorophyll, biomass and NSC, indicating that EO3 increases more soluble sugars, especially fructose and carotenoids in the aboveground plant parts (leaves) rather than in the below-ground edible part, causing a large loss in the hypocotyl. Radish exposed to O3 allocates more nonstructural carbohydrates to the leaf at the expense of a great loss of hypocotyl biomass. Globally, O3 concentrations have been increasing in some of the world’s metropolitan areas as one of the major air pollutants, the effects of O3 on root crops may be underestimated due to a whole biomass assessment approach, which would further underestimate the loss of the edible part belowground.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

LL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft. BY: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JL: Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. XW: Resources, Writing – review & editing. SU: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 31971509; 32171586); Jiangsu Province “Qing Lan” Project for Excellent Young University Teacher (2022-29). The participation of SU in this research was made possible with funding support from the BBSRC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Innovation Club project (BB/R021716/1) and UKRI NERC-NSF grant-DiRTS (NE/T012323/1).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

AbdElgawad, H., Avramova, V., Baggerman, G., Van Raemdonck, G., Valkenborg, D., Van Ostade, X., et al. (2020). Starch biosynthesis contributes to the maintenance of photosynthesis and leaf growth under drought stress in maize. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 2254–2271. doi: 10.1111/pce.13813

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A. (2007). The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Asensi-Fabado, A., Garcia-Breijo, F. J., Reig-Arminana, J. (2010). Ozone-induced reductions in below-ground biomass: an anatomical approach in potato. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 1070–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02128.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bansal, S., Germino, M. (2009). Temporal variation of nonstructural carbohydrates in montane conifers: similarities and differences among developmental stages, species and environmental conditions. Tree Physiol. 29, 559–568. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barnes, J. D., Pfirrmann, T. (1992). The influence of CO2 and O3, singly and in combination, on gas exchange, growth and nutrient status of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). New Phytol. 121, 403–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb02940.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bisbis, M. B., Gruda, N., Blanke, M. (2018). Potential impacts of climate change on vegetable production and product quality–A review. J. Cleaner Production 170, 1602–1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.224

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

BMEPB (2015). Beijing Environmental Statement (Beijing, China: Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau). Available at: http://www.bjepb.gov.cn/2015zt_jsxl/index.html (Accessed April 13, 2016).

Google Scholar

CAOPPBB (2020). China’s Atmospheric Ozone Pollution Prevention Blue Book (Beijing, China: Ozone Pollution Control Professional Committee of Chinese Society of Environmental Sciences).

Google Scholar

Casper-Lindley, C., Björkman, O. (1998). Fluorescence quenching in four unicellular algae with different light-harvesting and xanthophyll-cycle pigments. Photosynthesis Res. 56, 277–289. doi: 10.1023/A:1006037516479

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Castagna, A., Ranieri, A. (2009). Detoxification and repair process of ozone injury: from O3 uptake to gene expression adjustment. Environ. pollut. 157, 1461–1469. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaudhary, I. J., Rathore, D. (2021). Assessment of ozone toxicity on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: Its defensive system and intraspecific sensitivity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 166, 912–927. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.06.054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Cao, J., Yu, H., Shang, H. (2018). Effects of elevated ozone levels on photosynthesis, biomass and nonstructural carbohydrates of Phoebe bournei and Phoebe zhennan in subtropical China. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1764. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01764

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Choquette, N. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Bezodis, W., Cavanagh, A. P. (2020). Ozone tolerant maize hybrids maintain Rubisco content and activity during long-term exposure in the field. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 3033–3047. doi: 10.1111/pce.v43.12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Croce, R., van Amerongen, H. (2020). Light harvesting in oxygenic photosynthesis: Structural biology meets spectroscopy. Science 369, eaay2058. doi: 10.1126/science.aay2058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, Y., Lu, R., Xia, J. (2020). Impacts of global environmental change drivers on non-structural carbohydrates in terrestrial plants. Funct. Ecol. 34, 1525–1536. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13577

