Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Biotechnology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547317

Corrigendum: [Development of a 50K SNP array for whole-genome analysis and its application in the genetic localization of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) fruit shape]

Provisionally accepted
Chuying Yu Chuying Yu 1Qihong Yang Qihong Yang 1*Weiliu Li Weiliu Li 1*Yaqin Jiang Yaqin Jiang 1*Guiyun Gan Guiyun Gan 1*Liangyu Cai Liangyu Cai 1*Xinchun Li Xinchun Li 1*Zhiqiang Li Zhiqiang Li 1*Wenjia Li Wenjia Li 1*Min Zou Min Zou 1*Yang Yang Yang Yang 2*Yikui Wang Yikui Wang 1*
  • 1 Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
  • 2 Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The corrected sentence appears below:"[Of these, 390 were Chinese varieties (including 78 were purified offspring of self-selected varieties, and self-selected 4 eggplant lines), 148 were varieties from other countries (Table S1)]"In the published article, there was an error. [Since we discerned the order of the table when the material sources and phenotypes were entered, resulting in errors in the matching of material sources, phenotypes and groups, we rechecked the data and corrected the description of Figure 4.Our changes have no impact on the conclusions of the article].A correction has been made to Further analysis of the fruit shape of the 577 eggplants revealed that the fruits in Groups 1 and 4 were mainly long strips, medium-short tubes or short tubes (FIGURE 4b). The fruits in Groups 2 and 3 were mainly long strips, oval and medium-short tubes. The fruits in Groups 5 and 6 were mainly oval, round and flat round. The fruits in Group 7 were mainly short sticks, pears and long strips. Analysis of 577 eggplant fruits revealed that the fruits in Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 consisted of mainly purple-black and purple-red. The fruits in Group 6 were mainly purple, white and purple-white (FIGURE 4c). Further analysis of the geographical distribution of the 428 Chinese eggplant materials revealed that Group 1 eggplant materials were distributed mainly in Sichuan and Yunnan, China (FIGURE 4d). Group 2 was mainly distributed in the northwest inland areas of China (Xinjiang, Sichuan, Shaanxi, Gansu and Guizhou). Group 3 was mainly distributed in the southern coastal areas of China (Yunnan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian and Jiangxi), with Guizhou and Heilongjiang containing 5 and 4 materials, respectively. Group 4 was distributed mainly in the central and eastern coastal areas of China (Shandong, Jiangsu, Shanxi, Chongqing, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Liaoning, Anhui and Henan). Group 5 was mainly distributed in Northeast China (Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang), with 8 materials in Beijing and 6 materials in Shandong and Tianjin. Group 6 consisted mainly of materials from other countries, with a small amount of materials in Yunnan, Guangxi and Hainan in China, and Group 7 did not contain Chinese materials]"The corrected sentence appears below:"[Through the phylogenetic tree of the samples and the PCA classification results, 577 eggplant materials in the 7 groups were statistically analyzed (FIGURE 4a). Group 1 contained 28 genotypes, accounting for 4.85% of the total genotypes. Group 2 contained 64 genotypes, accounting for 11.09% of the total genotypes. Group 3 contained 78 genotypes, accounting for 13.52% of the total genotypes. Group 4 contained 98 genotypes, accounting for 16.98% of the

    Keywords: eggplant, liquid-phase probes, Fruit shape, BSA-seq, candidate gene

    Received: 30 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Yang, Li, Jiang, Gan, Cai, Li, Li, Li, Zou, Yang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Qihong Yang, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Weiliu Li, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Yaqin Jiang, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Guiyun Gan, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Liangyu Cai, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Xinchun Li, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Zhiqiang Li, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Wenjia Li, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Min Zou, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China
    Yang Yang, Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, 400060, Chongqing Municipality, China
    Yikui Wang, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.