Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Nutrition
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1530128
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Plant–Microbe Interactions to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Plant-Soil Health for Sustainable Agriculture View all 7 articles

Comparative and Synergistic Impacts of Lime and Biochar on Soil Properties, Nitrogen Transformation, and Microbial Function in Acidic Soils Under Tobacco Cropping

Provisionally accepted
Bian Hong Zhang Bian Hong Zhang 1Lina Tang Lina Tang 2*Zhicheng Chen Zhicheng Chen 2*Xiaoyan Chen Xiaoyan Chen 1*Lindong You Lindong You 1*Ruixin Pan Ruixin Pan 1*Ting Chen Ting Chen 1*Yifei Liu Yifei Liu 1*Wenxiong Lin Wenxiong Lin 1*Jinwen Huang Jinwen Huang 1*
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
  • 2 Tobacco Science Research Institute of Fujian Tobacco Monopoly Bureau,Fuzhou,Fujian 350003,China, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Lime and biochar are widely utilized to enhance nitrogen utilization in crops grown on acidic soils, though each has its own set of limitations. Understanding their combined effects is crucial for optimizing soil remediation strategies. This study investigates the impact of lime and biochar on nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) in a tobacco monoculture system, which has been practiced for 20 years on acidified soils in Fuzhou, southeastern China, over the period from 2021 to 2022. Four treatments were applied: control (CK), lime alone (L), biochar alone (B), and a lime-biochar combination (L+B). The results indicated that all treatments significantly improved NUE, with increases ranging from 20.07% to 27.17% compared to CK. Biochar (B) was more effective than lime (L), and the combined treatment (L+B) showed comparable effects to biochar alone. Correlation analysis revealed that increases in soil pH and exchangeable base cations facilitated nitrogen transformation, thereby enhancing NUE. Lime treatments (L, L+B) promoted nitrification potential in rhizosphere soil, whereas biochar application (B, L+B) resulted in elevated nitrate nitrogen content. Microbial functional analysis indicated that lime (L, L+B) enhanced nitrification, while biochar (B, L+B) fostered dissimilatory nitrate reduction, thereby improving nitrogen retention. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between dissimilatory nitrate reduction and both soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen contents. These findings suggest that lime enhances nitrification, while biochar promotes nitrate retention, together increasing soil nitrogen availability. The combined application of lime and biochar integrates these benefits, yielding results comparable to biochar alone. This study offers valuable insights into the synergistic use of lime and biochar for mitigating soil acidification and optimizing nitrogen management in agricultural systems.

    Keywords: Lime, biochar, acidic soil, Nitrogen utilization efficiency, Tobacco

    Received: 18 Nov 2024; Accepted: 23 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Tang, Chen, Chen, You, Pan, Chen, Liu, Lin and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Lina Tang, Tobacco Science Research Institute of Fujian Tobacco Monopoly Bureau,Fuzhou,Fujian 350003,China, Fuzhou, China
    Zhicheng Chen, Tobacco Science Research Institute of Fujian Tobacco Monopoly Bureau,Fuzhou,Fujian 350003,China, Fuzhou, China
    Xiaoyan Chen, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
    Lindong You, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
    Ruixin Pan, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
    Ting Chen, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
    Yifei Liu, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
    Wenxiong Lin, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China
    Jinwen Huang, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.