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Z., De Marco, A., Anav, A., Gualtieri, M., Sicard, P., Tian, H., et al. (2019). Economic losses due to ozone impacts on human health, forest productivity and crop yield across China. Environ. Int. 131, 104966. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104966

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Z., Kobayashi, K., Ainsworth, E. A. (2008). Impact of elevated ozone concentration on growth, physiology, and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 14, 2696–2708. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01673.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gandin, A., Dizengremel, P., Jolivet, Y. (2021). Integrative role of plant mitochondria facing oxidative stress: The case of ozone. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 159, 202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.12.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grantz, D. A., Gunn, S., Vu, H. B. (2006). O3 impacts on plant development: A meta-analysis of root/shoot allocation and growth. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1193–1209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01521.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grantz, D. A., Yang, S. (2000). Ozone impacts on allometry and root hydraulic conductance are not mediated by source limitation nor developmental age. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 919–927. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.346.919

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, D. K., Palma, J. M., Corpas, F. J. (Eds.) (2015). Reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in plants under stress (No. 11810) (Swirtzerland: Springer International Publishing).

Google Scholar

Hassan, I. A., Bell, N. B., Ashmore, M. R., Cotrozzi, L., Haiba, N. S., Basahi, J. M., et al. (2018). Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cultivar-specific response to O3: Patterns of biochemical and plant growth characteristics. Clean–Soil Air Water 46, 1800124. doi: 10.1002/clen.201800124

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoch, G. (2015). “Carbon reserves as indicators for carbon limitation in trees,” in Progress in Botany (Genetics-Physiology-Systematics-Ecology). Eds. Lüttge, U., Beyschlag, W. (Springer, Cham).

Google Scholar

Kleier, C., Farnsworth, B., Winner, W. (2001). Photosynthesis and biomass allocation of radish cv.”Cherry Belle” in response to root temperature and ozone. Environ. pollut. 111, 127–133. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00326-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Koch, K. (2019). Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and functional roles in stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 3139–3148. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kozłowski, J. (1992). Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: implications for age and size at maturity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 15–19. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90192-E

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leung, F., Sitch, S., Tai, A. P., Wiltshire, A. J., Gornall, J. L., Folberth, G. A., et al. (2022). CO2 fertilization of crops offsets yield losses due to future surface ozone damage and climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 074007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7246

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Li, J., Wang, X., Wang, W., Leung, F., Liu, X., et al. (2022). Growth reduction and alteration of nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) allocation in a sympodial bamboo (Indocalamus decorus) under atmospheric O3 enrichment. Sci. Total Environ. 826, 154096. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154096

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Li, J., Wang, X., Ullah, S., Lin, S. (2024). Responses of morphological and biochemical traits of bamboo trees under elevated atmospheric O3 enrichment. Environ. Res. 252, 119069. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119069

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Ma, Y., Duan, F., Zhu, L., Ma, T., Yang, S., et al. (2021). Stronger secondary pollution processes despite decrease in gaseous precursors: a comparative analysis of summer 2020 and 2019 in Beijing. Environ. pollut. 279, 116923. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116923

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Manning, W. J., Tong, L., Wang, X. (2015). Chronic drought stress reduced but not protected Shantung maple (Acer truncatum Bunge) from adverse effects of ozone (O3) on growth and physiology in the suburb of Beijing, China. Environ. pollut. 201, 34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Shao, L., Wang, W., Li, H., Wang, X., Li, Y., et al. (2020). Air quality improvement in response to intensified control strategies in Beijing during 2013–2019. Sci. Total Environ. 744, 140776. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140776

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophyll fluorescence signatures of leaves during the autumnal chlorophyll breakdown. J. Plant Physiol. 131, 101–110. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(87)80271-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Y., Xie, Y., Ha, R., Cao, B., Song, L. (2021). Effects of elevated CO2 on photosynthetic accumulation, sucrose metabolism-related enzymes, and genes identification in goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 12, 643555. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.643555

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Manning, W. J. (2023). Use of protective chemicals to assess the effects of ambient ozone on plants[M]//Environmental pollution and plant responses (New York, USA: Routledge), 247–258.

