data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Technical Advances in Plant Science
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1540604
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Remote Sensing Techniques for Forest Monitoring and Analysis View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Erannis jacobsoni Djak.(EJD) is one of the major pests that severely threatens forest health. Its damage predominantly affects pine species, resulting in significant changes to the biochemical composition of needle leaves. Needle leaf water content exhibits a clear response to these changes and is highly sensitive in reflecting the degree of tree damage. In this work, we combine vegetation indices with machine learning algorithms to estimate the water content of needles at a large scale.Multiple vegetation indices are screened via recursive feature elimination cross validation (RFECV), and then support vector regression (SVR) and back-propagation neural network (BP) models are used to predict the leaf weight content fresh (LWCF) and leaf weight content dry (LWCD) of needles over a large area. The water content ranges were then classified based on the severity of damage derived from actual sampling data. These ranges were used to categorize the estimated water content, thereby assessing the degree of tree damage. The accuracy of the method is verified by comparing the estimation results with field measurements, and the results are combined with the classifications of the leaf loss rate(LLR) to assess the severity of infestation. The results indicate that:1)When estimating LWCD and LWCF using the SVR and BP models, the SVR model demonstrated superior accuracy and stability (MAE for LWCF = 0.1477, RMSE = 0.17314; MAE for LWCD = 0.10507, RMSE = 0.14760).2)The classification accuracies of LWCD and LWCF were notably higher in areas with light and medium damage, suggesting that these indices are effective indicators for assessing damage caused by Erannis jacobsoni Djak. and can serve as valuable tools for monitoring pest infestation and its progression.3)Through precision evaluation and supplementary validation, the results show that LWCD is more stable and reliable than LWCF, demonstrating greater credibility, particularly in terms of MAE and RMSE, where LWCD exhibits lower values (MAE for LWCD = 0.10507, RMSE = 0.14760). This method's high reliability provides an effective approach for estimating leaf weight content, both fresh and dry (LWCF and LWCD), and underscores its significant potential for the early monitoring and management of forest pests.
Keywords: Erannis Jacobsoni Djak., leaf weight content dry, leaf weight content fresh, vegetation index, remote sense
Received: 06 Dec 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Xiaojun, Zhou, Zhang, Bao, Tong, Bao, Ganbat, Altanchimeg, Enkhnasan and Ariunaa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
HUANG Xiaojun, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.