
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1529852
This article is part of the Research Topic Plant Ecophysiology: Responses to Climate Changes and Stress Conditions View all 31 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Dry versus rainy seasons in many locations across the globe often involve major differences in cloudiness, precipitation, and incident sunlight. Thus, this study examines whether light availability or water stress is the primary limiting factor for photosynthesis in páramo plants across dry and rainy seasons. Somewhat surprisingly, mean net photosynthetic carbon gain per unit leaf area (An) in two dominant páramo species Espeletia grandiflora and Chusquea tessellata, was higher in the dry season despite increased water stress, suggesting that light availability plays a more dominant role in carbon assimilation. Photosynthetic light-response curves performed during both seasons suggest larger potential carbon uptake by E. grandiflora during the dry season and by C. tessellata during the rainy season, indicating seasonal differences in carbon assimilation. Statistical analyses showed that during the dry season, light is a more influential factor on carbon gain. During the rainy season, light is the most determinant factor on An for E. grandiflora, but for C. tessellata, light, temperature and vapor pressure deficit all have a significant effect. We conclude that the combination of high solar radiation and high leaf temperatures provide the conditions for larger carbon assimilation (especially in E. grandiflora) during the dry season. The cloudier and low incident sunlight conditions during the rainy season reduce carbon assimilation and growth, despite a lack of water stress during this season. Although C. tessellata had the highest mean An values during the dry season, it appeared vulnerable to intense radiation and subsequent desiccation. This study highlights that cloud cover and light availability, rather than water stress alone, are key drivers of páramo plant carbon uptake, with important implications for predicting future climate change effects.
Keywords: Chingaza, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Climate Change, Photosynthesis, Seasonality of carbon uptake, Tropical mountains, water potential
Received: 17 Nov 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sanchez, Mercado, Posada and Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Adriana Sanchez, Rosario University, Bogotá, Colombia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.