Google Scholar

Matyssek, R., Sandermann, H. (2003). Impact of ozone on trees: An ecophysiological perspective. Prog. Bot. 64, 349–404. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55819-1_15

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Melash, A. A., Bogale, A. A., Bytyqi, B., Nyandi, M. S., Ábrahám, É. B. (2023). Nutrient management: as a panacea to improve the caryopsis quality and yield potential of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) under the changing climatic conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1232675. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1232675

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mills, G., Hayes, F., Simpson, D., Emberson, L., Norris, D., Harmens, H., et al. (2011). Evidence of widespread effects of ozone on crops and (semi-) natural vegetation in Europe, (1990–2006) in relation to AOT40-and flux-based risk maps. Global Change Biol. 17, 592–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02217.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Papazian, S., Blande, J. D. (2020). Dynamics of plant responses to combinations of air pollutants. Plant Biol. 22, 68–83. doi: 10.1111/plb.v22.s1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pell, E. J., Schlagnhaufer, C. D., Arteca, R. N. (1997). Ozone-induced oxidative stress: mechanisms of action and reaction. Physiologia Plantarum 100, 264–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04782.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pellegrini, E. (2014). PSII photochemistry is the primary target of oxidative stress imposed by ozone in Tilia americana. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 13, 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pellegrini, E., Carucci, M. G., Campanella, A., Lorenzini, G., Nali, C. (2011). Ozone stress in Melissa officinalis plants assessed by photosynthetic function. Environ. Exp. Bot. 73, 94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pellegrini, E., Francini, A., Lorenzini, G., Nali, C. (2015). Ecophysiological and antioxidant traits of Salvia officinalis under ozone stress. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 22, 13083–13093. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4569-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Piccolo, E. L., Landi, M., Massai, R., Remorini, D., Guidi, L. (2020). Girled-induced anthocyanin accumulation in red-leafed Prunus cerasifera: Effect on photosynthesis, photoprotection and sugar metabolism. Plant Sci. 294, 110456. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110456

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Polle, A., Matyssek, R., Günthardt-Goerg, M. S., Maurer, S. (2023). Defense strategies against ozone in trees: the role of nutrition. In Environmental pollution and plant responses. Routledge, 223–245. doi: 10.1201/9780203756935

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramya, A., Dhevagi, P., Poornima, R., Avudainayagam, S., Watanabe, M., Agathokleous, E. (2023). Effect of ozone stress on crop productivity: A threat to food security. Environ. Res. 236, 116816. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116816

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rashid, F. A. A., Scafaro, A. P., Asao, S., Fenske, R., Dewar, R. C., Masle, J., et al. (2020). Diel-and temperature-driven variation of leaf dark respiration rates and metabolite levels in rice. New Phytol. 228, 56–69. doi: 10.1111/nph.v228.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruan, Y. L. (2014). Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 33–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakalauskaitė, J., Brazaitytė, A., Urbonavičiūtė, A., Samuolienė, G., Šabajevienė, G., Sakalauskienė, S., et al. (2008). Radish response to distinct ozone exposure and to its interaction with elevated CO2 concentration and temperature. Sodininkystė ir Daržininkystė 27, 151–160.

Google Scholar

Sánchez-Rodríguez, E., Rubio-Wilhelmi, M. M., Cervilla, L. M., Blasco, B., Rios, J. J., Rosales, M. A., et al. (2012). Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci. 182, 43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.10.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanità di Toppi, L., Gabbrielli, R. (2021). “Response to ozone stress in plants,” in Plants and the Atmosphere (Springer, Chambridge), 97–146.

