The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1542301
This article is part of the Research Topic Plant Ecophysiology: Responses to Climate Changes and Stress Conditions View all 20 articles
Stress dose explains drought recovery in Norway spruce
Provisionally accepted- 1 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
- 2 University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
- 3 Institute for Meteorology and Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Understanding stress recovery of trees, particularly with respect to increasing droughts due to climate change, is crucial. An often-overlooked aspect is how short versus long drought events of high intensity (i.e. low and high stress dose) result in stress damage and affect post-stress recovery. This study examines stress and recovery dynamics of 3-year-old Picea abies following a short drought (n = 5) of 18 days or a long drought (n = 9) of 51 days during late summer. We particularly assessed how the recovery of canopy conductance and tree transpiration is linked to: i) stress intensity in terms of minimum water potential, ii) stress duration inferred by days below a water potential related to 12 % hydraulic conductance loss (dP12), iii) stress dose inferred by the cumulative tree water deficit on days below P12 (TWDP12) as well as the cumulative water potential (Ψcum), and iv) the percent loss of conductive xylem area (PLA). Both drought treatments resulted in stem and root embolism with a higher PLA of 49 ± 10 % in the long compared to 18 ± 6 % in the short drought treatment consistent across the measured plant parts. Suffering from embolism and leaf shedding (long drought: 32 %, short drought: 12 %), canopy conductance in the long drought treatment recovered to 41 ± 3% of the control and in the short drought treatment to 66 ± 4%, twelve days after drought release. These recovery rates were well explained by the observed PLA (R² = 0.66) and the dP12 (R² = 0.62), but best explained by stress dose metrics, particularly the cumulative TWDP12 (R² = 0.88). Our study highlights that stress duration and intensity should be integrated to assess post-stress recovery rates.Here the tree water deficit derived from point-dendrometers appears promising as it provides a nondestructive and high temporal resolution of the stress dose.
Keywords: Stress recovery, Drought stress, Tree water deficit, Stress dose, tree water fluxes
Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 30 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Knüver, Bär, Hamann, Zuber, Mayr, Beikircher and Ruehr. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Timo Knüver, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.