Google Scholar

Sharps, K., Hayes, F., Harmens, H., Mills, G. (2021). Ozone-induced effects on leaves in African crop species. Environ. pollut. 268, 115789. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115789

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., Anenberg, S. C., De Marco, A., Paoletti, E., Calatayud, V. (2023). Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: A global perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 1, 160064. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sild, E., Pleijel, H., Sellden, G. (2002). Elevated ozone (O3) alters carbohydrate metabolism during grain filling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 92, 71–81. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00270-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, A. A., Ghosh, A., Pandey, B., Agrawal, M., Agrawal, S. B. (2023). Unravelling the ozone toxicity in Zea mays L.(C4 plant) under the elevated level of CO2 fertilization[J]. Tropical Ecology 64 (4), 739–755. doi: 10.1007/s42965-023-00298-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Thalmann, M., Santelia, D. (2017). Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytol. 214, 943–951. doi: 10.1111/nph.2017.214.issue-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, S., Agrawal, M. (2011). Assessment of the variability in response of radish and brinjal at biochemical and physiological levels under similar ozone exposure conditions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 175, 443–454. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1542-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, S., Agrawal, M., Tiwari, S., Agrawal, M. (2018). “Effect of ozone on physiological and biochemical processes of plants,” in Tropospheric Ozone and its Impacts on Crop Plants: A Threat to Future Global Food Security (Beilin: Springer International Publishing AG), 65–113.

Google Scholar

Tong, L., Feng, Z. W., Sudebilige Wang, Q., Wang, X. (2012). Stomatal ozone uptake modeling and comparative analysis of flux-response relationships of winter wheat. Acta Ecologica Sin. 32, 2890e2899. doi: 10.5846/stxb201103260385

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tripathi, R., Agrawal, S. B. (2013). Evaluation of changes in lipid peroxidation, ROS production, surface structures, secondary metabolites and yield of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) under individual and combined stress of ultraviolet-B and ozone using open top chambers[J]. Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics 50 (4), 318–325.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

van Doorn, W. G. (2008). Is the onset of senescence in leaf cells of intact plants due to low or high sugar levels? J. Exp. Bot. 59, 1963–1972. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Konopka, P., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Müller, R., Plöger, F., et al. (2012). Tropospheric ozone trend over Beijing from 2002–2010: ozonesonde measurements and modeling analysis. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 12, 8389–8399. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-8389-2012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Yang, L., Höller, M., Zaisheng, S., Pariasca-Tanaka, J., Wissuwa, M., et al. (2014). Pyramiding of ozone tolerance QTLs OzT8 and OzT9 confers improved tolerance to season-long ozone exposure in rice. Environ. Exp. Bot. 104, 26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.03.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, S., Luo, S., Li, J., Yang, Q., Dai, C., Yang, Y., et al. (2021). Fructose and glucose in buckwheat nectar enhance Peristenus spretus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) survival and parasitism of the mirid Apolygus lucorum. Biol. Control 161, 104710. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104710

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xing, X., Hu, T., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, W., Hu, H., et al. (2024). Construction of SNP fingerprints and genetic diversity analysis of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1329890. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1329890

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Y., Yu, Z., Liu, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, J., et al. (2024). Variability in soybean yield responses to elevated atmospheric CO2: insights from non-structural carbohydrate remobilisation during seed filling. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2024, 108802.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Li, F., Hao, L., Yu, J., Guo, L., Zhou, H., et al. (2019). Elevated CO2 concentration induces photosynthetic down-regulation with changes in leaf structure, non-structural carbohydrates and nitrogen content of soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1600-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: O3 pollution, chlorophyll contents, nonstructural carbohydrates, yield, root vegetable

Citation: Li L, Yang B, Li J, Wang X and Ullah S (2025) Effects of elevated atmospheric ozone concentration on biomass and non-structural carbohydrates allocation of cherry radish. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1547359. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547359

Received: 18 December 2024; Accepted: 10 January 2025;
Published: 20 February 2025.

Edited by:

Majid Sharifi-Rad, Zabol University, Iran

Reviewed by:

Hua Wang, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, China
Guoyou Zhang, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China

Copyright © 2025 Li, Yang, Li, Wang and Ullah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Li Li, bGlsaTAyOEBuamZ1LmVkdS5jbg==; Sami Ullah, cy51bGxhaEBiaGFtLmFjLnVr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more